A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of docetaxel administered in combination with continuous intravenous infusion of 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Encouraged by preclinical synergism between docetaxel and 5-fluorouracil (5FU), we conducted a Phase I study of docetaxel in combination with continuous i.v. infusion of 5FU in patients with advanced solid tumors to determine the maximum tolerated dose, the recommended dose for Phase II studies, and the safety and pharmacokinetic profiles of this combination. Forty-two patients with advanced solid tumors, most of whom had been previously treated, received docetaxel on day 1 as a 1-h i.v. infusion, immediately followed by a 5-day continuous i.v. infusion of 5FU, every 3 weeks without hematopoietic growth factor support. All patients were premedicated with methylprednisolone. Dose levels of docetaxel/SFU studied were (daily dose, in mg/m2) 60/300, 75/300, 75/500, 75/750, 85/750, 85/1000, and 75/1000. Forty-one patients were assessable for toxicity. The maximum tolerated dose determined during the first cycle was 1000 mg/m2/day for 5 days of 5FU with either 75 or 85 mg/m2 docetaxel. Dose-limiting toxicities at these dose levels were reversible secretory diarrhea (4 of 12 evaluable patients), stomatitis (2 patients), and febrile neutropenia (2 patients). Overall, grade 3/4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were seen in 63.4% and 9.8% of the patients, respectively. Four patients experienced grade 3/4 infection, which led to toxic death in one of them. There were five early deaths: (a) one was clearly treatment related; (b) two others were possibly treatment related or remotely treatment related; and (c) two deaths were not related to the study drugs. Partial responses were documented in 5 of 39 evaluable patients. Pharmacokinetic results of both drugs were consistent with those from single-agent studies. The recommended dose of this combination, which showed acceptable toxicity and antitumoral activity at various dose levels, is 85 mg/m2 docetaxel given as a 1-h i.v. infusion on day 1 immediately followed by a 5-day continuous i.v. infusion of 5FU (750 mg/m2/day). This study has been extended by adding cisplatin on day 1 of the combination of docetaxel and 5FU.

An ongoing European organization for research and treatment of cancer crossover trial comparing single-agent paclitaxel and doxorubicin as first- and second-line treatment of advanced breast cancer.

The activity of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) in advanced breast cancer patients who have failed doxorubicin treatment is well established, but the optimal sequence between these two important agents remains to be determined. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer therefore designed a prospective randomized clinical trial in which patients not exposed to anthracyclines in the adjuvant setting received either first-line paclitaxel, given as a 3-hour infusion at a dose of 200 mg/m2 followed at the time of disease progression by second-line doxorubicin, given as a bolus injection at a dose of 75 mg/m2 or the reverse sequence. The target accrual is 330 patients. Interim results on 207 evaluable patients of 289 randomized are presented.

[Various antibiotics in the monotherapy and combined therapy of infections in cancer patients. Retrospective study of 290 patients]. / Rôzne antibiotiká v monoterapii i kombinovanej terapii infekcií u onkologických pacientov. Retrospektívna stúdia u 290 pacientov.

The authors present in a retrospective study the results of treatment of infections in 290 immunodeficient patients, mostly with haematological malignancies. As compared with classical empirical combined treatment (aminoglycoside + IIIrd generation cephalosporins), combinations of quinolones and amoxycillin, amoxycillin clavulanate or vancomycin proved more satisfactory.

Mitomycin C and vinblastine in combination with amifostine in metastatic breast cancer. A feasibility study of the EORTC--Investigational Drug Branch for Breast Cancer (IDBBC).

