Erosive Progression by High-Resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography and Conventional Radiography in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) to assess erosive progression during one year compared to conventional radiography (CR) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: This prospective study included 359 patients with RA (disease duration ≥ 5 years) between March 2018 and October 2020. HR-pQCT and CR were obtained at inclusion and after one year. Erosive assessment was performed at two metacarpophalangeal joints of the dominant hand using HR-pQCT and progression was defined as an increase in erosion number ≥ 1 or an increase in erosive volume > least significant change. CR of hands, wrists, and feet were evaluated using Sharp/van der Heijde scores and erosive progression was defined as a 1.1-point increase in erosion score according to the smallest detectable change. RESULTS: In paired analyses (n = 310), erosive progression was identified in 30 patients using CR and in 40 patients using HR-pQCT. In the 40 patients with erosive progression on HR-pQCT, progression was not identified by CR in 33 patients. Adding HR-pQCT to CR doubled the proportion of patients identified with progression from 30 (10%) to 63 (20%) patients. Using CR as the reference, the sensitivity (% (95% CI)) of HR-pQCT for identifying erosive progression was 23.3 (9.9-42.3) and the specificity was 88.2 (83.8-91.7). CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of patients with erosive progression are overlooked using CR only to monitor erosive progression. Adding high-resolution peripheral CT to CR doubles the proportion of patients, who may benefit from individualised therapy targeting erosive progression in RA.

Bone Mineral Density Derived from Cardiac CT Scans: Using Contrast Enhanced Scans for Opportunistic Screening.

PURPOSE: Osteoporosis is under-diagnosed and often co-exists with other diseases. Very low bone mineral density (BMD) indicates risk of osteoporosis and opportunistic screening for low BMD in CT-scans has been suggested. In a non-contrast enhanced thoracic CT scan, the scan-field-of-view includes vertebrae enabling BMD estimation. However, many CT scans are obtained by administration of contrast material. If the impact of contrast enhancement on BMD measurements could be quantified, considerably more patients are eligible for screening. METHODS: This study investigated the impact of intravenous contrast on thoracic BMD measurements in cardiac CT scans pre- and post-contrast, including different contrast trigger levels of 130 and 180 Hounsfield units (HU). BMD was measured using quantitative CT with asynchronous calibration. RESULTS: In 195 participants undergoing cardiac CT (mean age 57±9 years, 37 % females) contrast increased mean thoracic BMD from 116±33 mg/cm3 (non-enhanced CT) to 130±38 mg/cm3 (contrast-enhanced CT) (p<0.001). Using clinical cut-off values for very low (<80 mg/cm3) and low BMD (<120 mg/cm3) showed that 24 % (47/195 participants) were misclassified when BMD was measured on contrast-enhanced CT-scans. Of the misclassified patients, 6 % (12/195 participants) were categorized as having low BMD despite having very low BMD on the non-enhanced images. Contrast-CT using a higher contrast trigger level showed a significant increase in BMD compared to the lower trigger level (119±32 vs. 135±40 mg/cm3, p<0.01). CONCLUSION: For patients undergoing cardiac CT, using contrast-enhanced images to assess BMD entails substantial overestimation. Contrast protocol trigger levels also affect BMD measurements. Adjusting for these factors is needed before contrast-enhanced images can be used clinically. MINI ABSTRACT: Osteoporosis is under-diagnosed. Contrast-enhanced CT made to examine other diseases might be utilized simultaneously for bone mineral density (BMD) screening. These scans, however, likely entails overestimation of BMD due to the effect of contrast. Adjusting for this effect is needed before contrast-enhanced images can be implemented clinically for BMD screening.

Genome-wide association study identifies genetic variants which predict the response of bone mineral density to teriparatide therapy.

