RESUMO
BACKGROUND: As a result of the continuing surge of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), many patients have delayed or missed routine screening and preventive services. Medical conditions, such as coronary heart disease, mental health issues, and substance use disorder, may be identified later, leading to increases in patient morbidity and mortality. METHODS: National Emergency Medical Services Information System data were used to assess 911 emergency medical services (EMS) activations during 2018-2020. For specific activation types, the percentage of total activations was calculated per week, and Joinpoint analysis was used to identify changes over time. RESULTS: Since March 2020, the number of 911 EMS activations has decreased, while the percentages of on-scene death, cardiac arrest, and opioid use/overdose EMS activations were higher than prepandemic levels. During the early pandemic period, percentages of total EMS activations increased for on-scene death (from 1.3% to 2.4% during weeks 11-15), cardiac arrest (from 1.3% to 2.2% during weeks 11-15), and opioid use/overdose (from 0.6% to 1.1% during weeks 8-18). The percentages then declined but remained above prepandemic levels through calendar week 52. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic has indirect consequences, such as relative increases in EMS activations for cardiac events and opioid use/overdose, possibly linked to disruptions is healthcare access and health-seeking behaviors. Increasing telehealth visits and other opportunities for patient-provider touch points for chronic disease and substance use disorders that emphasize counseling, preventive care, and expanded access to medications can disrupt delayed care-seeking during the pandemic and potentially prevent premature death.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Overdose de Drogas , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Overdose de Drogas/tratamento farmacológico , Overdose de Drogas/epidemiologia , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Due to bone loss, endosseous implants often require addition of a bone graft to support adequate primary fixation, bone regeneration, and osseointegration. The aim of this study was to compare effectiveness of autogenic and allogenic bone grafts when used during simultaneous insertion of the implant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 4-mm-diameter rabbit diaphyseal bone autografts or allografts (n = 16/group) with a 3.2-mm pre-drilled hole in the center were placed into a 4 mm defect in the proximal femur of 3.5 kg male New Zealand White rabbits. Machined 3.2 × 10 mm grit-blasted, acid-etched titanium-aluminum-vanadium (Ti6Al4V) implants were placed. Control implants were placed into progressively drilled 3.2-mm holes in the contralateral limbs. Post-insertion day 70, samples were analyzed by micro-CT and calcified histology, or by mechanical torque and push-out testing followed by decalcified histology. RESULTS: Both grafts were integrated with the native bone. Micro-CT showed less bone volume (BV) and bone volume/total volume (BV/TV) in the allograft group, but histology showed no differences in BV or BV/TV between groups. Allograft lacked living cells, whereas autograft was cellularized. No difference was found in maximum removal torque between groups. Compressive loading at the graft-to-bone interface was significantly lower in allograft compared with autograft groups. CONCLUSIONS: There was less bone in contact with the implant and significantly less maximum compressive load in the allograft group compared with autograft. The allograft remained acellular as demonstrated by empty lacunae. Taken together, block allograft implanted simultaneously with an implant produces a poorer quality bone compared with autograft.
Assuntos
Implantes Dentários , Osseointegração , Animais , Transplante Ósseo , Implantação Dentária Endóssea , Fêmur , Masculino , Coelhos , TitânioRESUMO
Quality adolescent sexual and reproductive health (ASRH) services play an important role in supporting the overall health and well-being of adolescents. Improving access to this care can help reduce unintended pregnancies, sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and their associated consequences, as well as promote health equity. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention funded three grantees to implement a clinic-based ASRH quality improvement initiative complimented by activities to strengthen systems to refer and link youth to ASRH services. The purpose of this study is to describe the initiative and baseline assessment results of ASRH best practice implementation in participating health centers. The assessment found common use of the following practices: STD/HIV screening, education on abstinence and the use of dual protection, and activities to increase accessibility (e.g., offering after-school hours and walk-in and same-day appointments). The following practices were used less frequently: provider training for Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) insertion and removal, LARC availability, same-day provision of all contraceptive methods, and consistent sharing of information about confidentiality and minors' rights with adolescent clients. This study describes the types of training and technical assistance being implemented at each health center and discusses implications for future programming.
