The Role of Open Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Chest Trauma Patients with No Sign of Life: A National Trauma Data Bank Study.

PURPOSE: The effectiveness of open cardiopulmonary resuscitation (OCPR) remains controversial for trauma patients. In this current study, the role of OCPR in managing chest trauma patients is evaluated using nationwide real-world data. METHODS: From 2014 to 2015, the National Trauma Data Bank was retrospectively queried for chest trauma patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest status. The emergency department (ED) and overall survival of patients without signs of life were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression (MLR) analysis was performed to evaluate independent factors of mortality for the target group. Furthermore, a subset group of patients who survived after the ED were studied, focusing on the duration of survival after leaving the ED. RESULTS: A total of 911 patients were enrolled in this study (OCPR vs. non-OCPR: 161 patients vs. 750 patients). The average overall mortality rate was 98.6% (N = 898). Among penetrating chest trauma patients, non-survivors in the ED had significantly higher proportions of gunshot injuries (83.9% vs. 69.7%, p = 0.001) and lower proportions of OCPR (20.7% vs. 44.4%, p < 0.001). MLR analysis showed that gunshot injuries and non-OCPR were significantly related to ED mortality in penetrating trauma patients without signs of life (odds ratio = 2.039, p = 0.006 and odds ratio = 2.900, p < 0.001, respectively). However, the overall survival rate of patients after ED survival (n = 99) was 9.9%, and only 21.2% (n = 21) of them survived more than 1 day after leaving the ED. CONCLUSION: OCPR could be considered in situations where appropriate indications exist. The survival benefit was observed in critically ill patients with penetrating chest trauma who show no signs of life. By enhancing ED survival, OCPR may also contribute to overall survival improvement.

Does Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injury Increase the Probability of Delayed Intra-abdominal Hemorrhage in Patients With Concomitant Blunt Abdominal Trauma?

PURPOSE: Most blunt thoracic aortic injuries (BTAIs) may be treated using thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), and most blunt abdominal traumas (BATs) are managed conservatively. We hypothesized that severe trauma that needs TEVAR may increase the risk of delayed intra-abdominal hemorrhage in patients with concomitant BTAI and BAT because of the potential hemorrhagic shock, disseminated intravascular coagulopathy, blood loss, consequent need for blood transfusion, and procedure-associated heparinization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2015 to 2019, blunt trauma patients with concomitant severe chest trauma and abdominal trauma who could be managed conservatively were studied. The probability of delayed intra-abdominal hemorrhage was compared between patients with concomitant BTAI who received or did not undergo TEVAR. Propensity score matching (PSM), inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), and multivariate logistic regression (MLR) were used to eliminate discrepancies between these 2 groups. RESULTS: Among the 341 studied patients, there were 26 patients with BTAI, and 19 of them underwent TEVAR. Delayed intra-abdominal hemorrhage was observed in 4 patients (21.1%, 4/19) who underwent TEVAR. Both PSM and IPTW showed that patients who underwent TEVAR for concomitant BTAI had a greater delayed need for blood transfusions and a larger proportion of delayed intra-abdominal hemorrhage than patients who did not undergo the procedure. The MLR analysis showed that TEVAR for BTAI was an independent risk factor for delayed intra-abdominal hemorrhage (odds ratio: 10.534, 95%, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: An increased probability of delayed intra-abdominal hemorrhage in patients with BAT (who could be managed conservatively) was observed in patients who underwent TEVAR for concomitant BTAI. CLINICAL IMPACT: More attention should be give in patients with high grade aortic injuries and concomitant abdominal trauma.

The role of acute care surgeons in treating rib fractures-a retrospective cohort study from a single level I trauma center.

BACKGROUND: Rib fractures are the most common thoracic injury in patients who sustained blunt trauma, and potentially life-threatening associated injuries are prevalent. Multi-disciplinary work-up is crucial to achieving a comprehensive understanding of these patients. The present study demonstrated the experience of an acute care surgery (ACS) model for rib fracture management from a single level I trauma center over 13 years. METHODS: Data from patients diagnosed with acute rib fractures from January 2008 to December 2020 were collected from the trauma registry of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CGMH). Information, including patient age, sex, injury mechanism, Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) in different anatomic regions, injury severity score (ISS), index admission department, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), total admission LOS, mortality, and other characteristics of multiple rib fracture, were analyzed. Patients who received surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) were analyzed separately, and basic demographics and clinical outcomes were compared between acute care and thoracic surgeons. RESULTS: A total of 5103 patients diagnosed with acute rib fracture were admitted via the emergency department (ED) of CGMH in the 13-year study period. The Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery (TR) received the most patients (70.8%), and the Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery (CTS) received only 3.1% of the total patients. SSRF was initiated in 2017, and TR performed fixation for 141 patients, while CTS operated for 16 patients. The basic demographics were similar between the two groups, and no significant differences were noted in the outcomes, including LOS, LCU LOS, length of indwelling chest tube, or complications. There was only one mortality in all SSRF patients, and the patient was from the CTS group. CONCLUSIONS: Acute care surgeons provided good-quality care to rib fracture patients, whether SSRF or non-SSRF. Acute care surgeons also safely performed SSRF. Therefore, we propose that the ACS model may be an option for rib fracture management, depending on the deployment of staff in each institute.

Positive signs on physical examination are not always indications for endotracheal tube intubation in patients with facial burn.

BACKGROUND: After clinical evaluation in the emergency department (ED), facial burn patients are usually intubated to protect their airways. However, the possibility of unnecessary intubation or delayed intubation after admission exists. Objective criteria for the evaluation of inhalation injury and the need for airway protection in facial burn patients are needed. METHODS: Facial burn patients between January 2013 and May 2016 were reviewed. Patients who were and were not intubated in the ED were compared. All the intubated patients received routine bronchoscopy and laboratory tests to evaluate whether they had inhalation injuries. The patients with and without confirmed inhalation injuries were compared. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the independent risk factors for inhalation injuries in the facial burn patients. The reasons for intubation in the patients without inhalation injuries were also investigated. RESULTS: During the study period, 121 patients were intubated in the ED among a total of 335 facial burn patients. Only 73 (60.3%) patients were later confirmed to have inhalation injuries on bronchoscopy. The comparison between the patients with and without inhalation injuries showed that shortness of breath (odds ratio = 3.376, p = 0.027) and high total body surface area (TBSA) (odds ratio = 1.038, p = 0.001) were independent risk factors for inhalation injury. Other physical signs (e.g., hoarseness, burned nostril hair, etc.), laboratory examinations and chest X-ray findings were not predictive of inhalation injury in facial burn patients. All the patients with a TBSA over 60% were intubated in the ED even if they did not have inhalation injuries. CONCLUSIONS: In the management of facial burn patients, positive signs on conventional physical examinations may not always be predictive of inhalation injury and the need for endotracheal tube intubation in the ED. More attention should be given to facial burn patients with shortness of breath and a high TBSA. Airway protection is needed in facial burn patients without inhalation injuries because of their associated injuries and treatments.

Evaluating the advantages of treating acute cholecystitis by following the Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18): a study emphasizing clinical outcomes and medical expenditures.

BACKGROUND: Acute cholecystitis (AC) is a common surgical emergency. The Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18) provides a reliable algorithm for the treatment of AC patients to achieve optimal outcomes. However, the economic benefits have not been validated. We hypothesize that good outcomes and cost savings can both be achieved if patients are treated according to the TG18. METHOD: This retrospective study included 275 patients who underwent cholecystectomy in a 15-month span. Patients were divided into three groups (group 1: mild AC; group 2: moderate AC with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class ≤ 2 and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score ≤ 5; and group 3: moderate AC with ASA class ≥ 3, CCI score ≥ 6, or severe AC). Each group was further divided into two subgroups according to management (followed or deviated from the TG18). Patient demographics, clinical outcomes, and hospital costs were compared. RESULTS: For group 1 patients, 77 (81%) were treated according to the TG18 and had a significantly higher successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) rate (100%), lower hospital cost ($1896 vs $2388), and shorter hospital stay (2.9 vs 8 days) than those whose treatment deviated from the TG18. For group 2 patients, 50 (67%) were treated according to the TG18 and had a significantly lower hospital cost ($1926 vs $2856), shorter hospital stay (3.9 vs 9.9 days), and lower complication rate (0% vs 12.5%). For group 3 patients, 62 (58%) were treated according to the TG18 and had a significantly lower intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate (9.7% vs 25%), but a longer hospital stay (12.6 vs 7.8 days). However, their hospital costs were similar. Early LC in group 3 patients did not have economic benefits over gallbladder drainage and delayed LC. CONCLUSION: The TG18 are the state-of-the-art guidelines for the treatment of AC, achieving both satisfactory outcomes and cost-effectiveness.