OBJECTIVES: Teriparatide (TPTD) is an effective treatment for osteoporosis but the individual response to therapy is variable for reasons that are unclear. This study aimed to determine whether the response to TPTD might be influenced by genetic factors. METHODS: We searched for predictors of the response of bone mineral density (BMD) to TPTD using a two-stage genome-wide association study in 437 patients with osteoporosis from three referral centres. Demographic and clinical data including the response of BMD to treatment at the lumbar spine and hip were extracted from the medical records of each participant. RESULTS: Allelic variation at rs6430612 on chromosome 2, close to the CXCR4 gene was associated with the response of spine BMD to TPTD at a genome wide significant level (p=9.2×10-9 beta=-0.35 (-0.47 to -0.23)). The increase in BMD was almost twice as great in AA homozygotes at rs6430612 as compared with GG homozygotes with intermediate values in heterozygotes. The same variant was also associated with response of femoral neck and total hip BMD (p=0.007). An additional locus on chromosome 19 tagged by rs73056959 was associated with the response of femoral neck BMD to TPTD (p=3.5×10-9, beta=-1.61 (-2.14 to -1.07)). CONCLUSIONS: Genetic factors influence the response to TPTD at the lumbar spine and hip with a magnitude of effect that is clinically relevant. Further studies are required to identify the causal genetic variants and underlying mechanisms as well as to explore how genetic testing for these variants might be implemented in clinical practice.

Denosumab Discontinuation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the pathophysiology, the clinical consequences as well as way of mitigating the effects of denosumab discontinuation. RECENT FINDINGS: Treatment with denosumab (DMAB) is reversible and upon discontinuation there is a rapid increase in bone turnover and a subsequent bone loss. During this phase of high bone turnover, an increased risk of fractures has been reported. Therefore, treatment with DMAB could be considered life-long. However, side-effects may prompt the need for discontinuation and moreover, treatment with DMAB may have increased BMD to levels where continuing treatment does not provide further fracture risk reduction. Patients stopping DMAB should be offered subsequent antiresorptive treatment with an intense monitoring regimen during the initial year as most of the bone loss occurs within these initial 12 months. In this review, we evaluated the literature published over the past 1 to 3 years investigating DMAB withdrawal with focus on bone turnover markers, bone mineral density, and fracture risk and the transition to other anti-osteoporosis therapies. Furthermore, we summarized the current recommendations of international guidelines. In this review, we evaluated the literature published over the past 1 to 3 years investigating denosumab (DMAB) discontinuation and the transition to other anti-osteoporosis therapies. Additionally, we summarized the current recommendations of international guidelines.

Diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography and X-ray for classifying erosive rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT (HR-pQCT) of two metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints can more accurately classify patients as having erosive RA compared with conventional radiography (CR) of 44 joints in the hands, wrists and feet. METHODS: In this single-centre cross-sectional study, patients with established RA (disease duration ≥5 years) were investigated by HR-pQCT and CR. The second and third MCP joints of the dominant hand were assessed for erosions by HR-pQCT. CR of the hands, wrists and feet were scored according to the Sharp-van der Heijde (SHS) method. RESULTS: In total, 353 patients were included; 66 (18.7%) patients were classified as having non-erosive RA, and 287 (81.3%) had erosive RA by CR. The sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) of HR-pQCT for classifying patients as having erosive RA when standard CR of hands, wrists and feet was used as the reference was 89% (84, 92%) and 30% (20, 43%), respectively. Using HR-pQCT as the reference, the sensitivity and specificity of CR for classifying patients having erosive RA were 85% (80, 89%) and 38% (25, 52%), respectively. McNemar's χ2 test showed no significant difference between the sensitivities of patients classified as having erosive RA by HR-pQCT or by CR (2.14, P = 0.177). CONCLUSION: The diagnostic accuracy of HR-pQCT scanning of only two MCP joints and CR of 44 joints suggests the two modalities were comparable for classifying patients with established RA as having erosive disease. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03429426).

Romosozumab and antiresorptive treatment: the importance of treatment sequence.

To evaluate whether treatment sequence affects romosozumab response, this analysis reviewed studies where romosozumab was administered before or following an antiresorptive (alendronate or denosumab). Initial treatment with romosozumab followed by an antiresorptive resulted in larger increases in bone mineral density of both hip and spine compared with the reverse sequence. INTRODUCTION: Teriparatide followed by an antiresorptive increases bone mineral density (BMD) more than using an antiresorptive first. To evaluate whether treatment sequence affects romosozumab response, we reviewed randomized clinical trials where romosozumab was administered before (ARCH, FRAME) or following (STRUCTURE, Phase 2 extension) an antiresorptive (alendronate or denosumab, respectively). METHODS: We evaluated BMD percentage change for total hip (TH) and lumbar spine (LS) and response rates (BMD gains ≥ 3% and ≥ 6%) at years 1 and 2 (except STRUCTURE with only 1-year data available). RESULTS: With 1-year romosozumab initial therapy in ARCH and FRAME, TH BMD increased 6.2% and 6.0%, and LS BMD increased 13.7% and 13.1%, respectively. When romosozumab was administered for 1 year after alendronate (STRUCTURE) or denosumab (Phase 2 extension), TH BMD increased 2.9% and 0.9%, respectively, and LS BMD increased 9.8% and 5.3%, respectively. Over 2 years, TH and LS BMD increased 7.1% and 15.2% with romosozumab/alendronate, 8.5% and 16.6% with romosozumab/denosumab, and 3.8% and 11.5% with denosumab/romosozumab, respectively. A greater proportion of patients achieved BMD gains ≥ 6% when romosozumab was used first, particularly for TH, versus the reverse sequence (69% after romosozumab/denosumab; 15% after denosumab/romosozumab). CONCLUSION: In this study, larger mean BMD increases and greater BMD responder rates were achieved when romosozumab was used before, versus after, an antiresorptive agent. Since BMD on treatment is a strong surrogate for bone strength and fracture risk, this analysis supports the thesis that initial treatment with romosozumab followed by an antiresorptive will result in greater efficacy versus the reverse sequence.

Bone Turnover, Mineralization, and Volume Estimated by 18F-Sodium Fluoride PET/CT and Biomarkers in Chronic Kidney Disease: Mineral and Bone Disorder Compared with Bone Biopsy.

INTRODUCTION: Invasive bone biopsy to assess bone metabolism in patients with chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder may be replaced by the noninvasive 18F-NaF PET/CT and biomarkers of bone metabolism. We aimed to compare parameters of bone turnover, mineralization, and volume assessed by bone biopsies with results derived from 18F-NaF PET/CT and biomarkers (bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, fibroblast growth factor 23, and osteoprotegerin). METHODS: A cross-sectional study included 17 dialysis patients, and results from 18F-NaF PET/CT scans and the biomarkers were directly compared with the results of histomorphometric analyses of tetracycline double-labeled trans-iliac bone biopsies. RESULTS: Bone biopsies showed 40% high, 20% normal, and 40% low bone turnover. No biopsies had generalized abnormal mineralization, and the bone volume/total tissue volume was low in 80% and high in 7%. The pelvic skeletal plasma clearance (Ki) from 18F-NaF PET/CT correlated with bone turnover parameters obtained by bone biopsy (activation frequency: r = 0.82, p < 0.01; bone formation rate/bone surface: r = 0.81, p < 0.01), and Ki defined low turnover with high sensitivity (83%) and specificity (100%). CT-derived radiodensity correlated with bone volume, r = 0.82, p < 0.01. Of the biomarkers, only osteocalcin showed a correlation with turnover assessed by histomorphometry. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, 18F-NaF PET/CT may be applicable for noninvasive assessment of bone turnover and volume in CKD-MBD.

Sex Differences in the Association Between Bone Mineral Density and Coronary Artery Disease in Patients Referred for Cardiac Computed Tomography.

Atherosclerosis and osteoporosis are both common and preventable diseases. Evidence supports a link between coronary artery disease (CAD) and low bone mineral density (BMD). This study aimed to assess the association between thoracic spine BMD and CAD in men and women with symptoms suggestive of CAD. This cross-sectional study included 1487 (mean age 57 years (range 40-80), 47% men) patients referred for cardiac computed tomography (CT). Agatston coronary artery calcium score (CACS), CAD severity (no, mild, moderate, and severe), vessel involvement (no, 1-, 2-, and 3/left main disease), and invasive measurements were evaluated. BMD of three thoracic vertebrae was measured using quantitative CT. We used the American college of radiology cut-off values for lumbar spine BMD to categorize patients into very low (<80 mg/cm3), low (80-120 mg/cm3), or normal BMD (>120 mg/cm3). BMD as a continuous variable was included in the linear regression analyses to assess associations between CACS (CACS=0, CACS 1- 399, and CACS ≥ 400) and BMD, and CAD severity and BMD. Significant lower BMD was present with increasing CACS and stenosis degree unadjusted. Multivariate linear regression analyses in women revealed a significant correlation between BMD and CACS groups (ß = -4.06, p<0.05), but no correlation between BMD and CAD severity (ß = -1.59, p = 0.14). No association was found between BMD and CACS (ß = -1.50, p = 0.36) and CAD severity (ß = 0.07, p = 0.94) in men. BMD is significantly correlated to CACS after adjusting for confounders in women, but not in men, suggesting a possible sex difference in pathophysiology.