Assuntos
Saúde do Adolescente , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Serviços de Saúde Reprodutiva , Saúde Reprodutiva , Adolescente , Anticoncepção , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Gravidez , Gravidez não Planejada , Saúde Pública , Melhoria de Qualidade , Comportamento Sexual , Infecções Sexualmente TransmissíveisRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Diagnosis and control of chronic conditions have implications for women's health and are major contributing factors to maternal and infant morbidity and mortality. This study estimated the prevalence of hypertension and diabetes in non-pregnant women of reproductive age in the United States, the proportion who were unaware of their condition or whose condition was not controlled, and differences in the prevalence of these conditions by selected characteristics. METHODS: We used data from the 2011-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey to estimate overall prevalence of hypertension and diabetes among women of reproductive age (aged 20-44 y), the proportion who were unaware of having hypertension or diabetes, and the proportion whose diabetes or hypertension was not controlled. We used logistic regression models to calculate adjusted prevalence ratios to assess differences by selected characteristics. RESULTS: The estimated prevalence of hypertension was 9.3% overall. Among those with hypertension, 16.9% were unaware of their hypertension status and 40.7% had uncontrolled hypertension. Among women with diabetes, almost 30% had undiagnosed diabetes, and among those with diagnosed diabetes, the condition was not controlled in 51.5%. CONCLUSION: This analysis improves our understanding of the prevalence of hypertension and diabetes among women of reproductive age and may facilitate opportunities to improve awareness and control of these conditions, reduce disparities in women's health, and improve birth outcomes.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Affordability plays an important role in the utilisation of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and non-IVF fertility treatments. Fertility treatments are associated with increased risk of multiple births. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between the affordability of fertility treatments across US states and the percentage of multiple births due to natural conception, non-IVF treatments, and IVF, and the association between these percentages and state-specific multiple birth rates. METHODS: State-specific per capita disposable personal income and state-specific infertility insurance mandates were used as measures of affordability. Maternal age-adjusted percentages of multiple births due to natural conception, non-IVF treatments, and IVF were estimated for each state using birth certificate and IVF data. Scatter plots and regression analysis were used to explore associations between state-level measures of affordability, the percentage of multiple births due to natural conception and fertility treatments, and state-specific multiple birth rates. RESULTS: In 2013, age-adjusted contributions of natural conception, non-IVF fertility treatments, and IVF to multiple births in US were 58.2, 22.8, and 19.0% respectively. States with greater affordability of fertility treatments had higher percentages of multiples due to IVF and lower percentages due to natural conception. Higher percentages of multiples due to IVF and lower percentages due to natural conception were associated with higher state-specific multiple birth rates. CONCLUSION: Increasing affordability of fertility treatments may increase state-specific multiple birth rates. Policies and treatment practices encouraging single-gestation pregnancies may help reduce multiple births resulting from these treatments.
Assuntos
Financiamento Pessoal/estatística & dados numéricos , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez Múltipla/estatística & dados numéricos , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/economia , Coeficiente de Natalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Renda , Recém-Nascido , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Idade Materna , Vigilância da População , Gravidez , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The advent of fertility treatments has led to an increase in the rate of multiple births in the United States. However, the trends in and magnitude of the contribution of fertility treatments to the increase are uncertain. METHODS: We derived the rates of multiple births after natural conception from data on distributions of all births from 1962 through 1966 (before fertility treatments were available). Publicly available data on births from 1971 through 2011 were used to determine national multiple birth rates, and data on in vitro fertilization (IVF) from 1997 through 2011 were used to estimate the annual proportion of multiple births that were attributable to IVF and to non-IVF fertility treatments, after adjustment for maternal age. Trends in multiple births were examined starting from 1998, the year when clinical practice guidelines for IVF were developed with an aim toward reducing the incidence of multiple births. RESULTS: We estimated that by 2011, a total of 36% of twin births and 77% of triplet and higher-order births resulted from conception assisted by fertility treatments. The observed incidence of twin births increased by a factor of 1.9 from 1971 to 2009. The incidence of triplet and higher-order births increased by a factor of 6.7 from 1971 to 1998 and decreased by 29% from 1998 to 2011. This decrease coincided with a 70% reduction in the transfer of three or more embryos during IVF (P<0.001) and a 33% decrease in the proportion of triplet and higher-order births attributable to IVF (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Over the past four decades, the increased use of fertility treatments in the United States has been associated with a substantial rise in the rate of multiple births. The rate of triplet and higher-order births has declined over the past decade in the context of a reduction in the transfer of three or more embryos during IVF. (Funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.).
Assuntos
Prole de Múltiplos Nascimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida , Adulto , Transferência Embrionária/tendências , Feminino , Fertilização in vitro , Humanos , Idade Materna , Gravidez , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/tendências , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Between 09 Jan 2011 to 25 Mar 2011 an outbreak of respiratory illness was reported from a Military Training institution. 52 cases of respiratory tract infection were admitted from this institution. All the cases were trainees between 18 and 21 years of age. Aggressive control measures were instituted along with the investigation of the outbreak to determine the nature of the disease and the causative organism. METHODS: The investigation of the outbreak was initiated on 08 Mar 2011 when a sudden rise in number of hospital admissions due to respiratory illness was noticed. Epidemiological information was collected from the cases. Routine blood investigations, sputum examination and chest radiograph of suspected cases were done. RESULTS: Total of 52 cases of respiratory illness were reported during the period of outbreak giving an attack rate of 25.8 per 1000. Out of these 52 cases 23 (44.2%) were radiologically confirmed. Streptococcus pneumoniae was grown in 8 (25.85) out of 31 sputum samples. The outbreak was controlled by administration of 'supervised mass chemoprophylaxis' of all susceptible individuals in the institution with Tablet Azithromycin orally. Last suspected case was admitted to the military hospital on 25 Mar 2011. CONCLUSION: The study highlights the importance of Streptococcus pneumoniae as a causative organism for outbreaks of community acquired pneumonia (CAP) in large residential training institutions and reiterates the need for formulating a policy for continuous surveillance. It also highlights the importance of the novel method of using chemoprophylaxis for control of an ongoing outbreak of CAP.
RESUMO
Implantation and live birth rates resulting from IVF cycles using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and (GnRH) antagonist IVF protocols were compared among good-prognosis patients using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance System 2009-2010 data (n = 203,302 fresh, autologous cycles). Bivariable and multivariable analyses were conducted between cycles to compare outcomes. Cycles were restricted as follows: age younger than 35 years, maximum FSH less than 10 mIU/mL, first assisted reproduction technology cycle and FSH dose less than 3601 IU. A subgroup analysis including only elective single embryo transfer was also carried out. Among good-prognosis patients, the GnRH-agonist protocol was associated with a lower risk of cancellation before retrieval (4.3 versus 5.2%; P < 0.05) or transfer (5.5 versus 6.8%; P < 0.05), and a higher live birth rate per transfer (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.13, confidence interval [CI] 1.03 to 1.25) than the GnRH-antagonist group. Among the elective single embryo transfer group, the GnRH-agonist protocol was associated with a higher implantation rate (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.36, CI 1.08 to 1.73) and a higher live birth rate (adjusted OR 1.33, CI 1.07 to 1.66) compared with the GnRH-antagonist protocol. The GnRH-antagonist group had lower rates of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Among good-prognosis patients, agonist protocols decreased cancellation risk and increased odds of implantation and live birth. Antagonist protocols may confer decreased risk of hyperstimulation.
