Epitope analysis of the FanC subunit protein of the K99 (F5) fimbriae of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli using a recombinant fusion technique.

We have used a recombinant approach to characterise the B- and T-cell epitopes of FanC, the major subunit polypeptide of K99 (F5) fimbriae of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli strains. This involved the fusion of FanC and its carboxy-terminal truncated derivatives to a reporter, the E. coli alkaline phosphatase (PhoA), generating stable, recombinant fusions. The B-cell epitopes of FanC were characterised by Western blotting of FanC::PhoA fusion proteins with a polyclonal mouse antiserum directed against K99 fimbrial antigen, and with a panel of monoclonal antibodies generated to the K99 antigen. An attempt to characterise the T-cell epitopes of the fimbrial subunit was made by standard in vitro T-cell proliferation assay. Our results suggest that the B-cell epitopes of FanC are likely to be continuous, with a potentially immunodominant epitope at the carboxy-terminus. However, T-cell proliferation assays with the FanC::PhoA fusion proteins did not indicate any immunodominant T-cell epitope(s). We hypothesise that fusion of FanC peptides to PhoA had resulted in altered folding of the peptides for antibody and T-cell recognition, highlighting the potential problems and drawbacks of the recombinant fusion technique in defining the epitopes of certain proteins.

DNA vaccines expressing the duck hepatitis B virus surface proteins lead to reduced numbers of infected hepatocytes and protect ducks against the development of chronic infection in a virus dose-dependent manner.

We tested the efficacy of DNA vaccines expressing the duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV) pre-surface (pre-S/S) and surface (S) proteins in modifying the outcome of infection in 14-day-old ducks. In two experiments, Pekin Aylesbury ducks were vaccinated on days 4 and 14 of age with plasmid DNA vaccines expressing either the DHBV pre-S/S or S proteins, or the control plasmid vector, pcDNA1.1Amp. All ducks were then challenged intravenously on day 14 of age with 5 x 10(7) or 5 x 10(8) DHBV genomes. Levels of initial DHBV infection were assessed using liver biopsy tissue collected at day 4 post-challenge (p.c.) followed and immunostained for DHBV surface antigen to determine the percentage of infected hepatocytes. All vector vaccinated ducks challenged with 5 x 10(7) and 5 x 10(8) DHBV genomes had an average of 3.21% and 20.1% of DHBV-positive hepatocytes respectively at day 4 p.c. and 16 out of 16 ducks developed chronic DHBV infection. In contrast, pre-S/S and S vaccinated ducks challenged with 5 x 10(7) DHBV genomes had reduced levels of initial infection with an average of 1.38% and 1.93% of DHBV-positive hepatocytes at day 4 p.c. respectively and 10 of 18 ducks were protected against chronic infection. The pre-S/S and the S DNA vaccinated ducks challenged with 5 x 10(8) DHBV genomes had an average of 31.5% and 9.2% of DHBV-positive hepatocytes on day 4 p.c. respectively and only 4 of the 18 vaccinated ducks were protected against chronic infection. There was no statistically significant difference in the efficacy of the DHBV pre-S/S or S DNA vaccines. In conclusion, vaccination of young ducks with DNA vaccines expressing the DHBV pre-S/S and S proteins induced rapid immune responses that reduced the extent of initial DHBV infection in the liver and prevented the development of chronic infection in a virus dose-dependent manner.

Vaccination of ducks with a whole-cell vaccine expressing duck hepatitis B virus core antigen elicits antiviral immune responses that enable rapid resolution of de novo infection.

