The Impact of FASTPASS: A Collaboration With Emergency Department to Improve Management of Patients With Gallbladder Disease and Acute Appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: Efficient Emergency Department (ED) throughput depends on several factors, including collaboration and consultation with surgical services. The acute care surgery service (ACS) collaborated with ED to implement a new process termed "FASTPASS" (FP), which might improve patient-care for those with acute appendicitis and gallbladder disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the 1-year outcome of FP. METHODS: FASTPASS is a joint collaboration between ACS and ED. ED physicians were provided with a simple check-list for diagnosing young males (<50-year old) with acute appendicitis (AA) and young males or females (<50-year old) with gallbladder disease (GBD). Once ED deemed patients fit our FP check-list, patients were directly admitted (FASTPASSed) to the observation unit. The ACS then came to evaluate the patients for possible surgical intervention. We performed outcome analysis before and after the institution of the FP. Outcomes of interest were ED length of stay (LOS), time from ED to the operating room (OR) (door-to-knife), hospital LOS (HLOS), and cost. RESULTS: During our 1-year study period, for those patients who underwent GBD/AA surgery, 56 (26%) GBD and 27 (26%) AA patients met FP criteria. Compared to the non-FP patients during FP period, FP halved ED LOS for GBD (7.4 ± 3.0 versus 3.5 ± 1.7 h, P < 0.001) and AA (6.7 ± 3.3 versus. 1.8 ± 1.6 h, P < 0.001). Similar outcome benefits were observed for door-to-knife time, HLOS, and costs. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the FP process improved ED throughput in a single, highly-trained ER leading to an overall improved patient care process. A future study involving multiple EDs and different disease processes may help decrease ED overcrowding and improve healthcare system efficiency.

Randomized Clinical Trial of 14-French (14F) Pigtail Catheters versus 28-32F Chest Tubes in the Management of Patients with Traumatic Hemothorax and Hemopneumothorax.

INTRODUCTION: Traditional management of traumatic hemothorax/hemopneumothorax (HTX/HPTX) has been insertion of large-bore 32-40 French (Fr) chest tubes (CTs). Retrospective studies have shown 14Fr percutaneous pigtail catheters (PCs) are equally effective as CTs. Our aim was to compare effectiveness between PCs and CTs by performing the first randomized controlled trial (RCT). We hypothesize PCs work equally as well as CTs in management of traumatic HTX/HPTX. METHODS: Prospective RCT comparing 14Fr PCs to 28-32Fr CTs for management of traumatic HTX/HPTX from 07/2015 to 01/2018. We excluded patients requiring emergency tube placement or who refused. Primary outcome was failure rate defined as retained HTX or recurrent PTX requiring additional intervention. Secondary outcomes included initial output (IO), tube days and insertion perception experience (IPE) score on a scale of 1-5 (1 = tolerable experience, 5 = worst experience). Unpaired Student's t-test, chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum test were utilized with significance set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were enrolled. Baseline characteristics between PC patients (N = 20) and CT patients (N = 23) were similar. Failure rates (10% PCs vs. 17% CTs, P = 0.49) between cohorts were similar. IO (median, 650 milliliters[ml]; interquartile range[IR], 375-1087; for PCs vs. 400 ml; IR, 240-700; for CTs, P = 0.06), and tube duration was similar, but PC patients reported lower IPE scores (median, 1, "I can tolerate it"; IR, 1-2) than CT patients (median, 3, "It was a bad experience"; IR, 3-4, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with traumatic HTX/HPTX, 14Fr PCs were equally as effective as 28-32Fr CTs with no significant difference in failure rates. PC patients, however, reported a better insertion experience. www.ClinicalTrials.gov Registration ID: NCT02553434.

Number and Type of Complications Associated With Failure to Rescue in Trauma Patients.

BACKGROUND: Failure to rescue (FTR) is becoming a ubiquitous metric of quality care. The aim of our study is to determine the type and number of complications associated with FTR after trauma. METHODS: We reviewed the Trauma Quality Improvement Program including patients who developed complications after admission. Patients were divided as the following: "FTR" if the patient died or "rescued" if the patient did not die. Logistic regression was used to ascertain the effect of the type and number of complications on FTR. RESULTS: A total of 25,754 patients were included with 972 identified as FTR. Logistic regression identified sepsis (odds ratio [OR] = 6.61 [4.72-9.27]), pneumonia (OR = 2.79 [2.15-3.64]), acute respiratory distress syndrome (OR = 4.6 [3.17-6.69]), and cardiovascular complications (OR = 24.22 [19.39-30.26]) as predictors of FTR. The odds ratio of FTR increased by 8.8 for every single increase in the number of complications. CONCLUSIONS: Specific types of complications increase the odds of FTR. The overall complication burden will also increase the odds of FTR linearly. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III Prognostic.

