Variation of cervical sagittal alignment parameters according to gender, pelvic incidence and age.

PURPOSE: The aim was to describe radiographic cervical sagittal alignment variations according to age, gender and pelvic incidence (PI) and to investigate relationships with thoracic alignment. METHODS: A total of 2599 individuals (5-93 years) without spinal deformity were studied. Cranial cervical parameters were: McGregor slope, occipita-C2 angle, McGregor-C2 lordosis and C1-C2 lordosis. Caudal cervical parameters were: C2-C7, cranial arch and caudal arch lordosis and C7- and T1-slope. A Bayesian inference compared parameter distributions. Correlations with spinopelvic and global alignment parameters were investigated. RESULTS: Among cranial cervical parameters, variations of McGregor slope were non-significant. McGregor-C2 lordosis and C1-C2 lordosis were smaller in males and increased significantly during growth, whereas the occipito-C2 angle decreased (Pr > 0.95). The occipito-C2 angle was larger and McGregor-C2 lordosis was smaller in low PI (Pr > 0.95). Among caudal cervical parameters, C2-C7 lordosis and C7- and T1-slope were larger in males and increased after 50 years (Pr > 0.95). Lordosis changes were non-significant in the cranial arch, whereas values increased in the caudal arch after 35 years (Pr > 0.95). Caudal parameter differences were non-significant between PI groups. Strong correlations existed between C2-C7, caudal arch lordosis, C7-slope, T1-slope and thoracic kyphosis. The sagittal vertical axis C2 correlated with caudal arch lordosis and T1-slope (ρ > 0.5; Pr > 0.95). CONCLUSION: Cervical alignment parameters vary according to age, gender and PI. In the cranial cervical spine, changes occur mainly during growth. In the caudal cervical spine, lordosis increases in the caudal arch, which is related to thoracic kyphosis increase with age. The caudal cervical arch acts as a compensatory segment by progressive extension, allowing horizontal gaze.

A prospective multicenter randomized study comparing the SpineJack system and nonsurgical management with a brace in acute traumatic vertebral fractures: the SPICO study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efffectiveness of a titanium vertebral augmentation device (SpineJack system) in terms of back pain, radiological outcomes, and economic burden compared with nonsurgical management (NSM) (bracing) for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures. Complications were also evaluated for both treatment methods. METHODS: A prospective multicenter randomized study was performed at 9 French sites. Patients (n = 100) with acute traumatic Magerl type A1 and A3.1 vertebral fractures were enrolled and randomized to treatment with the SpineJack system or NSM consisting of bracing and administration of pain medication. Participants were monitored at admission, during the procedure, and at 1, 12, and 24 months after treatment initiation. Primary outcomes included visual analog scale back pain score, and secondary outcomes included disability (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] score), health-related quality of life (EQ-5D score), radiological measures (vertebral kyphosis angle [VKA] and regional traumatic angulation [RTA]), and economic outcomes (costs, procedures, hours of help, and time to return to work). RESULTS: Ninety-five patients were included in the analysis, with 48 in the SpineJack group and 47 in the NSM group. Back pain improved significantly for all participants with no significant differences between groups. ODI and EQ-5D scores improved significantly between baseline and follow-up (1, 12, and 24 months) for all participants, with the SpineJack group showing a larger improvement than the NSM group between baseline and 1 month. VKA was significantly lower (p < 0.001) (i.e., better) in the SpineJack group than in the NSM group at 1, 12, and 24 months of follow-up. There was no significant change over time in RTA for the SpineJack group, but the NSM group showed a significant worsening in RTA over time. SpineJack treatment was associated with higher costs than NSM but involved a shorter hospital stay, fewer medical visits, and fewer hours of nursing care. Time to return to work was significantly shorter for the SpineJack group than for the NSM group. There were no significant differences in complications between the two treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there was no statistical difference in the primary outcomes between the SpineJack treatment group and the NSM group. In terms of secondary outcomes, SpineJack treatment was associated with better radiological outcomes, shorter hospital stays, faster return to work, and fewer hours of nursing care.

Can intraoperative radiation dose in percutaneous posterior thoracolumbar internal fixation be reduced by impedancemetry-guided pedicle sighting? A prospective randomized study.

INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous spine surgery is on the rise; the main drawback is iterative irradiation of the care team in theater. The aim of the present study was to compare intraoperative radiation dose in percutaneous posterior thoracolumbar internal fixation (PPTLIF) using impedancemetry-guided pedicle sighting by the PediGuard device (SpineGuard®) versus gold-standard free-hand sighting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A single-center, single-surgeon continuous prospective randomized study was conducted from September 2017 to April 2018. Dose-area product (DAP, in cGy.cm2) was recorded at the end of pedicle sighting and end of surgery in the free-hand control group and the impedancemetry group. Pedicle screw position was studied on postoperative CT scan. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were included in either group after 2 had been excluded. The groups were comparable for age, gender, body-mass index (BMI), indication and number of instrumented levels. Mean DPA at end of sighting and end of procedure was respectively 147.4 cGy.cm2 and 230.9 cGy.cm2 in the control group and 171.1 cGy.cm2 and 280.7 cGy.cm2 in the PediGuard group (p> 0.05). Screw positioning on CT was comparable in the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: In the present study, the PediGuard device did not reduce intraoperative radiation dose. The correlation between radiation dose and BMI was confirmed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II; prospective randomized study.

Do Age-Related Variations Of Sagittal Alignment Rely On SpinoPelvic Organization? An Observational Study Of 1540 Subjects.

STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive radiographic analysis of a prospective multi-center database. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to provide normative values of spinopelvic parameters and their correlations according to age and pelvic incidence (PI) of subjects without spinal deformity. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, 1540 full spine radiographs were analyzed. Subjects were divided into 3 groups of PI: low PI < 45°, intermediate PI 45-60°, high PI > 60°, and then stratified by age (20-34, 35-49, 50-64, > 65 Y.O). Pelvic and spinal parameters were measured. Statistical analysis between parameters was performed using Bayesian inference and correlation. RESULTS: Mean age was 53.5 years (845 females, 695 males, range 20-93 years).In low PI group, lumbar lordosis (LL) decrease was mainly observed in the 2 younger age groups.In medium and high PI groups, loss of lordosis was linear during aging and occurred mainly on the distal arch of lordosis. Moderate PI group had a stable lordosis apex and thoracolumbar inflection point. High PI group had a stable thoracolumbar inflection point and a more distal lordosis apex in elderly subjects.For all subjects, kyphosis and pelvic tilt (PT) increased with age.There was a constant chain of correlation between PI and age groups. Proximal lumbar lordosis (PLL) was correlated with kyphosis and sagittal vertical axis (SVA C7), while the distal lumbar lordosis (DLL) was correlated with PI and PT. CONCLUSION: This study provides a detailed repository of sagittal spinopelvic parameters normative values with detailed analysis of segmental kyphosis and lordosis distribution according to gender, age, and PI.

Comparison of Spinopelvic Configuration and Roussouly Alignment Types Between Pediatric and Adult Populations.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to describe spinopelvic alignment types by pelvic incidence (PI) and age to compare the Roussouly classification between pediatric and adult populations. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The Roussouly classification was validated for adults. Alignment types may vary during growth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiographs of 1706 non pathologic individuals (5-49 yr) were analyzed. Individuals ≤19 years were stratified by chronological age and skeletal maturity (triradiate cartilage, Risser), and compared with adults. Global and spinopelvic alignment parameters were assessed. Roussouly Types 1, 2, 3, 3A (anteverted pelvis), and 4 were determined. The distribution of parameters was analyzed by Bayesian inference. The relationship between PI and age by Roussouly type was modeled by linear regression. RESULTS: The Sagittal Vertical Axis C7 decreased during growth and was significantly smaller in adults (20-34 yr) (Pr>0.99). Thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis increased during growth and were larger in adults (Pr<0.025). Lordosis increased mainly in the cranial arch (Pr<0.025). PI and pelvic tilt increased during growth and were larger in adults (Pr<0.025). In children and adolescents, PI<45° represented the largest proportion, significantly larger compared with adults (Pr>0.99). Proportions of Roussouly Types 1 and 2 were similar throughout ages. Types 3 and 4 were rarer during the prepubertal period (Pr<0.025). The proportion of Type 3A was significantly higher in children and adolescents (Pr>0.99). Linear regression showed that Type 4 had the largest PI increase with age, with significantly higher curve slope compared with other types (Pr>0.9999). Types 3, 3A and 2 had similar slopes and lowest PI increase with age. CONCLUSION: Global and spinopelvic alignment changed during childhood and adolescence, leading to different kyphosis and lordosis distribution compared with adults. Growth-related PI increase influenced Roussouly types with typical predominance of Type 3A in the pediatric population and larger PI increase in Type 4. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Variation of Global Sagittal Alignment Parameters According to Gender, Pelvic Incidence, and Age.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to describe existing global sagittal alignment parameters across ages and to analyze differences according to gender and pelvic incidence (PI). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Variability with age has been reported. It remains unclear how gender and spinopelvic morphology could additionally influence global alignment parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiographs of 2599 individuals (5-93 y) were analyzed. Translation parameters were: Sagittal Vertical Axis (SVA)-C7, SVA-C2, SVA-Center Acoustic Meatus (CAM), C7/Sacrofemoral Distance (SFD) ratio. Inclination parameters were: C7-Vertical Tilt (VT), T1-VT and T9-VT, Odontoid-Hip Axis (OD-HA), OD-CAM. Pelvic compensation parameters were: T1-Pelvic Angle (TPA), Global Tilt (GT), Spino-Sacral Angle (SSA). Global sagittal alignment (GSA) was considered among formulae. The distribution of parameters was analyzed using a Bayesian inference. Correlations with spinopelvic parameters were investigated. RESULTS: SVA-C7, SVA-C2, SVA-CAM were larger in males and high PI, and increased significantly after 50 years (Pr>0.9999). C7/SFD decreased during growth and was larger in low PI (Pr=0.951). There was no correlation with spinopelvic parameters. Age-related variations of inclination parameters were nonsignificant. T1-VT and T9-VT increased with PI and were significantly larger in high PI (Pr>0.95). C7-VT was significantly larger in low PI (Pr>0.9999). OD-HA and OD-CAM were constant and increased after 80 years. TPA and GT increased with PI (Pr>0.9999) and age after 35 years (Pr>0.9999). SSA decreased nonsignificantly after 50 years. TPA correlated with PI (ρ=0.6130) and pelvic tilt (PT) (ρ=0.8375). GT correlated with PI (ρ=0.5961) and PT (ρ=0.8996). SSA correlated with sacral slope (ρ=0.9026). GSA was larger in high PI (Pr>0.9999) and increased after 35 years (Pr>0.9999). GSA correlated with PT (ρ=0.7732). CONCLUSION: Translation parameters increase with age, more prominently in males and high PI. Variations of inclination parameters are smaller. Pelvic compensation parameters and GSA increase with age and are closely related to PT and spinopelvic morphology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Can Lumbopelvic Parameters Be Used to Predict Thoracic Kyphosis at all Ages? A National Cross-Sectional Study.

STUDY DESIGN: National cross-sectional study. BACKGROUND: Thoracic kyphosis (TK) is related to sagittal parameters as pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis (LL) and pelvic incidence (PI). The equation TK =2 (PT+LL-PI) was validated for adolescents.Objective: to investigate if this equation correctly predicts TK regardless of age. METHODS: Sagittal alignment parameters were assessed on full spine radiographs of 2599 individuals without spine pathology (1488 females, 1111 males). Calculated TK (CTK) = 2 (PT+LL-PI) and measured TK (MTK) were compared by calculating the gap and using a linear regression between both parameters. Subgroup analyses were performed for gender, age, TK groups (≤20°, 21°-40°, 41°-60°, >60°), and PI groups (<45°, 45°-60°, >60°). RESULTS: Average values in the total population were: MTK 45.0°, CTK 36.9°. Average TK gap was 8.1°, 5.2° in females (intercept 11.7, slope .61) and 11.9° in males (intercept 7.1, slope .58). The mean gap was 3.6° for 15-34 years, 5.7° under 15 years and it increased progressively after 35 years with a maximum of 19.9° over 80 years. The gap also increased with the amount of MTK: -3.5° for TK<20° up to 17.3° for TK >60°. Differences in gaps were minor between PI groups. The intercept was smallest and slopes >.6 for PI <45° and TK ≤20°. CONCLUSION: The formula TK=2 (PT+LL-PI) yielded moderate accuracy for adolescents and young adults, but did not fit for over 35 years and under 15. The amount and variance in TK increased in elderly subjects, which made the formula less accurate.

