Pancreatic head resection for carcinoma of the ampulla vateri - better long-term prognosis, but more postoperative complications.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatoduodenectomies are complex surgical procedures with a considerable morbidity and mortality even in high-volume centers. However, postoperative morbidity and long-term oncological outcome are not only affected by the surgical procedure itself, but also by the underlying disease. The aim of our study is an analysis of pancreatoduodenectomies for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and ampullary carcinoma (CAMP) concerning postoperative complications and long-term outcome in a tertiary hospital in Germany. METHODS: The perioperative and oncological outcome of 109 pancreatic head resections performed for carcinoma of the ampulla vateri was compared to the outcome of 518 pancreatic head resections for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma over a 20 year-period from January 2002 until December 2021. All operative procedures were performed at the University Hospital Freiburg, Germany. Patient data was analyzed retrospectively, using a prospectively maintained SPSS database. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for differences in surgical and reconstruction technique. Primary outcome of our study was long-term overall survival, secondary outcomes were postoperative complications and 30-day postoperative mortality. Postoperative complications like pancreatic fistula (POPF), postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) and delayed gastric emptying (DGE) were graded following current international definitions. Survival was estimated using Kaplan Meier curves and log-rank tests. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Operation time was significantly longer in PDAC patients (432 vs. 391 min, p < 0.001). The rate of portal vein resections was significantly higher in PDAC patients (p < 0.001). In CAMP patients, a pancreatogastrostomy as reconstruction technique was performed more frequently compared to PDAC patients (48.6% vs. 29.9%, p < 0.001) and there was a trend towards more laparoscopic surgeries in CAMP patients (p = 0.051). After propensity score matching, we found no difference in DGE B/C and PPH B/C (p = 0.389; p = 0.517), but a significantly higher rate of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) in patients with pancreatoduodenectomies due to ampullary carcinoma (30.7% vs. 16.8%, p < 0.001). Long-term survival was significantly better in CAMP patients (42 vs. 24 months, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Patients with pancreatoduodenectomies due to ampullary carcinomas showed a better long-term oncological survival, by reason of the better prognosis of this tumor entity. However, these patients often needed a more elaborated postoperative treatment due to the higher rate of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula in this group.

Banded gastric bypass - four years follow up in a prospective multicenter analysis.

BACKGROUND: The gastric bypass is the gold standard of bariatric surgery. Nevertheless some patients show insufficient weight loss or weight regain. Dilation of the pouch or the pouch outlet may be the cause. The banded gastric bypass tries to overcome dilation by placing an implant around the pouch or pouch outlet. In this study we describe our results using the GaBP™ ring system in banded gastric bypass operations in 3 bariatric centers. METHODS: 183 patients in 3 bariatric reference centers received a banded gastric bypass operation using the GaBP™ ring system. Up to 4 years follow up was evaluated including weight loss and complications. RESULTS: Mean EWL after 6 Months was 60% with a mean BMI of 30.1 kg/m2. After one year mean EWL reached 75.3% with a mean BMI of 27 kg/m2 (110 patients). After two and three years the EWL was 78.8% (n = 49) and 79.9% (n = 35). There was a mean EWL of 85% after 4 years. Thirteen patients finished a 4 year follow up period and mean BMI after 4 years was 25.2 kg/m2. In the perioperative and early postoperative period there was a low complication rate (4.3%). Stenosis or dysphagia was observed in only one patient. There was only one ring related complication. CONCLUSION: Banded gastric bypass using the GaBP™ ring system allows good weight loss with no regain of weight in a four year follow up. The complication rate is low. A randomized controlled trial is currently underway to compare banded and conventional gastric bypass.

Pylorus preserving loop duodeno-enterostomy with sleeve gastrectomy - preliminary results.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric operations mostly combine a restrictive gastric component with a rerouting of the intestinal passage. The pylorus can thereby be alternatively preserved or excluded. With the aim of performing a "pylorus-preserving gastric bypass", we present early results of a proximal postpyloric loop duodeno-jejunostomy associated with a sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) compared to results of a parallel, but distal LSG with a loop duodeno-ileostomy as a two-step procedure. METHODS: 16 patients underwent either a two-step LSG with a distal loop duodeno-ileostomy (DIOS) as revisional bariatric surgery or a combined single step operation with a proximal duodeno-jejunostomy (DJOS). Total small intestinal length was determined to account for inter-individual differences. RESULTS: Mean operative time for the second-step of the DIOS operation was 121 min and 147 min for the combined DJOS operation. The overall intestinal length was 750.8 cm (range 600-900 cm) with a bypassed limb length of 235.7 cm in DJOS patients. The mean length of the common channel in DIOS patients measured 245.6 cm. Overall excess weight loss (%EWL) of the two-step DIOS procedure came to 38.31% and 49.60%, DJOS patients experienced an %EWL of 19.75% and 46.53% at 1 and 6 months, resp. No complication related to the duodeno-enterostomy occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Loop duodeno-enterosomies with sleeve gastrectomy can be safely performed and may open new alternatives in bariatric surgery with the possibility for inter-individual adaptation.

