Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Nutrients ; 13(3)2021 Feb 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33668992

RESUMO

With the growing popularity of probiotics in dietary supplements, foods, and beverages, it is important to substantiate not only the health benefits and efficacy of unique strains but also safety. In the interest of consumer safety and product transparency, strain identification should include whole-genome sequencing and safety assessment should include genotypic and phenotypic studies. Bacillus subtilis MB40, a unique strain marketed for use in dietary supplements, and food and beverage, was assessed for safety and tolerability across in silico, in vitro, and in vivo studies. MB40 was assessed for the absence of undesirable genetic elements encoding toxins and mobile antibiotic resistance. Tolerability was assessed in both rats and healthy human volunteers. In silico and in vitro testing confirmed the absence of enterotoxin and mobile antibiotic resistance genes of safety concern to humans. In rats, the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) for MB40 after repeated oral administration for 14 days was determined to be 2000 mg/kg bw/day (equivalent to 3.7 × 1011 CFU/kg bw/day). In a 28 day human tolerability trial, 10 × 109 CFU/day of MB40 was well tolerated. Based on genome sequencing, strain characterization, screening for undesirable attributes and evidence of safety by appropriately designed safety evaluation studies in rats and humans, Bacillus subtilis MB40 does not pose any human health concerns under the conditions tested.


Assuntos
Bacillus subtilis/classificação , Probióticos/efeitos adversos , Animais , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Proteínas de Ligação a DNA , Suplementos Nutricionais , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Feminino , Microbiologia de Alimentos , Proteínas Fúngicas , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Nível de Efeito Adverso não Observado , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-Dawley
2.
Food Chem Toxicol ; 97: 57-69, 2016 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27580979

RESUMO

The potential toxicity of corn starch fiber was assessed and compared to polydextrose, a commonly used bulking agent with a long history of safe use in the food supply. Groups of male and female Crl:CD(SD) rats were fed 0 (control), 1,000, 3,000, or 10,000 mg/kg-bw/day corn starch fiber in the diet for 90 days. The polydextrose reference article was offered on a comparable regimen at 10,000 mg/kg-bw/day. Following a single gavage dose of [14C]-corn starch fiber on study day 13 or 90, the mass balance of the test article was assessed by analysis of excreta samples collected from 0 to 168 h post-dose. There were no toxicologically or biologically relevant findings in any of the test article-treated groups. The few minor differences observed between the corn starch fiber and polydextrose exposed groups were considered to be due to normal biological variation. Following [14C]-corn starch fiber dosing, nearly complete excretion of the administered dose occurred over 168 h post-dosing, with the majority excreted in the feces. The dietary no-observed-adverse-effect level of corn starch fiber after 90 days was 10,000 mg/kg-bw/day. Similar toxicity profiles for corn starch fiber and polydextrose were observed due to the structural and compositional similarities of these materials.


Assuntos
Radioisótopos de Carbono/análise , Fibras na Dieta/toxicidade , Fezes/química , Amido/toxicidade , Administração Oral , Animais , Fibras na Dieta/administração & dosagem , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Aditivos Alimentares/administração & dosagem , Aditivos Alimentares/toxicidade , Glucanos/administração & dosagem , Glucanos/toxicidade , Masculino , Nível de Efeito Adverso não Observado , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-Dawley , Amido/administração & dosagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA