RESUMO
Objective: This article aims to describe a unique case of didanosine-induced retinal degeneration that was discovered 11 years after the drug withdrawal. Case report: The patient is a 42-year-old woman with a medical history of HIV and hepatitis C virus since 2004. She has been prescribed antiretroviral therapy since then. For the first seven years (2004-2011), the patient was prescribed a combination therapy consisting of didanosine, efavirenz, and lamivudine. The protocol was changed to atripla (efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir) from 2011 to 2021. Recently (October 2021-January 2021), the patient was prescribed eviplera (rilpivirin, emtricitabine, and tenofovir). In addition, her past medical history revealed Gougerot-Sjogren syndrome and rheumatoid arthritis. She was prescribed hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) (2009-2021) at a dose of 400 mg daily. She had no vision complaint. Results: During her routine HCQ screening at the eye clinic, University Hospital Bretonneau, Tours, France, the widefield colour fundus photograph showed well-defined symmetric mid-peripheral areas of chorioretinal atrophy sparing the posterior pole of both eyes. Furthermore, the widefield fundus autofluorescence illustrated mid-peripheral round well-demarcation hypoautofluorescent areas of chorioretinal atrophy of both eyes. Conversely, the macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) was normal. Many of her drugs are known to be associated with retinopathy such as HCQ, tenofovir, efavirenz, and didanosine. Because our data corroborate peripheral retinal damage rather than posterior pole damage, this case report is compatible with didanosine-induced retinopathy rather than HCQ, efavirenz, or tenofovir retinal toxicity. Conclusions: All HIV patients who are presently or were previously on didanosine therapy should have their fundus examined utilising widefield fundus autofluorescence and photography.
Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Degeneração Retiniana , Adulto , Atrofia , Doenças da Coroide , Didanosina/efeitos adversos , Emtricitabina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapêutico , Degeneração Retiniana/induzido quimicamente , Tenofovir/efeitos adversos , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica/métodosRESUMO
The treatment of primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL) remains controversial regarding the use of local, systemic, or combined treatments. The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy and toxicity of intravenous high-dose methotrexate (IV HD-MTX) based systemic therapy in a uniformly treated population of PVRL patients. From a nationwide French database, we retrospectively selected 59 patients (median age: 70 years, median Karnofsky Performance Status: 90%) with isolated PVRL at diagnosis who received first-line treatment with HD-MTX between 2011 and 2018. 8/59 patients also received a local treatment. No deaths or premature discontinuations of MTX due to toxicity were reported. A complete response was obtained in 40/57 patients after chemotherapy. Before treatment, IL-10 was elevated in the aqueous humor (AH) or in the vitreous in 89% of patients. After treatment, AH IL-10 was undetectable in 87% of patients with a CR/uCR/PR and detectable in 92% of patients with PD/SD. After a median follow-up of 61 months, 42/59 (71%) patients had relapsed, including 29 isolated ocular relapses as the first relapse and a total of 22 brain relapses. The median overall survival, progression-free survival, ocular-free survival and brain-free survival were 75, 18, 29 and 73 months, respectively. IV HD-MTX based systemic therapy as a first-line treatment for isolated PVRL is feasible, with acceptable toxicity, even in an elderly population. This strategy seems efficient to prevent brain relapse with prolonged overall survival. However, the ocular relapse rate remains high. New approaches are needed to improve local control of this disease, and ocular assessment could be completed by monitoring AH IL-10.
Assuntos
Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Linfoma Intraocular/tratamento farmacológico , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Retina/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Intravenosa , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Linfoma Intraocular/diagnóstico , Masculino , Metotrexato/administração & dosagem , Metotrexato/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Neoplasias da Retina/diagnóstico , Resultado do TratamentoAssuntos
Neoplasias Oculares/tratamento farmacológico , Linfoma/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Retina/tratamento farmacológico , Temozolomida/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Oculares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Oculares/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Linfoma/epidemiologia , Linfoma/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias da Retina/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Retina/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Corpo Vítreo/patologiaRESUMO
AIMS: To compare effectiveness of subconjunctival triamcinolone acetonide injections and intravitreal injections of dexamethasone 700 µg implants in reducing central macular thickness (CMT) in uveitic and postoperative macular oedema (ME). METHODS: We conducted an open-label, French multicentre randomised comparative trial with a logarithmic CMT non-inferiority margin set at 0.06. Patients were adults with non-infectious inflammatory ME, without any contraindication to the treatments. They were randomised 1:1 to receive either triamcinolone or dexamethasone. The primary endpoint was the difference in CMT among treated eyes between baseline and 2 months, measured with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Secondary outcomes included visual acuity, laser flare, vitreous haze, duration of action, tolerance to injections and adverse events. RESULTS: Between January 2016 and January 2020, 106 patients were enrolled (54 in the triamcinolone group and 52 in the dexamethasone group). Subconjunctival triamcinolone injections seemed to be non-inferior to intravitreal dexamethasone injections, especially at month 3 (and nearly at month 1). Nevertheless, we could not demonstrate it, with a treatment effect at month 2 of 0.05 (0.01 ; 0.09) (p value=0.001). This was corroborated by post hoc analyses in the postoperative subgroup, for whom the non-inferiority was nearly demonstrated at month 2 with a treatment effect of 0.02 (-0.03 ; 0.08) (p=0.37). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of adverse effects. CONCLUSION: We could not demonstrate the non-inferiority of triamcinolone injections at month 2. Nevertheless, they showed some efficacity, particularly in treating postoperative ME, being as safe as dexamethasone injections, without any loss of chance if a therapeutic switch is necessary.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To describe the etiologies of binocular diplopia for patients presenting to the ophthalmologic emergency department of the Regional University Center Hospital (CHRU) of Tours. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of the medical records of patients who presented with binocular diplopia in the ophthalmic emergency department of the CHRU of Tours between January 1st and December 31st, 2019. Binocular diplopia was classified as paralytic or non-paralytic according to the ocular motility examination. RESULTS: One hundred twelve patients were included. The median age was 61 years. Internal referral from other hospital services represented 44.6% of the patients. On ophthalmological examination, 73.2% had paralytic diplopia, 13.4% non-paralytic diplopia and 13.4% normal examination. Neuroimaging was performed in 88.3% of cases, with 75.7% of patients receiving it on the same day. Oculomotor nerve palsy was the most frequent cause of diplopia in 58.9%, the majority represented by abducens nerve palsy (60.6%). The most frequent etiology of binocular diplopia was ischemic, with microvascular damage in 26.8% of cases and stroke in 10.7% of cases. CONCLUSION: Among patients assessed in an ophthalmological emergency department setting, one in ten patients had stroke. It is essential to inform patients of the urgent nature of ophthalmological evaluation in the case of acute binocular diplopia. Urgent neurovascular management is also mandatory and should be based on the clinical description provided by the ophthalmologist. Neuroimaging should be performed as soon as possible, based on the ophthalmologic and neurological findings.