Pediatric Liver Injury: Physical Examination, Fast and Serum Transaminases Can Serve as a Guide.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to determine if the combination of physical examination (PE), serum transaminases along with Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) would effectively rule out major hepatic injuries (HIs) after blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) in hemodynamically stable pediatric patients. METHODS: We conducted a 9-year retrospective study of pediatric patients (<18 y) with BAT. We collected data on liver enzymes (aspartate transaminase [AST] and alanine transaminase [ALT]), FAST, and PE findings. Definitive diagnosis and staging of HI were based on abdominal CT scanning. The sensitivity and specificity of ALT/AST, FAST, and PE were then calculated individually and in combination. RESULTS: We identified a total of 423 pediatric patients with BAT. Mean age was 11 y, median abdominal Abbreviated Injury Scale was 3 [2-4], and mean ED-SBP was 132 mm Hg. One hundred ninety-eight patients had HI of which 107 were major HI, defined by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma as ≥grade III. Using ROC curve analysis, optimum ALT and AST thresholds were determined to be 90 U/L and 120 U/L, respectively. The sensitivity of FAST was 50% while that of PE was 40%. Combining PE with AST/ALT and FAST had an overall sensitivity of 97%, a specificity of 95%, a positive predictive value of 87%, and a negative predictive value of 98%. CONCLUSIONS: In hemodynamically stable pediatric blunt abdominal trauma patients, CT scanning can be avoided using a combination of readily available tests thus avoiding unnecessary radiation exposure. However, pediatric patients with positive PE, FAST, and elevated AST/ALT may eventually require CT scan to further evaluate liver injuries.

Chronic Alcohol Consumption and Risk of Deep Venous Thrombosis: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Alcoholism is associated with variable effects on the coagulation system. Therefore, the aim of our study was to analyze the currently unknown association between chronic alcohol consumption and the risk of venous thromboembolism, which includes deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). METHODS: We performed a 2-y (2013-2014) analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database. All trauma patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 16 were included. We excluded patients with acute alcohol intoxication, hematologic disorders, and cancer. Patients were divided into two groups (alcoholic and nonalcoholic) and were matched using propensity score matching (1:1) for demographics, ISS, injury location, and admission vitals. Outcomes measures were the prevalence of venous thromboembolism in each group. RESULTS: Of the 91,066 trauma patients included in our analysis, 35,460 patients were matched (alcoholics: 17,730; nonalcoholics: 17,730). The mean was age 45 ± 18 y, and 81% were males. Matched groups were similar in age (P = 0.32), heart rate (P = 0.31), systolic blood pressure (P = 0.46), location of injury (P = 0.85), ISS (P = 0.76), and Glasgow Coma Scale (P = 0.38). Prevalence of DVT was lower in alcoholics compared with nonalcoholics (2.34% versus 5.12%, P = 0.01). The overall incidence of PE was 1.2%, and there was no difference between the two groups (1.1% versus 1.3%, P = 0.22). Similarly, there was no difference in mortality (14.8% versus 15.4%, P = 0.32) between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic alcohol consumption is associated with a low risk of DVT in trauma patients. This association warrants further investigation of the possible physiological effects of alcohol in trauma patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III Prognostic.

Risk Factors for Perforated Appendicitis in the Acute Care Surgery Era-Minimizing the Patient's Delayed Presentation Factor.