Early brain computed tomographic angiography to screen for blunt cerebrovascular injuries in patients with polytrauma: Is it necessary?

BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) is among the most difficult challenges in trauma treatment. This study aimed to determine the optimal timing of computed tomographic angiography (CTA) screening for suspicious BCVI in patients with polytrauma. METHODS: We reviewed the trauma registry and medical records of patients with head and neck injuries from a Level I trauma center between January 2012 and December 2016. Those receiving CTA within 24 h of presentation at the emergency department were the primary CTA group; those who received CTA after 24 h were the delayed CTA group. The basic demographics, indications for CTA, CTA severity grading, and outcomes were compared. RESULTS: In all, 228 patients received brain CTA. Most were male (75%); the mean age was around 40 years. The 38 patients with positive BCVI had a significantly higher ratio of severe chest trauma (52.6% vs 25.8%, p = 0.001); 26 of them received primary CTA and 12 received delayed CTA. Patients with polytrauma predominated in the delayed CTA group (66.7% vs 30.8%, p = 0.037). Of the patients in the primary CTA group, 26.9% received CTA due to symptomatic presentation (p = 0.047). Patients in the delayed group had better neurological outcomes (83% neurologically intact, vs 38.5%, p = 0.01) and lower mortality (0% vs 26.9%, p = 0.047). The only independent positive prognostic factor was initial motor response ≥M5 (Odds Ratio 21.46, 95% Confidence Interval 2.01-228.71). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with polytrauma, performing brain CTA for BCVI screening in the first 24-h or after may not affect clinical outcome. Initial motor response is the sole indicator for outcome. Delaying the study for to the next 24-hour can be considered in such patients, when regarding hemodynamic stability, the dose of contrast medium, and the radiation exposure.

Unstable Hemodynamics is not Always Predictive of Failed Nonoperative Management in Blunt Splenic Injury.

BACKGROUND: The advanced technology of interventional radiology may contribute to a rapid and timely angioembolization for hemostasis. We hypothesized that unstable hemodynamics is no longer an absolute contraindication of nonoperative management (NOM) in blunt splenic injury patients using rapid angioembolization. METHODS: From January 2009 to December 2019, blunt splenic injury patients with unstable hemodynamics [initial pulse >120 beats/min or systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg] were included. Either emergency surgery or angioembolization was performed for hemostasis because of their unstable status. The characteristics of patients who underwent angioembolization or surgery were compared in each group (all patients, patients with hypotension, patients without response to resuscitation and hypotensive patients without response to resuscitation). RESULTS: A total of 73 patients were included in the current study. With respect to all patients, 68.5% (N = 50) of patients underwent NOM with angioembolization for hemostasis. Patients who underwent angioembolization for hemostasis had a significantly lower base deficit (5.3 ± 3.8 vs. 8.3 ± 5.2 mmol/L, p = 0.006) and a higher proportion of response to resuscitation (82.0% vs. 30.4%, p < 0.001) than did patients who underwent surgery. However, there was no significant difference in the proportion of hypotension (58.0% vs. 65.2%, p = 0.558) between these two groups. There were 44 patients with hypotension, and the angioembolization could be performed in 65.9% (N = 29) of them. Patients who underwent angioembolization had a significantly higher proportion of response to resuscitation than did patients who underwent surgery (89.7% vs. 33.3%, p < 0.001). In hypotensive patients without response to resuscitation (N = 13), 23.1% (N = 3) of the patients underwent angioembolization successfully. There was no significant difference in time to hemostasis procedure between patients who underwent angioembolization or surgery (24.7 ± 2.1 vs. 26.3 ± 16.7 min, p = 0.769). The demographics, vital signs, blood transfusion amount, injury severity, mortality rate and length of stay of patients who underwent angioembolization were not significantly different from patients who underwent surgery in each group. CONCLUSIONS: With a short preparation time of angioembolization, the NOM could be performed selectively for hemodynamically unstable patients with blunt splenic injury. The base deficit serves as an early detector of the requirement of surgical treatment.