Assuntos
Fertilização in vitro/métodos , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/antagonistas & inibidores , Indução da Ovulação/métodos , Adulto , Implantação do Embrião , Transferência Embrionária , Feminino , Antagonistas de Hormônios/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Gravidez , Taxa de Gravidez , Prognóstico , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: We describe changes in commercial insurance claims for contraceptive services during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We analyzed commercial insurance claims using IQVIA PharMetrics Plus data from more than 9 million U.S. females aged 15-49 years, enrolled during any month, January 2019 through September 2020. We calculated monthly rates of outpatient claims for intrauterine devices (IUDs), implants, and injectable contraception and monthly rates of pharmacy claims for contraceptive pills, patches, and rings. We used Joinpoint regression analysis to identify when statistically significant changes occurred in trends of monthly claims rates for each contraceptive method. We calculated monthly percentages of claims for contraceptive counseling via telehealth. RESULTS: Monthly claims rates decreased for IUDs (-50%) and implants (-43%) comparing February 2020 with April 2020 but rebounded by June 2020. Monthly claims rates for injectables decreased (-19%) comparing January 2019 with September 2020, and monthly claims rates for pills, patches, and rings decreased (-22%) comparing July 2019 with September 2020. The percentage of claims for contraceptive counseling occurring via telehealth was low (<1%) in 2019, increased to 34% in April 2020, and decreased to 9-12% in June-September 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial changes in commercial insurance claims for contraceptive services occurred during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, including transient decreases in IUD and implant claims and increases in telehealth contraceptive counseling claims. Contraceptive claims data can be used by decision makers to identify service gaps and evaluate use of interventions like telehealth to improve contraceptive access, including during public health emergencies.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Anticoncepcionais Femininos , Seguro , Feminino , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Humanos , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Anticoncepção/métodosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To study the contribution of ovulation induction and ovarian stimulation, in vitro fertilization (IVF), and unassisted conception to the increase in national plural births in the United States, a significant contributor to adverse maternal and infant health outcomes. DESIGN: National and IVF-assisted plural birth data were derived from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Vital Statistics System (1967-2021, after introduction of Clomiphene Citrate in the United States) and the National Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance System (1997-2021), respectively. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): Not applicable. INTERVENTION(S): Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): In addition to IVF-assisted plural births, the contributions of unassisted conception to plural births among women aged <35 and ≥35 years were estimated using plural birth rates from 1949-1966 and a Bayesian logistic model with race and age as independent variables. The contribution of ovulation induction and ovarian stimulation was estimated as the difference between national plural births and IVF-assisted and unassisted counterparts. RESULT(S): From 1967-2021, the national twin birth rate increased 1.7-fold to a 2014 high (33.9/1,000 live births), then declined to 31.2/1,000 live births; the triplet and higher order birth rate increased 6.7-fold to a 1998 high (1.9/1,000 live births), then declined to 0.8/1,000 live births. In 2021, the contribution of unassisted conception among women aged <35 years to the national plural births was 56.1%, followed by ovulation induction and ovarian stimulation (19.5%), unassisted conception among women aged ≥35 years (16.8%), and IVF (7.6%). During 2009-2021, the contribution of ovulation induction and ovarian stimulation has remained stable, the contribution of unassisted conception among women aged <35 and ≥35 years has increased, and the contribution of IVF has decreased. CONCLUSION(S): Ovulation induction and ovarian stimulation are leading iatrogenic contributors to plural births. They are, therefore, targets for intervention to reduce the adverse maternal and infant health outcomes associated with plural births. Maternal age of ≥35 years is a significant contributor to the national plural birth increase.
Assuntos
Fertilização in vitro , Indução da Ovulação , Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Adulto , Indução da Ovulação/tendências , Indução da Ovulação/estatística & dados numéricos , Indução da Ovulação/efeitos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Fertilização in vitro/tendências , Fertilização in vitro/estatística & dados numéricos , Fertilização in vitro/efeitos adversos , Coeficiente de Natalidade/tendências , Idade Materna , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem , Nascido Vivo/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Objective: To examine claims for reversible prescription contraceptives and chlamydia and gonorrhea testing among commercially and Medicaid-insured adolescent and young adult (AYA) females in the United States. Methods: Using IBM MarketScan Research Databases, we identified sexually active, nonpregnant AYA (15- to 24-year-old) females enrolled in 2018. We examined claims for reversible prescription contraceptives and chlamydia and gonorrhea testing, using drug names and diagnosis/procedure codes, by age-group in commercially and Medicaid-insured separately and by race/ethnicity in Medicaid-insured. Results: Among 15- to 19-year-old and 20- to 24-year-old females, 67.2% and 67.9% of commercially insured and 57.3% and 54.0% of Medicaid-insured, respectively, had claims for reversible prescription contraceptives in 2018. Across insurance types among both age-groups, the most common claim for contraceptives was prescription for combined oral contraceptives. Among Medicaid-insured 15- to 19-year-olds, claims for contraceptives ranged from 42.6% for Hispanic females to 63.4% for non-Hispanic White females; among Medicaid-insured 20- to 24-year-olds, claims ranged from 50.4% for non-Hispanic Black females to 57.0% for non-Hispanic White females. Approximately half of the commercially and Medicaid-insured females had claims for chlamydia and gonorrhea testing. Non-Hispanic Black females had the highest percentages of claims for chlamydia testing (56.3% among 15- to 19-year-olds and 61.1% among 20- to 24-year-olds) and gonorrhea testing (61.6% among 15- to 19-year-olds and 64.9% among 20- to 24-year-olds). Conclusion: Approximately, two-thirds of commercially insured and more than half of Medicaid-insured, sexually active, nonpregnant AYA females had claims for reversible prescription contraceptives. Race/ethnicity data were available for Medicaid-insured females, and there were differences in claims for contraceptives and chlamydia and gonorrhea testing by race/ethnicity. Half of the AYA females had claims for chlamydia and gonorrhea testing suggesting missed opportunities.
