Lymphopenia at the time of transplant is associated with short-term mortality after deceased donor liver transplantation.

Absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) is considered a surrogate marker for nutritional status and immunocompetence. We investigated the association between ALC and post-liver transplant outcomes in patients who received a deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT). Patients were categorized by ALC at liver transplant: low (<500/µL), mid (500-1000/µL), and high ALC (>1000/µL). Our main analysis used retrospective data (2013-2018) for DDLT recipients from Henry Ford Hospital (United States); the results were further validated using data from the Toronto General Hospital (Canada). Among 449 DDLT recipients, the low ALC group demonstrated higher 180-day mortality than mid and high ALC groups (83.1% vs 95.8% and 97.4%, respectively; low vs mid: P = .001; low vs high: P < .001). A larger proportion of patients with low ALC died of sepsis compared with the combined mid/high groups (9.1% vs 0.8%; P < .001). In multivariable analysis, pretransplant ALC was associated with 180-day mortality (hazard ratio, 0.20; P = .004). Patients with low ALC had higher rates of bacteremia (22.7% vs 8.1%; P < .001) and cytomegaloviremia (15.2% vs 6.8%; P = .03) than patients with mid/high ALC. Low ALC pretransplant through postoperative day 30 was associated with 180-day mortality among patients who received rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction (P = .001). Pretransplant lymphopenia is associated with short-term mortality and a higher incidence of posttransplant infections in DDLT patients.

Multiple Pretransplant Treatments for Patients Without Pathological Complete Response may Worsen Posttransplant Outcomes in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplant (LT) candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) often receive cancer treatment before transplant. We investigated the impact of pre-transplant treatment for HCC on the risk of posttransplant recurrence. METHODS: Adult HCC patients with LT at our institution between 2013 and 2020 were included. The impact of pre-LT cancer treatments on the cumulative recurrence was evaluated, using the Gray and Fine-Gray methods adjusted for confounding factors. Outcomes were considered in two ways: 1) by pathologically complete response (pCR) status within patients received pre-LT treatment; and 2) within patients without pCR, grouped by pre-LT treatment as A) none; B) one treatment; C) multiple treatments. RESULTS: The sample included 179 patients, of whom 151 (84%) received pretreatment and 42 (28% of treated) demonstrated pCR. Overall, 22 (12%) patients experienced recurrence. The 5-year cumulative post-LT recurrence rate was significantly lower in patients with pCR than those without pCR (4.8% vs. 19.2%, P = 0.03). In bivariable analyses, pCR significantly decreased risk of recurrence. Among the 137 patients without pCR (viable HCC in the explant), 28 (20%) had no pretreatment (A), 70 (52%) had one treatment (B), and 39 (20%) had multiple treatments (C). Patients in Group C had higher 5-year recurrence rates than those in A or B (39.6% vs. 8.2%, 6.5%, P = 0.004 and P < 0.001, respectively). In bivariable analyses, multiple treatments was significantly associated with recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: pCR is a favorable prognostic factor after LT. When pCR was not achieved by pre-LT treatment, the number of treatments might be associated with post-LT oncological prognosis.

Effects of the implementation of acuity circle policy on waitlist and post-transplant outcomes of liver re-transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Acuity circle (AC) policy implementation improved the waitlist outcomes for certain liver transplant (LT)-candidates. The impact of the policy implementation for liver retransplant (reLT) candidates is unknown. METHODS: Using Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing (OPTN/UNOS) data from January, 2018 to September, 2021, we investigated the effect of the AC policy on waitlist and post-LT outcomes among patients who had previously received a LT. Patients were categorized by relisting date: Pre-AC (Era 1: January 1, 2018-February 3, 2020; n = 750); and Post-AC (Era 2: February 4, 2020-June 30, 2021; n = 556). Patient and donor characteristics, as well as on-waitlist and post-reLT outcomes were compared across eras. RESULTS: In Era 2, the probability of transplant within 90 days overall and among patients relisted > 14 days from initial transplant (late relisting) were significantly higher compared to Era 1 (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] 1.40, 95% CI 1.18-1.64, p < .001; sHR 1.52, 95% CI 1.23-1.88, p = .001, respectively). However, there was no difference by era among patients relisted ≤14 days from initial transplant (early relisting; sHR 1.21, 95% CI .93-1.57, p = .15). Likewise, among early relisting patients, risks for 180-day graft loss and mortality were significantly higher in Era 2 versus Era 1 (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 5.77, 95% CI 1.71-19.51, p = .004; and aHR 8.22, 95% CI 1.85-36.59, p = .005, respectively); for late relisting patients, risks for these outcomes were similar across eras. CONCLUSION: Our results show that the implementation of AC policy has improved transplant rates and reduced waiting time for reLT candidates listed > 14 days from initial transplant. However, the impact upon early relisting patients may be mixed.

The use of normothermic liver preservation in combined liver and lung transplantation: A single-center experience.

Combined liver and lung transplantation (CLLT) is indicated in patients with both end-stage liver and lung disease. Ex-situ normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) has been previously used for extended normothermic lung preservation in CLLT. We aim to describe our single-center experience using ex-situ NMP for extended normothermic liver preservation in CLLT. Four CLLTs were performed from 2019 to 2020 with the lung transplanted first for all patients. Median ex-situ pump time for the liver was 413 min (IQR 400-424). Over a median follow-up of 15 months (IQR 14-19), all patients were alive and doing well. Normothermic extended liver preservation is a safe method to allow prolonged cold ischemia using normothermic perfusion of the liver during CLLT.

Use of neural network models to predict liver transplantation waitlist mortality.

Current liver transplantation (LT) organ allocation relies on Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-sodium scores to predict mortality in patients awaiting LT. This study aims to develop neural network (NN) models that more accurately predict LT waitlist mortality. The study evaluates patients listed for LT between February 27, 2002, and June 30, 2021, using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing registry. We excluded patients listed with Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) exception scores and those listed for multiorgan transplant, except for liver-kidney transplant. A subset of data from the waiting list was used to create a mortality prediction model at 90 days after listing with 105,140 patients. A total of 28 variables were selected for model creation. The data were split using random sampling into training, validation, and test data sets in a 60:20:20 ratio. The performance of the model was assessed using area under the receiver operating curve (AUC-ROC) and area under the precision-recall curve (AUC-PR). AUC-ROC for 90-day mortality was 0.936 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.934-0.937), and AUC-PR was 0.758 (95% CI, 0.754-0.762). The NN 90-day mortality model outperformed MELD-based models for both AUC-ROC and AUC-PR. The 90-day mortality model specifically identified more waitlist deaths with a higher recall (sensitivity) of 0.807 (95% CI, 0.803-0.811) versus 0.413 (95% CI, 0.409-0.418; p < 0.001). The performance metrics were compared by breaking the test data set into multiple patient subsets by ethnicity, gender, region, age, diagnosis group, and year of listing. The NN 90-day mortality model outperformed MELD-based models across all subsets in predicting mortality. In conclusion, organ allocation based on NN modeling has the potential to decrease waitlist mortality and lead to more equitable allocation systems in LT.

Liver Transplant Recipient Characteristics Associated With Worse Post-Transplant Outcomes in Using Elderly Donors.

Advanced age of liver donor is a risk factor for graft loss after transplant. We sought to identify recipient characteristics associated with negative post-liver transplant (LT) outcomes in the context of elderly donors. Using 2014-2019 OPTN/UNOS data, LT recipients were classified by donor age: ≥70, 40-69, and <40 years. Recipient risk factors for one-year graft loss were identified and created a risk stratification system and validated it using 2020 OPTN/UNOS data set. At transplant, significant recipient risk factors for one-year graft loss were: previous liver transplant (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 4.37, 95%CI 1.98-9.65); mechanical ventilation (aHR 4.28, 95%CI 1.95-9.43); portal thrombus (aHR 1.87, 95%CI 1.26-2.77); serum sodium <125 mEq/L (aHR 2.88, 95%CI 1.34-6.20); and Karnofsky score 10-30% (aHR 2.03, 95%CI 1.13-3.65), 40-60% (aHR 1.65, 95%CI 1.08-2.51). Using those risk factors and multiplying HRs, recipients were divided into low-risk (n = 931) and high-risk (n = 294). Adjusted risk of one-year graft loss in the low-risk recipient group was similar to that of patients with younger donors; results were consistent using validation dataset. Our results show that a system of careful recipient selection can reduce the risks of graft loss associated with older donor age.

Improvements in liver transplant outcomes in patients with HCV/HIV coinfection after the introduction of direct-acting antiviral therapies.

