Low-dose rituximab is efficacious in refractory idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.

OBJECTIVES: Rituximab (RTX) use early in the course of refractory idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) is not well studied. This study sought to determine the short-term efficacy of RTX in a registry-based cohort of refractory IIM. METHODS: Registry-based observational data about IIM patients receiving RTX between 2018 and 2021 were included. Total improvement score was calculated from the core set measures as per International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies group (IMACS) at baseline, 6 months and 12 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Forty-two patients (F:M, 29:13), with a mean (s.d.) age of 39.5 (11.5) years were studied. Majority of patients received RTX for refractory myositis, after a median (interquartile range) duration of 8 (4,18) months. Twenty-eight received RTX at a dosage of 1 g × two doses, while 14 received 500 mg × two doses with an interval of 15 days. At 6 months and 12 months post-RTX, the improvement was recorded in manual muscle testing (MMT-8) scores, physician global assessment (PGA), patient global assessment (PtGA) and median steroid dosage as compared with the baseline (P < 0.01 for all). A mean (s.d.) improvement of 44.5 (16) and 48.7 (19.2) in total improvement score was recorded at 6 and 12 months, respectively. The change in MMT-8, PGA and PtGA scores from baseline between the two dosage regimens of RTX were comparable at 6 and 12 months. Severe lower respiratory tract infections requiring hospitalization occurred in three patients of the cohort. CONCLUSION: RTX improved IMACS core set measures and had steroid sparing efficacy at 6 and 12 months in patients with IIM in this registry-based study. Rituximab as an induction regimen of two doses of 500 mg can be as efficacious as 1 g at 6 months and 12 months of follow-up.

Neuropathologic evaluation of cerebrovascular disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Active RA has been associated with an increased risk of both cardiovascular and peripheral vascular disease. We aimed to compare cerebrovascular changes in patients with and without RA, both with and without a neuropathologic diagnosis of neurodegenerative disease. METHODS: Patients with RA (n = 32) who died and underwent autopsy between 1994 and 2021 were matched to non-RA controls (n = 32) on age, sex and level of neurodegenerative proteinopathy. Routine neuropathologic examination was performed at the time of autopsy. Cerebrovascular disease severity was evaluated using modified Kalaria and Strozyk scales. Clinical dementia diagnoses were manually collected from patients' medical records. RESULTS: Prior to death, 15 (47%) RA patients and 14 (44%) controls were diagnosed with dementia; 9 patients in each group (60% and 64%, respectively) had Alzheimer's disease. The prevalence of cerebral amyloid angiopathy, microinfarcts, infarcts or strokes was found to be similar between groups. Patients with RA were more likely to have more severe vascular changes in the basal ganglia by Kalaria scale (P = 0.04), but not in other brain areas. There were no significant differences in the presence of large infarcts, lacunar infarcts or leukoencephalopathy by Strozyk scale. Among patients with RA and no clinical diagnosis of dementia, the majority had mild-moderate cerebrovascular abnormalities, and a subset of patients had Alzheimer's disease neuropathologic changes. CONCLUSION: In this small series of autopsies, patients with and without RA had largely similar cerebrovascular pathology when controlling for neurodegenerative proteinopathies, although patients with RA exhibited more pronounced cerebrovascular disease in the basal ganglia.

Comparison of clinical features between patients with anti-synthetase syndrome and dermatomyositis: Results from the MYONET registry.

OBJECTIVES: To compare clinical characteristics, including the frequency of cutaneous, extramuscular manifestations, and malignancy, between adults with anti-synthetase syndrome (ASyS) and dermatomyositis (DM). METHODS: Using data regarding adults from the MYONET registry, a cohort of DM patients with anti-Mi2/-TIF1É£/-NXP2/-SAE/-MDA5 autoantibodies, and a cohort of ASyS patients with anti-tRNA synthetase autoantibodies (anti-Jo1/-PL7/-PL12/-OJ/-EJ/-Zo/-KS) were identified. Patients with DM sine dermatitis or with discordant dual autoantibody specificities were excluded. Sub-cohorts of patients with ASyS with or without skin involvement were defined based on presence of DM-type rashes (heliotrope rash, Gottron's papules/sign, violaceous rash, shawl sign, V sign, erythroderma, and/or periorbital rash). RESULTS: In total 1,054 patients were included (DM, n = 405; ASyS, n = 649). In ASyS cohort, 31% (n = 203) had DM-type skin involvement (ASyS-DMskin). A higher frequency of extramuscular manifestations, including Mechanic's hands, Raynaud's phenomenon, arthritis, interstitial lung disease, and cardiac involvement differentiated ASyS-DMskin from DM (all p< 0.001), whereas higher frequency of any of four DM-type rashes: heliotrope rash (n = 248, 61% vs n = 90, 44%), violaceous rash (n = 166, 41% vs n = 57, 9%), V sign (n = 124, 31% vs n = 28, 4%), and shawl sign (n = 133, 33% vs n = 18, 3%) differentiated DM from ASyS-DMskin (all p< 0.005). Cancer-associated myositis (CAM) was more frequent in DM (n = 67, 17%) compared with ASyS (n = 21, 3%) and ASyS-DMskin (n = 7, 3%) cohorts (both p< 0.001). CONCLUSION: DM-type rashes are frequent in patients with ASyS; however, distinct clinical manifestations differentiate these patients from classical DM. Skin involvement in ASyS does not necessitate increased malignancy surveillance. These findings will inform future ASyS classification criteria and patient management.

