Recommendations on compiling test datasets for evaluating artificial intelligence solutions in pathology.

Artificial intelligence (AI) solutions that automatically extract information from digital histology images have shown great promise for improving pathological diagnosis. Prior to routine use, it is important to evaluate their predictive performance and obtain regulatory approval. This assessment requires appropriate test datasets. However, compiling such datasets is challenging and specific recommendations are missing. A committee of various stakeholders, including commercial AI developers, pathologists, and researchers, discussed key aspects and conducted extensive literature reviews on test datasets in pathology. Here, we summarize the results and derive general recommendations on compiling test datasets. We address several questions: Which and how many images are needed? How to deal with low-prevalence subsets? How can potential bias be detected? How should datasets be reported? What are the regulatory requirements in different countries? The recommendations are intended to help AI developers demonstrate the utility of their products and to help pathologists and regulatory agencies verify reported performance measures. Further research is needed to formulate criteria for sufficiently representative test datasets so that AI solutions can operate with less user intervention and better support diagnostic workflows in the future.

[Artificial intelligence in kidney transplant pathology]. / Künstliche Intelligenz in der Nierentransplantationspathologie.

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) systems have showed promising results in digital pathology, including digital nephropathology and specifically also kidney transplant pathology. AIM: Summarize the current state of research and limitations in the field of AI in kidney transplant pathology diagnostics and provide a future outlook. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Literature search in PubMed and Web of Science using the search terms "deep learning", "transplant", and "kidney". Based on these results and studies cited in the identified literature, a selection was made of studies that have a histopathological focus and use AI to improve kidney transplant diagnostics. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Many studies have already made important contributions, particularly to the automation of the quantification of some histopathological lesions in nephropathology. This likely can be extended to automatically quantify all relevant lesions for a kidney transplant, such as Banff lesions. Important limitations and challenges exist in the collection of representative data sets and the updates of Banff classification, making large-scale studies challenging. The already positive study results make future AI support in kidney transplant pathology appear likely.

Next-Generation Morphometry for pathomics-data mining in histopathology.

Pathology diagnostics relies on the assessment of morphology by trained experts, which remains subjective and qualitative. Here we developed a framework for large-scale histomorphometry (FLASH) performing deep learning-based semantic segmentation and subsequent large-scale extraction of interpretable, quantitative, morphometric features in non-tumour kidney histology. We use two internal and three external, multi-centre cohorts to analyse over 1000 kidney biopsies and nephrectomies. By associating morphometric features with clinical parameters, we confirm previous concepts and reveal unexpected relations. We show that the extracted features are independent predictors of long-term clinical outcomes in IgA-nephropathy. We introduce single-structure morphometric analysis by applying techniques from single-cell transcriptomics, identifying distinct glomerular populations and morphometric phenotypes along a trajectory of disease progression. Our study provides a concept for Next-generation Morphometry (NGM), enabling comprehensive quantitative pathology data mining, i.e., pathomics.