BACKGROUND: In recipients with HCV/HIV coinfection, the impact that the wider use of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) has had on post-liver transplant (LT) outcomes has not been evaluated. We investigated the impact of DAAs introduction on post-LT outcome in patients with HCV/HIV coinfection. METHODS: Using Organ Procurement and Transplant Network/United Network for Organ Sharing data, we compared post-LT outcomes in patients with HCV and/or HIV pre- and post-DAAs introduction. We categorized these patients into two eras: pre-DAA (2008-2012 [pre-DAA era]) and post-DAA (2014-2019 [post-DAA era]). To study the impact of DAAs introduction, inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust patient characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 17 215 LT recipients were eligible for this study (HCV/HIV [n = 160]; HIV mono-infection [n = 188]; HCV mono-infection [n = 16 867]). HCV/HIV coinfection and HCV mono-infection had a significantly lower hazard of 1- and 3-year graft loss post-DAA, compared pre-DAA (1-year: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16-0.53 in HIV/HCV, aHR 0.58, 95% CI 0.54-0.63, respectively; 3-year: aHR 0.30, 95% CI 0.14-0.61, aHR 0.64, 95% CI 0.58-0.70, respectively). The hazards of 1- and 3-year graft loss post-DAA in HIV mono-infection were comparable to those in pre-DAA. HCV/HIV coinfection had significantly lower patient mortality post-DAA, compared to pre-DAA (1-year: aHR 0.30, 95% CI 0.17-0.55; 3-year: aHR 0.31, 95% CI 0.15-0.63). CONCLUSIONS: Post-LT outcomes in patients with coinfection significantly improved and became comparable to those with HCV mono-infection after introducing DAA therapy. The introduction of DAAs supports the use of LT in the setting of HCV/HIV coinfection.

Retransplantation outcomes for hepatitis C in the United States before and after direct-acting antiviral introduction.

The success of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy has led to near-universal cure for patients chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and improved post-liver transplant (LT) outcomes. We investigated the trends and outcomes of retransplantation in HCV and non-HCV patients before and after the introduction of DAA. Adult patients who underwent re-LT were identified in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database. Multiorgan transplants and patients with >2 total LTs were excluded. Two eras were defined: pre-DAA (2009-2012) and post-DAA (2014-2017). A total of 2112 re-LT patients were eligible (HCV: n = 499 pre-DAA and n = 322 post-DAA; non-HCV: n = 547 pre-DAA and n = 744 post-DAA). HCV patients had both improved graft and patient survival after re-LT in the post-DAA era. One-year graft survival was 69.8% pre-DAA and 83.8% post-DAA (P < .001). One-year patient survival was 73.1% pre-DAA and 86.2% post-DAA (P < .001). Graft and patient survival was similar between eras for non-HCV patients. When adjusted, the post-DAA era represented an independent positive predictive factor for graft and patient survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.67; P = .005, and HR: 0.65; P = .004) only in HCV patients. The positive post-DAA era effect was observed only in HCV patients with first graft loss due to disease recurrence (HR: 0.31; P = .002, HR 0.32; P = .003, respectively). Among HCV patients, receiving a re-LT in the post-DAA era was associated with improved patient and graft survival.

Outcomes in Living Donor Compared With Deceased Donor Primary Liver Transplantation in Lower Acuity Patients With Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Scores <30.

Although recent studies have reported favorable outcomes in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), it remains unclear which populations benefit most from LDLT. This study aims to evaluate LDLT outcomes compared with deceased donor LT (DDLT) according to Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score categories. Using data from the United Network for Organ Sharing registry, outcomes were compared between 1486 LDLTs; 13,568 donation after brain death (DBD)-DDLTs; and 1171 donation after circulatory death (DCD)-DDLTs between 2009 and 2018. Because LDLT for patients with MELD scores >30 was rare, all patients with scores >30 were excluded to equalize LDLT and DDLT cohorts. Risk factors for 1-year graft loss (GL) were determined separately for LDLT and DDLT. Compared with LDLT, DBD-DDLT had a lower risk of 30-day (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.60; P < 0.001) and 1-year GL (aHR, 0.57; P < 0.001). The lower risk of GL was more prominent in the mid-MELD score category (score 15-29). Compared with LDLT, DCD-DDLT had a lower risk of 30-day GL but a comparable risk of 1-year GL, regardless of MELD score category. In LDLT, significant ascites was an independent risk for GL in patients with mid-MELD scores (aHR, 1.68; P = 0.02), but not in the lower-MELD score group. The risk of 1-year GL in LDLT patients with ascites who received a left liver was higher than either those who received a right liver or those without ascites who received a left liver. In LDLT, combinations of MELD scores of 15 to 29, moderate/severe ascites, and the use of a left liver are associated with worse outcomes. These findings help calibrate appropriate patient and graft selection in LDLT.