Thoracic Bone Mineral Density Derived from Cardiac CT Is Associated with Greater Fracture Rate.

Background Osteoporosis is a prevalent, under-diagnosed, and treatable disease associated with increased fracture risk. Bone mineral density (BMD) derived from cardiac CT may be used to determine fracture rate. Purpose To assess the association between fracture rate and thoracic BMD derived from cardiac CT. Materials and Methods This prospective cohort study included consecutive participants referred for cardiac CT for evaluation of ischemic heart disease between September 2014 and March 2016. End of follow-up was June 30, 2018. In all participants, volumetric BMD of three thoracic vertebrae was measured by using quantitative CT software. The primary and secondary outcomes were any incident fracture and any incident osteoporosis-related fracture registered in the National Patient Registry, respectively. Hazard ratios were assessed by using BMD categorized as very low (<80 mg/cm3), low (80-120 mg/cm3), or normal (>120 mg/cm3). The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT02264717). Results In total, 1487 participants (mean age, 57 years ± 9; age range, 40-80 years; 52.5% women) were included, of whom 179 (12.0%) had very low BMD. During follow-up (median follow-up, 3.1 years; interquartile range, 2.7-3.4 years; range, 0.2-3.8 years), 80 of 1487 (5.3%) participants were diagnosed with an incident fracture and in 31 of 80 participants, the fracture was osteoporosis related. In unadjusted Cox regressions analyses, very low BMD was association with a greater rate of any fracture (hazard ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4, 4.7; P = .002) and any osteoporosis-related fracture (hazard ratio, 8.1; 95% CI: 2.4, 26.7; P = .001) compared with normal BMD. After adjusting for age and sex, very low BMD remained associated with any fracture (hazard ratio, 2.1; 95% CI: 1.1, 4.2) and any osteoporosis-related fracture (hazard ratio, 4.0; 95% CI: 1.1, 14.6). Conclusion Routine cardiac CT can be used to help measure thoracic bone mineral density (BMD) to identify individuals who have low BMD and a greater fracture rate. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Bredella in this issue.

Feasibility of Opportunistic Screening for Low Thoracic Bone Mineral Density in Patients Referred for Routine Cardiac CT.

Despite being a frequent and treatable disease, osteoporosis remains under-diagnosed worldwide. Our study aim was to characterize the bone mineral density (BMD) status in a group of patients with symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease (CAD) with low/intermediate risk profile undergoing routine cardiac computed tomography (CT) to rule out CAD. This cross-sectional study used prospectively acquired data from a large consecutively included cohort. Participants were referred for cardiac CT based on symptoms of CAD. Quantitative CT (QCT) dedicated software was used to obtain BMD measurements in 3 vertebrae starting from the level of the left main coronary artery. We used the American College of Radiology cut-off values for lumbar spine QCT to categorize patients into very low (<80 mg/cm3), low (80-120 mg/cm3), or normal BMD (>120 mg/cm3). Analyses included 1487 patients. Mean age was 57 years (range 40-80), and 52% were women. The number of patients with very low BMD was 105 women (14%, 105/773) and 74 men (10%, 74/714). The majority of patients with very low BMD was not previously diagnosed with osteoporosis (87%) and received no anti-osteoporotic treatment (90%). Opportunistic screening in patients referred for cardiac CT revealed a substantial number of patients with very low BMD. The majority of these patients was not previously diagnosed with osteoporosis and received no anti-osteoporotic treatment. Identification of these patients could facilitate initiation of anti-osteoporotic treatment and reduce the occurrence of osteoporosis-related complications.