BACKGROUND: Numerous factors contribute to advanced disease or increased complications in patients with acute appendicitis (AA). This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with AA perforation, including the effect of system time (ST) delay, after controlling for patient time (PT) delay. In this study, PT was controlled (to less than or equal to 24 h) to better understand the effect of ST delay on AA perforation. METHODS: Medical records of patients who underwent surgery for AA at a tertiary referral hospital from October 2009 through September 2013 were reviewed. Data collected included demographics, body mass index, presence of fecalith, PT (i.e., duration of time from symptom onset to arrival in emergency department), and ST (i.e., duration of time from arrival in emergency department to operating room). AA was classified as simple (acute, nonperforated) versus advanced (gangrenous, perforated). RESULTS: Seven hundred forty-seven patients underwent surgery for AA. After excluding patients with PT > 24 h, 445 patients fit the study criteria, of which 358 patients with simple AA and 87 patients with advanced disease. Advanced appendicitis patients were older and had higher body mass index, longer PT, higher WBC, and higher incidence of fecaliths. Both groups had similar ST. Risk factors for advanced appendicitis after multiple regression analysis are age >50 y old, WBC >15,000, the presence of fecaliths, and PT delay >12 h. CONCLUSIONS: Once PT delay was limited to ≤24 h, the ST delay of >12 h did not adversely affect the incidence of advanced AA. Age >50 y, WBC >15,000, PT delay >12 h, and the presence of fecaliths were identified as risk factors associated with advanced AA.

Is There a Need for Platelet Transfusion After Traumatic Brain Injury in Patients on P2Y12 Inhibitors?

BACKGROUND: A significant portion of patients sustaining traumatic brain injury (TBI) are on antiplatelet medications. The reversal of P2Y12 agents after intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) remains unclear. The aim of our study is to evaluate outcomes after TBI in patients who are on preinjury P2Y12 inhibitors and received a platelet transfusion. METHODS: We analyzed our prospectively maintained TBI database from 2013 to 2016 and included all patients with isolated ICH who were on P2Y12 inhibitors (Clopidogrel, Prasugrel, Ticagrelor). Regression analysis was performed adjusting for demographics and injury parameters. Outcome measures included progression of ICH, adverse discharge disposition (skilled nursing facility), and mortality. RESULTS: A total 243 patients with ICH on preinjury P2Y12 inhibitor met our inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Mean age was 55 ± 18 y, 58% were males and 60% were white and median injury severity score was 13 [9-18]. 73.6% received platelet transfusion after admission. The median packs of platelet transfusion were 1 [1-2] units. After controlling for confounders, patients who received platelet transfusion had a lower rate of progression (OR: 0.68, P = 0.01) and decreased rate of neurosurgical intervention (OR: 0.80, P = 0.03). Overall mortality was 12.3%. Patients on P2Y12 inhibitors who received platelet transfusion had lower odds of discharge to a skilled nursing facility (OR: 0.75, P = 0.02) and mortality (OR: 0.85, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Platelet transfusion after isolated traumatic ICH in patients on P2Y12 inhibitors is associated with improved outcomes. Platelet transfusion was associated with decreased risk of progression of ICH, neurosurgical intervention, and mortality. Further randomized studies to validate the use of platelet transfusion and define the optimal dose in patients on P2Y12 inhibitors are warranted.

Can Sarcopenia Quantified by Computed Tomography Scan Predict Adverse Outcomes in Emergency General Surgery?

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia (a decline of skeletal muscle mass) has been identified as a predictor of poor postoperative outcomes. The impact of sarcopenia in emergency general surgery (EGS) remains undetermined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between sarcopenia and outcomes after EGS. METHODS: A 3-y (2012-15) review of all EGS patients aged ≥45 y was presented to our institution. Patients who underwent computer tomography-abdomen were included. Sarcopenia was defined as the lowest sex-specific quartile of total psoas index (computer tomography-measured psoas area normalized for body surface area). Patients were divided into sarcopenic (SA) and nonsarcopenic. Primary outcome measures were in-hospital complications, hospital-length of stay [h-LOS], intensive care unit-length of stay, adverse discharge disposition, and in-hospital mortality. Our secondary outcome measures were 30-d complications, readmissions, and mortality. RESULTS: Four hundred fifty-two patients undergoing EGS were included. Mean age was 58 ± 8.7 y, and 60% were males. Hundred thirteen patients were categorized as SA. Compared to nonsarcopenic, SA patients had higher rates of minor complications (28% versus 17%, P = 0.01), longer hospital-length of stay (7d versus 5d, P = 0.02), and were more likely to be discharged to skilled nursing facility/Rehab (35% versus 17%, P = 0.01). There was no difference between the two groups regarding major complications, intensive care unit-length of stay, mortality, and 30-d outcomes. On regression analysis, sarcopenia was an independent predictor of minor complications (OR 1.8 [1.6-3.7]) and discharge to rehab/SNIF (OR: 1.9 [1.5-3.2]). However, there was no association with major complications, mortality, 30-d complications, readmissions, and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Sarcopenia is an independent predictor of minor postoperative complications, prolonged hospital-length of stay, and an adverse discharge disposition in patients undergoing EGS. Identifying SA EGS patients will improve both resource allocation and discussion about the patient's prognosis between physicians, patients, and their families.

