Mortality patterns in Dutch diabetes outpatients.

AIM: Diabetes mellitus is a major cause of death. Outpatients with diabetes have more complications than patients in general practice; mortality patterns have only been studied in the total diabetes population. This study aims to assess mortality, causes, and predictors in outpatients with diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort study, included people with diabetes mellitus from the nationwide Dutch Paediatric and Adult Registry of Diabetes (DPARD) visiting diabetes outpatient clinics in 2016-2020. DPARD data were linked to Statistics Netherlands (CBS), comprising data on mortality, ethnicity and education. All-cause and cardiovascular mortality rates were estimated using Cox proportional hazard regression. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 3.1 years among 12 992 people with diabetes, mortality rates per 10 000 person-years were 67.7 in adult type 1 diabetes and 324.2 in type 2 diabetes. The major cause of non-cardiovascular death was malignancy. During the pandemic years of influenza (2018) and COVID (2020), mortality rates peaked. Age, smoking and an estimated glomerular filtration rate of <60 ml/min were associated with all-cause mortality. In type 2 diabetes, additional factors were male sex, body mass index <20 kg/m2, diabetes duration <1 year and hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality among Dutch outpatients with diabetes is high. Smoking and renal failure were associated with mortality in both types. Further focus on early detection and treatment of mortality-associated factors may improve clinical outcomes.

Potency of quality indicators in Dutch and international diabetes registries.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus forms a slow pandemic. Cardiovascular risk and quality of diabetes care are strongly associated. Quality indicators improve diabetes management and reduce mortality and costs. Various national diabetes registries render national quality indicators. We describe diabetes care indicators for Dutch children and adults with diabetes, and compare them with indicators established by registries worldwide. METHODS: Indicator scores were derived from the Dutch Pediatric and Adult Registry of Diabetes Indicator sets of other national diabetes registries were collected and juxtaposed with global and continental initiatives for indicator sets. RESULTS: This observational cohort study included 3738 patients representative of the Dutch diabetic outpatient population. The Dutch Pediatric and Adult Registry of Diabetes harbors ten quality indicators comprising treatment volumes, HbA1c control, foot examination, insulin pump therapy, and real-time continuous glucose monitoring. Worldwide, nine national registries record quality indicators, with great variety between registries. HbA1c control is recorded most frequently, and no indicator is reported among all registries. CONCLUSIONS: Wide variety among quality indicators recorded by national diabetes registries hinders international comparison and interpretation of quality of diabetes care. The potential of quality evaluation will be greatly enhanced when diabetes care indicators are aligned in an international standard set with variation across countries taken into consideration.