An Optimised Fracture Liaison Service Model: Maintained Diagnostic Sensitivity Despite Reduced Number of Diagnostic Tests Performed.

Patients suffering a low-energy fracture are at high risk of subsequent fractures. Investigation of all fragility fracture patients above the age of 50 years is recommended in order to prevent further fractures. The aim of this study was to investigate alternative strategies including known risk factors (age, sex, and body weight) for selecting fracture patients for osteoporosis assessment and investigate how these strategies would affect the proportion of patients with osteoporosis identified and the number of patients referred for Dual X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) compared with the original FLS strategy. From OFELIA; a cohort study comprising 794 fragility fracture patients we included 622 patients aged 18 + years (mean age 56 ± 17) with fragility fractures. We investigated the predictive value of clinical risk factors using ROC curves and AUC analyses. The revised strategies were compared by analyzing sensitivity and specificity of different strategies based on sex, age, BMI, and bodyweight. For patients 50 + years, a strategy investigating men and women with body weight ≤ 85 kg resulted in sensitivity and specificity of 94% and 25%, respectively, reducing the number of DXAs by 21%. For patients < 50 years, the prevalence of osteoporosis was low and it was, therefore, difficult to develop an acceptable strategy. We found that the original FLS strategy can be modified to include substantially fewer patients and still only miss the osteoporosis diagnosis in a very few patients. A modified strategy would potentially save costs and concerns in many patients.

OFELIA: Prevalence of Osteoporosis in Fragility Fracture Patients.

Worldwide, a care gap has been recognized between presenting with a fracture and prevention of the next fracture. Fracture Liaison Service is the most cost-effective method to close this gap, but its implementation is sparse in the Nordic countries. To assess the need for a fracture prevention program, the primary aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of osteoporosis in patients treated for fragility fractures at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. Secondary aims were to identify clinical risk factors associated with osteoporosis and the up-take of anti-osteoporosis treatment. The study was conducted as a cross-sectional study and patients aged 18+ years were consecutively identified over a 12 months period. Of 1164 identified patients, 832 were included and 794 (70% women, 66% aged ≥ 50 years) patients completed the study. Bone mineral density was measured by DXA and information about clinical risk factors were obtained. The overall prevalence of osteoporosis in this cohort was 14.9%, increasing to 20.3% in patients ≥ 50 years (22.9% in women, 9.6% in men). In addition to age above 50 years, female sex, low BMI, and early menopause were significantly associated with osteoporosis. At 3-years follow-up in patients diagnosed with osteoporosis, 95% of patients who initiated anti-osteoporosis treatment after their fracture were still adherent to treatment. Given that osteoporosis was demonstrated in one in five fragility fracture patients above 50 years, OFELIA stresses the need for implementation of a program aiming at securing appropriate investigation and treatment of osteoporosis in patients presenting a fragility fracture.

Reduction of Hip and Other Fractures in Patients Receiving Teriparatide in Real-World Clinical Practice: Integrated Analysis of Four Prospective Observational Studies.

The phase 3 teriparatide Fracture Prevention Trial showed significant reductions in vertebral (VF) and nonvertebral (NVF) fractures; however, patient exposure was insufficient for full analysis of low-incidence fractures, including hip. We assessed fracture results in pooled data from four prospective, observational teriparatide studies. Ambulatory women and men with osteoporosis received subcutaneous teriparatide 20 µg/day for up to 24 months per routine clinical practice. Fracture rates were compared between 6-month periods, using 0 to 6 months of treatment as the reference period. Analyses used a piecewise exponential model for first fracture. Hip, NVF, clinical VF (CVF), any clinical, and wrist fractures were assessed. For 8828 patients analyzed, mean age was 71 years; mean (SD) treatment duration was 17.4 (8.6) months. The rate of hip fracture decreased significantly for the > 12 to 18-month (- 47.7%) and > 18-month periods (-85.2%) versus the first 6 months of therapy, and for the > 18 versus the > 6 to 12-month period. NVF, CVF, and all clinical fractures were all significantly decreased in each post-reference period, with maximum decreases (> 18-month period) of 52.7%, 69.4%, and 61.2%, respectively, versus 0 to 6 months. No significant reduction was seen for rates of wrist fracture. Teriparatide treatment was associated with statistically significant decreases in hip fracture rate, particularly for > 18 months of treatment, and in NVF, CVF, and all clinical fracture rate in real-world patients. These results should be interpreted in the context of the non-controlled design of the source studies.

