Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Histopathology ; 68(5): 722-8, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26266900

RESUMO

AIMS: Equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (ENT1) is the major transporter of the chemotherapeutic drug gemcitabine, the current therapy for advanced gallbladder cancer (GBC). ENT1 expression has been proposed as a predictive marker for gemcitabine-treated pancreatic cancer patients. The aim of study was to explore the value of ENT1 measurement in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced GBC. MATERIALS AND RESULTS: Immunohistochemistry for ENT1 was performed on 214 GBC samples from patients who had never undergone co-adjuvant or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Advanced GBC cases were divided into groups with low or high ENT1 expression. Kaplan-Meier tests were used for survival analyses. The Cox regression method was used to assess the association of ENT1 expression with overall survival (OS). Low ENT1 expression was associated with younger patient age (P = 0.03) and moderate-to-poor histological differentiation (P = 0.01). pT2 patients with low ENT1 expression had shorter median survival (17.3 versus 28.7 months) and lower OS (17.3% versus 33.3%, P < 0.05) than patients with high ENT1 expression. Low ENT1 expression was an independent prognostic factor for OS (P = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: ENT1 is a prognostic marker for pT2 GBC patients. Additional studies are needed to determine whether ENT1 has predictive value for gemcitabine response in GBC.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Transportador Equilibrativo 1 de Nucleosídeo/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Vesícula Biliar/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/metabolismo , Idoso , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Desoxicitidina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Vesícula Biliar/diagnóstico por imagem , Vesícula Biliar/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Vesícula Biliar/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Vesícula Biliar/metabolismo , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise de Sobrevida , Gencitabina
2.
Transl Lung Cancer Res ; 10(4): 1623-1634, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34012779

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Approximately half of all patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC will develop acquired resistance to first or second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) with a T790M mutation. In the AURA3 trial, patients with a T790M mutation had a response rate of 71% to osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR-TKI. The response to osimertinib may vary according to plasma T790M mutation frequency. Our aim was to determine the effect of plasma T790M mutation load on treatment response to osimertinib in an Australian multi-institutional cohort. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study on patients treated with osimertinib in the second-line setting and beyond between 2016-2018 from ten centres in Australia, who had T790M mutations detected in tumour or plasma. The primary objective was to investigate if there was a difference in disease control rate (DCR) between patients with high vs. low T790M relative allelic frequency (RAF) as detected in plasma, using a 0.3 RAF cut-off, as determined by ddPCR or BEAMing PCR. Secondary objective was to determine the survival outcomes according to high versus low plasma T790M RAF. Additional analyses were performed to investigate the survival outcome for patients with plasma versus tissue T790M positivity. RESULTS: A total of 139 patients were included in this study. Patients with higher RAF demonstrated higher DCR (74% vs. 36%, P=0.02), however there was no statistically significant difference in survival outcomes in the two groups. Exploratory analysis showed that patients with tissue T790M+ had improved DCR compared with those with plasma T790M+ (89% vs. 68%, P=0.01) and longer progression free survival (median 15.4 vs. 9.7 months; HR 0.51, 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.77, P=0.003) and overall survival (median not reached, HR 0.51, 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.86, P=0.02). Patients who were tissue T790M+ demonstrated superior survival compared to plasma T790M+ after correcting for confounding variables in a multivariate model. CONCLUSIONS: DCR was superior in patients with higher plasma T790M mutation load versus lower plasma T790M mutational load, without significant survival benefit. Plasma T790M RAF is a potential predictive biomarker which should be investigated and validated in larger prospective studies.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA