Barriers and facilitators to influenza and pneumococcal vaccine hesitancy in rheumatoid arthritis: a qualitative study.

OBJECTIVES: Immunization is an essential component of RA care. Nevertheless, vaccine coverage in RA is suboptimal. Contextual, individual and vaccine-related factors influence vaccine acceptance. However, barriers and facilitators of vaccination in RA are not well defined. The aim of this study was to assess perspectives of RA patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in RA care of barriers and facilitators regarding influenza and pneumococcal vaccines. METHODS: Eight focus groups (four with RA patients and four with HCPs) and eight semi-structured open-ended individual interviews with vaccine-hesitant RA patients were conducted. Data were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and imported to MAXQDA software. Analysis using the framework of vaccine hesitancy proposed by the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization was conducted. RESULTS: RA patients and HCPs reported common and specific barriers and facilitators to influenza vaccination that included contextual, individual and/or group and vaccine- and/or vaccination-specific factors. A key contextual influence on vaccination was patients' perception of the media, pharmaceutical industry, authorities, scientists and the medical community at large. Among the individual-related influences, experiences with vaccination, knowledge/awareness and beliefs about health and disease prevention were considered to impact vaccine acceptance. Vaccine-related factors including concerns about vaccine side effects such as RA flares, the safety of new formulations, the mechanism of action, access to vaccines and costs associated with vaccination were identified as actionable barriers. CONCLUSION: Acknowledging RA patients' perceived barriers to influenza and pneumococcal vaccination and implementing specific strategies to address them might increase vaccination coverage in this population.

Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of primary somatosensory cortex on vibrotactile detection and discrimination.

Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) of primary somatosensory cortex (S1) has been shown to enhance tactile spatial acuity, but there is little information as to the underlying neuronal mechanisms. We examined vibrotactile perception on the distal phalanx of the middle finger before, during, and after contralateral S1 tDCS [a-, cathodal (c)-, and sham (s)-tDCS]. The experiments tested our shift-gain hypothesis, which predicted that a-tDCS would decrease vibrotactile detection and discrimination thresholds (leftward shift of the stimulus-response function with increased gain/slope) relative to s-tDCS, whereas c-tDCS would have the opposite effects (relative to s-tDCS). The results showed that weak a-tDCS (1 mA, 20 min) led to a reduction in both vibrotactile detection and discrimination thresholds to 73-76% of baseline during the application of the stimulation in subjects categorized as responders. These effects persisted after the end of a-tDCS but were absent 30 min later. Most, but not all, subjects showed a decrease in threshold (8/12 for detection; 9/12 for discrimination). Intersubject variability was explained by a ceiling effect in the discrimination task. c-tDCS had no significant effect on either detection or discrimination threshold. Taken together, our results supported our shift-gain hypothesis for a-tDCS but not c-tDCS.

Training Physicians in Motivational Communication to Address Influenza Vaccine Hesitation: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

BACKGROUND: Strategies to support health care professionals on how to address vaccine hesitancy are needed. METHODS: We developed a 4-h Motivational Communication (MC) training program tailored to help physicians address hesitancy related to influenza vaccination among patients living with rheumatoid arthritis. Five MC competencies were evaluated at baseline and post-training with a standardized patient using the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity [MITI] scale. Adherence to MC during clinical consultations and changes in vaccine intentions was measured as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Seven rheumatology physicians participated in the training. MITI scores increased in all participants, and 71% (n = 5) achieved thresholds of clinical competency (i.e., ≥3.5/5 at MITI global score and ≥3/5 on at least 3 individual competency score) post-training. Autonomy/support and empathy competencies reached competency thresholds (+2.4 ± 1.3 to +4.1 ± 0.7 and +2.1 ± 0.7 to +4.1 ± 0.7, respectively). Evocation and collaboration competencies improved but without reaching competency thresholds (+1.4 ± 0.8 to +3.1 ± 1.1; +1.4 ± 0.8 to +2.9 ± 1.1, respectively). Direction did not improve. Among 21 patient consultations post-training, 15 (71%) were MC-consistent. Of the 15 patients, 67% (10/15) intended to receive the influenza vaccine and 33% (5/15) received it. CONCLUSION: A brief MC training program targeting vaccine hesitancy increased MC competency among rheumatology physicians and promoted behavioral change among patients.