Outcomes After Massive Transfusion in Trauma Patients: Variability Among Trauma Centers.

BACKGROUND: Exsanguinating trauma patients often require massive blood transfusion (defined as transfusion of 10 or more pRBC units within first 24 h). The aim of our study is to assess the outcomes of trauma patients receiving massive transfusion at different levels of trauma centers. METHODS: Two-y (2013-2014) retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program. We included all adult trauma patients who received massive transfusion (MT) of blood. Outcome measures were mortality, hospital length of stay, intensive care unit-free and ventilator-free days, blood products received, and complications. RESULTS: We analyzed a total of 416,957 patients, of which 2776 met the inclusion criteria and included in the study. Mean age was 40.6 ± 20 y, 78.3% were males and 33.1% of the injuries were penetrating. Median injury severity score [IQR] was 29 [18-40], median [IQR] Glasgow Coma Scale 10[4-15]. Mean packed red blood cells transfusion in the first 24 h was 20 ± 13 units and mean plasma transfusion was 13 ± 11 units. Overall in-hospital mortality was 43.5%. Receiving MT in level I trauma center was independently associated with lower rates of mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 0.75 [0.46-0.96], P < 0.001). Higher injury severity score (OR: 1.020 [1.010-1.030], P < 0.001) and increased units of packed red blood cells transfused (OR: 1.067 [1.041-1.093], P < 0.001) were independently associated with increased mortality. However, there was no association between teaching status, age, gender, emergency department vitals, and units of plasma transfused. CONCLUSIONS: Hemorrhage continues to remain one of the most common cause of death after trauma. Almost half of the patients who received massive transfusion died. Patients who receive massive blood transfusion in a level I trauma centers have improved survival compared with level II trauma centers.

Day of Hospital Admission and Effect on Outcomes: The Weekend Effect in Acute Gallstone Pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to evaluate outcomes in patients who are admitted on weekend compared with those admitted on a weekday for acute gallstone pancreatitis. METHODS: We performed a 3-y (2010-2012) analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. Patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) were included and were divided into two groups: admission on the weekend versus the weekday. Primary outcome measures were time to ERCP, adverse events, and mortality. Secondary outcome measures were hospital length of stay and total cost. RESULTS: A total of 5803 patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis who underwent ERCP were included in our study; of which 22.6% were admitted on the weekend, whereas 77.4% were admitted on a weekday. Mean age was 57 ± 18 y and 57.1% were female. Within 24 h, the rate of ERCP was higher in patients admitted on the weekday compared with those admitted on the weekend (40% versus 24%; P < 0.001). Similarly, by 48 h, the rate of ERCP was higher in the weekday group (69% versus 49%, P < 0.001). Patients admitted over the weekends had higher complications rate (P = 0.03), hospital length of stay (P < 0.001), and the total cost of hospitalization (P < 0.001) compared with the weekday group with no difference in in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Patients admitted on weekends for acute gallstone pancreatitis experience a delay in getting ERCP and have higher complications, prolonged hospital stay, and increased hospital costs compared with those admitted on weekdays.

Failure to Rescue After Emergency General Surgery in Geriatric Patients: Does Frailty Matter?

