CT-based Hounsfield unit values reflect the degree of steatohepatitis in patients with low-grade fatty liver disease.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common liver disease worldwide. Ultrasound, the most used tool for diagnosing NAFLD, is operator-dependent and shows suboptimal performance in patients with mild steatosis. However, few studies have been conducted on whether alternative noninvasive methods are useful for diagnosing mild hepatic steatosis. Also, little is known about whether noninvasive tests are useful for grading the severity of hepatic steatosis or the degree of intrahepatic inflammation. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate whether the HSI, the FLI and HU values in CT could be used to discriminate mild hepatic steatosis and to evaluate the severity of hepatic steatosis or the degree of intrahepatic inflammation in patients with low-grade fatty liver disease using liver biopsy as a reference standard. METHODS: Demographic, laboratory, CT imaging, and histological data of patients who underwent liver resection or biopsy were analyzed. The performance of the HSI, HU values and the FLI for diagnosing mild hepatic steatosis was evaluated by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Whether the degree of hepatic steatosis and intrahepatic inflammation could be predicted using the HSI, HU values or the FLI was also analyzed. Moreover, we validate the results using magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction as an another reference standard. RESULTS: The AUROC for diagnosing mild hepatic steatosis was 0.810 (p < 0.001) for the HSI, 0.732 (p < 0.001) for liver HU value, 0.802 (p < 0.001) for the difference between liver and spleen HU value (L-S HU value) and 0.813 (p < 0.001) for the FLI. Liver HU and L-S HU values were negatively correlated with the percentage of hepatic steatosis and NAFLD activity score (NAS) and significantly different between steatosis grades and between NAS grades. The L-S HU value was demonstrated the good performance for grading the severity of hepatic steatosis and the degree of intrahepatic inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: The HU values on CT are feasible for stratifying hepatic fat content and evaluating the degree of intrahepatic inflammation, and the HSI and the FLI demonstrated good performance with high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing mild hepatic steatosis.

Validation and Comparison of the Japanese Score and Other Scores in Patients with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Various scoring systems have been developed to predict endoscopic intervention, mortality, and rebleeding in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB); however, they have not been sufficiently validated in Korea. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of several scoring systems in Korea by validating and comparing the Japanese score and other scores in Korean people with NVUGIB. METHODS: The medical records of 1,368 patients with NVUGIB were reviewed to collect statistical, clinical, laboratory, and endoscopic data. The Japanese score, ABC score, Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score (GBS), and MAP score were calculated retrospectively at a single research institution. These scores for predicting the need for endoscopic intervention, mortality, and rebleeding were calculated and evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: Of 1,368 patients, 88.5% required endoscopic intervention, 4.1% died within 30 days, and 12.6% experienced rebleeding. The Japanese score was effective for predicting endoscopic intervention, and the ABC score was best for predicting 30-day mortality. Sex, age, hematemesis, blood urea nitrogen, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score were found to be predictors of the need for endoscopic intervention. CONCLUSION: The Japanese score did not prove useful in Koreans with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Additional research is needed due to the limitations of a retrospective study conducted in a single research institute.

Outcomes of laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation versus percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have compared the therapeutic outcomes in patients with HCC who underwent laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation (LRFA) versus percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Therefore, this study compared the recurrence and survival outcomes of the two RFA methods in patients with HCC. METHODS: Recurrence and overall survival outcomes were evaluated in 307 patients who underwent LRFA (n = 151) or PRFA (n = 156) as a treatment method for de novo HCC. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was performed to reduce the impact of treatment selection bias. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in major baseline characteristics between the LRFA and PRFA groups. However, the proportion of cirrhotic patients was higher in the LRFA group, whereas the LRFA group had more tumors and a more advanced tumor-node-metastasis stage. Moreover, the mean tumor size was significantly larger in the LRFA group than in the PRFA group. In a multivariate analysis, serum albumin level, more than three tumors, and the RFA method were identified as significant predictors of recurrence-free survival. Moreover, for the overall survival of HCC patients, serum albumin levels, days of hospital stay during RFA, and the RFA method were independent predictors. In the IPTW-adjusted analysis, the LRFA group showed significantly higher recurrence-free survival and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that compared with PRFA, LRFA was associated with longer recurrence-free survival and favorable overall survival in patients with HCC. Therefore, LRFA should be considered the primary therapy in patients with HCC eligible for RFA.

Validation and modification of existing mortality prediction models for lower gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) often subsides without medical intervention; however, in some cases, the bleeding does not stop and the patient's condition worsens. Therefore, predicting severe LGIB in advance can aid treatment. This study aimed to evaluate variables related to mortality from LGIB and propose a scoring system. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we reviewed the medical records of patients who visited the emergency room with hematochezia between January 2016 and December 2020. Through regression analysis of comorbidities, medications, vital signs, laboratory investigations, and duration of hospital stay, variables related to LGIB-related mortality were evaluated. A scoring system was developed and the appropriateness with an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) was evaluated and compared with other existing models. RESULTS: A total of 932 patients were hospitalized for LGIB. Variables associated with LGIB-related mortality were the presence of cancer, heart rate > 100 beats/min, blood urea nitrogen level ≥ 30 mg/dL, an international normalized ratio > 1.50, and albumin level ≤ 3.0 g/dL. The AUROCs of the models CNUH-4 and CNUH-5 were 0.890 (p < 0.001; cutoff, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 0.0851-0.929) and 0.901 (p < 0.001; cutoff, 3.5; 95% confidence interval, 0.869-0.933), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The model developed for predicting the risk of LGIB-related mortality is simple and easy to apply clinically. The AUROC of the model was better than that of the existing models.