Assessing Physician's Motivational Communication Skills: 5-Step Mixed Methods Development Study of the Motivational Communication Competency Assessment Test.

BACKGROUND: Training physicians to provide effective behavior change counseling using approaches such as motivational communication (MC) is an important aspect of noncommunicable chronic disease prevention and management. However, existing evaluation tools for MC skills are complex, invasive, time consuming, and impractical for use within the medical context. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to develop and validate a short web-based tool for evaluating health care provider (HCP) skills in MC-the Motivational Communication Competency Assessment Test (MC-CAT). METHODS: Between 2016 and 2021, starting with a set of 11 previously identified core MC competencies and using a 5-step, mixed methods, integrated knowledge translation approach, the MC-CAT was created by developing a series of 4 base cases and a scoring scheme, validating the base cases and scoring scheme with international experts, creating 3 alternative versions of the 4 base cases (to create a bank of 16 cases, 4 of each type of base case) and translating the cases into French, integrating the cases into the web-based MC-CAT platform, and conducting initial internal validity assessments with university health students. RESULTS: The MC-CAT assesses MC competency in 20 minutes by presenting HCPs with 4 out of a possible 16 cases (randomly selected and ordered) addressing various behavioral targets (eg, smoking, physical activity, diet, and medication adherence). Individual and global competency scores were calculated automatically for the 11 competency items across the 4 cases, providing automatic scores out of 100. From the factorial analysis of variance for the difference in competency and ranking scores, no significant differences were identified between the different case versions across individual and global competency (P=.26 to P=.97) and ranking scores (P=.24 to P=.89). The initial tests of internal consistency for rank order among the 24 student participants were in the acceptable range (α=.78). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that MC-CAT is an internally valid tool to facilitate the evaluation of MC competencies among HCPs and is ready to undergo comprehensive psychometric property analyses with a national sample of health care providers. Once psychometric property assessments have been completed, this tool is expected to facilitate the assessment of MC skills among HCPs, skills that will better support patients in adopting healthier lifestyles, which will significantly reduce the personal, social, and economic burdens of noncommunicable chronic diseases.

Understanding factors associated with vaccine uptake and vaccine hesitancy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a scoping literature review.

Due to higher risk of complications associated with vaccine-preventable infections (e.g., influenza, pneumococcus), patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are a priority group for vaccination. However, vaccination rates among RA patients are low, indicating a need to understand the determinants of vaccine hesitancy in this group. This study conducted an evidence synthesis of various stakeholders' (patients, physicians/rheumatologists) perspectives about the determinants of vaccine hesitancy and uptake among patients with RA. We searched three bibliographic and reference databases (PUBMED, PsychINFO, and SCOPUS) for relevant English or French articles published in peer-reviewed journals through July 2019 that conducted either qualitative or quantitative assessments of vaccine hesitancy or uptake. Key themes associated with vaccination hesitancy themes according to different stakeholders were extracted and summarized. Of 783 unique citations, 16 articles met the inclusion criteria. Most studies (78%; n = 134,787 RA patients) examined barriers reported by patients, 13% (n = 114) by rheumatologists. Two principal themes and six sub-themes associated with vaccination hesitancy were identified among both patients and rheumatologists: 'social and contextual factors' (including healthcare policies, access to care/high patient loads, and social/media influences) and 'patient and provider factors' (including patient understanding of benefits and risks, provider awareness of guidelines and perceived responsibility for vaccination, and implementation challenges). Determinants of vaccine hesitancy and uptake in RA identified by different stakeholders implicate patient-, provider-, and healthcare system­related factors. This information is relevant for the design of interventions that target improving vaccine uptake in RA patients.