As a first step in developing immuno-therapeutic vaccines for patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection, we examined the ability of a whole-cell vaccine, expressing the duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV) core antigen (DHBcAg), to target infected cells leading to the resolution of de novo DHBV infections. Three separate experiments were performed. In each experiment, ducks were vaccinated at 7 and 14 days of age with primary duck embryonic fibroblasts (PDEF) that had been transfected 48 h earlier with plasmid DNA expressing DHBcAg with and without the addition of anti-DHBcAg (anti-DHBc) antibodies. Control ducks were injected with either 0.7% NaCl or non-transfected PDEF. The ducks were then challenged at 18 days of age by intravenous inoculation with DHBV (5 x 10(8) viral genome equivalents). Liver biopsies obtained on day 4 post-challenge demonstrated that vaccination did not prevent infection of the liver as similar numbers of infected hepatocytes were detected in all vaccinated and control ducks. However, analysis of liver tissue obtained 9 or more days post-challenge revealed that 9 out of 11 of the PDEF-DHBcAg vaccinated ducks and 8 out of 11 ducks vaccinated with PDEF-DHBcAg plus anti-DHBc antibodies had rapidly resolved the DHBV infection with clearance of infected cells. In contrast, 10 out of 11 of the control unvaccinated ducks developed chronic DHBV infection. In conclusion, vaccination of ducks with a whole-cell PDEF vaccine expressing DHBcAg elicited immune responses that induced a rapid resolution of DHBV infection. The results establish that chronic infection can be prevented via the vaccine-mediated induction of a core-antigen-specific immune response.

Effect of antiviral treatment with entecavir on age- and dose-related outcomes of duck hepatitis B virus infection.

Entecavir (ETV), a potent inhibitor of the hepadnaviral polymerases, prevented the development of persistent infection when administered in the early stages of duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV) infection. In a preliminary experiment, ETV treatment commenced 24 h before infection showed no significant advantage over simultaneous ETV treatment and infection. In two further experiments 14-day-old ducks were inoculated with DHBV-positive serum containing 10(4), 10(6), 10(8), or 5 x 10(8) viral genomes (vge) and were treated orally with 1.0 mg/kg of body weight/day of ETV for 14 or 49 days. A relationship between virus dose and infection outcome was seen: non-ETV-treated ducks inoculated with 10(4) vge had transient infection, while ducks inoculated with higher doses developed persistent infection. ETV treatment for 49 days did not prevent initial infection of the liver but restricted the spread of infection more than approximately 1,000-fold, a difference which persisted throughout treatment and for up to 49 days after withdrawal. Ultimately, three of seven ETV-treated ducks resolved their DHBV infection, while the remaining ducks developed viremia and persistent infection after a lag period of at least 63 days. ETV treatment for 14 days also restricted the spread of infection, leading to marked and sustained reductions in the number of DHBV-positive hepatocytes in 7 out of 10 ducks. In conclusion, short-term suppression with ETV provides opportunity for the immune response to successfully control DHBV infection. Since DHBV infection of ducks provides a good model system for HBV infection in humans, it seems likely that ETV may be useful in postexposure therapy for HBV infection aimed at preventing the development of persistent infection.

Entecavir therapy combined with DNA vaccination for persistent duck hepatitis B virus infection.

This study was designed to test the efficacy of antiviral treatment with entecavir (ETV) in combination with DNA vaccines expressing duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV) antigens as a therapy for persistent DHBV infection in ducks. Ducks were inoculated with 10(9) DHBV genomes at 7 days of age, leading to widespread infection of the liver and viremia within 7 days, and were then treated orally with either ETV (0.1 mg/kg of body weight/day) or distilled water from 21 days posthatch for 244 days. Treatment with ETV caused a 4-log drop in serum DHBV DNA levels within 80 days and a slower 2- to 3-log drop in serum DHBV surface antigen (DHBsAg) levels within 120 days. Following withdrawal of ETV, levels of serum DHBV DNA and DHBsAg rebounded to match those in the water-treated animals within 40 days. Sequential liver biopsy samples collected throughout the study showed that ETV treatment reduced DHBV DNA replicative intermediates 70-fold in the liver, while the level of the stable, template form, covalently closed circular DNA decreased only 4-fold. ETV treatment reduced both the intensity of antigen staining and the percentage of antigen-positive hepatocytes in the liver, but the intensity of antigen staining in bile duct cells appeared not to be effected. Intramuscular administration of five doses of a DNA vaccine expressing the DHBV presurface, surface, precore, and core antigens, both alone and concurrently with ETV treatment, on days 50, 64, 78, 127, and 141 did not result in any significant effect on viral markers.