How do Cancer Patients in Economically Marginalized Neighborhoods Decide Where to Seek Care: Perspectives From Cancer Patients and Healthcare Professionals.

BACKGROUND: The quality of cancer care affects patient outcomes. It is therefore important to understand what factors and/or barriers shape a cancer patient's decision about where to seek care. We sought to understand factors influencing decision-making for historically marginalized communities in a large metropolitan area with multiple options for cancer care, including a National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated comprehensive cancer center. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with cancer patients from economically marginalized neighborhoods in Washington D.C., and with healthcare professionals who work with patients from these areas. Participants were recruited through flyers, social media posts, and word of mouth. Two researchers analyzed the data using a combination of inductive and deductive approaches supported by the ATLAS. ti software. RESULTS: A total of 15 interviews were conducted. Analysis revealed 3 major factors influencing where patients decide to seek care: health insurance, transportation, and prioritization of needs. Participants repeatedly identified navigating the bureaucracy of insurance enrollment and high medical costs as prohibitive to seeking care. Transportation was often mentioned in terms of convenience of use and proximity to the care center. Prioritization of needs refers to circumstances such as unstable housing, poverty, and mental illness, that some patients prioritize over seeking quality cancer care. Across these themes 2 findings arose: a discrepancy between stated and actual factors in choosing an oncologist, and the extent to which a cancer patient is able to choose their oncologist. CONCLUSION: This study helps explain some of the factors that influence how cancer patients in urban settings choose an oncology center, and the barriers which prohibit access. AIMS OF THE STUDY: This study aimed to understand how cancer patients decide where to seek treatment.

Telehealth use and Satisfaction among U.S. Households: Results of a National Survey.

Telehealth services have expanded dramatically during the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic; we provide estimates of telehealth use and satisfaction based on a nationally representative, random survey of 3454 U.S. households. Fifty percent of households reported using telehealth because they could not receive medical care in person. Satisfaction was high among telehealth users (86%). However, satisfaction with telehealth was lower (65%) among households who reported experiences of delayed medical care for serious problems. Telehealth use was lower among rural households than urban households (46% vs. 53%) and among <$30,000 annually (47%), $30,000-<$50,000 (39%), and $75,000-<$100,000 (49%) compared with those earning $100,000 + (60%). Telehealth use was lower among households without high-speed internet compared to those with it (36 vs. 53%). Among users, satisfaction did not differ significantly by metro area, income, or internet quality. Telehealth may play a valuable role in access for many patient populations, but may not always be a perfect substitute for in-person care.