Interventions to improve vaccine acceptance among rheumatoid arthritis patients: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVE: National guidelines emphasize the importance of annual immunization for patients living with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but vaccination rates remain suboptimal in this population. Evaluating the efficacy of patient and/or provider-targeted interventions to improve vaccination uptake among RA patients could inform practice. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review (SR) to examine the efficacy of interventions (exposure) aiming to improve vaccination uptake in patients with RA (outcome). English and French language, peer-reviewed interventional studies to improve vaccination rates in RA patients published between 2009 and 2018 were included. RESULTS: The search yielded a total of 450 records. Five articles met inclusion criteria. All interventions focused on changing provider behavior using some form of vaccination reminder as the primary intervention strategy, though only two studies reported provider prescribing behavior as an outcome (which was 4% and 58%). Overall, studies varied greatly regarding intervention delivery mode (e.g., educational sessions, e-mail reminders, best practice alerts), and behavior change techniques used to encourage providers to prescribe vaccination (e.g., feedback and monitoring, shaping knowledge, self-regulation). For influenza, pneumococcal and herpes zoster, post-intervention (mean 12-16 months follow-up) vaccination rates increased by a mean of 16.6% (± 15.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to enhance vaccine uptake in RA focused almost exclusively on improving provider prescription of vaccines using reminder-type interventions. Although effective in improving vaccination rates, those studies used heterogeneous interventions and behavior change techniques. Few studies measured provider prescribing behavior as an outcome. Future studies targeting providers should measure relevant provided-related outcomes and their impact on patient outcomes, to determine overall efficacy.

Correction to: Interventions to improve vaccine acceptance among rheumatoid arthritis patients: a systematic review.

The original version of this article contained error. Table 1 was shown in the wrong version, thus corrected table is shown in this article.

Education needs of nurses in thrombosis and hemostasis: An international, mixed-methods study.

BACKGROUND: The need for a more integrated, multidisciplinary approach to care for individuals with bleeding or clotting disorders has been highlighted in recent years. Evidence-based education adapted to nurses' needs is essential for a successful evolution. However, limited data currently exist on the clinical challenges nurses face in this specialty area. OBJECTIVES: Identify barriers and challenges faced by specialty nurses, and determine possible causes, to develop appropriate educational interventions. METHODS: A mixed-methods study, combining qualitative (semi-structured interviews) and quantitative (online survey) data was conducted on the challenges experienced by hemostasis nurses in nine countries (Argentina, Australia, Canada, China, France, Germany, Spain, the UK, and the US), and deployed in five languages (English, French, German, Mandarin, and Spanish). Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Quantitative data were analyzed using frequency tables, chi-squares and standard deviations. RESULTS: Participants (n = 234) included nurses (n = 212; n = 22 qualitative; n = 190 quantitative); and patients receiving care for bleeding or clotting conditions or their caretakers (n = 22 qualitative phase only). Through triangulated data analysis, six challenging areas emerged: (a) Understanding of von Willebrand disease (VWD); (b) Anticoagulant safety profile in specific patients; (c) Understanding the treatment of patients with inhibitors; (d) Patient risk assessments; (e) Individualization of care and communication with patients; and (f) Accessing and implementing relevant professional education. CONCLUSIONS: This needs assessment provides a comprehensive illustration of the current challenges faced by nurses in the field of bleeding and clotting disorders, and indicates where gaps in skills, knowledge or confidence would benefit from nurse-specific educational programming.

A multi-stakeholder perspective on asthma care in Canada: findings from a mixed methods needs assessment in the treatment and management of asthma in adults.

BACKGROUND: Although several aspects of asthma care have been identified as being sub-optimal in Canada, such as patient education, practice guideline adoption, and access to care, there remains a need to determine the extent to which these gaps remain, so as to investigate their underlying causes, and potential solutions. METHODS: An ethics-approved mixed methods educational needs assessment was conducted in four Canadian provinces (Alberta, British Columbia, Ontario, and Quebec), combining a qualitative phase (45-min semi-structured interviews with community-based healthcare providers and key stakeholders) and a quantitative phase (15-min survey, healthcare providers only). RESULTS: A total of 234 participants were included in the study, 44 in semi-structured interviews and 190 in the online survey. Five clinical areas were reported to be suboptimal by multiple categories of participants, and specific causes were identified for each. These areas included: Integration of guidelines into clinical practice, use of spirometry, individualisation of asthma devices to patient needs, emphasis on patient adherence and self-management, and clarity regarding roles and responsibilities of different members of the asthma healthcare team. Common causes for gaps in all these areas included suboptimal knowledge amongst healthcare providers, differing perceptions on the importance of certain interventions, and inadequate communication between healthcare providers. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a better understanding of the specific causes underlying common gaps and challenges in asthma care in Canada. This information can inform future continuing medical education, and help providers in community settings obtain access to adequate materials, resources, and training to support optimal care of adult patients with asthma.

