Cricothyrotomy Online: Quality Assessment of Educational Videos on YouTube.

BACKGROUND: Medical learners may use YouTube® videos to prepare for procedures. Videos are convenient and readily available, but without any uploading standards, their accuracy and quality for education are uncertain. We assessed the quality of emergency cricothyrotomy videos on YouTube through an expert panel of surgeons with objective quality metrics. METHODS: A YouTube® search for "emergency cricothyrotomy" was performed and results were filtered to remove animations and lectures. The 4 most-viewed videos were sent to a panel of trauma surgeons for evaluation. An educational quality (EQ) score was generated for each video based on its ability to explain the procedure indications, orient the viewer to the patient, provide accurate narration, provide clear views of procedure, identify relevant instrumentation and anatomy, and explain critical maneuvers. Reviewers were also asked if safety concerns were present and encouraged to give feedback in a free-response field. RESULTS: Four surgical attendings completed the survey. The median EQ score was 6 on a 7-point scale (95% CI [6, 6]). All but one of the individual parameters had a median EQ score of 6 (95% CI: indications [3, 7], orientation [5, 7], narration [6, 7], clarity [6, 7], instruments [6, 7], anatomy [6, 6], critical maneuvers [5, 6]). Safety received a lower EQ score (5.5, 95% CI [2, 6]). CONCLUSIONS: The most-viewed cricothyrotomy videos were rated positively by surgical attendings. Still, it is necessary to know if medical learners can distinguish high from low quality videos. If not, this suggests a need for surgical societies to create high-quality videos that can be reliably and efficiently accessed on YouTube®.

Nurses' response to pain communication from patients: a post-test experimental study.

BACKGROUND: Inadequate communication about pain can result in increased pain for patients. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the current pilot study was to test how nurses respond when patients use their own words, a pain intensity scale, or both to communicate pain. DESIGN: A post-test only experimental design was used with three pain description conditions, personal and numeric; personal only; numeric only. SETTING: The setting included six hospitals and one school of nursing located in the northeastern United States. PARTICIPANTS: PARTICIPANTS included 122 registered medical surgical nurses. METHODS: Nurses were randomly assigned to condition, and read a vignette about a trauma patient with moderately severe pain. The vignettes were identical except for the patient's pain description and age. The nurses then wrote how they would respond to the patient's pain. Two blind raters content analyzed the responses, giving nurses one point for including each of six a priori criteria derived from the Acute Pain Management Panel [1992. Acute Pain Management: operative or medical procedures and trauma. Clinical practice guideline (AHCPR Publication No. 92-0032)., Rockville, MD, USA] and the American Pain Society [2003. Principles of analgesic use in the treatment of acute pain and cancer pain, Glenville, IL, USA]. RESULTS: Nurses planned similar numbers of pain management strategies across the three conditions, with a mean of 2.1 (SD=1.14) strategies out of the recommended six. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses did not respond with more pain management strategies when patients describe pain in their own words, or in their own words and a pain intensity scale. The relatively small number of pain management strategies planned by the nurses suggests that nurses use few strategies to respond to moderately severe pain problems.

Experience with 161 cases of anterior exposure of the thoracic and lumbar spine in an acute care surgery model: impact of exposure level and underlying pathology on morbidity.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of anterior exposure of the thoracic and lumbar spine by an acute care surgery service. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spine surgeons typically require an "approach surgeon" to provide anterior exposure of the thoracic and lumbar spine. We hypothesized that a dedicated acute care surgery service can perform those operations with acceptable morbidity and mortality. METHODS: A retrospective review of 161 trauma and nontrauma patients was performed. All cases were performed at a level I trauma center with a dedicated acute care surgery service. In-hospital morbidity and mortality were evaluated. A brief description of the operative techniques used by our group is also provided. RESULTS: Of the 161 patients, 59 (37%) were trauma patients. Ninety-three patients (58%) had anterolateral retroperitoneal exposure of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Sixty-eight patients (42%) had anterior retroperitoneal midline exposure of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine. Total morbidity was 9.3% (7.4% for trauma patients and 1.8% for non trauma patients). Morbidity was highest in patients who had anterolateral exposure of the thoracic and lumbar spine (6.8%). Morbidity in patients who had midline exposure of L4 to S1 was 0%. Total mortality was 1.2% (3.3% for trauma patients and 0% for nontrauma patients). The acute care surgery service gained 3141 physician work relative value units (RVU) by performing those operations. CONCLUSION: Anterior exposure of the thoracic and lumbar spine both for trauma and nontrauma related indications can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality by a dedicated acute care surgery service. Morbidity and mortality were higher in trauma patients and in those who underwent thoracolumbar procedures. Patients who had midline exposure of L4 to S1 for degenerative disc disease had the lowest morbidity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.