Assuntos
Infecções por Chlamydia , Gonorreia , Medicaid , Humanos , Feminino , Estados Unidos , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Gonorreia/diagnóstico , Gonorreia/etnologia , Infecções por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Anticoncepção/estatística & dados numéricos , AdultoRESUMO
To examine health care burden, pregnancy outcomes and impact of high risk medical conditions among pregnancy hospitalizations during influenza season. Length of stay, hospitalization charges, and delivery complications were compared between hospitalizations with and without respiratory illness and compared by presence of high risk medical conditions. Length of stay and hospital charges were significantly increased among respiratory illness hospitalizations versus non-respiratory hospitalizations. Among respiratory illness hospitalization, the odds of intrauterine fetal demise were increased (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.50, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.97-3.18). Among live births, there were higher odds of preterm delivery (aOR 3.82, 95 % CI 3.53-4.14), cesarean delivery (aOR 3.47, 95 % CI 3.22-3.74), and fetal distress (aOR 2.33, 95 % CI 2.15-2.52). The presence of high risk medical conditions did not impact pregnancy outcomes. Among pregnant women hospitalized during influenza season, those with respiratory illness were more likely than those without respiratory illness to have poor perinatal outcomes, regardless of the presence of high risk conditions. Efforts to minimize influenza morbidity, including universal vaccination and early antiviral therapy should be promoted among all pregnant women.
Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Doenças Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Surtos de Doenças , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Morbidade/tendências , Trabalho de Parto Prematuro/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Resultado da Gravidez , Nascimento Prematuro , Prevalência , Doenças Respiratórias/diagnóstico , Fatores de Risco , Estações do Ano , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
IMPORTANCE: The prevalence of oocyte donation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) has increased in the United States, but little information is available regarding maternal or infant outcomes to improve counseling and clinical decision making. OBJECTIVES: To quantify trends in donor oocyte cycles in the United States and to determine predictors of a good perinatal outcome among IVF cycles using fresh (noncryopreserved) embryos derived from donor oocytes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Analysis of data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National ART Surveillance System, to which fertility centers are mandated to report and which includes data on more than 95% of all IVF cycles performed in the United States. Data from 2000 to 2010 described trends. Data from 2010 determined predictors. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Good perinatal outcome, defined as a singleton live-born infant delivered at 37 weeks or later and weighing 2500 g or more. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2010, data from 443 clinics (93% of all US fertility centers) were included. The annual number of donor oocyte cycles significantly increased, from 10,801 to 18,306. Among all donor oocyte cycles, an increasing trend was observed from 2000 to 2010 in the proportion of cycles using frozen (vs fresh) embryos (26.7% [95% CI, 25.8%-27.5%] to 40.3% [95% CI, 39.6%-41.1%]) and elective single-embryo transfers (vs transfer of multiple embryos) (0.8% [95% CI, 0.7%-1.0%] to 14.5% [95% CI, 14.0%-15.1%]). Good perinatal outcomes increased from 18.5% (95% CI, 17.7%-19.3%) to 24.4% (95% CI, 23.8%-25.1%) (P < .001 for all listed trends). Mean donor and recipient ages remained stable at 28 (SD, 2.8) years and 41 (SD, 5.3) years, respectively. In 2010, 396 clinics contributed data. For donor oocyte cycles using fresh embryos (n = 9865), 27.5% (95% CI, 26.6%-28.4%) resulted in good perinatal outcome. Transfer of an embryo at day 5 (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.17 [95% CI, 1.04-1.32]) and elective single-embryo transfers (adjusted OR, 2.32 [95% CI, 1.92-2.80]) were positively associated with good perinatal outcome; tubal (adjusted OR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.60-0.86]) or uterine (adjusted OR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.58-0.94]) factor infertility and non-Hispanic black recipient race/ethnicity (adjusted OR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.35-0.67]) were associated with decreased odds of good outcome. Recipient age was not associated with likelihood of good perinatal outcome. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In the United States from 2000 to 2010, there was an increase in number of donor oocyte cycles, accompanied by an increase in good outcomes. Further studies are needed to understand the mechanisms underlying the factors associated with less successful outcomes.
