Is neuroradiological imaging sufficient for exclusion of intracranial hypertension in children? Intracranial hypertension syndrome without evident radiological symptoms.

There are still many important questions about algorithms and clinical scenarios in the context of children with clinical intracranial hypertension symptoms (IHS) without radiological findings. Such conditions could appear in different clinical situations, including slit ventricle syndrome, overdrainage syndrome, normal volume hydrocephalus, or idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Many articles have defined specific treatment strategies for various forms of IHS, including ventriculoperitoneal shunting, medication for shunt-related migraine, steroids, and valve upgrades with antisiphoning devices or programmable systems. This study is an attempt to define the proper diagnostic procedures and treatment options for patients with various forms of IHS without evident neuroradiological findings. The authors discuss possible pathological mechanisms leading to IHS in the pediatric population. The authors present six children treated in their center. All of the children presented clinical manifestation of intracranial hypertension without evident neuroradiological findings in CT and/or MRI examinations. In three cases, the final diagnosis was slit ventricle syndrome; in two cases, normal volume hydrocephalus; in another case, idiopathic intracranial hypertension. The treatment options included short-term steroid (dexamethasone) administration and ventriculoperitoneal shunting using programmable systems. In one case of idiopathic intracranial hypertension, ICP monitoring was also performed. The authors discuss possible diagnostic and treatment strategies for the aforementioned cases. There are still many controversies about management of children with clinical symptoms of intracranial hypertension that are not confirmed in neuroimaging. It seems that our understanding of intracranial hypertension in the pediatric population is not nearly as sophisticated or complete as we might have imagined. Ventriculoperitoneal shunting with antisiphoning devices and/or short-term dexamethasone administration seem to be the best treatment options in these cases.

[Back pain in children]. / Zespoly bólowe kregoslupa u dzieci.

Back pain and pain of the surrounding structures leads to significant diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties which result from a complex pathomechanism. They are the symptom of a large number of pathologic processes that may to a varying extent contribute to pain related manifestation of symptoms. In 80-90% of cases the cause of the back pain remains unknown, only in 10-20% adult patients it is feasible to establish the etiological factor during one year observation. Contrary to the situation in adults, in over 50% of children it is possible to identify the cause of the reported ailments. The authors present etiological factors and clinical symptoms in 44 patients, hospitalized because of back pain in Child Neurology Department of Medical University of Silesia in Katowice in the period between 2004 and 2007.

Prevention and management of painful neuroma.

Painful neuroma is a common sequela of peripheral nerve injury which is usually resistant to pharmacologic treatment and requires surgical intervention. The widely accepted methods of neuroma management prevent regrowth of nerve fibers, thus precluding any functional repair. The present study reviews the currently used methods and experimental approaches to prevent and cure neuromas developing after peripheral nerve injury. The main recommendations are as follows. Special care should be taken to minimize scar formation when operating on peripheral nerves. The laser or scissors transection methods should be used to cut the nerve rather than electrocoagulation or cryoneurolysis. Direct nerve reconstruction, or, if a gap occurs, nerve grafting, should be performed immediately after nerve injury. Surgical resection of recurrent neuroma followed by implantation of the nerve into the muscle or capping the nerve stump with epineural graft seems to be the most effective method of prevention.

Epidural hematomas in a child with Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome (HGPS) is a rare genetic disorder. It is characterized by severe growth failure, premature aging, and very early atherosclerosis with coronary artery disease and cerebrovascular disease. CASE REPORT: A 10-year-old boy with HGPS was admitted to our department because of progressive deterioration after a mild head injury. The CT scans revealed epidural hematoma in posterior fossa and another one in the temporal region on the left side. On admission the child was given an estimated score of 10 on the GCS. Neurological examination revealed right hemiparesis. The boy was operated on, and both hematomas were evacuated. In a few days the neurological symptoms disappeared, and he was discharged from the hospital with only residual, minimal right hemiparesis. CONCLUSION: Intracranial pathology was certainly caused by the head trauma, but was more severe than would have been expected had the trauma been the sole cause. We suggest that progressive atherosclerosis of intracranial vessels was responsible for formation of the hematomas.