Paradigm Change in Liver Transplantation Practice After the Implementation of the Liver-Kidney Allocation Policy.

The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN)/United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) policy regarding kidney allocation for liver transplantation (LT) patients was implemented in August 2017. This study evaluated the effects of the simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLKT) policy on outcomes in LT alone (LTA) patients with kidney dysfunction. We analyzed adult primary LTA patients with kidney dysfunction at listing (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] less than 30 mL/minute or dialysis requirement) between January 2015 and March 2019 using the OPTN/UNOS registry. Waitlist practice and kidney transplantation (KT) listing after LTA were compared between prepolicy and postpolicy groups. There were 3821 LTA listings with eGFR <30 mL/minute included. The daily number of listings on dialysis was significantly higher in Era 2 (postpolicy group) than Era 1 (prepolicy group) (1.21/day versus 0.95/day; P < 0.001). Of these LTA listings, 90-day LT waitlist mortality, LTA probability, and 1-year post-LTA survival were similar between eras. LTA recipients in Era 2 had a higher probability for KT listing after LTA than those in Era 1 (6.2% versus 3.9%; odds ratio [OR], 3.30; P < 0.001), especially those on dialysis (8.4% versus 2.0%; OR, 4.38; P < 0.001). Under the safety net rule, there was a higher KT probability after LTA (26.7% and 53% at 6 months in Eras 1 and 2, respectively; P = 0.02). After the implementation of the policy, the number of LTA listings among patients on dialysis increased significantly. While their posttransplant survival did not change, KT listing after LTA increased. The safety net rule led to high KT probability and a low waitlist mortality rate in patients who were listed for KT after LTA. These results suggest that the policy successfully achieved the goals of providing appropriate opportunities of KT for LT patients, which did not compromise LTA waitlist or posttransplant outcomes in patients with kidney dysfunction and provided KT opportunities if patients developed kidney failure after LTA.

Effect of Mandatory 6-Month Waiting Period on Waitlist and Transplant Outcomes in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing (OPTN/UNOS) policy mandates a 6-month waiting period before exception scores are granted to liver transplant candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aims to evaluate waitlist and posttransplant outcomes in patients with HCC, before and after implementation of the 6-month waiting rule. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We examined two groups from the UNOS registry: Group 1 (pre-6-month rule) consisted of patients registered as transplant candidates with HCC from January 1, 2013, to October 7, 2015 (n = 4,814); group 2 (post-6-month rule) consisted of patients registered from October 8, 2015, to June 30, 2018 (n = 3,287). As expected, the transplant probability was higher in the first 6 months after listing in group 1 than group 2 at 42.0% versus 6.3% (P < 0.001). However, the 6-month waitlist mortality/dropout rate was lower in group 2 at 1.2% than group 1 at 4.1% (P < 0.001). To assess regional parity of transplant, UNOS regions were categorized into three groups based on Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score at transplant: lower-score (regions 3, 10, and 11), middle-score (1, 2, 6, 8, and 9), and higher-score region groups (4, 5, and 7). Outcomes were compared from the time exception points were given, which we defined as conditional waitlist outcomes. Conditional waitlist mortality/dropout decreased, and transplant probability increased in all region groups, but the benefits of the policy were more pronounced in the higher and middle-score groups, compared with the lower-score group. The decline in waitlist mortality/dropout was only significant in the high Model for End-Stage Liver Disease group (P < 0.001). No effect was observed on posttransplant mortality or percent of patients within Milan criteria on explant. CONCLUSIONS: The HCC policy change was associated with decreased waitlist mortality/dropout and increased transplant probability. The policy helped to decrease but did not eliminate regional disparities in transplant opportunity without an effect on posttransplant outcomes.

Disease-specific waitlist outcomes in liver transplantation - a retrospective study.

This study aimed to evaluate possible discrepancies in waitlist outcomes between liver diseases, including alcohol-related liver disease (ALD), nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), hepatitis C virus infection (HCV), primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Patients registered for liver transplantation from January 11, 2016, to June 30, 2018, were evaluated using OPTN/UNOS registry. Waitlist outcomes were compared between the five-disease groups. Patients were categorized by initial MELD-Na-score (6-20, 21-29, and ≥30) to identify outcome variations. Prognostic impact of transplantation was assessed according to final MELD-Na scores using Cox regression analysis modeling transplantation as a time-dependent covariate. 6053 with ALD, 3814 with NASH, 1558 with HCV, 602 with PBC, and 819 with PSC were eligible. Compared to ALD with comparable MELD-Na-scores, NASH with lower [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.30, P = 0.042] and mid-scores (aHR = 1.35, P = 0.008) showed significantly higher risk of 1-year waitlist mortality, and PBC with higher scores showed significantly higher risk of 90-day (aHR = 1.69, P = 0.03) and 1-year waitlist mortality (aHR = 1.69, P = 0.02). Positive prognostic impact of transplantation was not seen until score of 24-27 in ALD, 18-20 in HCV, 15-17 in NASH, and 24-27 in PBC and PSC. There are significant differences in waitlist outcomes among etiologies, which may differ the optimal transplant timing.

Short recipient warm ischemia time improves outcomes in deceased donor liver transplantation.

While adverse effects of prolonged recipient warm ischemia time (rWIT) in liver transplantation (LT) have been well investigated, few studies have focused on possible positive prognostic effects of short rWIT. We aim to investigate if shortening rWIT can further improve outcomes in donation after brain death liver transplant (DBD-LT). Primary DBD-LT between 2000 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided according to rWIT (≤30, 31-40, 41-50, and >50 min). The requirement of intraoperative transfusion, early allograft dysfunction (EAD), and graft survival were compared between the rWIT groups. A total of 1,256 patients of DBD-LTs were eligible. rWIT was ≤30min in 203 patients (15.7%), 31-40min in 465 patients (37.3%), 41-50min in 353 patients (28.1%), and >50min in 240 patients (19.1%). There were significant increasing trends of transfusion requirement (P < 0.001) and increased estimated blood loss (EBL, P < 0.001), and higher lactate level (P < 0.001) with prolongation of rWIT. Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated the lowest risk of EAD in the WIT ≤30min group. After risk adjustment, patients with rWIT ≤30 min showed a significantly lower risk of graft loss at 1 and 5-years, compared to other groups. The positive prognostic impact of rWIT ≤30min was more prominent when cold ischemia time exceeded 6 h. In conclusion, shorter rWIT in DBD-LT provided significantly better post-transplant outcomes.

Extreme hyponatremia as a risk factor for early mortality after liver transplantation in the MELD-sodium era.

The impact of hyponatremia on waitlist and post-transplant outcomes following the implementation of MELD-Na-based liver allocation remains unclear. We investigated waitlist and postliver transplant (LT) outcomes in patients with hyponatremia before and after implementing MELD-Na-based allocation. Adult patients registered for a primary LT between 2009 and 2021 were identified in the OPTN/UNOS database. Two eras were defined; pre-MELD-Na and post-MELD-Na. Extreme hyponatremia was defined as a serum sodium concentration ≤120 mEq/l. Ninety-day waitlist outcomes and post-LT survival were compared using Fine-Gray proportional hazard and mixed-effects Cox proportional hazard models. A total of 118 487 patients were eligible (n = 64 940: pre-MELD-Na; n = 53 547: post-MELD-Na). In the pre-MELD-Na era, extreme hyponatremia at listing was associated with an increased risk of 90-day waitlist mortality ([ref: 135-145] HR: 3.80; 95% CI: 2.97-4.87; P < 0.001) and higher transplant probability (HR: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.38-2.01; P < 0.001). In the post-MELD-Na era, patients with extreme hyponatremia had a proportionally lower relative risk of waitlist mortality (HR: 2.27; 95% CI 1.60-3.23; P < 0.001) and proportionally higher transplant probability (HR: 2.12; 95% CI 1.76-2.55; P < 0.001) as patients with normal serum sodium levels (135-145). Extreme hyponatremia was associated with a higher risk of 90, 180, and 365-day post-LT survival compared to patients with normal serum sodium levels. With the introduction of MELD-Na-based allocation, waitlist outcomes have improved in patients with extreme hyponatremia but they continue to have worse short-term post-LT survival.

Estimating Sleep Stages Using a Head Acceleration Sensor.

Sleep disruption from causes, such as changes in lifestyle, stress from aging, family issues, or life pressures are a growing phenomenon that can lead to serious health problems. As such, sleep disorders need to be identified and addressed early on. In recent years, studies have investigated sleep patterns through body movement information collected by wristwatch-type devices or cameras. However, these methods capture only the individual's awake and sleep states and lack sufficient information to identify specific sleep stages. The aim of this study was to use a 3-axis accelerometer attached to an individual's head to capture information that can identify three specific sleep stages: rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, light sleep, and deep sleep. These stages are measured by heart rate features captured by a ballistocardiogram and body movement. The sleep experiment was conducted for two nights among eight healthy adult men. According to the leave-one-out cross-validation results, the F-scores were: awake 76.6%, REM sleep 52.7%, light sleep 78.2%, and deep sleep 67.8%. The accuracy was 74.6% for the four estimates. This proposed measurement system was able to estimate the sleep stages with high accuracy simply by using the acceleration in the individual's head.

A Share 21 model in liver transplantation: Impact on waitlist outcomes.

With the introduction of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium (MELD-Na)-based allocation, the score at which patients benefit from liver transplantation (LT) has shifted from a score of 15 to 21. This study aimed to evaluate waitlist outcomes in patients with MELD-Na scores <21 and explore the utility of replacing "Share 15" with "Share 21." The study uses data from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing registry. All adult patients registered for LT after implementation of the MELD-Na-based allocation were evaluated. Waitlist patients with initial and final scores <21 were eligible. Patients with exception scores were excluded. To explore the potential impact of a Share 21 model, patients with an initial MELD-Na score of 6-14 (Group 1) and those with a score of 15-20 (Group 2) were compared for waitlist outcomes. There were 3686 patients with an initial score of 6-14 (Group 1) and 3282 with a score of 15-20 (Group 2). Group 2, when compared to Group 1, showed comparable risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.00, P = .97), higher transplant probability (aHR 3.25, P < .001), and lower likelihood of removal from listing because of improvement (aHR 0.74, P = .011). Share 21 may enhance transplant opportunities and increase parity for patients with higher MELD-Na scores without compromising waitlist outcomes.

Posttransplant Complications Predict Alcohol Relapse in Liver Transplant Recipients.

Alcohol relapse after liver transplantation (LT) in patients with alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) is a major challenge. Although its association with pretransplant psychosocial factors was extensively studied, the impacts of posttransplant courses on alcohol relapse have not been well investigated. The aim of this study is to analyze peritransplant factors associated with posttransplant alcohol relapse in patients with ALD. This study evaluated 190 adult LT patients with ALD from 2013 to 2019. Risk factors for alcohol relapse were analyzed, focusing on posttransplant chronic complications, which were classified as Clavien-Dindo classification 3a or higher that lasted over 30 days. The posttransplant alcohol relapse rate was 13.7% (26/190) with a median onset time of 18.6 months after transplant. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that posttransplant chronic complications were an independent risk factor for posttransplant alcohol relapse (hazard ratio [HR], 5.40; P = 0.001), along with psychiatric comorbidity (HR, 3.93; P = 0.001), history of alcohol relapse before LT (HR, 3.00; P = 0.008), and an abstinence period <1.5 years (HR, 12.05; P = 0.001). A risk prediction model was created using 3 pretransplant risk factors (psychiatric comorbidity, alcohol relapse before LT, and abstinence period <1.5 years). This model clearly stratified the risk of alcohol relapse into high-, moderate-, and low-risk groups (P < 0.001). Of the 26 patients who relapsed, 11 (42.3%) continued drinking, of whom 3 died of severe alcoholic hepatitis, and 13 (50.0%) achieved sobriety (outcomes for 2 patients were unknown). In conclusion, posttransplant chronic complications increased the risk of alcohol relapse. Recognition of posttransplant chronic complications in conjunction with the risk stratification model by pretransplant psychosocial factors would help with the prediction of posttransplant alcohol relapse.