Which scoring system should be used for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding? Old or new?

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Several scoring systems for predicting outcomes in patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) have recently been devised, but not sufficiently validated. We compared the predictive accuracy of several scoring systems and assessed the usefulness of new scoring systems. METHODS: The medical records of 1048 patients with NVUGIB were reviewed to collect demographic, clinical, laboratory, and endoscopic data. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCs) were calculated for the ABC, new Japanese scoring system, Progetto Nazionale Emorrhagia Digestiva (PNED), and other scores to compare their predictive accuracy for 30-day mortality, therapeutic intervention, rebleeding, and prolonged hospital stay (≥ 10 days). Outcome predictors were identified by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The ABC, new Japanese scoring system, and PNED scores best predicted 30-day mortality (AUROC 0.907), need for therapeutic intervention (AUROC 0.707), and rebleeding (AUROC 0.874), respectively (all P < 0.001). The ABC and PNED scores were similarly better at predicting prolonged hospital stay (ABC AUROC: 0.765; PNED AUROC: 0.790; both P < 0.001). Thirty-day mortality was related to sex, systolic blood pressure (SBP), syncope, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), albumin, heart failure, disseminated malignancy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and liver cirrhosis. Sex, age, SBP, hematemesis, blood urea nitrogen, and eGFR independently predicted the need for therapeutic intervention. Sex, SBP, pulse, albumin level, heart failure, disseminated malignancy, and COPD predicted rebleeding. CONCLUSION: The outcomes of patients with NVUGIB were better predicted by newly developed than by old scoring systems.

Comparison of conventional and modified endoscopic mucosal resection methods for the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Small rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) confined to the submucosa are endoscopically resectable. Because most rectal NETs are submucosal tumors, conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (cEMR) may not result in a complete resection. This study investigated whether modified EMRs, namely endoscopic submucosal resection with ligation (ESMR-L), EMR with precutting (EMR-P), and strip biopsy are superior to cEMR for achieving histologically complete resection (HCR) of rectal NETs. METHODS: Medical records of 215 patients who were treated with endoscopic resections for rectal NETs between January 2011 and July 2019 were retrospectively enrolled. Of the patients, 110, 33, 29, and 43 underwent cEMR, ESMR-L, EMR-P, and strip biopsy, respectively. For each method, HCR and en bloc resection rates, procedure times, and complication rates were measured. RESULTS: HCR was achieved with cEMR, EMR-P, ESMR-L, and strip biopsies for 74.5%, 90.9%, 93.1%, and 90.7% of cases, respectively. The HCR rate for cEMR was inferior to those of the modified EMRs (p = 0.045 for cEMR vs. EMR-P; p = 0.031 for cEMR vs. ESMR-L; p = 0.027 for cEMR vs. strip biopsy). Among the three modified EMRs, there was no significant difference in achieving HCR (p = 1.000). En bloc resection (p = 0.096) and complication rates (p = 0.071) were not significantly different among the four EMR methods, although EMR-P required the longest procedure time (p = 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: All three modified EMRs are superior to cEMR and are equally effective for achieving HCR of rectal NETs.

Development and Validation of a Risk Scoring Model for Early Prediction of Severe Colon Ischemia.

BACKGROUND: Colon ischemia (CI) is injury to the intestines secondary to insufficient blood flow. Its clinical severity can range from mild to life-threatening. AIMS: To investigate predictive risk factors for CI and propose a scoring model for severe outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients admitted to Chungnam National University Hospital from January 2010 to December 2018. CI was defined as severe when patients required surgery immediately or after initial conservative management, death occurred after hospitalization, or symptoms persisted after 2 weeks. By controlling for possible confounders from the logistic regression analysis, we obtained a new risk scoring model for the early prediction of severe CI. Furthermore, using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC), we assessed the accuracy of the model. RESULTS: A total of 274 patients endoscopically diagnosed with CI were included, of whom 181 had severe CI. In the multivariate analysis, tachycardia, elevated C-reactive protein, Favier endoscopic classification stage ≥ 2, and history of hypertension were independently and significantly associated with severe CI. The AUROC of the model was 0.749. CONCLUSIONS: This risk scoring model based on the presence of tachycardia, elevated C-reactive protein level, unfavorable endoscopic findings by Favier's classification, and the history of hypertension could be used to predict severe CI outcomes at an early stage.

Significant Mendelian genetic contribution to pediatric mild-to-moderate hearing loss and its comprehensive diagnostic approach.