Oncological survival in pancreatic head ductal carcinoma: hybrid minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy - a single centre analysis.

BACKGROUND: Surgery remains the only curative treatment option for pancreatic head cancer. Laparoscopic surgical techniques are increasingly used, in line with the development of visceral surgery as a whole. The success of surgery is measured by the oncological outcome. Aim of this study is to evaluate the oncological outcome and survival after laparoscopic assisted resection of the pancreatic head compared to open surgery for ductal adenocarcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected in a prospectively maintained database. Perioperative and oncological outcomes of 182 laparoscopic pancreatic head resections for ductal carcinoma were compared with 585 open pancreatic head resections. The laparoscopic procedures were performed between 2010 and 2022, the open procedures between 2002 and 2022. RESULTS: Laparoscopic procedure was significantly superior in terms of intraoperative blood loss (575 vs. 600 mL, P=0.021) and operative time (413 vs. 427 min, P=0.033). Tumour size (25 vs. 27 mm, P=0.028), need for portal vein resection (P=0.009) and blood transfusion (P=0.004) were significantly greater in the open group (P=0.009). The resection margin remained negative significantly more often in the laparoscopic group (159 [87%] vs. 449 [77%], P<0.001). There was no difference in postoperative mortality and morbidity. Postoperative survival at 5 years was significantly better in the laparoscopic group (37% vs. 15%, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: In our cohort, patients who underwent hybrid laparoscopic resection of pancreatic head cancer showed a significantly improved oncological outcome. Most of these effects are due to selection bias, which is not captured by the clinical parameters used to date. Our results highlight the need for additional prognostic factors in pancreatic cancer.

Intestinal-type of differentiation predicts favourable overall survival: confirmatory clinicopathological analysis of 198 periampullary adenocarcinomas of pancreatic, biliary, ampullary and duodenal origin.

BACKGROUND: Periampullary adenocarcinomas comprise pancreatic, distal bile duct, ampullary and duodenal adenocarcinoma. The epithelia of these anatomical structures share a common embryologic origin from the foregut. With steadily increasing numbers of pancreatoduodenectomies over the last decades, pathologists, surgeons and oncologists are more often confronted with the diagnosis of "other than pancreatic" periampullary cancers. The intestinal subtype of ampullary cancer has been shown to correlate with better prognosis. METHODS: Histological subtype and immunohistochemical staining pattern for CK7, CK20 and CDX2 were assessed for n = 198 cases of pancreatic ductal, distal bile duct, ampullary and duodenal adenocarcinoma with clinical follow-up. Routine pathological parameters were included in survival analysis performed with SPSS 20. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, intestinal subtype was associated with better survival in ampullary, pancreatic ductal and duodenal adenocarcinoma. The intestinal type of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma was not associated with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and could not be reliably diagnosed by immunohistochemical staining pattern alone. Intestinal differentiation and lymph node ratio, but not tumor location were independent predictors of survival when all significant predictor variables from univariate analysis (grade, TNM stage, presence of precursor lesions, surgical margin status, perineural, vascular and lymphatic vessel invasion, CK7 and CDX2 staining pattern) were included in a Cox proportional hazards model. CONCLUSIONS: Intestinal type differentiation and lymph node ratio but not tumor location are independent prognostic factors in pooled analysis of periampullary adenocarcinomas. We conclude that differentiation is more important than tumor location for prognostic stratification in periampullary adenocarcinomas.

Surgical complications requiring late surgical revisions after pancreatoduodenectomy increase postoperative morbidity and mortality.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatoduodenectomies are complex surgical procedures with considerable postoperative morbidity and mortality. Here, we describe complications and outcomes in patients requiring surgical revisions following pancreatoduodenectomy. METHODS: A total of 1048 patients undergoing a pancreatoduodenectomy at our institution between 2002 and 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. All patients with surgical revisions were included. Revisions were divided into early and late using a cut-off of 5 days after the first surgery. Statistical significance was examined by using chi-square tests and Fisher's exact tests. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. RESULTS: A total of 150 patients with at least 1 surgical revision after pancreatoduodenectomy were included. Notably, 64 patients had a revision during the first 5 days and were classified as early revision. Compared with the 86 patients with late revisions, we found no differences concerning wound infections, delayed gastric emptying, or acute kidney failure. After late revisions, we found significantly more cases of sepsis (31.4% late versus 15.6% early, p = 0.020) and reintubation due to respiratory failure (33.7% versus 18.8%, p = 0.031). Postoperative mortality was significantly higher within the late revision group (23.2% versus 9.4%, p = 0.030). CONCLUSION: Arising complications after pancreatoduodenectomy should be addressed as early as possible as patients requiring late surgical revisions frequently developed septic complications and multiorgan failure.

Pre-bent instruments used in single-port laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery: comparative study of performance in a dry lab.

BACKGROUND: Different types of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) have become increasingly popular. Although SILS is technically even more challenging than conventional laparoscopy, published data of first clinical series seem to demonstrate the feasibility of these approaches. Various attempts have been made to overcome restrictions due to loss of triangulation in SILS by specially designed SILS-specific instruments. This study involving novices in a dry lab compared task performances between conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) and single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) using newly designed pre-bent instruments. METHODS: In this study, 90 medical students without previous experience in laparoscopic techniques were randomly assigned to undergo one of three procedures: CLS, SPLS using two pre-bent instruments (SPLS-pp), or SPLS using one pre-bent and one straight laparoscopic instrument (SPLS-ps). In the dry lab, the participants performed four typical laparoscopic tasks of increasing difficulty. Evaluation included performance times or number of completed tasks within a given time frame. All performances were videotaped and evaluated for unsuccessful attempts and unwanted interactions of instruments. Using subjective questionnaires, the participants rated difficulties with two-dimensional vision and coordination of instruments. RESULTS: Task performances were significantly better in the CLS group than in either SPLS group. The SPLS-ps group showed a tendency toward better performances than the SPLS-pp group, but the difference was not significant. Video sequences and participants` questionnaires showed instrument interaction as the major problem in the single-incision surgery groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although SILS is feasible, as shown in clinical series published by laparoscopically experienced experts, SILS techniques are demanding due to restrictions that come with the loss of triangulation. These can be compensated only partially by currently available SILS-designed instruments. The future of SILS depends on further improvements in the available equipment or the development of new approaches such as needlescopically assisted or robotically assisted procedures.

Revisionary bariatric surgery: indications and outcome of 100 consecutive operations at a single center.

BACKGROUND: A growing number of revisionary and secondary bariatric operations have been performed in recent years, with the number of operations doubling each year at the authors' center. Diagnostics, indications, and most revisionary operations should be performed by an experienced bariatric surgeon. This study was undertaken to evaluate indications and outcomes of revisionary bariatric operations at a specialized center. METHODS: At the Centre of Obesity and Metabolic Surgery (University of Freiburg, Germany), 100 consecutive revisionary bariatric operations performed between March 2007 and September 2009 were analyzed concerning indications and outcomes. RESULTS: Only 9 of the 100 revisions were due to early complications (<30 days after the primary operation). The indication for most revisions was poor weight loss (n = 55). A mean body mass index reduction of 10 points could be achieved in 1 year, which equals a 56% excess weight loss (EWL). No significant difference in weight reduction between restrictive and malabsorptive revisions was observed. Revisions due to implant-related problems also were frequent (n = 25). Laparoscopic revision was possible in 95% of the cases. CONCLUSION: Insufficient weight loss is the most frequent indication for revisionary bariatric surgery. The surgery can be performed laparoscopically in most cases, and a significant EWL (> 50%) can be achieved in 1 year if the right revisionary procedure is chosen.