Assuntos
Diplopia , Doenças do Nervo Oculomotor , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Diplopia/diagnóstico , Diplopia/epidemiologia , Diplopia/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Emergências , Doenças do Nervo Oculomotor/diagnóstico , Doenças do Nervo Oculomotor/epidemiologia , Doenças do Nervo Oculomotor/etiologia , Hospitais , Visão Binocular/fisiologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of fluocinolone acetonide implant (FAci) injected 1 month after the last dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEXi) in chronic diabetic macular oedema (DME) patients. METHODS: Retrospective multicentric study conducted in pseudophakic patients with chronic DME frequently treated with dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEXi; time to DME recurrence ≤ 6 months), receiving FAci 1 month after the last DEXi, with at least a 6-month follow-up. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT) on optical coherence tomography, intraocular pressure (IOP) and additional treatments were assessed on the day of FAci injection (M0), 1 (M1) and 3 months (M3) later and then every 3 months. RESULTS: A total of 41 eyes from 34 patients were included. At M0, patients' mean age was 68.7 ± 9.8 years, the mean DME duration was 63.9 ± 22.9 months, the mean interval between two DEXi was 14.2 ± 3.3 weeks. M12 data were available for 71% of patients. At baseline, the mean BCVA, CMT and IOP were 63.2 ± 16.6 letters, 299.4 ± 103.3 µm, and 16.2 ± 4.5 mmHg, respectively, and remained stable during the follow-up. At M12, 14% of patients required additional intravitreal treatments. CONCLUSION: In pseudophakic patients with chronic DME showing good response to DEXi but requiring repeated injections every < 6 months, switching to FAci 1 month after the last DEXi was effective and safe. Further prospective randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings, and to determine the best interval between the last DEXi and the first FAci.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Hyperoxaluria is a rare cause of hereditary crystalline retinopathy. We report the first case of acquired calcium oxalate crystalsretinopathy following domino liver transplantation (DLT). CLINICAL CASE: A 72-year-old patient was referred for bilateral visual impairment 9 months after DLT. Slit lamp examination was unremarkable. Fundus examination revealed calcium oxalate crystals accumulation within both retina. Owing to multi-organ failure, the patient underwent combined liver-kidney retransplantation. During the following two years, calcium oxalate crystals accumulation within the retina gradually decreased and visual acuity improved. Nevertheless, OCT-angiography revealed abnormalities in the inner and outer retinal vascular plexus (i.e. retinal vessels occlusion and dilatation). Visual field examination revealed bilateral constriction associated with decreased optic nerve fibre layer thickness suggesting optic nerve atrophy. CONCLUSION: This case highlights the need for ophthalmologists to consider the diagnosis of acquired hyperoxaluria in patients with progressive bilateral visual impairment following DLT, especially if the postoperative course is marked by renal failure. Moreover, even after liver-kidney transplantation with a conventional graft, visual function can remain impaired owing to maculopathy and optic atrophy.
Assuntos
Hiperoxalúria Primária , Hiperoxalúria , Transplante de Rim , Doenças Retinianas , Idoso , Oxalato de Cálcio , Humanos , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Doenças Retinianas/diagnóstico , Doenças Retinianas/etiologiaAssuntos
Humor Aquoso/metabolismo , Neoplasias Oculares/diagnóstico , Interleucinas/metabolismo , Linfoma Intraocular/diagnóstico , Linfoma não Hodgkin/diagnóstico , Corpo Vítreo/metabolismo , Biomarcadores Tumorais/metabolismo , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Neoplasias Oculares/metabolismo , Feminino , Citometria de Fluxo , Seguimentos , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Interleucina-10/metabolismo , Interleucina-6/metabolismo , Linfoma Intraocular/metabolismo , Linfoma não Hodgkin/metabolismo , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the real-world effectiveness of intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg (Lucentis) in improving visual acuity (VA) in adults with decreased VA due to diabetic macular edema (DME). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Real-world prospective observational 24-month study. Ranibizumab-naïve patients (n=116) were enrolled, treated and followed up according to investigators' usual procedures. Outcomes included change from baseline to month 24 in best-corrected VA (BCVA; primary outcome), central retinal thickness (CRT), treatment exposure and safety. RESULTS: Overall, 62.9% of patients completed the study per protocol, 68.6% completed the induction phase (first three injections one month apart). On average, patients had 12.5 ophthalmologist visits and 5.74 injections in year 1, decreasing to 4.6 visits and 1.94 injections in year 2. Mean baseline BCVA was 58.4 letters, mean gain at M24 was +6.08 letters (95% CI: 2.95, 9.21). Gains were higher for patients who completed induction, and for patients who did not switch treatment. Mean CRT improved by 149.17 µm at M24. There were no new safety signals. BCVA variation of ≥6 letters by M3 was predictive of BCVA gains at M24 (p=0.007), as was hypertension medication at baseline (p=0.022). CONCLUSION: Real-world ranibizumab treatment improved VA in DME patients, despite fewer injections than recommended.