Differences in prevalence of self-reported oral hypofunction between older adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis and the general older population: A cross-sectional study using propensity score matching.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and oral hypofunction (OHF) using propensity score matching (PSM) to adjust for differences between older adults with RA and the general older adult population. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey among 189 older adults with RA in 2019 (mean age, 71.9 ± 3.6) and 47 178 independent older adult residents in 2016 (mean age, 71.6 ± 4.0), respectively. The questionnaire covered information on socio-demographic characteristics and OHF for both groups. Age, sex, educational level and smoking history were used to determine PSM. Prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of self-reported OHF (fewer remaining teeth, decreased masticatory function, deterioration of swallowing function and oral dryness) were estimated using Poisson regressions. RESULT: OHF was observed in 44.4% of patients with RA and 27.5% of residents. Before PSM, the prevalence of OHF among patients with RA was higher than that of residents (PR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.50-2.05). After PSM, there were 189 patients with RA and residents, and the prevalence of OHF among patients with RA was still higher (PR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.22-2.13). Poisson regression showed that the prevalence of 19 or fewer teeth (PR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.82-1.36), difficulties eating tough foods (PR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.90-1.55), difficulties swallowing tea or soup (PR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.19-2.63), and dry mouth (PR, 2.79; 95% CI, 1.90-4.07) was higher among patients with RA than residents. CONCLUSION: Compared with the general older adult population, patients with RA have a higher prevalence of self-reported OHF.

Consensus statement on the management of late-onset rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Late-onset rheumatoid arthritis (LORA), which has been increasing in recent years, lacks evidence for initial treatment. Japanese rheumatology experts recognized this gap and addressed it by developing consensus statements on the first clinical application of LORA. METHODS: These statements were created following an introductory discussion about treatment fundamentals, which included a review of existing literature and cohort data. The steering committee created a draft, which was refined using a modified Delphi method that involved panel members reaching a consensus. The panel made decisions based on input from geriatric experts, clinical epidemiologists, guideline developers, patient groups, and the LORA Research Subcommittee of the Japan College of Rheumatology. RESULTS: The consensus identified four established facts, three basic approaches, and six expert opinions for managing LORA. Methotrexate was recommended as the primary treatment, with molecular-targeted agents being considered if treatment goals cannot be achieved. An emphasis was placed on assessing the lives of older patients due to challenges in risk management and methotrexate accessibility caused by comorbidities or cognitive decline. CONCLUSIONS: The experts substantiated and refined 13 statements for the initial treatment of LORA. To validate these claims, the next is to conduct a registry study focusing on new LORA cases.

Comparison of effectiveness of methotrexate in patients with late-onset versus younger-onset rheumatoid arthritis: Real-world data from an inception cohort in Japan (NICER-J).

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of methotrexate (MTX) as initial therapy in patients with late-onset and younger-onset rheumatoid arthritis (LORA and YORA). METHODS: Of 114 patients with YORA and 96 patients with LORA, defined as RA occurring at ≥65 years of age, enrolled in a multicentre RA inception cohort study, 71 and 66 patients who had been followed up to 6 months after starting MTX treatment were included in this study. RESULTS: Proportions of patients on MTX treatment at 6 months were 96% and 92% in the YORA and LORA groups, respectively. Despite lower doses of MTX in the LORA group compared with the YORA group, no significant difference was observed in clinical disease activity index scores between the two groups throughout the follow-up period. The proportion of patients in clinical disease activity index remission at 6 months was 35% in both groups. Logistic regression analysis revealed that knee joint involvement and high Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index were significant negative predictors of achieving clinical disease activity index remission at 6 months in the LORA group. CONCLUSION: Observations up to 6 months revealed that the effectiveness of MTX administered based on rheumatologist discretion in patients with LORA is comparable to that in patients with YORA in clinical settings.

Increased prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage in rheumatoid arthritis patients with moderate/high disease activity.

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) nasal carriage is a well-known risk factor for surgical site infection (SSI) after total joint arthroplasty. This study aimed to compare the prevalence of S. aureus nasal carriage between patients with osteoarthritis (OA), a degenerative joint disease, and those with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease, who underwent total joint arthroplasty, and to investigate the influence of RA disease activity on nasal carriage rate. METHODS: This retrospective study targeted 508 OA and 107 RA patients who underwent S. aureus nasal screening prior to primary total knee and/or hip arthroplasty. RA patients were divided into two groups based on disease activity: the remission/low disease activity (REM/LDA) group and the moderate/high disease activity (MDA/HDA) group. Factors associated with S. aureus nasal carriage were assessed with multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of all 615 patients, 155 (25%) carried S. aureus in their nares. Compared to OA patients, RA patients had a significantly higher rate of S. aureus nasal carriage (24% vs. 33%, p = 0.049). Compared to the REM/LDA group (n = 39), the MDA/HDA group (n = 58) had a significantly higher rate of S. aureus nasal carriage (21% vs. 41%, p = 0.032). Multivariate analysis revealed that the MDA/HDA group, but not the REM/LDA group, had a significantly higher odds of S. aureus nasal carriage compared to the OA group (odds ratio: 2.76, 95% confidence interval: 1.07-7.12). CONCLUSION: Preoperative nasal screening for S. aureus is beneficial, especially in RA patients with moderate/high disease activity.

Choice of and response to treatment in patients with early-diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis: Real-world data from an inception cohort in Japan (NICER-J).

OBJECTIVE: Various guidelines recommend that patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) try to achieve clinical remission within 6 months, and early therapeutic intervention is important to this end. This study aimed to investigate short-term treatment outcomes of patients with early-diagnosed RA in clinical practice and to examine predictive factors for achieving remission. METHODS: Of the 210 patients enrolled in the multicenter RA inception cohort, 172 patients who were followed up to 6 months after treatment initiation (baseline) were included. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the impact of baseline characteristics on achievement of Boolean remission at 6 months. RESULTS: Participants (mean age, 62 years) initiated treatment after a mean of 19 days from RA diagnosis. At baseline and 3 and 6 months after treatment initiation, proportions of patients using methotrexate (MTX) were 87.8%, 89.0%, and 88.3%, respectively, and rates of Boolean remission were 1.8%, 27.8%, and 34.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that physician global assessment (PhGA) (Odds ratio (OR): 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71-0.99) and glucocorticoid use (OR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.10-0.65) at baseline were independent factors that predicted Boolean remission at 6 months. CONCLUSION: After a diagnosis of RA, satisfactory therapeutic effects were achieved at 6 months after the initiation of treatment centered on MTX according to the treat to target strategy. PhGA and glucocorticoid use at treatment initiation are useful for predicting the achievement of treatment goals.

Predictive factors for achievement of treatment goals in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis treated with denosumab.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate efficacy of long-term treatment with denosumab and predictive factors for achievement of treatment goals in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO). METHODS: We enrolled 111 PMO patients who had T-scores ≤-2.5 either at the lumbar spine (L-) or femoral neck (FN-), who had never been treated for osteoporosis, and who could be followed for at least 3 years. We first evaluated changes in bone mineral density (BMD) for up to 7 years. We next defined the treatment goal as the achievement of a T-score >-2.5 at month 36 and performed multivariate analysis to identify predictive factors for achievement of the goal. RESULTS: Lumbar spine- and femoral neck bone-mineral density increased yearly for 7 years. Among 87 patients with baseline L-T-scores ≤-2.5, better baseline L-T-scores predicted achievement of L-T-scores >-2.5 at month 36. The cut-off value for baseline L-T-score was -3.4. Among 76 patients with baseline FN-T-scores ≤-2.5, better baseline FN-T-scores predicted achievement of FN-T-scores >-2.5 at month 36. The cut-off value for baseline FN-T-scores was -2.8. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment with denosumab was effective in PMO patients. As better baseline T-score predicted achievement of T-scores >-2.5, early initiation of treatment will contribute to better outcome.

Risk factors for denosumab discontinuation in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVES: Persistence with treatment is key to achieving successful treatment outcomes in patients with osteoporosis. We investigated risk factors for denosumab discontinuation in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO). METHODS: A total of 333 patients with PMO who had never received osteoporosis treatment were included in this study. Baseline demographics and retention rate of denosumab were evaluated in all patients. Univariate analysis was performed in patients divided into two groups according to whether they had continued or discontinued denosumab. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine risk factors for denosumab discontinuation. RESULTS: The mean age was 80.7 years, the body mass index (BMI) was 21.5 kg/m2, and T-scores for the lumbar spine and femoral neck were -2.7 and -2.8, respectively. The retention rate of denosumab at 36 months was 50.3%. Patients who continued denosumab were younger and had higher BMI, serum albumin (Alb) levels, lumbar spine bone mineral density, and fewer vertebral fractures (VFs), compared with those who discontinued denosumab. The Cox proportional hazards model revealed that a low BMI, low serum Alb levels, and a high number of VFs are independent risk factors for denosumab discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: A low BMI, low serum Alb levels, and a high number of VFs were associated with denosumab discontinuation in patients with PMO.

Factors associated with frailty in rheumatoid arthritis patients with decreased renal function.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate factors associated with frailty in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with decreased renal function. METHODS: RA patients who visited outpatient clinics from June to August 2021 were included (N = 625). Patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 were defined as having decreased renal function (N = 221) and divided into the non-frailty (N = 153) and frailty (N = 58) groups. Patient characteristics were compared between the two groups by univariate analysis. Significant factors in univariate analysis were assessed by logistic regression analysis to determine their association with frailty in patients with decreased renal function. RESULTS: Patients in the frailty group were older (74.0 vs.79.0 years) and had a longer duration of disease (11.1 vs. 17.8 years), higher Disease Activity Score erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR; 2.99 vs. 3.80), higher Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (0.42 vs. 1.43), and a lower rate of methotrexate (MTX) use (46.4% vs. 25.9) compared to those in the non-frailty group. Factors associated with frailty in patients with decreased renal function were age (odds ratio: 1.07), duration of disease (1.06), DAS28-ESR (1.85), and MTX use (0.42). CONCLUSIONS: Among factors associated with frailty in RA patients with decreased renal function, improving DAS28-ESR is likely to be the most feasible approach to promote recovery from frailty (200/200 words).

Age and symptoms at onset of ankylosing spondylitis in Japanese patients.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the age at onset and initial symptoms as clinical features of ankylosing spondylitis in Japanese patients. METHODS: This retrospective study included 60 Japanese patients diagnosed with ankylosing spondylitis at our institute between January 2004 and June 2021. Initial symptoms were considered pain in axial joints and/or extra-axial joints. If a patient had initial symptoms at multiple sites, each site was counted. We assessed trends for the number of patients and sites of initial symptoms according to age at onset. RESULTS: Mean age (± standard deviation) at onset was 28.9 (± 14.3) years. Approximately one-third of patients experienced onset before age 20. The back was the most common site of initial symptoms (36.7%), followed by the hip (26.7%), knee (15%), buttocks (15%), neck (10%), finger (6.7%), shoulder (3.3%), and others (including overlapping sites). Thirty-two (53.3%) and 25 (41.7%) patients had initial symptoms only in axial joints and only in extra-axial joints, respectively. The proportion of patients with initial symptoms only in extra-axial joints significantly decreased with increasing age (p = .024). CONCLUSIONS: Sites of initial symptoms were frequently the back, hip, knee, and buttocks, and 41.7% had initial symptoms only in extra-axial joints. Younger onset patients frequently had extra-axial involvement.

Effectiveness of tacrolimus concomitant with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and tolerance of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) therapy administered concomitantly with tacrolimus (TAC) treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: 2792 patients who underwent therapy with five bDMARDs (etanercept: ETN, adalimumab, golimumab, tocilizumab, and abatacept: ABT) were enrolled. Among the study subjects, 1582 were concomitant methotrexate (MTX group), 147 were concomitant TAC (TAC group), and 1063 were non-concomitant MTX and TAC (non-MTX/TAC group). The primary outcome was the incident rate of discontinuation of bDMARDs by adverse events (AEs) or loss of efficacy. RESULTS: Concerning the analysis for each reasons of discontinuation, including AEs and loss of efficacy, the hazards ratio (HR) was significantly lower in the TAC group than in non-MTX/TAC groups (AEs: HR = 0.39, 95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.68, loss of efficacy: HR = 0.49, 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.78). The loss of efficacy with the use of ETN and ABT was lower in the TAC group than in non-MTX/TAC groups. Concomitant TAC did not induce elevated risk for discontinuation of AEs in all bDMARD analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant TAC with ABT or ETN showed higher retention rates than bDMARDs therapy without TAC or MTX. AEs did not increase over long-term observation.