BACKGROUND: Failure to rescue (FTR) is considered as an index of quality of care provided by a hospital. However, the role of frailty in FTR remains unclear. We hypothesized that the FTR rate is higher for frail geriatric emergency general surgery (EGS) patients than nonfrail geriatric EGS patients. METHODS: We performed a 3-y (2015-2017) prospective cohort study of all geriatric patients (age ≥ 65 y) requiring EGS. Frailty was calculated by using the EGS-specific Frailty Index (EGSFI) within 24 h of admission. Patients were divided into two groups: frail (FI ≥ 0.325) and nonfrail (FI < 0.325). We defined FTR as death from a major complication. Regression analysis was performed to control for demographics, type of operative intervention, admission vitals, and admission laboratory values. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-six geriatric EGS patients were included, of which 38.9% were frail. Frail patients were more likely to be white (P < 0.01) and, on admission, had a higher American Association of Anesthesiologist class (P = 0.03) and lower serum albumin (P < 0.01). However, there was no difference between the groups regarding age (P = 0.54), gender (P = 0.56), admission vitals, and WBC count (P = 0.35). Overall, 26.7% (n = 85) of patients developed in-hospital complications; and mortality occurred in 30% (n = 26) of those patients (i.e., the FTR group). Frail patients had higher rates of FTR (14% vs. 4%, P < 0.001) than nonfrail patients. On regression analysis, after controlling for confounders, frail status was an independent predictor of FTR (OR: 3.4 [2.3-4.6]) in geriatric EGS patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that in geriatric EGS patients, a frail status independently contributes to FTR and increases the odds of FTR threefold compared with nonfrail status. Thus, it should be included in quality metrics for geriatric EGS patients.

Oral Xa Inhibitors Versus Low Molecular Weight Heparin for Thromboprophylaxis After Nonoperative Spine Trauma.

BACKGROUND: Thromboprophylaxis with oral Xa inhibitors (Xa-Inh) are recommended after major orthopedic operation; however, its role in spine trauma is not well-defined. The aim of our study was to assess the impact of Xa-Inh in spinal trauma patients managed nonoperatively. METHODS: A 4-y (2013-2016) review of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database. We included all patients with an isolated spine trauma (Spine-abbreviated injury scale ≥3 and other-abbreviated injury scale <3) who were managed nonoperatively and received thromboprophylaxis with either low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or Xa-Inh. Patients were divided into two groups based on the thromboprophylactic agent received: Xa-Inh and LMWH and were matched in a 1:2 ratio using propensity score matching for demographics, vitals and injury parameters, and level of spine injury. Outcomes were rates of deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and mortality. RESULTS: We analyzed a total of 58,936 patients, of which 1056 patients (LMWH: 704, Xa-Inh: 352) were matched. Matched groups were similar in demographics, vital and injury parameters, length of hospital stay (P = 0.31), or time to thromboprophylaxis (P = 0.79). Patients who received Xa-Inh were less likely to develop a deep venous thrombosis (2.3% versus 5.7%, P < 0.01). There were no differences in the rate of pulmonary embolism (P = 0.73), postprophylaxis packed red blood cells transfusions (P = 0.79), postprophylaxis surgical decompression of spinal column (P = 0.75), and mortality rate (P = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: Oral Xa-Inh seems to be more effective as prophylactic pharmacologic agent for the prevention of deep venous thrombosis in patients with nonoperative spinal trauma compared to LMWH. The two drugs had similar safety profile. Further prospective trials should be performed to change current guidelines.

"No zone" approach in penetrating neck trauma reduces unnecessary computed tomography angiography and negative explorations.

BACKGROUND: The most recent management guidelines advocate computed tomography angiography (CTA) for any suspected vascular or aero-digestive injuries in all zones and give zone II injuries special consideration. We hypothesized that physical examination can safely guide CTA use in a "no zone" approach. METHODS: An 8-year retrospective analysis of all adult trauma patients with penetrating neck trauma (PNT) was performed. We included all patients in whom the platysma was violated. Patients were classified into three groups as follows: hard signs, soft signs, and asymptomatic. CTA use, positive CTA (contrast extravasation, dissection, or intimal flap) and operative details were reported. Primary outcomes were positive CTA and therapeutic neck exploration (TNE) (defined by repair of major vascular or aero-digestive injuries). RESULTS: A total of 337 patients with PNT met the inclusion criteria. Eighty-two patients had hard signs and all of them went to the operating room, of which 59 (72%) had TNE. One hundred fifty-six patients had soft signs, of which CTA was performed in 121 (78%), with positive findings in 12 (10%) patients. The remaining 35 (22%) underwent initial neck exploration, of which 14 (40%) were therapeutic yielding a high rate of negative exploration. Ninty-nine patients were asymptomatic, of which CTA was performed in 79 (80%), with positive findings in 3 (4%), however, none of these patients required TNE. On sub analysis based on symptoms, there was no difference in the rate of TNE between the neck zones in patients with hard signs (P = 0.23) or soft signs (P = 0.51). Regardless of the zone of injury, asymptomatic patients did not require a TNE. CONCLUSIONS: Physical examination regardless of the zone of injury should be the primary guide to CTA or TNE in patients with PNT. Following traditional zone-based guidelines can result in unnecessary negative explorations in patients with soft signs and may need rethinking.