Identifying the educational needs of physicians in pediatric epilepsy in order to improve care: results from a needs assessment in Germany, Spain, and the United States.

The objective of this study was to gather evidence-based data on the educational needs of neuropediatricians. A needs assessment was conducted to identify the clinical challenges of physicians when diagnosing, medically treating, and managing pediatric patients with epilepsy; which could be addressed through educational interventions. A two-phase mixed-methods approach was used to conduct the needs assessment in Germany, Spain, and the US. Phase 1 consisted of qualitative data collection through multiple sources: a literature review, semi-structured interviews with clinicians and nurses working in pediatric epilepsy, and interpretation and input from faculty experts. Qualitative data were coded (NVivo) and analyzed using a thematic analysis, and findings were then used to design the second phase. Phase 2 consisted of quantitative data collection through an online survey that aimed to validate the identified challenges and underlying causes using a larger sample than in Phase 1. Data from the survey were analyzed using frequency tabulations and chi-square tests (SPSS). A total of 267 participants were included in the study. Phase 1 included 88 participants (neurologists, pediatricians, neuropediatricians, and nurses). Phase 2 included 179 participants (neurologists, pediatricians, and neuropediatricians). The main areas of challenge which emerged from the triangulated data included: the integration of guidelines into practice, identification of epilepsy and epilepsy events, integration of genetic testing into practice, integration of non-pharmacological treatments, transition from pediatric to adult care, and involvement and engagement with caregivers. Underlying causes of these challenges are reported, along with supporting qualitative findings. This study identified the educational needs of physicians working in pediatric epilepsy in Germany, Spain and the USA. Increasingly, educational interventions are required to be evidence-based. The results of this study could be used to design such interventions to support neuropediatricians who wish to specialize in pediatric epileptology, in order to manage the identified challenges.

Identifying Educational Needs and Practice Gaps of European Hematologists and Hematology Nurses in the Treatment and Management of Multiple Myeloma.

This needs-assessment aimed to identify clinical challenges faced by hematologists and hematology nurses in the diagnosis, treatment, and management of multiple myeloma, as well as contextual barriers hindering optimal care of patients with multiple myeloma. This manuscript focuses on key findings in relation to decision-making regarding new treatment options. A mixed methods study consisting of qualitative (from semistructured interviews) and quantitative data (from an online survey) was conducted in 8 European countries among hematologists and hematology nurses. The triangulated data led to the identification of 3 key findings related to decision-making: (1) Educational needs regarding mechanisms of action and side effect profiles of new therapies, (2) educational needs regarding the sequencing and combination of new agents with current therapies, and (3) contextual barriers to the integration of new agents. Specific knowledge and skill gaps were identified as causalities of the educational needs, providing information to guide future educational programs. Of note, 34% of hematologists and 69% of nurses reported suboptimal knowledge of the mechanisms of action of new agents and 30% of hematologists reported suboptimal skills integrating new agents in combination with current treatments. This needs-assessment highlighted the importance to address the educational needs and their underlying causes through medical education activities to ensure hematologists and hematology nurses are up-to-date with the latest treatments in the field as they become available. The contextual barriers identified should be considered when designing the educational programs to ensure content is applicable to the clinical reality of learners.

The involvement of the striatum in decision making.