Reasons and risk factors for discontinuation of treatment with any biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A long-term observational study.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) usually switch to a second biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) when the first has proven to be ineffective, although some may discontinue bDMARDs treatment altogether. We investigated the total rate of bDMARDs retention and the risk of bDMARDs discontinuation in patients with RA. METHODS: The study included 564 patients with RA who started bDMARDs treatment before 2008 (<65 years old, n = 413; ≥65, n = 151). The primary outcome was the incidence of bDMARDs discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs). Risk factors were examined using Fine and Gray regression models. RESULTS: Among 564 patients, 74 had discontinued bDMARDs treatment due to AEs. Male sex and Steinbrocker class 3-4 were more frequent, while rheumatoid factor and concomitant methotrexate treatment were less frequent, in those aged ≥65 years than in those aged <65 years, respectively. The subdistribution hazard ratio for discontinuation was significantly higher in the ≥65 group than in the <65 years group (hazard ratio = 3.53, 95% confidence interval = 2.07-6.03). Lack of concomitant treatment with MTX was risk factor for discontinuation in patients ≥65 years. Advanced Steinbrocker class was a risk factor in patients <65 years. CONCLUSIONS: Older patients are at higher risk of discontinuing bDMARDs treatment due to AEs than younger patients.

Non-drug and surgical treatment algorithm and recommendations for the 2020 update of the Japan College of Rheumatology clinical practice guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis-secondary publication.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to update the Japan College of Rheumatology (JCR) clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and prepare an algorithm for non-drug and surgical treatments. This article is a digest version of the guidelines. METHODS: The Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare's research group, in collaboration with the JCR, used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method to update the 2014 JCR CPG for RA. The consensus was formed by CPG panel members. RESULTS: We raised 19 clinical questions regarding non-drug and surgical treatments for RA and developed recommendations. The treatments included exercise therapy; occupational therapy; joint injection of corticosteroids; and orthopaedic surgeries including cervical spine surgery, wrist and foot arthroplasty, ankle arthrodesis, and replacement arthroplasty of the shoulder, elbow, finger, hip, knee, and ankle. Recommendations regarding the risks of surgery and perioperative discontinuation of medications have also been developed. Based on these recommendations, we created an original algorithm for the non-drug and surgical treatment of RA. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations are expected to serve rheumatologists, health care professionals, and patients with RA as tools for shared decision-making to treat residual limb joint symptoms and functional impairment.

Drug treatment algorithm and recommendations from the 2020 update of the Japan College of Rheumatology clinical practice guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis-secondary publication.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to update the Japan College of Rheumatology (JCR) clinical practice guidelines (CPG) for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA; JCR CPG for RA) according to recent changes in the medical environment in Japan. This article is a digest version of the guidance. METHODS: We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method to update the 2014 JCR CPG for RA. A consensus was formed by CPG panel members. RESULTS: We identified 36 important clinical questions regarding drug treatment and developed corresponding recommendations for RA. The recommendations included the following RA medications: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, anti-receptor activator for nuclear factor-κB ligand antibodies, and Janus kinase inhibitors, as well as the tapering and discontinuation of these medications. Recommendations regarding the efficacy and safety of treatments in the elderly and patients with comorbidities were also developed. Finally, we used these recommendations to create an original algorithm for drug treatment for RA based on the Treat-to-Target approach. CONCLUSION: The 2020 JCR CPG for RA provides a useful tool for rheumatologists, health care professionals, and patients with RA, enabling shared decision-making in a variety of clinical situations.