PURPOSE: Timely diagnosis and identification of etiology of pediatric mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) are both medically and socioeconomically important. However, the exact etiologic spectrum remains uncertain. We aimed to establish a genetic etiological spectrum, including copy-number variations (CNVs) and efficient genetic testing pipeline, of this defect. METHODS: A cohort of prospectively recruited pediatric patients with mild-to-moderate nonsyndromic SNHL from 2014 through 2018 (n = 110) was established. Exome sequencing, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and nested customized polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for exclusion of a pseudogene, STRCP, from a subset (n = 83) of the cohort, were performed. Semen analysis was also performed to determine infertility (n = 2). RESULTS: Genetic etiology was confirmed in nearly two-thirds (52/83 = 62.7%) of subjects, with STRC-related deafness (n = 29, 34.9%) being the most prevalent, followed by MPZL2-related deafness (n = 9, 10.8%). This strikingly high proportion of Mendelian genetic contribution was due particularly to the frequent detection of CNVs involving STRC in one-third (27/83) of our subjects. We also questioned the association of homozygous continuous gene deletion of STRC and CATSPER2 with deafness-infertility syndrome (MIM61102). CONCLUSION: Approximately two-thirds of sporadic pediatric mild-to-moderate SNHL have a clear Mendelian genetic etiology, and one-third is associated with CNVs involving STRC. Based on this, we propose a new guideline for molecular diagnosis of these children.

Validation of a new risk score system for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Recently, a new international bleeding score was developed to predict 30-day hospital mortality in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). However, the efficacy of this newly developed scoring system has not been extensively investigated. We aimed to validate a new scoring system for predicting 30-day mortality in patients with non-variceal UGIB and determine whether a higher score is associated with re-bleeding, length of hospital stay, and endoscopic failure. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on 905 patients with acute non-variceal UGIB who were examined in our hospital between January 2013 and December 2017. Baseline characteristics, endoscopic findings, re-bleeding, admission, and mortality were reviewed. The 30-day mortality rate of the new international bleeding risk score was calculated using the receiver operating characteristic curves and compared to the pre-endoscopy Rockall score, AIMS65, Glasgow Blatchford score, and Progetto Nazionale Emorragia Digestiva score. To verify the variable for the 30-day mortality of the new scoring system, we performed multivariate logistic regression using our data and further analyzed the score items. RESULTS: The new international bleeding scoring system showed higher receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve values in predicting mortality (area under ROC curve 0.958; [95% confidence interval (CI)]), compared with such as AIMS65 (AUROC, 0.832; 95%CI, 0.806-0.856; P < 0.001), PNED (AUROC, 0.865; 95%CI, 0.841-0.886; P < 0.001), Pre-RS (AUROC, 0.802; 95%CI, 0.774-0.827; P < 0.001), and GBS (AUROC, 0.765; 95%CI, 0.736-0.793; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis was performed using our data and showed that the 30-day mortality rate was related to multiple comorbidities, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, albumin, syncope at first visit, and endoscopic failure within 24 h during the first admission. In addition, in the high-score group, relatively long hospital stay, re-bleeding, and endoscopic failure were observed. CONCLUSION: This is a preliminary report of a new bleeding score which may predict 30-day mortality better than the other scoring systems. High-risk patients could be screened using this new scoring system to predict 30-day mortality. The use of this scoring system seemed to improve the outcomes of non-variceal UGIB patients in this study, through proper management and intervention.

Analysis of factors associated with local recurrence after endoscopic resection of gastric epithelial dysplasia: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are widely used techniques for the treatment of gastric epithelial dysplasia. Previous studies have compared the clinical outcome of endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer, but few studies have focused on gastric dysplasia alone. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term prognosis following endoscopic procedures for gastric epithelial dysplasia, investigate differences in local recurrence rates according to the treatment modality, and identify risk factors associated with local recurrence. METHODS: In this retrospective study, local recurrence rates and risk factors associated with local recurrence were compared between 599 patients who underwent EMR and 306 who underwent ESD for gastric epithelial dysplasia from January 2011 to December 2015. RESULTS: The en bloc resection rate (32.2% vs. 100%, p < 0.001) and complete resection rate (94.8% vs. 99.0%, p = 0.003) were significantly lower in the EMR group than in the ESD group. The local recurrence rate was significantly lower in the ESD group (1.3%) than in the EMR group (4.2%; p = 0.026). There was a significantly increased risk of local recurrence, regardless of lesion location or histologic grade, in patients with lesions > 2 cm (p = 0.002) or red in color (p = 0.03). The ESD group had a significantly lower local recurrence rate, with a higher complete resection rate, than that in the EMR group (p < 0.05). In the case of recurrence after endoscopic resection, most of the recurred lesions were removed through additional endoscopic procedures; there was no difference between the two groups (p = 0.153). CONCLUSIONS: The complete resection rate was significantly higher, and the local recurrence rate was significantly lower, in patients with gastric epithelial dysplasia treated with ESD. Therefore, ESD should be considered the preferred treatment in patients with lesions > 2 cm or showing redness due to an increased risk of local recurrence and EMR may be possible for low-grade dysplasia that is less than 2 cm without surface changes such as redness, depression and nodularity.