Posttreatment Head and Neck Cancer Imaging: Anatomic Considerations Based on Cancer Subsites.

Posttreatment imaging surveillance of head and neck cancer is challenging owing to complex anatomic subsites and diverse treatment modalities. Early detection of residual disease or recurrence through surveillance imaging is crucial for devising optimal treatment strategies. Posttreatment imaging surveillance is performed using CT, fluorine 18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT, and MRI. Radiologists should be familiar with postoperative imaging findings that can vary depending on surgical procedures and reconstruction methods that are used, which is dictated by the primary subsite and extent of the tumor. Morphologic changes in normal structures or denervation of muscles within the musculocutaneous flap may mimic recurrent tumors. Recurrence is more likely to occur at the resection margin, margin of the reconstructed flap, and deep sites that are difficult to access surgically. Radiation therapy also has a varying dose distribution depending on the primary site, resulting in various posttreatment changes. Normal tissues are affected by radiation, with edema and inflammation occurring in the early stages and fibrosis in the late stages. Distinguishing scar tissue from residual tumor becomes necessary, as radiation therapy may leave behind residual scar tissue. Local recurrence should be carefully evaluated within areas where these postradiation changes occur. Head and Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (NI-RADS) is a standardized reporting and risk classification system with guidance for subsequent management. Familiarity with NI-RADS has implications for establishing surveillance protocols, interpreting posttreatment images, and management decisions. Knowledge of posttreatment imaging characteristics of each subsite of head and neck cancers and the areas prone to recurrence empowers radiologists to detect recurrences at early stages. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions in the supplemental material and the slide presentation from the RSNA Annual Meeting are available for this article.

2021 WHO Classification of Lung Cancer: Molecular Biology Research and Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation.

The 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) classification system for thoracic tumors (including lung cancer) contains several updates to the 2015 edition. Revisions for lung cancer include a new grading system for invasive nonmucinous adenocarcinoma that better reflects prognosis, reorganization of squamous cell carcinomas and neuroendocrine neoplasms, and description of some new entities. Moreover, remarkable advancements in our knowledge of genetic mutations and targeted therapies have led to a much greater emphasis on genetic testing than that in 2015. In 2015, guidelines recommended evaluation of only two driver mutations, ie, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusions, in patients with nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer. The 2021 guidelines recommend testing for numerous additional gene mutations for which targeted therapies are now available including ROS1, RET, NTRK1-3, KRAS, BRAF, and MET. The correlation of imaging features and genetic mutations is being studied. Testing for the immune biomarker programmed death ligand 1 is now recommended before starting first-line therapy in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Because 70% of lung cancers are unresectable at patient presentation, diagnosis of lung cancer is usually based on small diagnostic samples (ie, biopsy specimens) rather than surgical resection specimens. The 2021 version emphasizes differences in the histopathologic interpretation of small diagnostic samples and resection specimens. Radiologists play a key role not only in evaluation of tumor and metastatic disease but also in identification of optimal biopsy targets. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions in the supplemental material and the slide presentation from the RSNA Annual Meeting are available for this article.

Imaging of salivary gland cancers derived from a sublingual gland herniated into the submandibular space: a report of three cases.

Sublingual gland herniation into the submandibular space through a mylohyoid muscle defect is a common anatomical variation; however, salivary gland cancers that arise from a herniated sublingual gland have not been described yet. Here, we report three patients with salivary gland cancers originating from a herniated sublingual gland. All tumors were detected as palpable submandibular masses, located anterior to the submandibular gland, medial to the mandible, and lateral to the mylohyoid muscle, with contact with the sublingual gland through a mylohyoid muscle defect. Intraoperative findings confirmed that the masses were derived from herniated sublingual glands. Pathological examination showed one case of mucoepidermoid carcinoma and two cases of adenoid cystic carcinoma. Imaging findings of the tumor location, in addition to the continuity with the sublingual gland through the mylohyoid muscle defect, are crucial for accurately diagnosing the tumor origin, which is essential for determining the appropriate clinical management.

Computed tomography-guided percutaneous needle biopsy for middle mediastinal tumors with retroaortic paravertebral approach: A case report.

A 74-year-old man was referred to our hospital for a close examination of a mediastinal mass. Contrast-enhanced CT showed a middle mediastinal tumor. We planned to perform a CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy of the tumor using a retroaortic paravertebral approach to avoid transpulmonary puncture. A coaxial blunt-tip needle with a side hole was used to create space in the mediastinum and avoid azygos vein injury. After injecting normal saline, a blunt-tip needle was advanced through the space between the aorta and the vertebral body to the anterior surface of the tumor, and tissue was obtained. The patient was discharged the following day with no complications. For percutaneous middle mediastinal tumor biopsy, the retroaortic paravertebral approach may be a safe, effective route.

Pancreas-sparing tumor resection for peripancreatic paraganglioma: a case series of six patients.

Paragangliomas (PGLs) located around the pancreas are rare and challenging to diagnose preoperatively. Tumor resection with pancreatectomy is often performed for peripancreatic PGL. However, pancreas-sparing tumor resection can be indicated with an accurate preoperative diagnosis. Six patients with pathologically diagnosed peripancreatic PGL were included. The clinical data were retrospectively collected from medical records. Five of them were suspected of peripancreatic PGL on imaging studies due to the fat plane identified between the tumor and pancreas, and subsequently diagnosed with PGL preoperatively based on elevated urinary catecholamine levels and/or metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy without biopsy. All patients underwent pancreas-sparing tumor resection with negative surgical margins, and they did not develop postoperative complications related to potential damage to the pancreas. A fat plane between the tumor and pancreas on imaging studies and hormone levels are key findings for obtaining an accurate preoperative diagnosis of peripancreatic PGL, which can be managed with pancreas-sparing tumor resection.

Radiologic feature of complications after artificial urinary sphincter implantation following total prostatectomy.

Incontinence following total prostatectomy for prostate cancer significantly impairs patient's quality of life. In severe cases, implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) has shown favorable outcomes, enhancing continence by constricting the bulbous urethra. The AUS system consists of a pressure-maintaining balloon, control pump serving as the operational switch, cuff that constricts the urethra, and tubes and connectors that link these components, maintaining a continuous circuit through an internal pressure medium. Most instances of AUS dysfunction are attributed to circuit leaks leading to a reduction in internal pressure, which is identifiable on imaging by fluid accumulation around the circuit, balloon collapse, control pump deformation, and air within the circuit. When the AUS circuit is uncompromised, dysfunction may arise from issues such as the inability to compress the pump due to pain or displacement outside the scrotum or urinary tract obstruction caused by bladder hemorrhage/hematoma. Imaging plays a pivotal role in the evaluation of urinary tract injuries, hematomas/seromas, and infections associated with AUS placement or replacement. Understanding the function of AUS and its appearance on CT imaging is essential for accurately assessing AUS dysfunction and post-implantation complications, guiding clinical decision-making and improving patient care outcomes.