Assuntos
Fertilização in vitro/estatística & dados numéricos , Doação de Oócitos/estatística & dados numéricos , Transferência de Embrião Único/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Peso ao Nascer , Aconselhamento , Tomada de Decisões , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doação de Oócitos/tendências , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Improper hand hygiene by healthcare workers (HCWs) is responsible for about 40% of nosocomial infections resulting in prolonged illnesses, hospital stays, long-term disability and unexpected high costs on patients and their families, and also lead to a massive additional financial burden on the health-care system. OBJECTIVE: To assess knowledge and practices regarding hand hygiene among HCWs of a tertiary health care facility. METHODS: A cross sectional, questionnaire and observation based study was carried out in a tertiary care health care facility in Pune. Based on sample size calculations, 100 HCWs working in medical and surgical wards were studied. RESULTS: The proportion knowledgeable about hand hygiene practices was 85% and 73% HCWs were of the belief that unclean hands are an important route of cross transmission. WHO guidelines regarding procedure were being followed by 90% for hand washing with soap and water and 64% for alcohol based rubs. Majority preferred hand washing with soap and water over hand rubbing with alcohol based solutions. 21% of HCWs were missing hand hygiene opportunities 1 in 5 times. Heavy workload (38%), non availability (52%) and inaccessibility (9%) of hand hygiene facilities were the common reasons for non-compliance. Availability of 'one time use paper towels' was low (12%). CONCLUSION: Inadequate compliance despite knowledge and false sense of security by alcohol based rubs was seen. A multi disciplinary, multifaceted approach is required to tackle issues of non-compliance.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Compliance and implementation of infection control guidelines have been recognized as efficient means to prevent and control hospital acquired infections. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate knowledge and practices about infection control guidelines amongst medical students and to explore their education needs as perceived by them and faculty. METHODS: A total of 160 final year students and 100 faculty members of one of the top medical colleges in India were selected by simple random sampling in each group as per sample size of 143 students (alpha 0.05, error 7%, prevalence 60%) and 99 (error 7.5%) faculty. Data collected by pilot-tested, unlinked, anonymous questionnaire. RESULTS: Amongst students, knowledge (77.50%; 95% CI, 70.24-83.72) was mixed with misconceptions. Only 31.25% always followed hand hygiene procedure; 50% recapped needles; disposal of hazardous material into designated containers always was low (sharps 20%, contaminated items 25%). Despite experiencing needle stick injury (6.25%) and splashes (40%), less than 30% reported these as 44% were unaware of reporting procedure. The discord between the perceptions of faculty regarding students and students' own perceptions was clearly evident (all Kappa values less than 0.50). Students and faculty agreed on workshops (58.13% and 58%) and reinforcement by colleagues (51% and 54%) but not on on-job training (51% and 34%) and part of curriculum (48% and 40%) for teaching-learning infection control. CONCLUSION: Tackling disconnect between students and faculty perceptions and empowering students with knowledge and skills in infection control is important. Approach needs to be researched and formulated as current methods seem to be inadequate.
