Photodynamic Photorejuvenation: A Review.

INTRODUCTION: Topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) is acknowledged to be a safe and efficient therapeutic option for the selective destruction of actinic keratosis and superficial carcinomas. Over the past 15 years, topical PDT has also been shown to be a possible method for "photorejuvenation." MATERIALS AND METHODS: An extensive review was performed of in vitro and in vivo (animals, organ transplant recipients, or immunocompetent patients) studies. RESULTS: The studies point to a high level of efficacy. Tone, lentigos, skin roughness, and moreover texture and fine wrinkles because of the effects of dermal remodeling are improved. Adverse effects are generally described as mild to moderate, without scarring, along with a fast recovery time. Patients with fair phototypes and a history of sun exposure and actinic damage of varying severity are the best candidates for this technique. Photodynamic photorejuvenation sessions can both rejuvenate their skins and also treat their visible or incipient UV-induced lesions. New protocols either with daylight use and/or previous intensification by laser or microneedling seem promising. CONCLUSION: The photodynamic rejuvenation technique seems to show excellent short-term efficacy and tolerability.

Clinical equivalence of conventional OnabotulinumtoxinA (900 KDa) and IncobotulinumtoxinA (neurotoxin free from complexing proteins - 150 KDa): 2012 multidisciplinary French consensus in aesthetics.

Botulinum neurotoxins are the most popular non-surgical treatments for aesthetic indications, but there is uncertainty about whether certain formulations are comparable in efficacy and safety and can be substituted for one another by a simple one to one dose conversion ratio. An expert panel of French practitioners was convened to establish a consensus on the clinical equivalence in efficacy and safety of OnabotulinumtoxinA (900 KDa) and IncobotulinumtoxinA (neurotoxin free from complexing proteins - 150 KDa). The consensus was divided into three sections incorporating a biological, bibliographic and clinical analysis of the two toxins. This included a review of the published data that have directly compared the two toxins for aesthetic indications and a survey of the panel's extensive clinical experience with the two toxins in terms of efficacy and safety. All panel members reviewed and endorsed the content of each section. Among this expert panel of French aesthetic physicians and biologists there was consensus that OnabotulinumtoxinA and IncobotulinumtoxinA are clinically equivalent in terms of efficacy and safety, and that a switch from one drug to the other can be made using a simple 1:1 conversion ratio.

Recommendations for the use of corrective makeup after dermatological procedures.

INTRODUCTION: The number of dermatological or cosmetic procedures carried out has continuously increased over the last decades. Almost all may cause transient local skin reactions such as erythema, blistering, crusts, scaling, hypo- or hyperpigmentation, or hemorrhagic lesions. One issue of dermatological procedures is the downtime, during which patients need to hide their skin, due to these local reactions. AIM: To provide dermatologists with easy-to-follow recommendations for the right timing of use of corrective makeup for patients who have undergone or who plan to undergo dermatological procedures, according to the invasiveness of the dermatological procedure chosen. METHODOLOGY: A group of experts in dermatological procedures met in 2019 and at the beginning of 2020 to discuss the different procedures, their local reactions and downtime, and the opportunities to use specific corrective makeup in order to hide these transient reactions. RESULTS: As a result of the discussions, the experts proposed a tabulated algorithm of use based on a classification of the different dermatological procedures according to their invasiveness and recommended timing of the first post-procedure corrective makeup application. CONCLUSION: Corrective makeup may be considered as a complement to certain dermatological procedures in order to minimize downtime. However, its use is conditioned by the correct understanding of skin barrier alteration and recovery time. The proposed algorithm of use of corrective makeup after procedures may help the practitioner to indicate his patient the right moment for applying corrective makeup in order to avoid local tolerance issues and post-procedure complications.

Management of scars: updated practical guidelines and use of silicones.

Hypertrophic scars and keloids resulting from surgery, burns, trauma and infection can be associated with substantial physical and psychological distress. Various non-invasive and invasive options are currently available for the prevention and treatment of these scars. Recently, an international multidisciplinary group of 24 experts on scar management (dermatologists; plastic and reconstructive surgeons; general surgeons; physical medicine, rehabilitation and burns specialists; psychosocial and behavioural researchers; epidemiologists; beauticians) convened to update a set of practical guidelines for the prevention and treatment of hypertrophic and keloid scars on the basis of the latest published clinical evidence on existing scar management options. Silicone-based products such as sheets and gels are recommended as the gold standard, first-line, non-invasive option for both the prevention and treatment of scars. Other general scar preventative measures include avoiding sun exposure, compression therapy, taping and the use of moisturisers. Invasive treatment options include intralesional injections of corticosteroids and/or 5-fluorouracil, cryotherapy, radiotherapy, laser therapy and surgical excision. All of these options may be used alone or as part of combination therapy. Of utmost importance is the regular re-evaluation of patients every four to eight weeks to evaluate whether additional treatment is warranted. The amount of scar management measures that are applied to each wound depends on the patient's risk of developing a scar and their level of concern about the scar's appearance. The practical advice presented in the current guidelines should be combined with clinical judgement when deciding on the most appropriate scar management measures for an individual patient.