Morbidity and clinicoradiological outcomes of anterior lumbar arthrodesis using tantalum intervertebral implants.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to assess the morbidity of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) using an intervertebral tantalum implant. Tantulum is an extremely porous metallic material which possesses properties of osseointegration, osteoinduction and osteoconduction while offering superior primary stability, compared to other materials more commonly used (polyether ether ketone or PEEK, titanium). Perioperative morbidity, short-term functional outcomes (2 years) and radiographic impaction of implants were also analysed. METHODS: This retrospective monocentric study involved 94 patients operated on between 2014 and 2017 for degenerative disc disease (75%), degenerative spondylolisthesis (3%) or isthmic lytic spondylolisthesis (22%). Sixty-five patients (69%) had isolated ("stand-alone") ALIF procedures, 24 (26%) with associated anterior osteosynthesis and 5 (5%) with associated posterior osteosynthesis. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve was established with surgical revision listed as the main criterion for failure. Perioperative complications were identified. The clinical evaluation at the last follow-up used a Visual Analogue Scale for radicular pain (VAS-R), for lumbar pain (VAS-L) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score. The impactions, assessed on x-rays, were divided into 2 groups according to severity in order to establish risk factors (RF). RESULTS: The primary objective showed a 2-year survival rate of 94% (95% CI [0.88; 0.99]). Two patients had early surgical revision for impaction and 4 patients had late surgical revision for pseudarthrosis. The rate of perioperative complications was 8.5%, mostly due to vascular causes. At the average follow-up of 33 months (24-59), the clinical results were significantly improved and the impaction rate was 36% in the immediate postoperative period (IPO) and 47% at one year. CONCLUSION: ALIF using an intervertebral tantalum implant is a reliable, reproducible and low morbidity technique. However, it is accompanied by a significant rate of immediate and secondary impaction but without any resounding influence on short-term clinical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Tantalum implants for posterior lumbar interbody fusion: A safe method at medium-term follow-up?

INTRODUCTION: Intervertebral implants increase stability and improve results in lumbar interbody fusion (LIF). The aim of the present study was to assess clinical and radiological results of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) using a tantalum intervertebral implant without associated interbody bone graft. MATERIEL AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective study included 52 cases of single-level PLIF, using 2 tantalum intervertebral cages, without interbody bone graft: 42 for degenerative disc disease, 10 for isthmic spondylolisthesis. Minimum follow-up was 2 years. Clinical assessment used a visual analog (pain) scale (VAS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Roland Morris (RM) scale. Tantalum osseointegration and intersegment mobility were assessed on static and dynamic X-ray. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were included, with a mean 55months' follow-up (range, 25-74months). VAS, ODI and RM scores showed significant improvement at last-follow-up, at 4, 30 and 28 points respectively. There was no mechanical failure on static X-ray; all patients had less than 5° mobility on dynamic X-ray at last follow-up. DISCUSSION: PLIF with tantalum intervertebral implant without interbody bone graft provided satisfactory clinical and radiological results at medium-term follow-up. The present findings showed reliable primary stability and osseointegration of the tantalum implant. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Role of MRI in the assessment of interbody fusion with tantalum intervertebral implant.

INTRODUCTION: Radiologic assessment of interbody fusion (IF) is controversial; thin-slice CT is the present gold standard despite artifacts due to the metal implant that hinder interpretation. The present study aimed to assess the contribution of MRI in IF assessment after instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) using tantalum intervertebral implants. The study hypothesis was that fusion following PLIF can be assessed on MRI. MATERIALS AND METHOD: A single-center retrospective study included 52 single-level PLIF procedures (42 for degenerative disc disease and 10 for isthmic spondylolisthesis) using 2 tantalum intervertebral cages without interbody bone graft. Fusion was assessed at 1 year on static and dynamic X-ray and on MRI with a dedicated protocol. Two senior osteoarticular radiologists screened frontal and sagittal MRI slices for continuous cancellous interbody bridges. Consolidation was considered acquired (grade I) in case of continuous bridges on at least 2 successive frontal or sagittal slices, possible (grade II) in case of continuous bridge on just 1 slice, or absent (grade III) in case of no or discontinuous bridge. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were included, with a mean 55 months' follow-up (range, 25-74 months). There were no hardware failures. Intervertebral mobility on dynamic X-ray was systematically less than 5°. Fusion on MRI was grade I in 71% of cases, grade II in 8% and grade III in 21%. Interobserver agreement was 100% on X-ray and 81% on MRI, with kappa coefficient=0.56 (range, 0.35-0.77). DISCUSSION: Tantalum implants without bone autograft enabled satisfactory standard radiographic study. MRI provided imperfect assessment of fusion, being contributive only in case of positive findings (71% in the present study); when no bridge is detected on MRI, no conclusion can be drawn. Progress in CT to reduce artifacts may improve fusion assessment, unless bone integration on both sides of the implant is considered to be sufficient for interbody continuity, without a continuous bone bridge between endplates being a requirement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.