Loss of DNA methylation disrupts syncytiotrophoblast development: Proposed consequences of aberrant germline gene activation.

DNA methylation is a repressive epigenetic modification that is essential for development and its disruption is widely implicated in disease. Yet, remarkably, ablation of DNA methylation in transgenic mouse models has limited impact on transcriptional states. Across multiple tissues and developmental contexts, the predominant transcriptional signature upon loss of DNA methylation is the de-repression of a subset of germline genes, normally expressed in gametogenesis. We recently reported loss of de novo DNA methyltransferase DNMT3B resulted in up-regulation of germline genes and impaired syncytiotrophoblast formation in the murine placenta. This defect led to embryonic lethality. We hypothesize that de-repression of germline genes in the Dnmt3b knockout underpins aspects of the placental phenotype by interfering with normal developmental processes. Specifically, we discuss molecular mechanisms by which aberrant expression of the piRNA pathway, meiotic proteins or germline transcriptional regulators may disrupt syncytiotrophoblast development.

BAP1/ASXL complex modulation regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition during trophoblast differentiation and invasion.

Normal function of the placenta depends on the earliest developmental stages when trophoblast cells differentiate and invade into the endometrium to establish the definitive maternal-fetal interface. Previously, we identified the ubiquitously expressed tumour suppressor BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) as a central factor of a novel molecular node controlling early mouse placentation. However, functional insights into how BAP1 regulates trophoblast biology are still missing. Using CRISPR/Cas9 knockout and overexpression technology in mouse trophoblast stem cells, here we demonstrate that the downregulation of BAP1 protein is essential to trigger epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) during trophoblast differentiation associated with a gain of invasiveness. Moreover, we show that the function of BAP1 in suppressing EMT progression is dependent on the binding of BAP1 to additional sex comb-like (ASXL1/2) proteins to form the polycomb repressive deubiquitinase (PR-DUB) complex. Finally, both endogenous expression patterns and BAP1 overexpression experiments in human trophoblast stem cells suggest that the molecular function of BAP1 in regulating trophoblast differentiation and EMT progression is conserved in mice and humans. Our results reveal that the physiological modulation of BAP1 determines the invasive properties of the trophoblast, delineating a new role of the BAP1 PR-DUB complex in regulating early placentation.

Effects of Medical Comorbidities on the Surgical Outcomes of Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson Disease: A Retrospective, Single-Institution Study.

OBJECTIVE: Advancing age and greater number of medical comorbidities are well-known risk factors for higher rates of surgical complications and undesirable outcomes. We sought to determine the risk of increasing medical comorbidities on surgical outcomes for patients with Parkinson disease undergoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 107 consecutive patients who underwent DBS for Parkinson disease at Ochsner Medical Center in 2008-2018. Patients were stratified into 3 groups based on Elixhauser comorbidity index (ECI) at the time of surgery: 0, 1, or ≥2. Outcome measures were changes in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale III scores, changes in medications, and surgical complications. Analysis of variance, paired t test, and nonparametric equivalents were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Of patients, 31 (29.0%) had ECI score 0, 44 (41.1%) had ECI score 1, and 32 (29.9%) had ECI score ≥2. For all groups, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale III scores decreased significantly postoperatively (P = 0.0014, P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001). All groups had a reduction in mean levodopa equivalent daily dose after surgery; however, only the group with ≥2 comorbidities achieved statistical significance (P = 0.0026). The rate of postoperative complications was significantly correlated with comorbidity score on univariate logistic regression analysis (P = 0.0425). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that DBS is efficacious in patients with multiple medical comorbidities. However, patients with ≥1 medical comorbidities may be more likely to have complications. The most common observed complication was wound infection. Patients with medical comorbidities may still benefit significantly from DBS when performed at experienced centers.

Long-term outcomes of deep brain stimulation in severe Parkinson's disease utilizing UPDRS III and modified Hoehn and Yahr as a severity scale.