Three-dimensional stomach analysis with computed tomography after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: sleeve dilation and thoracic migration.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is frequently performed as a definitive bariatric procedure today. Quantitative data on the detailed anatomy of the stomach after LSG are yet sparse. METHODS: Thirty-two multislice computed tomography (MSCT) data sets acquired in 27 LSG patients (22 female, 5 male) with a dedicated examination protocol and post-processing were evaluated for gastric volume, stomach length, sleeve length, antrum length, staple line length, and maximum cross-sectional sleeve area. Obtained parameters were compared to time after surgery, weight loss, and the occurrence of postsurgical regurgitation. RESULTS: Mean gastric volume was 186.5±88.4 ml. Gastric volume correlated significantly with the time interval after surgery. Sleeve sizes of 105.3±30.2 ml during early follow-up confirmed correct primary sizing of the sleeve, whereas marked dilation to 196.8±84.3 ml was found in patients with a follow-up of 6 months and longer (p=0.038). Sleeve area and staple line length were also positively correlated with time after surgery. No correlation was found between gastric volume and excess weight loss. In ten patients an intrathoracic migration of the staple line could be noted, with four of these patients developing persistent regurgitation after LSG. Regurgitation was present in only 2 of 17 patients without sleeve herniation. CONCLUSION: Multislice computed tomography allows for a comprehensive and quantitative evaluation of the anatomy after LSG and thus provides new insights in the process of sleeve dilation. Intrathoracic migration of the staple line could be identified as a possible cause of persistent regurgitation.

Oncological outcome of laparoscopically assisted pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma in a retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic resections of the pancreatic head are increasingly performed. Several studies show that they are comparable to open operations in terms of postoperative morbidity. However, since a substantial proportion of pancreatic head resections are necessary for pancreatic adenocarcinoma the oncologic safety and outcome of minimally invasive operations is of interest. In this study we evaluated oncologic outcome and survival after laparoscopically assisted pancreatic head resection for ductal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Perioperative and oncological outcome of sixty-two laparoscopically assisted pancreatic head resections for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma performed between 2010 and 2016 was compared to outcome of 278 open resections between 2001 and 2016 in a retrospective study. Data was continuously collected in a prospectively maintained database. RESULTS: Operation time was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group (477 vs. 428 min. p < 0.001). Tumor size, lymph node yield and lymph node state and need of portal vein resection were comparable. There was a higher rate of free resection margins in the laparoscopic group (87% vs. 71%, p < 0.01). There was no difference in postoperative mortality and morbidity. Patients with laparoscopic resection stayed in hospital significantly shorter (median 14 vs. 16 days, p < 0.003). Postoperative survival after 5 years was not different in both groups. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopically assisted resection of adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head is equal to open resection concerning oncologic outcome and actuarial survival. However, minimally invasive resection shortened the hospital stay. However, further evaluations with a longer follow up time are needed.

Common Channel Length in Bypass Surgery Does Not Impact T2DM in Diabetic Zucker Rats.

INTRODUCTION: Metabolic surgery is known to impact glucose tolerance but the exact mechanism is still unclear. Based on recently-published data, especially the role of the hindgut may require redefinition. METHODS: Either a loop duodeno-jejunostomy (DJOS) with exclusion of one third of total intestinal length, a loop duodeno-ileostomy (DiOS, exclusion of two thirds), or SHAM operation was performed in 9-week-old Zucker diabetic fatty rats. One, 3, and 6 months after surgery, an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and glucose-stimulated hormone analyses were conducted. Body weight was documented weekly. RESULTS: DJOS and DiOS animals showed significantly better glucose control in all OGTTs than the SHAM group (two-way ANOVA p < 0.0001). Body weight developed largely parallel in both intervention groups; SHAM animals had gained significantly less weight after 6 months (Mann-Whitney DJOS/DiOS vs. SHAM p < 0.05, DJOS vs. DiOS p > 0.05). Operative interventions had no impact on GLP-1 and GIP levels at any time point (Mann-Whitney p > 0.05 for all). DJOS/DiOS operations could preserve insulin production up to 6 months, while there was already a sharp decline of insulin levels in the SHAM group (Mann-Whitney: DJOS/DiOS vs. SHAM p < 0.05 for all time points). Additionally, insulin sensitivity was improved significantly 1 month postoperative in both intervention groups compared to SHAM (Mann-Whitney DJOS/DiOS vs. SHAM p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The data of the current study demonstrate a sharp amelioration of glucose control after duodenal exclusion with unchanged levels of GLP-1 and GIP. Direct or delayed hindgut stimulation had no impact on glucose control in our model.