Endovascular salvage for contained rupture of infected thoracic aortic aneurysm with esophageal fistula.

Aortoesophageal fistula is a rare but lethal condition. The initial presentations of the disease are mostly nonspecific, such as midthoracic pain, dysphagia, or episodes of gastrointestinal bleeding. Therefore, diagnosis is often delayed. Furthermore, despite timely diagnosis and management, the outcome is generally reported to be disappointing. Surgical intervention is the only chance for patient survival, but the optimal operative approach remains controversial. We present a case of esophageal perforation resulting from the contained rupture of an infected thoracic aortic aneurysm that was successfully managed by thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair and subsequent esophagectomy and reconstruction. The patient was 4 years after surgery.

Development and evaluation of a deep learning-based model for simultaneous detection and localization of rib and clavicle fractures in trauma patients' chest radiographs.

Purpose: To develop a rib and clavicle fracture detection model for chest radiographs in trauma patients using a deep learning (DL) algorithm. Materials and methods: We retrospectively collected 56 145 chest X-rays (CXRs) from trauma patients in a trauma center between August 2008 and December 2016. A rib/clavicle fracture detection DL algorithm was trained using this data set with 991 (1.8%) images labeled by experts with fracture site locations. The algorithm was tested on independently collected 300 CXRs in 2017. An external test set was also collected from hospitalized trauma patients in a regional hospital for evaluation. The receiver operating characteristic curve with area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and negative predictive value of the model on each test set was evaluated. The prediction probability on the images was visualized as heatmaps. Results: The trained DL model achieved an AUC of 0.912 (95% CI 87.8 to 94.7) on the independent test set. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity on the given cut-off value are 83.7, 86.8, and 80.4, respectively. On the external test set, the model had a sensitivity of 88.0 and an accuracy of 72.5. While the model exhibited a slight decrease in accuracy on the external test set, it maintained its sensitivity in detecting fractures. Conclusion: The algorithm detects rib and clavicle fractures concomitantly in the CXR of trauma patients with high accuracy in locating lesions through heatmap visualization.

Evaluating the clinical impact of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in patients with blunt trauma with hemorrhagic shock and coexisting traumatic brain injuries: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The impact of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) on traumatic brain injuries remains uncertain, with potential outcomes ranging from neuroprotection to exacerbation of the injury. The study aimed to evaluate consciousness recovery in patients with blunt trauma with shock and traumatic brain injuries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data were obtained from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program from 2017-2019. During the study period, 3,138,896 trauma registries were examined, and 16,016 adult patients with blunt trauma, shock, and traumatic brain injuries were included. Among these, 172 (1.1%) underwent REBOA. Comparisons were conducted between patients with and without REBOA after implementing 1:3 propensity score matching to mitigate disparities. The primary outcome was the highest Glasgow Coma Scale score during admission. The secondary outcomes encompassed the volume of blood transfusion, the necessity for hemostatic interventions and therapeutic neurosurgery, and mortality rate. RESULTS: Through well-balanced propensity score matching, a notable difference in mortality rate was observed, with 59.7% in the REBOA group and 48.7% in the non-REBOA group (P=0.015). In the REBOA group, the median 4-hour red blood cell transfusion was significantly higher (2800 mL [1500, 4908] vs. 1300 mL [600, 2500], P<0.001). The REBOA group required lesser hemorrhagic control surgeries (31.8% vs. 47.7%, P<0.001) but needed more transarterial embolization interventions (22.2% vs 15.9%, P=0.076). The incidence of therapeutic neurosurgery was 5.1% in the REBOA group and 8.7% in the non-REBOA group (P=0.168). Among survivors in the REBOA group, the median highest Glasgow Coma Scale score during admission was significantly greater for both total (11 [8, 14] vs. 9 [6, 12], P=0.036) and motor components (6 [4, 6] vs. 5 [3, 6], P=0.037). The highest GCS score among the survivors with predominant pelvic injuries was not different between the two groups (11 [8, 13] vs. 11 [7, 14], P=0.750). CONCLUSIONS: Patients experiencing shock and traumatic brain injury have high mortality rates, necessitating swift resuscitation and prompt hemorrhagic control. The use of REBOA as an adjunct for bridging definitive hemorrhagic control may correlate with enhanced consciousness recovery.