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Whether they are injected peri- or intraocularly, corticosteroids are still essential tools in the therapeutic arsenal for treating inflammatory macular oedema. A few years ago, however, only triamcinolone acetonide was available to ophthalmologists. While this compound was initially developed for rheumatological or dermatological use, it has been increasingly deployed in ophthalmology, despite still being off-label. In 2011, the system for delivery of dexamethasone from a biodegradable, injectable implant into the vitreous cavity obtained approval for use in inflammatory macular oedema. While the efficacy and safety of triamcinolone in macular oedema, including inflammatory oedema, have already been studied, there are currently no publications on subconjunctival triamcinolone injections, which are simple, effective and well tolerated. To date, the dexamethasone 700 µg implant has been authorized for the treatment of noninfectious intermediate and posterior uveitis, but there have been no studies to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the different peri- and intraocular strategies, including the treatment of inflammatory macular oedema. METHODS: This protocol is therefore designed to compare the efficacy and safety of peri- and intraocular corticosteroid injections in the treatment of inflammatory macular oedema. In this ongoing study, 142 patients will be included, and the oedematous eye will be randomised to treatment with either subconjunctival triamcinolone injection or an intravitreal implant containing 700 µg dexamethasone. Follow-up is planned for 6 months with monthly visits. Each visit will include visual acuity measurement, a slit lamp examination, fundoscopy, intraocular pressure measurement, laser flare measurement (if available) and spectral domain optical coherence tomography. DISCUSSION: The results of this trial will have a real impact on public health if it is shown that a Kenacort retard® (i.e. triamcinolone) injection costing just 2.84 and performed in the physician's office (with no additional overhead costs) is at least as effective as the dexamethasone 700 µg implant (Ozurdex®; costing approximately 960 with the injection performed in a dedicated room), with no increased side effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02556424. Registered on 22 September 2015.
Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios/administração & dosagem , Dexametasona/administração & dosagem , Implantes de Medicamento/administração & dosagem , Edema Macular/tratamento farmacológico , Triancinolona Acetonida/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Anti-Inflamatórios/efeitos adversos , Anti-Inflamatórios/economia , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Dexametasona/efeitos adversos , Dexametasona/economia , Estudos de Equivalência como Asunto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Fundo de Olho , Humanos , Injeções Intravítreas , Edema Macular/diagnóstico , Edema Macular/imunologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Triancinolona Acetonida/efeitos adversos , Triancinolona Acetonida/economia , Acuidade Visual/efeitos dos fármacosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To identify color Doppler imaging (CDI) parameters and other prognostic factors of a conversion from nonischemic to ischemic retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in a large population with a long follow-up. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study. Data were collected for patients who had been admitted to the ophthalmologic department of the Hospital of Tours because of nonischemic central RVO (CRVO) or branch RVO (BRVO). We analyzed the relation between time until conversion into ischemic RVO and several prognostic factors of conversion, mainly vein velocities as measured by CDI. RESULTS: Analyses involved 162 patients. One year after inclusion, conversion into ischemic RVO occurred in 25.0% of the 113 CRVO and in 28.6% of the 49 BRVO cases. For CRVO, an increase of the minimal central retinal venous velocity (CRV), measured by CDI before and after treatment by hemodilution, diminished the risk of conversion into an ischemic form (p=0.048). For BRVO, an elevated maximal CRV on diagnosis was a protector (p=0.004). Age was associated with a high risk of ischemic evolution for CRVO (p=0.023) but not BRVO. Initial visual acuity was not associated with the conversion, for BRVO or CRVO. Increased retinal hemorrhages highly increased the risk of conversion both for CRVO (p<0.0001) and BRVO (p=0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Risk of ischemic evolution for BRVO and CRVO treated by isovolemic hemodilution was associated with central venous velocities. CDI might be useful for identifying risk of ischemic conversion and individualizing the follow-up of patients.