Banding the Sleeve Improves Weight Loss in Midterm Follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) can achieve excellent weight loss, yet sleeve dilatation with concomitant weight regain proves to be a relevant issue. Hence, additional restriction might improve results after LSG. METHODS: In a retrospective matched-pair analysis, 42 patients who underwent banded LSG (BLSG) using a MiniMizer® ring between January 2012 and October 2014 were analysed regarding weight loss, complications and comorbidity. Median follow-up was 3 years. Forty-two patients who had undergone conventional LSG were selected as matched pairs. RESULTS: Mean preoperative BMI was 54.93 ± 7.42 kg/m2 for BLSG and 53.46 ± 6.69 kg/m2 for LSG (Mann-Whitney P = 0.540). Total weight loss (%TWL) was significantly greater in the BLSG group 3 years after surgery (BLSG 38.22% ± 7.26; n = 26 vs. LSG 32.69 ± 9.47; n = 26; P = 0.0154). Ring placement had no relevant impact on new-onset reflux (Fisher's exact test P = 1.0) but a tendency towards reflux improvement when reflux pre-existed (odds ratio 1.96). The major side effect of ring implantation was regurgitation with over 44% of patients presenting with regurgitation >1 per week (Fisher's exact test P = 0.0019, odds ratio 18.07). CONCLUSION: BLSG is a safe procedure showing similar comorbidity to conventional LSG. However, BLSG leads to a higher rate of postoperative regurgitation. Weight loss is significantly improved 3 years after surgery. Hence, additional ring implantation might be an option for increased restriction in LSG surgery.

Mesopancreatic Stromal Clearance Defines Curative Resection of Pancreatic Head Cancer and Can Be Predicted Preoperatively by Radiologic Parameters: A Retrospective Study.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by a strong fibrotic stromal reaction and diffuse growth pattern. Peritumoral fibrosis is often evident during surgery but only distinguishable from tumor by microscopic examination. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of clearance of fibrotic stromal reaction at the mesopancreatic resection margin as a criterion for radical resection and preoperative assessment of resectability.Mesopancreatic stromal clearance status (S-status) was defined as the presence or absence (S+/S0) of fibrotic stromal reaction at the mesopancreatic resection margin. Detailed retrospective clinicopathologic re-evaluation of margin status and preoperative cross-sectional imaging was performed in a cohort of 91 patients operated for pancreatic head PDAC from 2001 to 2011.Conventional margin positive resection (R+, tumor cells directly at the margin) was found in 36%. However, S-status further divided the margin negative (R0) group into patients with median survival of 14 months versus 31 months (S+ versus S0, P = 0.005). Overall rate of S+ was 53%. S-status and lymph node ratio constituted the only independent predictors of survival. Stranding of the superior mesenteric artery fat sheath was the only independent radiologic predictor of S+ resection, and achieved a 71% correct prediction of S-status.Mesopancreatic stromal clearance is a major determinant of curative resection in PDAC, and preoperative prediction by cross-sectional imaging is possible, setting the basis for a new definition of borderline resectability.

Pregnancy Specific ß-1 Glycoprotein 1 is Expressed in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and its Subcellular Localization Correlates with Overall Survival.

Proteins of the pregnancy specific ß-1 glycoprotein (PSG) family are renowned for their elevated expression during pregnancy. Only few reports have investigated their expression in adenocarcinomas. We studied the expression of PSG1 in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In a cohort of 104 patient samples, immunohistochemical analysis determined PSG1 expression in every specimen. PSG1 was found at apical and cytoplasmic localization or solely at cytoplasmic localization, with the latter case being correlated to shortened median survival (25 vs 11 months, logrank p-value < 0.001). At the same time, enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) did not detect elevated PSG1 levels in the plasma of PDAC patients as opposed to the plasma of healthy, non-pregnant control individuals. We also probed the impact of PSG1 expression in a murine tumor model system, using subcutaneous injection of Colo-26 cells into immunocompetent BALB/c mice. Here, tumor growth was not affected by the expression of human PSG1. Our study reaffirms interest into the tumor-contextual biology of PSG proteins.

To band or not to band--early results of banded sleeve gastrectomy.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the procedure with the fastest growing numbers worldwide. Although excellent weight loss can be achieved, one major obstacle of LSG is weight regain due to sleeve dilatation. Banded sleeve gastrectomy (BLSG) has been described as an option to counteract sleeve dilatation and ameliorate weight loss over time. In a retrospective study, we analysed 25 patients who underwent BLSG using a MiniMizer® ring. Twenty five patients who had previously undergone a conventional LSG were selected for matched-pair analysis. Patient follow-up was 12 months in both groups. Mean preoperative BMI was 56.1 ± 7.2 kg/m(2) for BLSG and 57.0 ± 6.3 kg/m(2) for LSG, P = 0.522. Operative time was significantly shorter for BLSG (53 ± 27 min vs. 68 ± 20 min, P = 0.0025). Excess weight loss (%EWL) was equal in both groups with %EWL at 12 months of 58.0 ± 14.6 % for BSLG patients vs. 58.4 ± 19.2 % for LSG patients. There was no procedure-related mortality in either group. At 12 months postoperative, vomiting was significantly increased in BSLG patients (OR 6.75, P = 0.035). New onset reflux was equal in both groups (OR 0.67, P = 0.469). Ring implantation does not increase the duration of surgery or early surgical complications. Weight loss in the first follow-up year is not influenced, but the incidence of vomiting is raised after 12 months when patients start to increase eating volume.