Risk Factors for Dementia in Patients With Incident Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: Growing evidence suggests that patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have increased risk for dementia. We assessed risk factors for incident dementia in an inception cohort of patients with RA. METHODS: This retrospective population-based cohort study included residents of 8 counties in Minnesota who were ≥ 50 years of age when they met 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria for incident RA between 1980 and 2014 and were followed until death/migration or December 31, 2019. Patients with dementia before RA incidence were excluded. Incident dementia was defined as 2 relevant International Classification of Diseases, 9th or 10th revision codes at least 30 days apart. Data on sociodemographics, disease characteristics, cardiovascular/cerebrovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, and comorbidities were abstracted from medical records. RESULTS: The study included 886 patients with RA (mean age 65.1 yrs, 65.2% female). During the follow-up period (median 8.5 yrs), 103 patients developed dementia. After adjusting for age, sex, and calendar year of RA incidence, older age at RA incidence (HR 1.14 per 1 year increase, 95% CI 1.12-1.17), rheumatoid nodules (HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.05-2.95), hypertension (HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.19-2.85), presence of large joint swelling (HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.14-3.60), any CVD (HR 2.25, 95% CI 1.38-3.66), particularly ischemic stroke (HR 3.16, 95% CI 1.84-5.43) and heart failure (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.10-3.00), anxiety (HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.16-2.97), and depression (HR 2.63, 95% CI 1.76-3.93) were associated with increased risk of dementia. After adjusting for CVD risk factors and any CVD, all covariates listed above were still significantly associated with risk of dementia. CONCLUSION: Apart from age, hypertension, depression, and anxiety, all of which are universally recognized risk factors for dementia, clinically active RA and presence of CVD were associated with an elevated risk of dementia incidence among patients with RA.

Risk factors associated with COVID-19 in systemic lupus erythematosus: Results from a longitudinal prospective cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with SLE (systemic lupus erythematosus) have a higher risk of infection due to dysregulated immune system as well as long-term use of immunosuppressants (IS). This could influence the risk of COVID-19 and its outcome. METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal prospective study across 15 rheumatology centres during the first wave of the pandemic to understand the risk factors contributing to COVID-19 in SLE patients. During the 6 months follow-up, those who tested positive for COVID-19, their clinical course and outcome information were recorded. RESULTS: Through the study period (April-December 2020), 36/1379 lupus patients (2.9%) developed COVID-19. On analysing the COVID-19 positive versus negative cohort during the study period, male gender (adjusted RR 3.72, 95% C.I. 1.85,7.51) and diabetes (adjusted RR 2.94, 95% C.I. 1.28, 6.79) emerged as the strongest risk factors for COVID-19, in the adjusted analysis. There was no significant influence of organ involvement, hydroxychloroquine, glucocorticoid dosage (prednisolone< 7.5 mg or ≥ 7.5 mg/day) or IS on the risk of COVID-19. There was only one death (1/36) among the lupus patients due to COVID-19. CONCLUSION: Traditional risk factors rather than lupus disease process or IS influenced the risk of COVID-19 in our cohort.

The impact of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease on the risk of dementia in rheumatoid arthritis: A mediation analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the role of cardiovascular disease (CVD) as a mediator in the pathway between rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). METHODS: This retrospective population-based study included patients over 50 years of age with incident RA, who met the 1987 ACR criteria in 1980-2014. This cohort was matched 1:1 on age, sex and index year to comparators without RA. Information on CVD events was manually extracted from electronic health records. The relationships between RA, CVD and ADRD were examined using Cox proportional hazard models. Time dependent mediation analysis was used to examine the role of CVD as a mediator between RA and ADRD. RESULTS: 1754 individuals were included (877 persons with RA and 877 comparators without RA). During follow-up, 105 patients with RA and 102 individuals without RA developed ADRD; 444 patients with RA and 375 individuals without RA developed CVD. There was a non-significant association between RA and ADRD both without (aHR 1.27, 95 % CI 0.96, 1.69) and with (aHR 1.27, 95 % CI 0.95,1.68) CVD as a time dependent mediator. The mediation effect of any CVD on ADRD risk was not significant (p = 0.84). We found a significant interaction between RA and CVD on the risk of ADRD (aHR 1.95, 95 % CI 1.11, 3.42; p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of ADRD in RA appears to be increased mainly in the presence of CVD. CVD was not a significant mediator on the risk of ADRD in RA. There was a significant synergistic effect of RA and CVD on ADRD risk.