Assuntos
Isquemia/fisiopatologia , Oclusão da Veia Retiniana/fisiopatologia , Veia Retiniana/fisiopatologia , Idoso , Velocidade do Fluxo Sanguíneo , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Hidroxietilrutosídeo/administração & dosagem , Hidroxietilrutosídeo/análogos & derivados , Fotocoagulação a Laser , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Fluxo Sanguíneo Regional , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ultrassonografia Doppler em Cores , Vasoconstritores/administração & dosagem , Acuidade Visual/fisiologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To compare ocular performance and quality of vision in pseudophakic eyes with an aspherical intraocular lens (IOL) or a conventional spherical IOL. SETTING: Bretonneau University Hospital, Tours, France. METHODS: Twenty patients (40 eyes) were randomly divided in 2 equal groups to bilaterally receive the aspherical Tecnis Z9000 IOL (AMO) or the spherical CeeOn Edge 911 IOL (AMO). Contrast sensitivity was measured and ocular wavefront analysis performed before surgery and 6 months after. Patients completed the Activities of Daily Vision Scale (ADVS) to evaluate patient-centered visual outcomes. Other examinations included refraction before and after mydriasis and pupil diameter. RESULTS: The mean postoperative best corrected visual acuity (logMAR) was 0.03 +/- 0.05 (SD) in the Tecnis group and 0.01 +/- 0.05 in the CeeOn Edge group (P = .41). Refractive evaluation with mydriasis showed a mean myopic shift as low as -0.02 +/- 0.36 diopter (D) in the Tecnis group and -0.51 +/- 0.37 D in the CeeOn Edge group (P = .001). Mesopic contrast sensitivity at high spatial frequencies was significantly better in the Tecnis group (P<.001), while contrast sensitivity under photopic and glare conditions was not different between the 2 groups. Spherical aberration was significantly lower in the Tecnis group, which had a mean Z(4)(0) of 0.01 +/- 0.06 microm, than in the CeeOn Edge group, which had a mean Z(4)(0) of 0.16 +/- 0.12 microm (P<.001). The global score on the ADVS was not statistically different between groups; however, quality of distance vision was better in the Tecnis group than in the CeeOn Edge group (mean 99.0 +/- 2.0 versus 89.2 +/- 3.4) (P<.001). CONCLUSION: Implantation of an aspherical IOL with a negative spherical aberration resulted in reduced ocular spherical aberration and improved mesopic contrast sensitivity and led to better subjective quality of vision.
Assuntos
Sensibilidades de Contraste/fisiologia , Implante de Lente Intraocular , Facoemulsificação , Pseudofacia/fisiopatologia , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia , Idoso , Topografia da Córnea , Feminino , Humanos , Lentes Intraoculares , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à SaúdeRESUMO
PURPOSE: To report a case of chorioretinopathy, which preceded diagnosis of Hodgkin's lymphoma. METHODS: Single patient case report. RESULTS: A 61-year-old woman with a history of breast cancer in remission and low-grade follicular lymphoma without criteria of high tumor burden presented with bilateral multifocal chorioretinopathy. The usual etiologies of chorioretinopathy were excluded, and subsequent onset of fever and back pain revealed the diagnosis of Hodgkin's lymphoma. The evolution of this case of ocular involvement was concordant with that of Hodgkin's lymphoma. CONCLUSION: The authors describe a case of Hodgkin's lymphoma postdating the onset of chorioretinopathy, emphasizing the need to research an underlying disorder when faced with any inflammatory intraocular disease, and the role of indocyanine green angiography in the diagnosis and follow-up of posterior uveitis.