Feasibility of non-operative management for patients sustained blunt splenic traumas with concomitant aortic injuries.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to elucidate the treatment approach for blunt splenic injuries concurrently involving the aorta. We hypothesized that non-operative management failure rates would be higher in such cases, necessitating increased hemorrhage control surgeries. METHODS: Data from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program spanning 2017 to 2019 were utilized. All patients with blunt splenic trauma were considered for inclusion. We conducted comparisons between blunt splenic trauma patients with and without thoracic or abdominal aortic injuries to identify any potential disparities in treatment. RESULTS: Among the 32,051 patients with blunt splenic injuries during the study period, 752 (2.3%) sustained concurrent aortic injuries. Following 2:1 propensity score matching, it was determined that the presence of aortic injuries did not significantly affect the utilization of splenic transarterial angioembolization (TAE) (7.2% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.243) or the necessity for splenectomy or splenorrhaphy (15.3% vs. 15.7%, p = 0.853). Moreover, aortic injuries were not a significant factor contributing to TAE failure, regardless of the location or severity of the injury. Patients with simultaneous splenic and aortic injuries required more red blood cell transfusion within first 4 hours (0 ml [0, 900] vs. 0 ml [0, 650], p = 0.001) and exhibited a higher mortality rate (10.6% vs. 7.9%, p = 0.038). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that patients with concurrent aortic and splenic injuries presented with more severe conditions, higher mortality rates, and extended hospital stays. The presence of aortic injuries did not substantially influence the utilization of TAE or the necessity for splenectomy or splenorrhaphy. Patients of this type can be managed in accordance with current treatment guidelines. Nonetheless, given their less favorable prognosis, they necessitate prompt and proactive intervention.

The effect of transarterial embolization and nephrectomy on acute kidney injury in patients with blunt renal trauma: An American College of Surgeons - Trauma Quality Improvement Program analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Transarterial embolization (TAE) or nephrectomy for patients with blunt renal trauma might result in acute kidney injury (AKI). Thus, we analyzed the American College of Surgeons - Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) to validate this. We hypothesized that nephrectomy, and not TAE, would be a risk factor for AKI in patients with blunt renal trauma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Adult patients with blunt injuries from the TQIP between 2017 and 2019 were eligible for inclusion. The patients were divided into three treatment groups: conservative treatment, TAE, and nephrectomy. Multivariable logistic regression was used to clarify the AKI predictors. RESULTS: The study included 12,843 patients, wherein 12,373 (96.3 %), 229 (1.8 %), and 241 (1.9 %) patients were in the conservative, TAE, and nephrectomy groups, respectively. A total of 269 (2.2 %), 20 (8.7 %), and 29 (12.0 %) patients had AKI in the three groups, respectively. Both TAE (odds ratio [OR], 2.367; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.372-3.900; p = 0.001) and Nephrectomy (OR, 2.745; 95 % CI, 1.629-4.528; p < 0.001) were a statistically significant predictor for AKI in the multivariable logistic regression. CONCLUSIONS: TAE and nephrectomy were statistically associated with AKI in patients with blunt renal trauma. This result differs from our previous research findings that nephrectomy, but not TAE, was a risk factor for AKI in patients with blunt renal trauma. Further prospective and well-designed research may be needed.

Opposite effects of Covid-19 infection on pitchers and batters: a retrospective study on Chinese Professional Baseball League players.

BACKGROUND: The influence of COVID-19 infection on elite athletes remains largely unknown, especially on baseball players. The goal of this study is to examine the actual performance of infected elite baseball players from the Chinese Professional Baseball League (CPBL) from a sabermetric point of view. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational cohort study. CPBL players who were infected with COVID-19 from April 27th to May 31st, 2022, were eligible for this study. The performance of study participants before and after COVID-19 infection was compared, and statistics from the batters and pitchers were analyzed separately. RESULTS: During the study interval, 56 players were infected with COVID-19, including 35 batters and 21 pitchers. After excluding injured players and players with inadequate playing opportunities, 23 batters and 12 pitchers were enrolled. For batters, there were no significant differences before and after COVID-19 infection. However, batters older than 28 years of age showed a decline in slugging percentage (0.372 vs. 0.292, P=0.049). Analysis of pitchers revealed significantly boosted fastball velocity after COVID-19 infection (142.10 km/h vs. 142.82 km/h, P=0.028) and improved strikeouts per nine innings (6.89 vs. 8.56, P=0.021). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 might have a potential influence on professional baseball players. For batters, veteran players more than 28 years of age were more likely to be negatively affected by COVID-19, whereas the effect of COVID-19 on pitchers was generally positive, with significantly improved fastball velocity and K/9 numbers.