Preoperative Systemic Bone Quality Does Not Affect Tibial Component Migration in Knee Arthroplasty: A 2-Year Radiostereometric Analysis of a Hundred Consecutive Patients.

BACKGROUND: Bone quality and other preoperative predictive factors may affect implant migration and the survival of knee arthroplasty. METHODS: In a prospective cohort of 100 consecutive patients (65 women) at a mean age of 67.7 years (range 39-87 years), we investigated preoperative predictors of postoperative tibial component migration in cemented and cementless total knee arthroplasties or cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Predictors consisted of Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Oxford Knee Score, questionnaires, bone turnover markers of CTX and P1NP, systemic bone mineral density (BMD), and knee osteoarthritis (OA) grade. Tibial component migration was measured with radiostereometry postoperative, at 1 and 2 years of follow-up. RESULTS: Between 1 and 2 years, 19 tibial components migrated continuously (maximum total point motion [MTPM] > 0.2 mm). In general, there was no difference in age, body mass index, BMD, KOOSs, or OA grade between patients with continuous tibial migration compared to patients without continuous migration (P > .11). However, cementless tibial components with continuous migration had a lower KOOS pain score (more pain), lower vitamin D, and a higher bone turnover (CTX) value than patients without continuous migration. There was no association between the BMD and MTPM at 1-year follow-up regardless of prothesis type (P > .17). Patients with osteoporosis and normal BMD had similar mean tibial component MTPM at 2 years (3 prostheses combined; P = .34). CONCLUSION: Migration of tibial components inserted with or without bone cement was not affected by the preoperative bone quality in terms of systemic BMD, bone turnover markers, and OA grade in the knee.

Romosozumab (sclerostin monoclonal antibody) versus teriparatide in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis transitioning from oral bisphosphonate therapy: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Previous bisphosphonate treatment attenuates the bone-forming effect of teriparatide. We compared the effects of 12 months of romosozumab (AMG 785), a sclerostin monoclonal antibody, versus teriparatide on bone mineral density (BMD) in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis transitioning from bisphosphonate therapy. METHODS: This randomised, phase 3, open-label, active-controlled study was done at 46 sites in North America, Latin America, and Europe. We enrolled women (aged ≥55 to ≤90 years) with postmenopausal osteoporosis who had taken an oral bisphosphonate for at least 3 years before screening and alendronate the year before screening; an areal BMD T score of -2·5 or lower at the total hip, femoral neck, or lumbar spine; and a history of fracture. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive voice response system to receive subcutaneous romosozumab (210 mg once monthly) or subcutaneous teriparatide (20 µg once daily). The primary endpoint was percentage change from baseline in areal BMD by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at the total hip through month 12 (mean of months 6 and 12), which used a linear mixed effects model for repeated measures and represented the mean treatment effect at months 6 and 12. All randomised patients with a baseline measurement and at least one post-baseline measurement were included in the efficacy analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01796301. FINDINGS: Between Jan 31, 2013, and April 29, 2014, 436 patients were randomly assigned to romosozumab (n=218) or teriparatide (n=218). 206 patients in the romosozumab group and 209 in the teriparatide group were included in the primary efficacy analysis. Through 12 months, the mean percentage change from baseline in total hip areal BMD was 2·6% (95% CI 2·2 to 3·0) in the romosozumab group and -0·6% (-1·0 to -0·2) in the teriparatide group; difference 3·2% (95% CI 2·7 to 3·8; p<0·0001). The frequency of adverse events was generally balanced between treatment groups. The most frequently reported adverse events were nasopharyngitis (28 [13%] of 218 in the romosozumab group vs 22 [10%] of 214 in the teriparatide group), hypercalcaemia (two [<1%] vs 22 [10%]), and arthralgia (22 [10%] vs 13 [6%]). Serious adverse events were reported in 17 (8%) patients on romosozumab and in 23 (11%) on teriparatide; none were judged treatment related. There were six (3%) patients in the romosozumab group compared with 12 (6%) in the teriparatide group with adverse events leading to investigational product withdrawal. INTERPRETATION: Transition to a bone-forming agent is common practice in patients treated with bisphosphonates, such as those who fracture while on therapy. In such patients, romosozumab led to gains in hip BMD that were not observed with teriparatide. These data could inform clinical decisions for patients at high risk of fracture. FUNDING: Amgen, Astellas, and UCB Pharma.