Disease activity at baseline is an independent predictor of frailty at one year in pre-frail patients with rheumatoid arthritis; a multicenter retrospective observational study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate factors predicting frailty for one year in pre-frail patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHOD: A total of 298 RA patients who were pre-frail in 2020 were evaluated in this structured, retrospective observational study. Of the 298 patients, 42 who were frail and 256 who were not in 2021 were assigned to the frailty and non-frailty groups, respectively. After comparing characteristics of both groups using univariate analysis, predictive factors of frailty were assessed by logistic regression analysis. The proportion of frail patients in 2021 by DAS28-ESR level in 2020 was examined by the Cochran-Armitage trend test and chi-squared test. After dividing pre-frail patients into those with DAS28-ESR ≥3.2 and DAS28-ESR <3.2 in 2020, one-year change in DAS28-ESR in the frailty and non-frailty groups for both subgroups were compared by the paired t-test. RESULTS: The frailty group was older (mean: 71.0 vs. 65.4 years) and had a higher DAS28-ESR (mean: 3.22 vs. 2.70) than the non-frailty group. DAS28-ESR was identified as a predictive factor for frailty (OR: 1.49). Among patients with DAS28-ESR ≥3.2 in 2020, DAS28-ESR improved in the non-frailty group in 2021 (mean: 3.97 in 2020 vs. 3.13 in 2021) but did not in the frailty group (3.97 in 2020 vs. 3.81 in 2021). Among those with DAS28-ESR <3.2 in 2020, DAS28-ESR was unchanged in the non-frailty group in 2021 (2.15 in 2020 vs. 2.23 in 2021) but increased in the frailty group (2.53 in 2020 vs. 3.23 in 2021). CONCLUSIONS: Disease activity at baseline is an independent predictor of frailty one year later in pre-frail patients with RA.

Relationship between locomotive syndrome and frailty in rheumatoid arthritis patients by locomotive syndrome stage.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the association between locomotive syndrome (LS) and frailty in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. METHODS: Subjects were 538 RA patients (female, 72.9%; mean age ± standard deviation, 66.8 ± 13.4 years). LS and frailty were defined as ≥16 points on the 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (Stage ≥2) and ≥8 points on the Kihon Checklist (KCL), respectively. RESULTS: There were 214 subjects with Stage ≥2 LS (39.8%) and 213 subjects with frailty (39.6%). Among subjects with Stage 0, 1, 2, and 3 LS, 11.0%, 21.9%, 48.3%, and 84.6% had frailty, respectively. The KCL points for cognitive and psychosocial factors had no significant differences across LS stages. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that the Health Assessment Questionnaire was independently associated with frailty and LS stage, and the Clinical Disease Activity Index was associated with LS stage but not frailty. CONCLUSIONS: As LS worsens in RA patients, the likelihood of developing physical frailty increases. RA patients with a low LS stage can still develop frailty, and suppressing disease activity may not be sufficient to prevent frailty. These findings highlight the need to screen for frailty in RA patients and consider appropriate interventions based on each patient's condition, focusing on nonphysical factors.

Does exercise therapy improve patient-reported outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis? A systematic review and meta-analysis for the update of the 2020 JCR guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of exercise therapy on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as part of the process of updating the 2020 Japanese guidelines for the management of RA according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Japana Centra Revuo Medicina Web, and the Cochrane Library (from 2009 to 2018) to identify articles that evaluated PROs of exercise therapy and RA disease activity. RESULTS: A total of 662 articles were identified, including nine RCTs, and meta-analyses were performed on six RCTs on systemic exercise therapy and three RCTs on upper extremity exercise therapy. Analyzed exercise therapies were diverse, differing in target population, intervention method, and duration. Significant improvements were observed in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (mean difference -0.35, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.60 to -0.10), pain (standardized mean difference -2.04, 95% CI: -3.77 to -0.32), and SF-36. For upper extremity exercise therapy, significant improvements in PROs (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire, Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire) were observed. CONCLUSION: Exercise therapy in RA treatment improves patient subjective assessment of pain, physical function, and quality of life.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of biosimilar for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis informing the 2020 update of the Japan College of Rheumatology clinical practice guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of biosimilars compared with reference biological disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as a part of the process of developing the 2020 update of the Japan College of Rheumatology guidelines for the management of RA. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Japan Centra Revuo Medicina were searched for articles to conduct a systematic review (SR). The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. RESULTS: Twenty randomized controlled trials were included (biosimilars of infliximab, etanercept, and adalimumab). A meta-analysis revealed that the risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of achieving the American College of Rheumatology 50% response (ACR50) at week 24 and serious adverse events (SAEs) for biosimilars compared with the reference bDMARDs were 1.04 (0.98-1.10) and 0.84 (0.61-1.18), respectively. The RRs of achieving ACR50 and SAEs at week 24 were respectively 0.93 (0.69-1.26) and 2.15 (0.55-8.35) in the patients who switched to biosimilars from the reference bDMARDs and 0.92 (0.76-1.12) and 1.41 (0.32-6.15) in those who continued the reference bDMARDs. CONCLUSION: Biosimilars and reference bDMARDs were equally useful for the management of RA.

