Operational research to inform post-validation surveillance of lymphatic filariasis in Tonga study protocol: History of lymphatic filariasis elimination, rational, objectives, and design.

BACKGROUND: Lymphatic filariasis (LF), a mosquito-borne helminth infection, is an important cause of chronic disability globally. The World Health Organization has validated eight Pacific Island countries as having eliminated lymphatic filariasis (LF) as a public health problem, but there are limited data to support an evidence-based approach to post-validation surveillance (PVS). Tonga was validated as having eliminated LF in 2017 but no surveillance has been conducted since 2015. This paper describes a protocol for an operational research project investigating different PVS methods in Tonga to provide an evidence base for national and regional PVS strategies. METHODS: Programmatic baseline surveys and Transmission Assessment Surveys conducted between 2000-2015 were reviewed to identify historically 'high-risk' and 'low-risk' schools and communities. 'High-risk' were those with LF antigen (Ag)-positive individuals recorded in more than one survey, whilst 'low-risk' were those with no recorded Ag-positives. The outcome measure for ongoing LF transmission will be Ag-positivity, diagnosed using Alere™ Filariasis Test Strips. A targeted study will be conducted in May-July 2024 including: (i) high and low-risk schools and communities, (ii) boarding schools, and (iii) patients attending a chronic-disease clinic. We estimate a total sample size of 2,010 participants. CONCLUSIONS: Our methodology for targeted surveillance of suspected 'high-risk' populations using historical survey data can be adopted by countries when designing their PVS strategies. The results of this study will allow us to understand the current status of LF in Tonga and will be used to develop the next phase of activities.

Anti-filarial antibodies are sensitive indicators of lymphatic filariasis transmission and enable identification of high-risk populations and hotspots.

OBJECTIVES: Circulating filarial antigen (Ag) is used by elimination programs to monitor lymphatic filariasis (LF) transmission; however, antifilarial antibodies (Ab) may be more sensitive than Ag for detecting LF. Our objectives were to describe Ab seroprevalence, identify risk factors for Ab seropositivity, investigate age-specific associations between Ag and Ab, and evaluate geographic clustering of seropositivity. METHODS: Community-based serosurveys of participants aged ≥5 years were conducted in 35 primary sampling units (PSUs). Ag-positivity was detected using Alere™ Filariasis Test Strips and Ab-seropositivity using multiplex bead assays. Seroprevalence was adjusted for study design. RESULTS: Of 3795 participants (range:5-90 years), adjusted prevalence for Ag, Bm14 Ab, Wb123 Ab, and Bm33 Ab were 3.7% (n=117), 20.3% (n=583), 32.2% (n=987), and 51.0% (n=1659), respectively. Male sex, older age, and residents of suspected hotspots had higher odds of seropositivity to all seromarkers. Seroprevalence was lower in 5-9-year-olds vs ≥10-year-olds (p<0.001). Clustering was significantly higher in households (intra-cluster correlation for Ag:0.45; Bm14 Ab:0.32; Bm33 Ab:0.31; Wb123 Ab:0.29) compared to PSUs or region. CONCLUSIONS: Abs enabled identification of risk factors for seropositivity and geographical clustering to inform targeted interventions for LF programmes. Further research is needed to define Ab thresholds for active versus past infection and elimination targets.