Identification of a novel locus on chromosome 2q13, which predisposes to clinical vertebral fractures independently of bone density.

OBJECTIVES: To identify genetic determinants of susceptibility to clinical vertebral fractures, which is an important complication of osteoporosis. METHODS: Here we conduct a genome-wide association study in 1553 postmenopausal women with clinical vertebral fractures and 4340 controls, with a two-stage replication involving 1028 cases and 3762 controls. Potentially causal variants were identified using expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) data from transiliac bone biopsies and bioinformatic studies. RESULTS: A locus tagged by rs10190845 was identified on chromosome 2q13, which was significantly associated with clinical vertebral fracture (P=1.04×10-9) with a large effect size (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.6). Bioinformatic analysis of this locus identified several potentially functional SNPs that are associated with expression of the positional candidate genes TTL (tubulin tyrosine ligase) and SLC20A1 (solute carrier family 20 member 1). Three other suggestive loci were identified on chromosomes 1p31, 11q12 and 15q11. All these loci were novel and had not previously been associated with bone mineral density or clinical fractures. CONCLUSION: We have identified a novel genetic variant that is associated with clinical vertebral fractures by mechanisms that are independent of BMD. Further studies are now in progress to validate this association and evaluate the underlying mechanism.

Effects of Teriparatide in Patients with Osteoporosis in Clinical Practice: 42-Month Results During and After Discontinuation of Treatment from the European Extended Forsteo® Observational Study (ExFOS).

This study aimed to describe clinical outcomes in patients prescribed teriparatide and followed up for 18 months after stopping the drug in real-life conditions. The Extended Forsteo® Observational Study analysed incident clinical fractures in 6-month intervals using logistic regression with repeated measures. Changes in back pain (visual analogue scale) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL; EQ-5D questionnaire) were analysed using mixed models for repeated measures. Patients were analysed if they had a post-baseline visit, regardless of whether and for how long they took teriparatide. Of 1531 patients analysed (90.7% female, mean age: 70.3 years), 76 (5.0%) never took teriparatide. Median treatment duration was 23.6 months. The adjusted odds of clinical fracture decreased by 47% in the > 12- to 18-month treatment period (p = 0.013) compared with the first 6-month period, with no statistically significant reduction in the > 18- to 24-month interval. The clinical fracture rate remained stable during the 18 months' post-teriparatide, when approximately 98% of patients took osteoporosis medication (51% bisphosphonates). Clinical vertebral fractures were reduced at every time period compared with the first 6 months. Adjusted mean back pain scores decreased and EQ-5D scores increased significantly at each post-baseline observation. In a real-life clinical setting, the risk of clinical fractures declined during 24 months of teriparatide treatment. This reduction was maintained 18 months after stopping teriparatide. In parallel, patients reported significant improvements in back pain and HRQoL. The results should be interpreted in the context of the non-controlled design of this observational study.

Osteoporosis in premenopausal women.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The scope of this review was to review the newest developments in the context of the existing knowledge on premenopausal bone fragility. Fragility fractures are common in postmenopausal women and men and diagnostic criteria for osteoporosis have been agreed and multiple pharmacological treatments have been developed over the last 25 years. In premenopausal women, fragility fractures and very low bone mass are uncommon and osteoporosis in premenopausal women has therefore attracted much less interest. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies have highlighted that lifestyle and dietary habits affect premenopausal bone mass. Bone mass may be improved by sufficient intake of calcium and vitamin D together with increased physical activity in premenopausal women with idiopathic osteoporosis. If pharmacological treatment is needed, teriparatide has been demonstrated to efficiently increase bone mass; however, no fracture studies and no comparative studies against antiresorptive therapies have been conducted. Pregnancy affects bone turnover and mass significantly, but pregnancy-associated osteoporosis is a rare and heterogeneous condition. SUMMARY: The diagnosis of osteoporosis should only be considered in premenopausal women with existing fragility fractures, diseases or treatments known to cause bone loss or fractures. Secondary causes of osteoporosis should be corrected or treated if possible. The women should be recommended sufficient intake of calcium and vitamin and physical activity. In women with recurrent fractures or secondary causes that cannot be eliminated, for example glucocorticoid or cancer treatment, pharmacological intervention with bisphosphonates or teriparatide (not in the case of cancer) may be considered.

