Collectives for Care: Perspectives of Providers and Community Members in Transgender Health Care in a Southern U.S. City.

Affirming and accessible health care may improve health outcomes for trans individuals in the U.S. We explored strategies to improve affirming care for trans individuals from the perspectives of providers and transgender and non-binary community members. Forty members of a collective group of gender-affirming providers (GAP) in the southern U.S. were recruited to participate in a brief online survey. A graphical LASSO undirected network analysis approach visualized associations across outcomes and explanatory variables. Multinomial ordered (or logistic, for binary outcomes) models explored associations between a common set of explanatory variables and outcomes. Strong partial correlations (network) and statistically significant explanatory variables (ordinal and logistic models) were identified. Additionally, we conducted three focus groups (FGs) audio-recorded over Zoom with 11 community members. Four study team members analyzed the transcripts using content analyses. Survey results indicated that higher frequency of attendance at monthly provider meetings, additional training, and provision of training and consultation were associated with greater perceived competence among GAP members. To improve services, FG participants suggested treating patients as experts, increasing diversity and representation among providers, and expanding the GAP group. These results highlight the critical need to design and implement community-identified interventions to improve gender-affirming services and enhance provider training.

The bystander intervention for problematic alcohol use model (BIPAUM).

Objective: The study aimed to identify phases of bystander intervention (BI) for problematic alcohol use (PAU) among college students. Participants: Twenty focus groups and nine interviews were conducted. Methods: Transcripts were thematically analyzed. Results: The phases of the Bystander Intervention for Problematic Alcohol Use Model (BIPAUM) include: (1) plan in advance, (2) notice and interpret a sign, (3) decide (i.e., assume responsibility, assess support/feasibility to intervene, and identify intervention strategy), (4) intervene, and (5) assess outcomes. Assessing outcomes loops to influence future behavior and each phase is influenced by barriers and facilitators. Conclusions: These unique phases should be considered when designing and evaluating intervention programs for PAU to meet students' needs and better reduce PAU. Future research should empirically test the BIPAUM. The results of the current study demonstrate a promising opportunity for applying BI to PAU, with the goal of reducing risky drinking among college students.

A Systematic Review of Validated Measures of U.S.-Based Bystander Intervention-Related Constructs.

This review aimed to identify U.S.-based, construct-validated measures of bystander intervention. Following PRISMA-P guidelines, electronic databases were searched, and emails were solicited identifying 8,559 articles for title screening. Abstracts and full texts were double screened, resulting in 24 scales meeting inclusion criteria: (a) measured a bystander-related construct in a situation where there was a potential for actual or perceived imminent physical or emotional harm, (b) written in English, and (c) statistically validated on U.S. samples. Most scales addressed the domain of interpersonal violence (67%), with fewer relating to bias/bullying (8.2%), mental health crises (12.5%), and substance use (12.5%). Most scales (71%) assessed the "take action" step of the situational model. The modal construct represented was intent/willingness/likelihood to intervene (50%). The average number of items on a scale was 14, and most (79%) provided Likert-style response options. None of the validated scales assessing behavior first accounted for an opportunity. Sample sizes ranged from 163 to 3,397, with the modal setting from colleges. Overall, samples were young (21.8 years old), White (75%), women (64%), and heterosexual (89%). Results indicate the need to validate additional measures that capture the "interpreting the situation as problematic" step of the situational model. Scales also need to be validated using diverse samples, particularly within the mental health crisis domain. Across all domains, validated measures need to be developed that first account for an opportunity when measuring actual bystander behavior. The information gleaned can be used to assist researchers in selecting measures and guide future measure development.

Disclosing and Reporting of Consent Violations Among Kink Practitioners in the United States.

Kink practitioners are marginalized and experience adverse health and social outcomes, which are exacerbated by consent violations. This study aims to understand experiences of reporting consent violations within a kink context. Kink practitioners (N = 2,888) completed a survey focused on consent violations, reporting, and recommendations, with 767 (25.56%) of them reporting consent violations in the kink context. The type of consent violation (sexual assault or kink-related behaviors), disclosure, and reporting significantly differed based on gender, sexual orientation, and injury status, but not age. Additionally, recommended steps included avoidance of police and others in positions of power and increased accountability.