Center Experience Affects Liver Transplant Outcomes in Patients with Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Based on favorable outcomes reported by experienced centers, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (Ph-CCA) has become an accepted indication for liver transplantation (LT). What is less clear is if the reported outcomes have been reproduced nationwide in the US. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate post-transplant outcomes in patients with Ph-CCA and to determine prognostic factors. METHODS: Patients who underwent LT with Model for End-stage Liver Disease exception scores for Ph-CCA between 2010 and 2017 were evaluated. Transplant centers were classified into well- and less-experienced groups: Group 1 [well-experienced (≥ 6 LTs), 7 centers]; Group 2 [less-experienced (< 6 LTs), 23 centers]. Post-transplant mortality due to all-cause and recurrence of Ph-CCA were set as endpoints. RESULTS: Post-transplant outcomes were significantly better in Group 1 than in Group 2, with 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient survival rates of 91.8%, 56.9%, and 45.8%, versus 65.6%, 48.8%, and 26.0%, respectively. Group 2 showed a significantly higher risk of 1-, 3-, and 5-year all-cause mortality and 1-year mortality associated with Ph-CCA recurrence. Center experience was an independent risk factor for post-transplant mortality. In intention-to-treat analysis, a positive prognostic effect of LT was significant and LT decreased the mortality risk by 86% in the well-experienced group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.14, p < 0.001], whereas this effect was not observed in the less-experienced group (HR 1.35, p = 0.47). CONCLUSIONS: Risk of recurrence of malignancy and mortality was significantly higher in the less-experienced center group. Center effects on post-transplant outcomes in patients with Ph-CCA should be recognized, and the introduction of center approval for LT for Ph-CCA may be justified to achieve comparable outcomes between centers.

Liver transplant waitlist outcomes in alcoholic hepatitis compared with other liver diseases: An analysis of UNOS registry.

There is growing interest in performing liver transplantation (LT) in patients with alcoholic hepatitis (AH) without a mandated abstinence period. The aim of this study is to investigate waitlist outcomes in AH patients compared to those with other liver diseases. Using data from the UNOS registry, adult patients listed for LT between 2009 and 2018 were evaluated. Waitlist outcomes were compared among liver diseases. A total of 64 646 patients were eligible, including 286 with AH, 16 871 with alcoholic cirrhosis (AC), 13 730 with hepatitis C (HCV), 10 315 with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and 5841 with cholestatic liver disease (CLD). In comparison with AH patients, patients with HCV, NASH, and CLD had a significantly higher risk of waitlist mortality and a lower likelihood of recovery on the waitlist. These trends were more prominent in the waiting-time period of 91-365 days than in shorter periods. In intention-to-treat analysis, positive prognostic effect of LT was significant in AH patients with MELD score ≥35 (HR 0.04, P < .001). AH patients showed lower mortality risk and a higher chance of recovery while on waitlist than other liver diseases, especially when waiting time exceeded 90 days. These results indicate the importance of continuous evaluation of disease progression in AH patients awaiting LT.

Impact of graft thickness reduction of left lateral segment on outcomes following pediatric living donor liver transplantation.

Reducing graft thickness is essential to prevent large-for-size graft problems in pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). However, long-term outcomes of LDLT using reduced-thickness left lateral segment (LLS) grafts are unclear. In 89 patients who underwent LDLT using reduced LLS grafts between 2005 and 2017, short-term and long-term outcomes were compared between a nonanatomically reduced LLS (NAR-LLS) graft group and a reduced-thickness LLS graft group. Estimated blood loss was lower and abdominal skin closure was less needed in the recipient operation in the reduced-thickness LLS graft group. Postoperatively, portal vein (PV) flow was significantly decreased in the NAR-LLS graft group, and there was shorter intensive care unit (ICU) stay and fewer postoperative complications, especially bacteremia, in the reduced-thickness LLS graft group. Graft survival at 1 and 3 years after LDLT using reduced-thickness LLS grafts was 95.2% and 92.4%, respectively, which was significantly better than for NAR-LLS grafts. Multivariate analysis revealed that fulminant liver failure, hepatofugal PV flow before LDLT, and NAR-LLS graft were associated with poor graft survival. In conclusion, LDLT using reduced-thickness LLS grafts is a safe and feasible option with better short- and long-term outcomes in comparison with NAR-LLS grafts.