RESUMO
The objective of this study was to characterize HIV-serodiscordant heterosexual couples and to evaluate acceptance for HIV testing and HIV prevalence in nonindex partners. We conducted a cross-sectional study with quantitative and qualitative components. Two cohorts of 1767 HIV-positive people were screened to identify heterosexual HIV-serodiscordant couples. HIV-positive partners (index) were administered a questionnaire; CD4, viral load (VL), and antiretroviral therapy (ART) history were gathered from clinical records. HIV-negative/unknown status partners (nonindex) were invited for a similar questionnaire and HIV testing. In-depth interviews with three HIV-serodiscordant couples were conducted. Two hundred and ninety-seven index partners agreed to enroll in this study. The median duration of the relationship was 10 years, and 81% were sexually active. All but two index partners were on ART, and 98% had VL < 1000 copies/mL. Only 111 (37%) nonindex partners came for HIV testing, and all of them tested HIV-negative. In addition, only 41% of nonindex partners had HIV testing in the last one year. The main reasons for the nonindex partners not to come for HIV testing were "no interest" (n = 117, 63%) and "nondisclosure of HIV status" (n = 46, 25%). The latter was substantiated and explained by the qualitative outcome of this study, suggesting relation to stigma against HIV-positive people. Our results support the WHO recommendation for starting ART for treatment and prevention in HIV-serodiscordant couples at any CD4 count. Furthermore, we recommend the dissemination of data showing that no HIV transmission in heterosexual couples through sex practice has been observed provided VL is suppressed. This could be a powerful tool for effective fight against stigma and self-stigma in people living with HIV.
Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Soronegatividade para HIV , Heterossexualidade , Parceiros Sexuais , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/transmissão , Adulto , Contagem de Linfócito CD4 , Estudos Transversais , Características da Família , Feminino , Seguimentos , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Prevalência , Comportamento Sexual , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/prevenção & controle , Inquéritos e Questionários , Tailândia/epidemiologia , Carga ViralRESUMO
Copper intrauterine device (IUD) is not commonly used in many countries, though it provides effective reversible contraception with no or minimal primary systemic side effects. We assessed its uptake and continuation of use among HIV-positive Thai women. Sixty-six of 322 women of reproductive age, whom we approached for the study, met the eligibility criteria. Sterilization (62%) was the main reason for failure to enroll. Twenty-nine of them (44%) underwent IUD insertion. Considering condom use sufficient for pregnancy prevention (12%) was the main reason among eligible women for the refusal to participate in the study. At six months, 54% of enrolled participants reported one or more side effects such as increased menstrual flow (43%), spotting (21%) and dysmenorrhea (11%). The continuation rate of IUD use was high (93%), in spite of the persistent non-systemic side effects. The study showed that copper IUD could be an acceptable contraceptive choice for Thai HIV-positive women. Easy access to the method in a setting linked with the HIV service, and education on IUD risks and benefits is needed to promote the use of IUD in addition to condoms as an effective contraceptive option in HIV-infected women.
Assuntos
Anticoncepção/métodos , Infecções por HIV , Dispositivos Intrauterinos de Cobre/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Preservativos/estatística & dados numéricos , Comportamento Contraceptivo , Países em Desenvolvimento , Serviços de Planejamento Familiar/métodos , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/psicologia , Infecções por HIV/transmissão , Humanos , Dispositivos Intrauterinos de Cobre/efeitos adversos , Gravidez , Medição de Risco , Comportamento Sexual , TailândiaRESUMO
Disclosure of HIV status to family members could improve communication, relationship, and cohesion. We evaluated the impact of a family-centered program designed to increase the readiness/willingness of parents to disclose HIV status to their children. People living with HIV (PLWH) with children ≥8 years were surveyed regarding HIV knowledge, family relationship, attitudes, willingness/readiness to disclose, and they were then invited to participate in group education and family camps. Of 367 PLWH surveyed, 0.8% had disclosed, 14.7% had not yet disclosed but were willing/ready to disclose, 50.4% were willing but not ready, and 33.2% did not wish to disclose. The educational sessions and camps led to significant improvements of HIV knowledge and disclosure techniques, and readiness/willingness to disclose. Given the benefits of group education and family camps in supporting PLWH to improve their communication with their families and disclose their HIV status, these supporting activities should be included in HIV programs.
Assuntos
Família/psicologia , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Soropositividade para HIV/psicologia , Revelação da Verdade , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pais , Inquéritos e Questionários , Tailândia/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: First, to evaluate the longitudinal changes of HIV RNA in genital secretions in HIV-positive women with plasma HIV RNA <50 copies/mL before and after the onset of menopause. Second, to assess inflammatory markers and prevalence of comorbidities after the onset of menopause. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study with two time points. HIV RNA in genital secretions (GVL) was measured in 15 HIV-positive menopausal women (second time point). Results were compared to earlier available data for GVL from the same participant before the onset of menopause (first time point). RESULTS: Median age at the first time point was 42 years, and 52 years at the second time point. Median time since the onset of menopause was 2 years and 33% of women were sexually active. Eighty per cent had at least one comorbidity. The GVL before menopause was >50 copies/mL in 27% of the participants, and in 40% after menopause. The GVL was <1000 copies/mL in all but one measurement. There was no significant difference between the two time points (P=0.687). Intermediate vaginal flora or bacterial vaginosis was found in 73% of participants during the second time point. CONCLUSIONS: There was a high prevalence of low-level GVL shedding before and after menopause. This needs further investigation, especially in relation to the vaginal microbiome and the complex interactions between micro-organisms. HIV-infected women in menopause do not seem to present a major public health risk for HIV transmission. Nevertheless, safe sex should be discussed with all, regardless of age. The high prevalence of non-communicable diseases after menopause requires special attention and comprehensive care.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Effective contraception has been widely promoted for HIV-positive women. However, there are limited data on the interactions between combined hormonal contraceptives and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors . METHODS: This study assessed the steady-state contraceptive effectiveness and safety of combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing 0.150 mg desogestrel /0.030 mg ethinyl estradiol with either nevirapine (NVP) or efavirenz (EFV) in 34 HIV-positive women. The targeted level for contraceptive effectiveness was endogenous progesterone level < 3.0 ng/mL. We measured NVP/EFV plasma concentrations 12 hours after administration (C12) with and without COC. The desired therapeutic levels were >3.1 mg/L for NVP and 1.0-4.0 mg/L for EFV, respectively. RESULTS: All 18 subjects in the NVP group had serum progesterone <1.0 ng/mL. Four of 16 subjects (25%) in the EFV group had serum progesterone >1.0 ng/mL, including 3 subjects with >3.0 ng/mL (might indicate ovulation). The difference in progesterone levels between the 2 groups was statistically significant (P = 0.04). The median C12 of NVP increased insignificantly by 17% with COC; the median C12 of EFV decreased significantly (P = 0.02) by 22%. In 3 of 16 subjects (19%) in the EFV group, C12 of EFV dropped below 1.0 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to NVP, coadministrating desogestrel/ethinyl estradiol containing COC with EFV was associated with unfavorable progesterone and antiretroviral levels. Our results suggest that NVP may be superior to EFV when used with COC in HIV-positive women.