Romosozumab in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density.

BACKGROUND: Sclerostin is an osteocyte-derived inhibitor of osteoblast activity. The monoclonal antibody romosozumab binds to sclerostin and increases bone formation. METHODS: In a phase 2, multicenter, international, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, eight-group study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of romosozumab over a 12-month period in 419 postmenopausal women, 55 to 85 years of age, who had low bone mineral density (a T score of -2.0 or less at the lumbar spine, total hip, or femoral neck and -3.5 or more at each of the three sites). Participants were randomly assigned to receive subcutaneous romosozumab monthly (at a dose of 70 mg, 140 mg, or 210 mg) or every 3 months (140 mg or 210 mg), subcutaneous placebo, or an open-label active comparator--oral alendronate (70 mg weekly) or subcutaneous teriparatide (20 µg daily). The primary end point was the percentage change from baseline in bone mineral density at the lumbar spine at 12 months. Secondary end points included percentage changes in bone mineral density at other sites and in markers of bone turnover. RESULTS: All dose levels of romosozumab were associated with significant increases in bone mineral density at the lumbar spine, including an increase of 11.3% with the 210-mg monthly dose, as compared with a decrease of 0.1% with placebo and increases of 4.1% with alendronate and 7.1% with teriparatide. Romosozumab was also associated with large increases in bone mineral density at the total hip and femoral neck, as well as transitory increases in bone-formation markers and sustained decreases in a bone-resorption marker. Except for mild, generally nonrecurring injection-site reactions with romosozumab, adverse events were similar among groups. CONCLUSIONS: In postmenopausal women with low bone mass, romosozumab was associated with increased bone mineral density and bone formation and with decreased bone resorption. (Funded by Amgen and UCB Pharma; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00896532.).

Case-Based Review of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (ONJ) and Application of the International Recommendations for Management From the International Task Force on ONJ.

Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) has been associated with antiresorptive therapy in both oncology and osteoporosis patients. This debilitating condition is very rare and advances in diagnosis and management may now effectively reduce the risk of its development and offer valuable treatment options for affected patients. This paper provides a case-based review of ONJ and application of the International Task Force on ONJ (referred to as the "Task Force") recommendations for the diagnosis and management of ONJ. The Task Force was supported by 14 international societies and achieved consensus from representatives of these multidisciplinary societies on key issues pertaining to the diagnosis and management of ONJ. The frequency of ONJ in oncology patients receiving oncology doses of bisphosphonate (BP) or denosumab is estimated at 1%-15%, and the frequency in the osteoporosis patient population receiving much lower doses of BP or denosumab is estimated at 0.001%-0.01%. Although the diagnosis of ONJ is primarily clinical, imaging may be helpful in confirming the diagnosis and staging. In those with multiple risk factors for ONJ for whom major invasive oral surgery is being planned, interruption of BP or denosumab therapy (in cancer patients) is advised, if possible, before surgery, until the surgical site heals. Major oral surgery in this context could include multiple extractions if surgical extractions are required, not simple forceps extractions. ONJ development may be reduced by optimizing oral hygiene and postoperatively using topical and systemic antibiotics as appropriate. Periodontal disease should be managed before starting oncology doses of BP or denosumab. Local debridement may be successful in disease unresponsive to conservative therapy. Successful surgical intervention has been reported in those with stage 3 disease; less severe disease is best managed conservatively. Teriparatide may be helpful in healing ONJ lesions and may be considered in osteoporosis patients at a high fracture risk in the absence of contraindications. Resumption of BP or denosumab therapy following healing of ONJ lesions is recommended, and there have not been reports of subsequent local recurrence.