Hyperlipidemia, Obesity, and Diabetes, and Risk of Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.

BACKGROUND: Several risk factors of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) have been established, including diabetes and obesity. However, the relationship between hyperlipidemia (HLD) and OPLL is incompletely understood. METHODS: PearlDiver was queried to identify adults with (+) and without (-) HLD, diabetes, and obesity. Comparative analyses were performed on demographics, comorbidities, and OPLL rates before and after matching for age, sex, and comorbidities. Stepwise logistic regression modeling assessing the relationship between HLD and OPLL with the addition of predictor variables was also performed. RESULTS: In total, 31,677 cervical OPLL patients, as well as 170,467 HLD+ and 118,665 HLD-, 168,985 Diabetes+ and 137,966 Diabetes-, and 150,363 Obesity+ and 142,553 Obesity- patients, were examined. Mean age ranged 43.44-59.46 years, 54.94-63.12% were females, and mean Charlson Comorbidity Index ranged from 0.06 from 1.53, all higher in those with the comorbidity. Before matching, OPLL rates were higher in those with HLD (HLD+=0.05% vs. HLD-=0.03%, P = 0.005), diabetes (Diabetes+=0.06% vs. Diabetes-=0.02%, P < 0.001), and obesity (Obesity+=0.05% vs. Obesity-=0.02%, P = 0.001). However, after matching by age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index, the associations between the studied comorbidities and OPLL were attenuated (all P > 0.05). Stepwise regression modeling revealed an association between HLD and cervical OPLL that was most impacted by the addition of age (OR=1.95, R2 = 0.029 to OR=1.38, R2 = 0.075) and obesity (OR=1.21, R2 = 0.086 to OR=1.07, R2 = 0.111) into the model. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical OPLL rates were higher in patients with HLD even after accounting for demographics and comorbidities. HLD may be an independent risk factor for OPLL development.

Preoperative Resilience and Improvement in Patient-Reported Outcomes After Lumbar Spinal Fusion.

BACKGROUND: It is incompletely understood how preoperative resilience affects 1-year postoperative outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion. METHODS: Patients undergoing open lumbar spinal fusion at a single-center institution were identified between November 2019 and September 2022. Preoperative resilience was assessed using the Brief Resilience Scale. Demographic data at baseline including age, gender, comorbidities, and body mass index (BMI) were extracted. Patient-reported outcome measures including Oswestry Disability Index, PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Global Physical Health, PROMIS Global Mental Health (GMH), and EuroQol5 scores were collected before the surgery and at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively. Bivariate correlation was conducted between Brief Resilience Scale scores and outcome measures at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients had baseline and 1 year outcome data. Compared with patients with high resilience, patients in the low-resilience group had a higher percentage of females (69.4% vs. 43.9%; P = 0.02), a higher BMI (32.7 vs. 30.1; P = 0.03), and lower preoperative Global Physical Health (35.8 vs. 38.9; P = 0.045), GMH (42.2 vs. 49.2; P < 0.001), and EuroQol scores (0.56 vs. 0.61; P = 0.01). At 3 months postoperatively, resilience was moderately correlated with GMH (r = 0.39) and EuroQol (r = 0.32). Similarly, at 1 year postoperatively, resilience was moderately correlated with GMH (r = 0.33) and EuroQol (r = 0.34). Comparable results were seen in multivariable regression analysis controlling for age, gender, number of levels fused, BMI, Charlson Comorbidity Index, procedure, anxiety/depression, and complications. CONCLUSIONS: Low preoperative resilience can negatively affect patient-reported outcomes 1 year after lumbar spinal fusion. Resiliency is a potentially modifiable risk factor, and surgeons should consider targeted interventions for at-risk patient groups.

Sacroplasty for Sacral Insufficiency Fractures: Narrative Literature Review on Patient Selection, Technical Approaches, and Outcomes.

Sacral insufficiency fractures commonly affect elderly women with osteoporosis and can cause debilitating lower back pain. First line management is often with conservative measures such as early mobilization, multimodal pain management, and osteoporosis management. If non-operative management fails, sacroplasty is a minimally invasive intervention that may be pursued. Candidates for sacroplasty are patients with persistent pain, inability to tolerate immobilization, or patients with low bone mineral density. Before undergoing sacroplasty, patients' bone health should be optimized with pharmacotherapy. Anabolic agents prior to or in conjunction with sacroplasty have been shown to improve patient outcomes. Sacroplasty can be safely performed through a number of techniques: short-axis, long-axis, coaxial, transiliac, interpedicular, and balloon-assisted. The procedure has been demonstrated to rapidly and durably reduce pain and improve mobility, with little risk of complications. This article aims to provide a narrative literature review of sacroplasty including, patient selection and optimization, the various technical approaches, and short and long-term outcomes.

Segmental Sagittal Alignment in Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Review of Evidence-Based Evaluation of Preoperative Measurement, Surgical Planning, Intraoperative Execution, and Postoperative Evaluation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Maintaining and restoring global and regional sagittal alignment is a well-established priority that improves patient outcomes in patients with adult spinal deformity. However, the benefit of restoring segmental (level-by-level) alignment in lumbar fusion for degenerative conditions is not widely agreed on. The purpose of this review was to summarize intraoperative techniques to achieve segmental fixation and the impact of segmental lordosis on patient-reported and surgical outcomes. METHODS: In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were queried for the literature reporting lumbar alignment for degenerative lumbar spinal pathology. Reports were assessed for data regarding the impact of intraoperative surgical factors on postoperative segmental sagittal alignment and patient-reported outcome measures. Included studies were further categorized into groups related to patient positioning, fusion and fixation, and interbody device (technique, material, angle, and augmentation). RESULTS: A total of 885 studies were screened, of which 43 met inclusion criteria examining segmental rather than regional or global alignment. Of these, 3 examined patient positioning, 8 examined fusion and fixation, 3 examined case parameters, 26 examined or compared different interbody fusion techniques, 5 examined postoperative patient-reported outcomes, and 3 examined the occurrence of adjacent segment disease. The data support a link between segmental alignment and patient positioning, surgical technique, and adjacent segment disease but have insufficient evidence to support a relationship with patient-reported outcomes, cage subsidence, or pseudoarthrosis. CONCLUSION: This review explores segmental correction's impact on short-segment lumbar fusion outcomes, finding the extent of correction to depend on patient positioning and choice of interbody cage. Notably, inadequate restoration of lumbar lordosis is associated with adjacent segment degeneration. Nevertheless, conclusive evidence linking segmental alignment to patient-reported outcomes, cage subsidence, or pseudoarthrosis remains limited, underscoring the need for future research.