OBJECTIVES: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is the surgical treatment of choice for moderate to severe Parkinson's Disease (PD). However, few studies have assessed its efficacy in severe PD as defined by the modified Hoehn and Yahr scale (HY). This study evaluates long-term and medication outcomes of DBS in severe PD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected the data of 15 patients from 2008 to 2014 with severe PD treated with DBS. Retrospective assessment with the modified Hoehn and Yahr scale and motor subset of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS III) were used to objectively track severity and motor function improvement, respectively. Levodopa equivalence daily doses (LEDD), number of anti-PD medications and number of daily medication doses were used to measure improvements in medication burden. Data was evaluated using univariate analyses, one sample paired t-test, two sample paired t-test, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: The mean post-operative follow-up was 44.63 months, average age at diagnosis and the average age at time of DBS was 51.3 years and 61.5 years, respectively, and the time from diagnosis to treatment was 13.2 years. Significant decreases were seen in UPDRS III scores (pre-op = 44.533; post-op = 26.13; p = 0.0094), LEDD (pre-op = 1679.34 mg; post-op = 837.48 mg; p = 0.0049), and number of daily doses (pre-op = 21.266; post-op 12.2; p = 0.0046). No significant decrease was seen in the number of anti-PD medications (pre-op = 3.8; post-op = 3.2; p = 0.16). CONCLUSION: Following DBS, severe PD patients demonstrated significant improvements in motor function and medication burden during long-term follow-up. We believe our results prove that DBS is efficacious in the management of severe PD, and that further research should follow to expand DBS criteria to include severe disease.

Comparison of elderly and young patient populations treated with deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: long-term outcomes with up to 7 years of follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is the procedure of choice for Parkinson's disease (PD). It has been used in PD patients younger than 70 years because of better perceived intra- and postoperative outcomes than in patients 70 years or older. However, previous studies with limited follow-up have demonstrated benefits associated with the treatment of elderly patients. This study aims to evaluate the long-term outcomes in elderly PD patients treated with DBS in comparison with a younger population. METHODS: PD patients treated with DBS at the authors' institution from 2008 to 2014 were divided into 2 groups: 1) elderly patients, defined as having an age at surgery ≥ 70 years, and 2) young patients, defined as those < 70 years at surgery. Functional and medical treatment outcomes were evaluated using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (UPDRS III), levodopa-equivalent daily dose (LEDD), number of daily doses, and number of anti-PD medications. Study outcomes were compared using univariate analyses, 1-sample paired t-tests, and 2-sample t-tests. RESULTS: A total of 151 patients were studied, of whom 24.5% were ≥ 70 years. The most common preoperative Hoehn and Yahr stages for both groups were 2 and 3. On average, elderly patients had more comorbidities at the time of surgery than their younger counterparts (1 vs 0, p = 0.0001) as well as a higher average LEDD (891 mg vs 665 mg, p = 0.008). Both groups experienced significant decreases in LEDD following surgery (elderly 331.38 mg, p = 0.0001; and young 108.6 mg, p = 0.0439), with a more significant decrease seen in elderly patients (young 108.6 mg vs elderly 331.38 mg, p = 0.0153). Elderly patients also experienced more significant reductions in daily doses (young 0.65 vs elderly 3.567, p = 0.0344). Both groups experienced significant improvements in motor function determined by reductions in UPDRS III scores (elderly 16.29 vs young 12.85, p < 0.0001); however, reductions in motor score between groups were not significant. Improvement in motor function was present for a mean follow-up of 3.383 years postsurgery for the young group and 3.51 years for the elderly group. The average follow-up was 40.6 months in the young group and 42.2 months in the elderly group. CONCLUSIONS: This study found long-term improvements in motor function and medication requirements in both elderly and young PD patients treated with DBS. These outcomes suggest that DBS can be successfully used in PD patients ≥ 70 years. Further studies will expand on these findings.

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients 70 Years and Older with Parkinson Disease.

BACKGROUND: Parkinson disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disease in elderly patients that may be treated with deep brain stimulation (DBS). DBS is an accepted surgical treatment in PD patients <70 years that demonstrates marked improvement in disease symptomology. Patients ≥70 years historically have been excluded from DBS therapy. Our objective is to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes in patients with PD ≥70 years who underwent DBS at our center. METHODS: In our single-center study, we retrospectively assessed a prospective registry of patients with PD treated with DBS who were ≥70 years old at the time of their procedure. Univariate analyses and 1-sample paired t test were used to evaluate data. Motor scores were evaluated with the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale III, and the effects on medication requirements were evaluated with levodopa equivalence daily doses (LEDD). RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were followed for an average of 42.2 months post-DBS. The average ages at diagnosis and at the time of DBS surgery were 63.05 years and 72.45 years, respectively. Significant reductions in the average Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale III score were observed (preoperative 31.8; postoperative 15.6; P < 0.0001). Significant reductions in the average LEDD (preoperative 891.94 mg; postoperative 559.6 mg; P = 0.0008) and medication doses per day (preoperative 11.54; postoperative 7.97; P = 0.0112) also were present. CONCLUSION: DBS is effective in treating elderly patients with PD. Patients experienced improvement in motor function, LEDD, and medication doses per day after DBS. Our results suggest that DBS is an effective treatment modality in elderly patients with PD.