Mitomycin C (MMC)-vinblastine (VBL) is a regimen that has commonly been used as salvage therapy for advanced breast cancer for many years. The hematologic toxicity of this combination is one aspect that limits its usefulness. Amifostine, an organic thiophosphate, has been developed as a selective chemoprotective agent. In this pilot study, we tested the feasibility of MMC/VBL administration in combination with amifostine and we monitored the hematologic toxicity closely. Patients having failed one or two chemotherapy regimens for advanced breast cancer, with a good performance status scored at 2 or better and measurable or evaluable lesion(s), were eligible. They were treated according to the following schedule: mitomycin C 10 mg/m2 i.v. day 1, vinblastine 5 mg/m2 i.v. day 1 and 15, amifostine 910 mg/m2 in short i.v. infusion prior to MMC. Premedication consisted of dexamethasone 3 x 20 mg, haloperidol 2 x 0.5 mg p.o., hydration with 11 of normal saline, metoclopramide 1.5 mg/kg in short infusion and procyclide HCl 10 mg i.v. Cycles were repeated every 4 weeks. In all, 14 cycles were administrated to six heavily pretreated patients. Following the first cycle, five of the six patients experienced grade 3 or 4 neutropenia on day 15, and consequently did not receive the second vinblastine administration as planned. Three out of four patients receiving two or more cycles had moderate thrombocytopenia. There were no patients with neutropenic fever or major bleeding problems. The MMC/VBL+amifostine regimen was well tolerated regarding other toxicities. Neither amifostine-related acute vomiting nor any significant decrease in blood pressure was observed. Administration of amifostine in combination with MMC/VBL was feasible but in this group of heavily pretreated patients there were no hints of a protective effect of amifostine on the hematologic toxicity profile of this chemotherapy regimen.

Ciprofloxacin plus vancomycin versus ceftazidime plus gentamicin in the treatment of pneumonia in granulocytopenic patients with or without venous catheters. Short communication.

58 granulocytopenic patients with confirmed bronchopneumonia were divided retrospectively into two groups for this pilot study: group 1 included neutropenic patients with venous catheters who were treated with ciprofloxacin (CIP; 200-300 mg, i.v. b.i.d.) + vancomycin (VAN; 0.5-1 g, i.v. b.i.d.), and group 2, which included patients without venous catheters treated with ceftazidime (2 g, i.v. t.i.d.) + gentamicin (1 mg/kg, i.v. t.i.d.). Pneumonia was diagnosed clinically and radiologically in all patients; 92.3% in group 1 and 46.8% in group 2 were also microbially confirmed. Mixed infections were present in most patients. 3 of 26 patients (11.5%) in group 1 and 9 of 32 (20.1%) in group 2 did not recover while 88.5% in group 1 and 71.9% in group 2 recovered. CIP + VAN seems to be more effective in treating pneumonia in neutropenic patients, with only 1 patient in the group suffering an adverse effect compared with 5 in group 2.

Netilmicin plus ceftriaxone versus amikacin plus ceftriaxone in the treatment of infections in granulocytopenic patients.

For the treatment of febrile episodes in granulocytopenic cancer patients, a combination of bactericidal and intravenously administered broad spectrum agents is recommended. An aminoglycoside plus a beta-lactame (piperacillin, azlocillin or IIIrd generation cephalosporins) are the drugs of first choice in an empiric approach. Because of frequent parenteral interventions (e.g. catheters, cannulations) in thrombopenic patients with multifactorial immunosuppression, we consider the application of once daily drugs, such as ceftriaxone, netilmicin or amikacin. For single dose treatment (1st day two applications), we used ceftriaxone in combination with netilmicin or amikacin as the first approach and retrospectively evaluated 47 patients for efficacy and safety.

Phase I study of cisplatin, irinotecan, and epirubicin administered every 3 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumours.

This phase I study was conducted to determine the recommended phase II doses, safety profile, and antitumour activity of a combination regimen of cisplatin, irinotecan, and epirubicin administered every 3 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumours. Cisplatin and epirubicin were given at fixed doses of 50 and 60 mg m(-2), respectively. The irinotecan dose was escalated at 10 mg m(-2) increments from a starting dose level of 70 mg m(-2). Epirubicin, irinotecan, and their metabolites were measured with HPLC methods. In all, 35 patients received 141 courses of treatment. Irinotecan dose was escalated in seven cohorts up to 130 mg m(-2), and then finally de-escalated to 110 mg m(-2). The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenic fever. Nonhaematologic toxicities included mild to moderate nausea/vomiting, diarrhoea and fatigue. Of 34 patients with evaluable disease, one patient had a complete response and nine patients had partial response, yielding an overall response rate of 29.4%. Pharmacokinetic parameters of epirubicin were not affected by the sequence of drug administration. However, the AUCs of irinotecan and its metabolites were increased significantly when irinotecan and epirubicin were administered concurrently. This combination regimen has promising broad antitumour activity, and will be further evaluated in phase II studies in multiple tumour types.