Assuntos
Doenças da Coroide/etiologia , Doença de Hodgkin/complicações , Doenças da Coroide/diagnóstico , Feminino , Doença de Hodgkin/diagnóstico , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Retinianas/diagnóstico , Doenças Retinianas/etiologia , Uveíte/diagnósticoRESUMO
Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is a multifactorial disease involving vessel damage, stasis, viscosity and thrombosis. Conflicting findings on hereditary thrombophilic risk factors have been reported and their impact on RVO features remains to be defined. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prevalence of hereditary thrombophilic risk factors (HTRF) and characteristics of RVO in patients with or without HTRF. The design of the study was a prospective, observational case series. Two hundred and thirty-four patients with RVO were included consecutively. A French healthy population of the same region was studied as control group. The HTRF studied were protein C (PC), protein S (PS) and antithrombin (AT) deficiencies, factor V Leiden (FVL) and factor II 20210A polymorphisms. Chi-Square was used for comparison with the healthy subjects and between RVO patient with and without HTRF according to localisation (branch vs. central), type of RVO (ischemic or non-ischemic), recurrence, age at first event and classical vascular risk factors. Twenty-two patients had HTRF (12 FV Leiden heterozygotes, 9 FII 20210A heterozygotes and 1 PS deficiency). No AT or PC deficiency was detected. Frequencies of PS deficiency, FVL and FII 20210A allele were similar to the reference population as well as to published data in the general caucasian population. Eighty-six patients experienced their first episode before the age of 60 years. Systemic hypertension, glaucoma and angina were significantly less frequent in patients with RVO before 60 years. Fourteen of the 22 patients with one HTRF (64%) experienced their first episode of RVO before the age of 60 years compared to 72 of 212 without HTRF (34%) (p = 0.006). Heterozygote status for FV Leiden was significantly more frequent in patients who had experienced their first episode of RVO before 60 years (p = 0.027). In conclusion, this study suggests a role of FV Leiden in the occurrence of RVO in patients younger than 60 years who exhibit fewer acquired vascular risk factors than in older patients.
Assuntos
Fator V/genética , Oclusão da Veia Retiniana/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Alelos , Antitrombinas/biossíntese , Fator V/biossíntese , Feminino , Heterozigoto , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Proteína C/biossíntese , Proteína S/biossíntese , Protrombina/biossíntese , Oclusão da Veia Retiniana/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Trombofilia/epidemiologia , Trombofilia/genética , Trombose , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
IMPORTANCE: Few data exist regarding the systemic safety of intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) monoclonal antibody (mAb). OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the risk of major cardiovascular and nonocular hemorrhagic events in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetes mellitus-associated macular edema (DME), or retinal vein occlusions (RVOs) who receive intravitreal anti-VEGF mAbs. DATA SOURCES: The MEDLINE and Cochrane Central databases were searched for potentially eligible studies. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized clinical trials comparing ranibizumab or bevacizumab with no anti-VEGF treatment, as well as those comparing ranibizumab with bevacizumab in patients with AMD, DME, or RVOs. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We used a fixed-effects model and report the results as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary end points were major cardiovascular and nonocular hemorrhagic events. Secondary end points were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, venous thromboembolic events (VTEs), and hypertension. RESULTS: Twenty-one trials that evaluated 9557 patients were retrieved. Anti-VEGF mAbs did not significantly increase the risk of major cardiovascular events (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.81-1.71) or nonocular hemorrhagic events (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.95-2.13) in treatment groups compared with control populations. Bevacizumab did not increase the risk of major cardiovascular events (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.59-1.52) or nonocular hemorrhagic events (OR, 2.56; 95% CI, 0.78-8.38) compared with ranibizumab, but significantly increased VTEs (OR, 3.45; 95% CI, 1.25-9.54). Subgroup analysis showed a significant increase of nonocular hemorrhagic events in patients with AMD in ranibizumab vs control trials (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.01-2.44). Anti-VEGF mAbs did not significantly increase overall mortality, cardiovascular mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, VTEs, or hypertension. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: We showed that intravitreal anti-VEGF-mAbs were not associated with significant increases in major cardiovascular or nonocular hemorrhagic events, but studies and meta-analyses were not powered enough to correctly assess these risks. Increased risks of VTEs with bevacizumab and nonocular hemorrhagic events in older patients with AMD with ranibizumab should be cautiously interpreted because more safety data are needed.