RESUMO
Florida resident birth certificates for 2004-2006 were linked to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National ART Surveillance System and were used to investigate 1) whether the association of assisted reproductive technology (ART) with preterm birth varies by prepregnancy body mass index and 2) whether the association varies by plurality. Preterm birth was defined as early preterm birth (gestation <34 weeks) and late preterm birth (gestation 34-36 weeks). Descriptive statistics and multinomial logistic regression were used to explore maternal and infant differences by ART status and plurality. Of 581,403 women included in the study, 24.0% were overweight, 18.6% were obese, 7.3% had late preterm birth, 2.6% had early preterm birth, and 0.67% conceived through ART. Among singleton births, ART was associated with increased early preterm birth risk among underweight (odds ratio (OR) = 2.94, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.27, 6.81), overweight (OR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.12, 2.72), and obese (OR = 2.37, 95% CI: 1.51, 3.71) women. Among twins, ART was significantly associated with increased risk among overweight (OR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.12, 2.32) and obese (OR = 1.85, 95% CI: 1.18, 2.90) women. Differences in the associations between ART and early preterm birth by body mass index and plurality warrant further investigation.
Assuntos
Obesidade/complicações , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Nascimento Prematuro/epidemiologia , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Peso ao Nascer , Índice de Massa Corporal , Feminino , Florida/epidemiologia , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Gravidez Múltipla/estatística & dados numéricos , Nascimento Prematuro/etiologia , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: In 2013, age restrictions for adolescents on over-the-counter access were removed for "Plan B One-Step", a single oral medication option for emergency contraception use. Restrictions on generic options of the emergency contraceptive pill (ECP) were removed in 2014. METHODS: National Survey of Family Growth data were used to assess the prevalence of ever use of ECPs among sexually experienced female adolescents and young adults (AYA) aged 15-24 years (2015-2017 sample), and trends in indicators of ECP use and acquisition (2006-2017 samples). Prevalence estimates were obtained by age subgroups for 15-17, 18-19, and 20-24 years. Statistical significance was determined using an alpha of .05 and 95% confidence intervals calculated around the point estimates. RESULTS: The weighted estimate of sexually experienced female AYA in the United States ranged from 13.3 million in 2006-2008 to 12.7 million in 2015-2017. The prevalence of ever ECP use was 18.2% (95% CI 15.7-21.1) and 31.8% (95% CI 26.9-37.1) in 2006-2008 and 2015-2017, respectively. Ever use in 2015-2017 varied by age group, number of lifetime opposite-sex partners and abortions, and experience of nonconsensual sex. In 2008-2010, 46.1% (95% CI 36.0-56.5) of respondents last obtained ECPs at community health or family planning clinics, and 31.8% (95% CI 22.9-42.2) last obtained ECPs at a pharmacy compared to 18.1% (95% CI 12.0-26.4) and 70.1% (95% CI 60.6-78.1) respectively in 2015-2017. Prevalence of provider counseling about emergency contraception in female AYA regardless of prior sexual experience in the past 12 months remained at or below 5% from 2006 to 2017. CONCLUSION: Increasing access to ECPs over-the-counter may have contributed to notable increases in reported ever use of ECPs and in the receipts from a pharmacy among AYA between 2006 and 2017. AYA may benefit if pharmacists and healthcare providers increase reproductive health counseling.
Assuntos
Aborto Induzido , Anticoncepção Pós-Coito , Anticoncepcionais Pós-Coito , Adolescente , Anticoncepcionais Pós-Coito/uso terapêutico , Serviços de Planejamento Familiar , Feminino , Humanos , Medicamentos sem Prescrição/uso terapêutico , Gravidez , Comportamento Sexual , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Equitable access to high quality adolescent sexual and reproductive health (ASRH) services can help reduce unintended pregnancies, sexually transmitted diseases, and disparities in these outcomes. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of Reproductive Health, has a long history of working to improve access to and quality of ASRH services through applied research and public health practice. This report from CDC summarizes the evolution of these efforts from more than a decade of work-from community-based demonstration projects to an initiative to support wide-scale implementation. We describe a community-wide teen pregnancy prevention program model that includes a component addressing ASRH services (2010-2015), focused efforts related to quality improvement (QI) of and community-clinic linkages to ASRH services (2015-2020), and the development of a QI package that collates implementation strategies and tools to improve ASRH services (2020-2022). We conclude by discussing future directions. In disseminating key strategies and resources from this work, we aim to support broader public health and clinical efforts to strengthen ASRH care in the United States in ways that promote health equity.