Patient satisfaction with total joint replacement surgery for rheumatoid arthritis: a questionnaire survey for the 2020 update of the Japan college of rheumatology clinical practice guidelines.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate satisfaction with total joint replacement (TJR) surgery among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We mailed questionnaires to randomly selected members of the Japan Rheumatism Friendship Association, stratified by age and prefecture, throughout Japan. The questionnaire collected demographic and clinical characteristics as well as patients' satisfaction with TJR and their current therapy. RESULTS: Of the 1156 patients who returned the questionnaire, 339 (29.3%) responded that they had had TJR of any type. The mean age was 66.6 years, and 94.4% were women. The mean time period from the hip and knee TJR was 14-15 years. Over half of the patients who had had TJR were satisfied with the results, especially those who had had hip (89.6%) and knee TJR (87.3%), who reported a high level of satisfaction. Multivariable linear regression analysis revealed that, in patients with knee TJR, satisfaction with current therapy was significantly related to whether they were satisfied with the results of the surgery. CONCLUSION: Most patients with RA who had undergone TJR were satisfied with the results even after a long period of time, and their level of satisfaction was associated with their satisfaction with current therapy.

Systematic review for the treatment of older rheumatoid arthritis patients informing the 2020 update of the Japan College of Rheumatology clinical practice guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To provide an evidence base for clinical practice guidelines (CPG) for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in older adults. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane library, and Japan Centra Revuo Medicina databases were searched for articles published between 1990 and 2019. Quality of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system, with some modifications. RESULTS: Among 702 identified articles, there were 5 post-hoc analyses of randomized controlled trials and 10 observational studies. Meta-analysis of the former yielded a mean difference of the van der Heijde-modified total Sharp score of -2.79 (95% confidence interval [CI] - 3.74 to -1.84) for treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. The risk ratio (RR) for the American College of Rheumatology 50% response rate, and for serious adverse events was 2.83 (95%CI 1.90-4.21) and 1.32 (95%CI 0.53-3.31), respectively, for Janus kinase inhibitors. Meta-analysis of the observational studies yielded an RR for disease activity score-28 remission and serious infections of 0.76 (95%CI 0.64-0.91) and 1.92 (95%CI 1.31-2.81) for older-versus-younger patients receiving biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, respectively. CONCLUSION: This systematic review provides the necessary evidence for developing CPG for the management of RA in older adults.

Patients' perspectives of rheumatoid arthritis treatment: a questionnaire survey for the 2020 update of the Japan college of rheumatology clinical practice guidelines.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate patients' opinions regarding their rheumatoid arthritis (RA) therapy and to reflect the patients' perspectives in the 2020 update of the Japan College of Rheumatology clinical practice guidelines. METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire was mailed to 1600 members of the Japan Rheumatology Friendship Association, who were randomly selected by age and prefecture. RESULTS: A total of 1156 patients returned the questionnaire (response rate, 72.3%; mean age, 63.0 ± 11.9 years). Those who reported having discussed their treatment goals with their doctors (450 respondents, 38.9%) were more likely to be satisfied with their current medical care (odds ratio, 7.13; 95% CI 4.72-10.8) compared with those who had not discussed their goals nor had them explained (287 respondents, 24.8%). The benefits exceeded the adverse effects for all pharmacotherapy (methotrexate, corticosteroids, conventional synthetic antirheumatic drugs, biological agents, Janus kinase inhibitor, and anti-RANKL antibodies). However, while 74.2% of the respondents using biological agents perceived that 'the favorable aspects outweighed the unfavorable aspects,' most of those taking anti-RANKL antibodies (69.2%) felt uncertain. CONCLUSIONS: The questionnaire successfully collected information regarding patients' perceptions regarding their therapy. Further implementation of treat-to-target is necessary in Japan to improve patient satisfaction.