Decision making has been extensively studied in the context of economics and from a group perspective, but still little is known on individual decision making. Here we discuss the different cognitive processes involved in decision making and its associated neural substrates. The putative conductors in decision making appear to be the prefrontal cortex and the striatum. Impaired decision-making skills in various clinical populations have been associated with activity in the prefrontal cortex and in the striatum. We highlight the importance of strengthening the degree of integration of both cognitive and neural substrates in order to further our understanding of decision-making skills. In terms of cognitive paradigms, there is a need to improve the ecological value of experimental tasks that assess decision making in various contexts and with rewards; this would help translate laboratory learnings into real-life benefits. In terms of neural substrates, the use of neuroimaging techniques helps characterize the neural networks associated with decision making; more recently, ways to modulate brain activity, such as in the prefrontal cortex and connected regions (eg, striatum), with noninvasive brain stimulation have also shed light on the neural and cognitive substrates of decision making. Together, these cognitive and neural approaches might be useful for patients with impaired decision-making skills. The drive behind this line of work is that decision-making abilities underlie important aspects of wellness, health, security, and financial and social choices in our daily lives.

La toma de decisiones ha sido ampliamente estudiada en el contexto de la economía y desde una perspectiva grupal, pero aun se conoce poco acerca de la toma de decisiones individual. En este artículo se comentan los diferentes procesos cognitivos involucrados en la toma de decisiones y en sus sustratos neurales asociados. Los supuestos conductores en la toma de decisiones parecen ser la corteza prefrontal y el estriado. El deterioro en las destrezas para la toma de decisiones en varias poblaciones clínicas se ha asociado con actividad en la corteza prefrontal y en el estriado. Se destaca la importancia del fortalecimiento del grado de integración de los sustratos cognitivos y neurales con el fin de mejorar nuestra comprensión acerca de las destrezas para la toma de decisiones. En términos de paradigmas cognitivos, hay una necesidad de mejorar el valor ecológico de las tareas experimentales que evalúan la toma de decisiones en varios contextos y con recompensas; esto ayudaría a traducir los aprendizajes de laboratorio en beneficios en la vida real. En términos de los sustratos neurales, el empleo de técnicas de neuroimágenes ayuda a caracterizar las redes neurales asociadas con la toma de decisiones. Recientemente la modulación de la actividad cerebral, tanto en la corteza prefrontal como en las regiones conectadas (por ejemplo, el estriado), mediante estimulación cerebral no invasora también ha dado luces acerca de los sustratos neural y cognitivo en la toma de decisiones. A la vez, estas aproximaciones cognitivas y neurales podrían ser útiles para pacientes con deterioro en las destrezas para la toma de decisiones. El denominador común detrás de esta línea de trabajo es que las destrezas para la toma de decisiones están a la base de importantes aspectos del bienestar, la salud, la seguridad y las elecciones financieras y sociales en nuestra vida diaria.

La prise de décision a été largement étudiée dans le contexte économique et du point de vue du groupe, mais la prise de décision individuelle est encore mal connue. Nous analysons ici les différents processus cognitifs impliqués dans la prise de décision et les substrats neuronaux associés. Les déclencheurs éventuels de la prise de décision se situeraient dans le cortex préfrontal et le striatum. Dans différentes populations cliniques, une altération des capacités de prise de décision s'associe à une activité du cortex préfrontal et du striatum. Nous soulignons l'importance de renforcer le degré d'intégration des substrats cognitifs et neuronaux afin de mieux comprendre les capacités de prise de décision. En termes de modèles cognitifs, il faut améliorer la valeur écologique des applications expérimentales qui évaluent la prise de décision dans différents contextes et avec des récompenses, ce qui aiderait à traduire les apprentissages expérimental en bénéfices dans la vie réelle. En termes de substrats neuronaux, la neuro-imagerie permet de caractériser les réseaux neuronaux associés à la prise de décision; plus récemment, la modulation de l'activité cérébrale, comme dans le cortex préfrontal et les régions connectées (par ex le striatum), par une stimulation cérébrale non invasive a aussi mis en lumière les substrats neuronaux et cognitifs de la prise de décision. Conjointement, ces approches cognitives et neuronales pourraient être utiles aux patients dont les capacités de prise de décision sont altérées. En fil conducteur de ce travail, l'aptitude à la prise de décision sous-tend des aspects importants du bien-être, de la santé, de la sécurité et des choix financiers et sociaux dans nos vies quotidiennes.