Influence of bioaugmentation and biostimulation on PAH degradation in aged contaminated soils: Response and dynamics of the bacterial community.

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) represent a group of hazardous compounds that are ubiquitous and persistent. The main aim of this study was to investigate the degradation of PAHs in chronically contaminated, aged and weathered soils obtained from a former gas plant of Australia. Biostimulation and bioaugmentation using individual isolates (Rhodococcus sp. (NH2), Achromobacter sp. (NH13), Oerskovia paurometabola (NH11), Pantoea sp. (NH15), Sejongia sp. (NH20), Microbacterium maritypicum (NH30) and Arthrobacter equi (NH21)) and a consortium of these isolates were tested during mesocosm studies. A significant reduction (99%) in PAH concentration was observed in all the treatments. In terms of the abundance of PAH-degrading genes and microbial community structure during PAH degradation, qPCR results revealed that Gram-positive bacteria were dominant over other bacterial communities in all the treatments. 16S sequencing results revealed that the inoculated organisms did not establish themselves during the treatment. However, substantial bacterial community changes during the treatments were observed, suggesting that the natural community exhibited sufficient resilience and diversity to enable an active, but changing degrading community at all stages of the degradation process. Consequently, biostimulation is proposed as the best strategy to remediate PAHs in aged, weathered and chronically contaminated soils.

Bioremediation potential of diesel-contaminated Libyan soil.

Bioremediation is a broadly applied environmentally friendly and economical treatment for the clean-up of sites contaminated by petroleum hydrocarbons. However, the application of this technology to contaminated soil in Libya has not been fully exploited. In this study, the efficacy of different bioremediation processes (necrophytoremediation using pea straw, bioaugmentation and a combination of both treatments) together with natural attenuation were assessed in diesel contaminated Libyan soils. The addition of pea straw was found to be the best bioremediation treatment for cleaning up diesel contaminated Libyan soil after 12 weeks. The greatest TPH degradation, 96.1% (18,239.6mgkg(-1)) and 95% (17,991.14mgkg(-1)) were obtained when the soil was amended with pea straw alone and in combination with a hydrocarbonoclastic consortium respectively. In contrast, natural attenuation resulted in a significantly lower TPH reduction of 76% (14,444.5mgkg(-1)). The presence of pea straw also led to a significant increased recovery of hydrocarbon degraders; 5.7log CFU g(-1) dry soil, compared to 4.4log CFUg(-1) dry soil for the untreated (natural attenuation) soil. DGGE and Illumina 16S metagenomic analyses confirm shifts in bacterial communities compared with original soil after 12 weeks incubation. In addition, metagenomic analysis showed that original soil contained hydrocarbon degraders (e.g. Pseudoxanthomonas spp. and Alcanivorax spp.). However, they require a biostimulant (in this case pea straw) to become active. This study is the first to report successful oil bioremediation with pea straw in Libya. It demonstrates the effectiveness of pea straw in enhancing bioremediation of the diesel-contaminated Libyan soil.

Impact of necrophytoremediation on petroleum hydrocarbon degradation, ecotoxicity and soil bacterial community composition in diesel-contaminated soil.

Hydrocarbon degradation is usually measured in laboratories under controlled conditions to establish the likely efficacy of a bioremediation process in the field. The present study used greenhouse-based bioremediation to investigate the effects of natural attenuation (NA) and necrophytoremediation (addition of pea straw (PS)) on hydrocarbon degradation, toxicity and the associated bacterial community structure and composition in diesel-contaminated soil. A significant reduction in total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) concentration was detected in both treatments; however, PS-treated soil showed more rapid degradation (87%) after 5 months together with a significant reduction in soil toxicity (EC50 = 91 mg diesel/kg). Quantitative PCR analysis revealed an increase in the number of 16S rRNA and alkB genes in the PS-amended soil. Substantial shifts in soil bacterial community were observed during the bioremediation, including an increased abundance of numerous hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria. The bacterial community shifted from dominance by Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria in the original soil to Actinobacteria during bioremediation. The dominance of two genera of bacteria, Sphingobacteria and Betaproteobacteria, in both NA- and PS-treated soil demonstrated changes occurring within the soil bacterial community through the incubation period. Additionally, pea straw itself was found to harbour a diverse hydrocarbonoclastic community including Luteimonas, Achromobacter, Sphingomonas, Rhodococcus and Microbacterium. At the end of the experiment, PS-amended soil exhibited reduced ecotoxicity and increased bacterial diversity as compared with the NA-treated soil. These findings suggest the rapid growth of species stimulated by the bioremediation treatment and strong selection for bacteria capable of degrading petroleum hydrocarbons during necrophytoremediation. Graphical abstract.

Soil bioremediation approaches for petroleum hydrocarbon polluted environments.

Increasing industrialisation, continued population growth and heavy demand and reliance on petrochemical products have led to unprecedented economic growth and development. However, inevitably this dependence on fossil fuels has resulted in serious environmental issues over recent decades. The eco-toxicity and the potential health implications that petroleum hydrocarbons pose for both environmental and human health have led to increased interest in developing environmental biotechnology-based methodologies to detoxify environments impacted by petrogenic compounds. Different approaches have been applied for remediating polluted sites with petroleum derivatives. Bioremediation represents an environmentally sustainable and economical emerging technology for maximizing the metabolism of organic pollutants and minimizing the ecological effects of oil spills. Bioremediation relies on microbial metabolic activities in the presence of optimal ecological factors and necessary nutrients to transform organic pollutants such as petrogenic hydrocarbons. Although, biodegradation often takes longer than traditional remediation methods, the complete degradation of the contaminant is often accomplished. Hydrocarbon biodegradation in soil is determined by a number of environmental and biological factors varying from site to site such as the pH of the soil, temperature, oxygen availability and nutrient content, the growth and survival of hydrocarbon-degrading microbes and bioavailability of pollutants to microbial attack. In this review we have attempted to broaden the perspectives of scientists working in bioremediation. We focus on the most common bioremediation technologies currently used for soil remediation and the mechanisms underlying the degradation of petrogenic hydrocarbons by microorganisms.

Comparison of rapid solvent extraction systems for the GC-MS/MS characterization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in aged, contaminated soil.

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are a major class of organic hydrocarbons with high molecular weight that originate from both natural and anthropogenic sources. Sixteen PAHs are included in the U.S Environmental Protection agency list of priority pollutants due to their mutagenic, carcinogenic, toxic and teratogenic properties. In this study, the development and optimization of a simplified and rapid solvent extraction for the characterisation of 16 USEPA priority poly aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in aged contaminated soils was established with subsequent analysis by GC-MS/MS. •Five different extraction solvent systems: dichloromethane: acetone, chloroform: methanol, dichloromethane, acetone: hexane and hexane were assessed in terms of their ability to extract PAHs from aged PAH-contaminated soils.•Highest PAH concentrations were extracted using acetone: hexane and chloroform: methanol. Given the greater toxicity associated with chloroform: methanol, acetone: hexane appears the best choice of solvent extraction system.•This protocol enables efficient extraction of PAHs from aged weathered soils.