The Application of Design Thinking in Developing a Deep Learning Algorithm for Hip Fracture Detection.

(1) Background: Design thinking is a problem-solving approach that has been applied in various sectors, including healthcare and medical education. While deep learning (DL) algorithms can assist in clinical practice, integrating them into clinical scenarios can be challenging. This study aimed to use design thinking steps to develop a DL algorithm that accelerates deployment in clinical practice and improves its performance to meet clinical requirements. (2) Methods: We applied the design thinking process to interview clinical doctors and gain insights to develop and modify the DL algorithm to meet clinical scenarios. We also compared the DL performance of the algorithm before and after the integration of design thinking. (3) Results: After empathizing with clinical doctors and defining their needs, we identified the unmet need of five trauma surgeons as "how to reduce the misdiagnosis of femoral fracture by pelvic plain film (PXR) at initial emergency visiting". We collected 4235 PXRs from our hospital, of which 2146 had a hip fracture (51%) from 2008 to 2016. We developed hip fracture DL detection models based on the Xception convolutional neural network by using these images. By incorporating design thinking, we improved the diagnostic accuracy from 0.91 (0.84-0.96) to 0.95 (0.93-0.97), the sensitivity from 0.97 (0.89-1.00) to 0.97 (0.94-0.99), and the specificity from 0.84 (0.71-0.93) to 0.93(0.990-0.97). (4) Conclusions: In summary, this study demonstrates that design thinking can ensure that DL solutions developed for trauma care are user-centered and meet the needs of patients and healthcare providers.

Is It Beneficial to Optimize Vital Signs Before Embolization for Pelvic Fractures? A Dilemma Between Resuscitation and Hemostasis.

PURPOSE: Adequate resuscitation and definitive hemostasis are both important in the management of hemorrhage related to pelvic fracture. The goal of this study was to analyze the relationship between the amount of blood transfused before transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) and the clinical outcome later in the disease course. METHODS: Patients with pelvic fractures who underwent TAE for hemostasis from January 2018 to December 2019 were studied. The characteristics of patients who received blood transfusions of >2 U (1000 mL) and ≤2 U before TAE were compared. The mortality rate, blood transfusion-related complications, and length of stay were compared between these two groups. RESULTS: Among the 75 studied patients, 39 (52.0%) received blood transfusions of ≤2 U before TAE, and the other 36 (48.0%) patients received blood transfusions of >2 U before TAE. The incidence rates of systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis, and coagulopathy were significantly higher in the >2 U group (97.2% vs 81.1%, P = .027; 50.0% vs 27.0%, P = .045; and 44.4% vs 5.4%, P < .01, respectively). After nonsurvivors were excluded, the >2 U group had a significantly higher proportion (43.8% vs 14.7%, P < .001) of prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (7 days or more) and a longer hospital length of stay (33.8 ± 15.1 vs 21.9 ± 94.0, P < .01) than the ≤2 U group. Pre-TAE blood transfusion >2 U serves as an independent risk factor for prolonged ICU length of stay and increased hospital length of stay. CONCLUSION: Early hemostasis for pelvic fracture-related hemorrhage is suggested to prevent pre-TAE blood transfusion-associated adverse effects of blood transfusion.

Timely surgical fixation confers beneficial outcomes in patients' concomitant flail chest with mild-to-moderate traumatic brain injury: a trauma quality improvement project analysis - a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic flail chest results in respiratory distress and prolonged hospital stay. Timely surgical fixation of the flail chest reduces respiratory complications, decreases ventilator dependence, and shortens hospital stays. Concomitant head injury is not unusual in these patients and can postpone surgical timing due to the need to monitor the status of intracranial injuries. Reducing pulmonary sequelae also assists in the recovery from traumatic brain injury and improves outcomes. No previous evidence supports that early rib fixation can improve the outcome of patients with concomitant flail chest and traumatic brain injury. RESEARCH QUESTION: Can early rib fixation improve the outcome of patients with concomitant flail chest and traumatic brain injury? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Adult patients with blunt injuries from the Trauma Quality Improvement Project between 2017 and 2019 were eligible for inclusion. Patients were divided into two treatment groups: operative and nonoperative. Inverse probability treatment weighting was used to identify the predictors of mortality and adverse hospital events. RESULTS: Patients in the operative group had a higher intubation rate [odds ratio (OR), 2.336; 95% CI, 1.644-3.318; p <0.001), a longer length of stay (coefficient ß , 4.664; SE, 0.789; p <0.001), longer ventilator days (coefficient ß , 2.020; SE, 0.528; p <0.001), and lower mortality rate (OR], 0.247; 95% CI, 0.135-0.454; p <0.001). INTERPRETATION: Timely rib fixation can improve the mortality rate of patients with flail chest and a concomitant mild-to-moderate head injury.

Long-term survival after major trauma: a retrospective nationwide cohort study from the National Health Insurance Research Database.

BACKGROUND: Most trauma-related studies are focused on short-term survival and complications within the index admission, and the long-term outcomes beyond discharge are mainly unknown. The purpose of this study was to analyze the data from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) and to assess the long-term survival of major trauma patients after being discharged from the index admission. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective, observational study included all patients with major trauma (injury severity score ≥16) in Taiwan from 2003 to 2007, and a 10-year follow-up was conducted on this cohort. Patients aged 18-70 who survived the index admission were enrolled. Patients who survived less than one year after discharge (short survival, SS) and those who survived for more than one year (long survival, LS) were compared. Variables, including preexisting factors, injury types, and short-term outcomes and complications, were analyzed, and the 10-year Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was conducted. RESULTS: In our study, 9896 patients were included, with 2736 in the SS group and 7160 in the LS group. Age, sex, comorbidities, low income, cardiopulmonary resuscitation event, prolonged mechanical ventilation, prolonged ICU length of stay (LOS), and prolonged hospital LOS were identified as the independent risk factors of SS. The 10-year cumulative survival for major trauma patients was 63.71%, and the most mortality (27.64%) occurred within the first year after discharge. CONCLUSION: 27.64% of patients would die one year after being discharged from major trauma. Major trauma patients who survived the index admission still had significantly worse long-term survival than the general population, but the curve flattened and resembled the general population after one year.

Accelerated fixation is associated with fewer pulmonary embolism in patients with isolated and unilateral femoral shaft fractures: A TQIP analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal time to intramedullary internal fixation for patients with isolated and unilateral femoral shaft fractures was investigated by the American College of Surgeons-Trauma Quality Improvement Program (ACS-TQIP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Adult patients from the TQIP between 2017 and 2019 were eligible for inclusion. The associations between time to fixation and target outcomes (pulmonary embolism [PE], deep vein thrombosis [DVT], acute respiratory distress syndrome [ARDS], and mortality) were assessed. Maximization of the sum of sensitivity and specificity was used to determine the optimal cut point. The patients were divided into three groups according to different time to fixation intervals. A multinomial propensity scores weighting using generalized boosted models was performed for all unbiased pre-treatment factors between the groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to clarify the outcomes predictors. RESULTS: The univariate and multivariate analysis before weighting showed that only PE was significantly associated with time to fixation (odds ratio [OR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.09; p = 0.012). The optimal cut point of time to fixation was 13.88 h. The patients were divided into accelerated (≤ 13.88 h), standard (> 13.88 and ≤ 24 h), and delayed (> 24 and < 36 h) groups. After weighting for all unbiased pre-treatment factors between the groups, multivariate logistic regression showed that standard group significantly increased the risk of PE compared with accelerated group (OR, 4.436; 95% CI, 1.844-10.672; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Accelerated intramedullary internal fixation within 13.88 h was associated with a significantly decreased risk of PE compared with standard fixation in patients with isolated and unilateral femoral shaft fractures without additional mortality risks.