Duodeno-enteral omega switches - more physiological techniques in metabolic surgery.

INTRODUCTION: In bariatric surgery, still new surgical techniques are developed. On the one hand, the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is one of the most common procedures used. However, many patients experience dumping syndrome or pain due to bile reflux. On the other hand, revisions after gastric banding are frequent and may be technically challenging. AIM: To create a new bariatric procedure counterbalancing the drawbacks of conventional RYGB, also suitable as a redo option after gastric banding. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To diminish the complication rate and pathophysiological disadvantages in reoperations after gastric banding, we primarily combined a gastric plication (GP) with a single anastomosis duodeno-ileal omega switch (DIOS), bypassing 2/3 of the total bowel length. Further on, in patients with lower body mass index we combined a GP or LSG and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with a duodeno-jejunal omega switch (DJOS), performing an end-to side anastomosis after 1/3 of the total bowel length. RESULTS: The DIOS and DJOS techniques restrict food intake and bypass the duodenum and part (DJOS) or the whole (DIOS) jejunum. Restriction is achieved either through gastric plicature or conventional sleeve gastrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Similar bariatric and metabolic effects to proximal RYGB are expected in the case of DJOS, or to a conventional duodenal switch when performing a DIOS procedure. Performing a gastric plicature will reduce the risk of gastric leak when revising patients after failed gastric banding.

Minimally invasive operations for acute necrotizing pancreatitis: comparison of minimally invasive retroperitoneal necrosectomy with endoscopic transgastric necrosectomy.

BACKGROUND: A "step-up" approach is currently the treatment of choice for acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Our aim was to evaluate the outcome of minimally invasive retroperitoneal necrosectomy (MINE) and endoscopic transgastric necrosectomy (ETG) and to compare it to open necrosectomy (ONE). METHODS: Patients with acute pancreatitis admitted to our institution from 1998 to 2010 (n = 334) were identified. From these, patients who underwent either ONE, MINE, or ETG were selected for further analysis. Statistical analysis employed 2-sided Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U-test. RESULTS: From 2002 to 2010, 32 patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis were treated by minimally invasive procedures including MINE (n = 14) and ETG (n = 18) or with the classic technique of ONE (n = 30). Time from onset of symptoms to intervention was less for ONE than for MINE or ETG (median, 11 vs 39 vs 54 days; P < .05). The rate of critically ill patients with sepsis or septic shock was greatest in ONE (93%) and MINE (71%) compared with ETG (17%; P < .05). Problems after ONE and MINE were ongoing sepsis (ONE 73% vs MINE 29% vs ETG 11%) and bleeding requiring intervention (ONE 26% vs MINE 21% vs ETG 17%). A specific complication of ETG was gastric perforation into the peritoneal cavity during the procedure (28%), requiring immediate open pseudocystogastrostomy. Laparotomy was necessary in 21% after MINE and 28% after ETG owing to specific complications or persistent infected necrosis. Overall mortality was greatest after ONE (ONE 63% vs MINE 21% vs ETG 6%; P < .05). CONCLUSION: Morbidity and mortality remains high in acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Operative procedures should be delayed as long as possible to decrease morbidity and mortality. Minimally invasive procedures can avoid laparotomy, but also introduce specific complications requiring immediate or secondary open operative treatment. Minimally invasive procedures require unique expertise and therefore should only be performed at specialized centers.

Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatic head resection and hybrid open reconstruction via pancreatogastrostomy.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery is ambitious and should only be performed in institutions with expert knowledge in pancreatic surgery. METHODS: Whereas pancreatic tail resection is routinely and safely performed in several institutions, the laparoscopic resection of the pancreatic head is only performed by a handful of surgeons. RESULTS: In this article, we present our hybrid approach with complete laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatic head resection and successive reconstruction via a small retrieval incision, which might combine the advantages of the laparoscopic resection with the safety of an open and routine pancreatic anastomosis.