Multicenter evaluation of the clinical utility of laparoscopy-assisted ERCP in patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The obesity epidemic has led to increased use of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). These patients have an increased incidence of pancreaticobiliary diseases, yet standard ERCP is not possible because of surgically altered gastroduodenal anatomy. Laparoscopy-assisted ERCP (LA-ERCP) has been proposed as an option, but supporting data are derived from single-center small case series. Therefore, we conducted a large multicenter study to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and outcomes of LA-ERCP. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with RYGB who underwent LA-ERCP in 34 centers. Data on demographics, indications, procedure success, and adverse events were collected. Procedure success was defined when all the following were achieved: reaching the papilla, cannulating the desired duct, and providing endoscopic therapy as clinically indicated. RESULTS: A total of 579 patients (median age, 51; 84% women) were included. Indication for LA-ERCP was biliary in 89%, pancreatic in 8%, and both in 3%. Procedure success was achieved in 98%. Median total procedure time was 152 minutes (interquartile range [IQR], 109-210), with a median ERCP time of 40 minutes (IQR, 28-56). Median hospital stay was 2 days (IQR, 1-3). Adverse events were 18% (laparoscopy related, 10%; ERCP related, 7%; both, 1%) with the clear majority (92%) classified as mild/moderate, whereas 8% were severe and 1 death occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Our large multicenter study indicates that LA-ERCP in patients with RYGB is feasible with a high procedure success rate comparable with that of standard ERCP in patients with normal anatomy. The ERCP-related adverse events rate is comparable with conventional ERCP, but the overall adverse event rate was higher because of the added laparoscopy-related events.

EUS-FNA diagnosis of pancreatic tophaceous gout: Two rare cases.

We report two patients with pancreatic tophaceous gout diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of presumed cystic mass lesions. The first case involved a patient who had a recent episode of acute pancreatitis 6 months prior, with subsequent imaging concerning for a pseudocyst or mass lesion. The second case involved a patient with epigastric pain associated with a pancreatic head cystic mass and an erroneous original diagnosis of a mucinous pancreatic neoplasm on EUS-FNA. Diff-Quik stained direct smears on fresh material obtained from EUS-FNA of the lesions showed chalky debris with needle shaped negatively birefringent crystals consistent with gout. For the first case, the chalky material was not present on the H&E stained paraffin embedded formalin fixed cellblock slides. The importance of inclusion of cytologic specimen preparations to examine monosodium urate crystals is emphasized.

Mimickers of neuroendocrine tumors on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirate material: Need for caution.

Cytologic diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors can be straightforward on cytologic preparations, given the classical neuroendocrine morphology and expression of neuroendocrine markers confirmed by immunohistochemistry. However, overreliance on neuroendocrine markers can lead to misdiagnosis even if individual cell features suggest a neuroendocrine tumor. We present three unusual cases, two of which were initially diagnosed as neuroendocrine tumors and the third one carried preliminary diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumor on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirates. These cases subsequently turned out to be cholangioblastic cholangiocarcinoma, metastatic melanoma, and gastric glomus tumor, respectively. We suggest approaches that could have pointed us towards the correct diagnosis at the outset and discuss potential pitfalls.

Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of a rectal submucosal nodule.

Although endoscopic biopsy of a rectal submucosal nodule may be nondiagnostic, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) can be an important tool to make diagnosis. We report a case of a female patient who had an EUS-FNA of a submucosal nodule after a nondiagnostic rectal biopsy. The original diagnosis was erroneously rendered as concerning for necrotic neoplasm. The correct diagnosis of Solesta-induced foreign body reaction was made on reviewing the slides once the history of remote Solesta injection was made available. This case illustrates the pathognomonic features of Solesta-induced rectal nodule and underscores the importance of detailed history as well as inclusion of iatrogenic diseases in the differential to prevent erroneous diagnosis and management. Potential pitfalls in cytopathological diagnosis are discussed.