Comparing Outcomes Between "Pull" Versus "Push" Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Acute Care Surgery: Under-Reported Pull Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Incidence of Tube Dislodgement.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) complications are often under-reported in the literature, especially regarding the incidence of tube dislodgement (TD). TD can cause significant morbidity depending on its timing. We compared outcomes between "push" and "pull" PEGs. We hypothesized that push PEGs, because of its T-fasteners and balloon tip, would have a lower incidence of TD and complications compared with pull PEGs. METHODS: We performed a chart review of our prospectively maintained acute care surgery database for patients who underwent PEG tube placement from July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2013. Data regarding age, gender, body mass index, indications (trauma versus nontrauma), and complications (including TD) were extracted. Procedure-related complications were classified as either major if patients required an operative intervention or minor if they did not. We compared outcomes between pull PEG and push PEG. Multiple regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with major complications. RESULTS: During the 4-y study period, 264 patients underwent pull PEGs and 59 underwent push PEGs. Age, gender, body mass index, and indications were similar between the two groups. The overall complications (major and minor) were similar (20% pull versus 22% push, P = 0.61). The incidence of TD was also similar (12% pull versus 9% push, P = 0.49). However, TD associated with major complications was higher in pull PEGs but was not statistically significant (6% pull versus 2% push, P = 0.21). Multiple regression analysis showed that dislodged pull PEG was associated with major complications (odds ratio 29.5; 95% confidence interval, 11.3-76.9; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of pull PEG TD associated with major complications is under-recognized. Specific measures should be undertaken to help prevent pull PEG TD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, therapeutic.

A Prospective Study of 7-Year Experience Using Percutaneous 14-French Pigtail Catheters for Traumatic Hemothorax/Hemopneumothorax at a Level-1 Trauma Center: Size Still Does Not Matter.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of 14-French (14F) pigtail catheters (PCs) compared to 32-40F chest tubes (CTs) in patients with traumatic hemothorax (HTX) and hemopneumothorax (HPTX) is becoming more well known but still lacking. The aim of our study was to analyze our cumulative experience and outcomes with PCs in patients with traumatic HTX/HPTX. We hypothesized that PCs would be as effective as CTs. METHODS: Using our PC database, we analyzed all trauma patients who required chest drainage for HTX/HPTX from 2008 to 2014. Primary outcomes of interest, comparing PCs to CTs, included initial drainage output in milliliters (mL), tube insertion-related complications, and failure rate. For our statistical analysis, we used the unpaired Student's t test, Chi-square test, and Wilcoxon rank-sum test. We defined statistical significance as P < 0.05. RESULTS: During the 7-year period, 496 trauma patients required chest drainage for traumatic HTX/HPTX: 307 by CTs and 189 by PCs. PC patients were older (52 ± 21 vs. 42 ± 19, P < 0.001), demonstrated a significantly higher occurrence of blunt trauma (86 vs. 55%, P ≤ 0.001), and had tubes placed in a non-emergent fashion (Day 1 [interquartile range (IQR) 1-3 days] for PC placement vs. Day 0 [IQR 0-1 days] for CT placement, P < 0.001). All primary outcomes of interest were similar, except that the initial drainage output for PCs was higher (425 mL [IQR 200-800 mL] vs. 300 mL [IQR 150-500], P < 0.001). Findings for subgroup analysis among emergent and non-emergent PC placement were also similar to CT placement. CONCLUSION: PCs had similar outcomes to CTs in terms of failure rate and tube insertion-related complications, and the initial drainage output from PCs was not inferior to that of CTs. The usage of PCs was, however, selective. A future multi-center study is needed to provide additional support and information for PC usage in traumatic HTX/HPTX.

Massive Transfusion: The Revised Assessment of Bleeding and Transfusion (RABT) Score.

BACKGROUND: Massive transfusion (MT) is a lifesaving treatment for trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock, assessed by Assessment of Blood Consumption (ABC) Score based on mechanism of injury, systolic blood pressure (SBP), tachycardia, and FAST exam. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of ABC score by replacing hypotension and tachycardia; with Shock Index (SI) > 1.0 and including pelvic fractures. METHODS: We performed a 2-year (2014-2015) analysis of all high-level trauma activations and excluded patients dead on arrival. The ABC score was calculated using the 4-point score [blunt (0)/penetrating trauma (1), HR ≥ 120 (1), SBP ≤ 90 mmHg (1), and FAST positive (1)]. The Revised Assessment of Bleeding and Transfusion (RABT) score also included 4 points, calculated by replacing HR and SBP with SI > 1.0 and including pelvic fracture. AUROC compared performances of the two scores. RESULTS: A total of 380 patients were included. The overall MT was 27%. Patients receiving MT had higher median ABC scores [1.1 (0-2) vs. 1 (0-2), p = 0.15] and RABT scores [2 (1-3) vs. 1 (0-2), p < 0.001]. The RABT score had better discriminative power (AUROC = 0.828) compared to ABC score (AUROC = 0.617) for predicting the need for MT. Cutoff of RABT score ≥ 2 had a sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 77% for predicting need for MT compared to ABC score with 39% sensitivity and 72% specificity. CONCLUSION: Replacement of hypotension and tachycardia with a SI > 1.0 and inclusion of pelvic fracture enhanced discrimination of ABC score for predicting the need for MT. The current ABC score would benefit from revision to more appropriately identify patients requiring MT.

The impact of Glasgow Coma Scale-age prognosis score on geriatric traumatic brain injury outcomes.

BACKGROUND: As the population ages, increasing number of geriatric patients sustain traumatic brain injury (TBI). Communication of accurate prognostic information is crucial for making informed decisions on behalf of such patients. Therefore, the aim of our study was to develop a simple and clinically applicable tool that accurately predicts the prognosis in geriatric TBI patients. METHODS: We performed a 1-y (2011) retrospective analysis of isolated geriatric TBI patients (age ≥65 y, head abbreviated injury score [AIS] ≥ 3, and other body AIS < 3) in the National Trauma Data Bank. We calculated a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)-age prognosis (GAP) score (age/GCS score) for all patients. Outcome measures were in-hospital adverse outcomes (mortality and Rehab/skilled nursing facility discharge disposition). Regression analysis and receiver operator characteristic curve analysis were performed to determine the discriminatory power of GAP score. RESULTS: A total of 8750 geriatric patients with TBI were included. Mean age was 77.8 ± 7.1 y, the median (interquartile range) GCS was 15 (13-15), and the median (interquartile range) head AIS was 4 (3-4). The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 12.7%, and 34.2% of the patients were discharged home. As the GAP score increased, the mortality rate increased and discharge to-home decreased. Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis revealed excellent discriminatory power for mortality (area under the curve: 0.826). Above a GAP score of 12, the mortality rate was >50% and more than 45% of the patients were discharged to Rehab/skilled nursing facility. CONCLUSIONS: For geriatric patients with TBI, a simple GAP score reliably predicts outcomes. A score above 12 results in a drastic increase in mortality and an adverse discharge disposition. This simple tool may help clinicians provide accurate prognostic information to patients' families.

Early thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin is safe in patients with pelvic fracture managed nonoperatively.

INTRODUCTION: Early initiation of thromboprophylaxis is highly desired in pelvic fracture patients, but it is often delayed due to the fear of hemorrhage. Aim of our study was to assess the safety of early initiation of venous thromboprophylaxis in patients with pelvic trauma managed nonoperatively. METHODS: Three-year (2010-2012) retrospective study of trauma patients with pelvic fractures who were managed nonoperatively and received thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). Patients were stratified in two groups based on the timing of initiation of prophylaxis; early (initiation within first 24 h) and late (after 24 h). Primary outcome measures included decrease in hemoglobin (Hb) levels, number of packed red blood cell (pRBC) units transfused, and the need for hemorrhage control (operative or angioembolization) after initiation of prophylaxis. Regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: 255 patients were included (158 in early and 97 in late group). Mean ± standard deviation age was 48.2 ± 23.3 y, and 50.6% were male. After adjusting for confounders, there was no difference between the two groups in the decrease in Hb levels (b = 0.087, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.253 to 1.025; P = 0.23) or pRBC units transfused (b = -0.005, 95% CI = -0.366 to 0.364; P = 0.75).One patient required hemorrhage control postprophylaxis and belonged to the late group. Subanalysis of patients with signs of bleeding (n = 52) showed no difference between the two groups in the decrease in Hb levels or pRBC units transfused. Patients who received LMWH after 24 h had a higher incidence of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis and a longer hospital length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Early initiation of thromboprophylaxis with LMWH in patients with pelvic fractures managed nonoperatively is safe and decreases the risk of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis.

Primary repair for pediatric colonic injury: Are there differences among adult and pediatric trauma centers?

BACKGROUND: Management of colonic injuries (colostomy [CO] versus primary anastomosis [PA]) among pediatric patients remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess outcomes in pediatric trauma patient with colonic injury undergoing operative intervention. METHODS: The National Trauma Data Bank (2011-2012) was queried including patients with isolated colonic injury undergoing exploratory laparotomy with PA or CO with age ≤18 y. Missing value analysis was performed. Patients were stratified into two groups: PA and CO. Outcome measures were mortality, in-hospital complications, and hospital length of stay. Multivariate regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 1151 patients included. Mean ± standard deviation age was 11.61 ± 2.8 y, and median [IQR] Injury Severity Score was 12 [8-16]; 39% (n = 449) of the patients had CO, and 35.6% (n = 410) were managed in pediatric trauma centers (PC). Patients with CO had a higher Injury Severity Score (P < 0.001), a trend toward lower blood pressure (P = 0.40), and an older age (P < 0.001). There was no difference in mortality between the PA and CO groups. However, patients who underwent PA had a shorter length of stay (P < 0.001) and lower in-hospital complications (P < 0.001). A subanalysis shows that, after controlling for all confounding factors, patients managed in PC were 1.2 times (1.2 [1.1-2.1], P = 0.04) more likely to receive a CO than those patients managed in adult trauma centers (AC). Moreover, there was no difference in mortality between the AC and the PC (P = 0.79). CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate no difference in mortality in pediatric trauma patients with colonic injury who undergo primary repair or CO. However, adult trauma centers had lower rates of CO performed as compared to a similar cohort of patients managed in pediatric trauma centers. Further assessment of the reasons underlying such differences will help improve patient outcomes.

Survival benefits of remote ischemic conditioning in sepsis.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis remains the leading cause of death in the surgical intensive care unit. Prior studies have demonstrated a survival benefit of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) in many disease states. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of RIC on survival in sepsis in an animal model and to assess alterations in inflammatory biochemical profiles. We hypothesized that RIC alters inflammatory biochemical profiles resulting in decreased mortality in a septic mouse model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight to 12 week C57BL/6 mice received intra-peritoneal injection of 12.5-mg/kg lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Septic animals in the experimental group underwent RIC at 0, 2, and 6 h after LPS by surgical exploration and alternate clamping of the femoral artery. Six 4-min cycles of ischemia-reperfusion were performed. Primary outcome was survival at 5-d after LPS injection. Secondary outcome was to assess the following serum cytokine levels: interferon-γ (IFN-γ), interleukin (IL)-10, IL-1ß, and tumor necrosis factoralpha (TNFα) at the baseline before LPS injection, 0 hour after LPS injection, and at 2, 4, 24 hours after induction of sepsis (RIC was performed at 2 h after LPS injection). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test were used. ANOVA test was used to compare cytokine measurements. RESULTS: We performed experiments on 44 mice: 14 sham and 30 RIC mice (10 at each time point). Overall survival was higher in the experimental group compared to the sham group (57% versus 21%; P = 0.02), with the highest survival rate observed in the 2-hour post-RIC group (70%). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, 2-h post-RIC group had increased survival at 5 days after LPS (P = 0.04) with hazard ratio of 0.3 (95% confidence interval = 0.09-0.98). In the RIC group, serum concentrations of IFN-γ, IL-10, IL-1ß, and TNFα peaked at 2 h after LPS and then decreased significantly over 24 hours (P < 0.0001) compared to the baseline. CONCLUSIONS: RIC improves survival in sepsis and has the potential for implementation in the clinical practice. Early implementation of RIC may play an immune-modulatory role in sepsis. Further studies are necessary to refine understanding of the observed survival benefits and its implications in sepsis management.