Parent and Nurse Satisfaction Using Pacidose® Oral Medication Delivery Device in the Pediatric Emergency Department: A Pilot Study.

PURPOSE: Administering oral medication to infants is challenging for caregivers, often resulting in incomplete delivery of the intended dose. Pacidose® is an oral medication delivery device that consists of a syringe attached to a tunneled pacifier. This study aimed to determine caregiver and nurse satisfaction and success rate of the Pacidose in the administration of acetaminophen to infants in the pediatric emergency department (ED). DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a prospective trial involving a convenience sample of patients who presented to a pediatric ED between November 2015 and August 2016. Patients younger than 24 months with a physician order for acetaminophen were eligible. Each child received a single dose of acetaminophen delivered by the Pacidose. Nurses, parents, and observing investigators were surveyed with a standardized questionnaire regarding the effectiveness, satisfaction and success rate of Pacidose. RESULTS: 61 patients were enrolled. The median age was 10 months and Pacidose was successful in 77% of patients. Those who required an alternative delivery route were older and no longer used pacifiers. Nurses reported that Pacidose helped administer the medication more easily in 66% of infants and 95% of parents preferred the Pacidose over standard delivery devices. CONCLUSIONS: Pacidose was well tolerated by infants, and both parents and nurses were highly satisfied with this method of administering acetaminophen. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Pacidose is an easy to implement device that can help nurses with oral medication administration. It may have the greatest impact in younger children with recent pacifier use.

Risk factors for apnea in pediatric patients transported by paramedics for out-of-hospital seizure.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Apnea is a known complication of pediatric seizures, but patient factors that predispose children are unclear. We seek to quantify the risk of apnea attributable to midazolam and identify additional risk factors for apnea in children transported by paramedics for out-of-hospital seizure. METHODS: This is a 2-year retrospective study of pediatric patients transported by paramedics to 2 tertiary care centers. Patients were younger than 15 years and transported by paramedics to the pediatric emergency department (ED) for seizure. Patients with trauma and those with another pediatric ED diagnosis were excluded. Investigators abstracted charts for patient characteristics and predefined risk factors: developmental delay, treatment with antiepileptic medications, and seizure on pediatric ED arrival. Primary outcome was apnea defined as bag-mask ventilation or intubation for apnea by paramedics or by pediatric ED staff within 30 minutes of arrival. RESULTS: There were 1,584 patients who met inclusion criteria, with a median age of 2.3 years (Interquartile range 1.4 to 5.2 years). Paramedics treated 214 patients (13%) with midazolam. Seventy-one patients had apnea (4.5%): 44 patients were treated with midazolam and 27 patients were not treated with midazolam. After simultaneous evaluation of midazolam administration, age, fever, developmental delay, antiepileptic medication use, and seizure on pediatric ED arrival, 2 independent risk factors for apnea were identified: persistent seizure on arrival (odds ratio [OR]=15; 95% confidence interval [CI] 8 to 27) and administration of field midazolam (OR=4; 95% CI 2 to 7). CONCLUSION: We identified 2 risk factors for apnea in children transported for seizure: seizure on arrival to the pediatric ED and out-of-hospital administration of midazolam.

Risk factors for apnea in children presenting with out-of-hospital seizure.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to quantify risk factors for apnea in children 0 to 5 years of age with out-of-hospital seizure. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of pediatric patients with seizure transported by paramedics to the pediatric emergency department (PED) of a tertiary center from July 2008 to June 2009. Patients with traumatic injury and those with another diagnosis after PED evaluation were excluded. We evaluated the effect of field diazepam and other potential risk factors on the occurrence of apnea, defined as the need for airway management, that is, bag-mask ventilation by paramedics or bag-mask ventilation or intubation by PED staff within 30 minutes of arrival. RESULTS: There were 336 pediatric patients meeting inclusion criteria. The median age was 1.9 years (interquartile range,1.3-3.0 years); 193 patients (57%) were male. Fifty-four patients (16%) were treated with diazepam before PED arrival. There were 28 apneic events (8.3%). The adjusted relative risk for apnea given diazepam in the field by any route was 10.2 (95% confidence interval, 3.9-21.8; P < 0.0001), adjusted for age and seizure on arrival. Persistent seizure on PED arrival was also highly associated with apnea, with an adjusted relative risk of 15.8 (95% confidence interval, 6.5-28.9; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Field treatment with diazepam and seizing at the time of PED arrival are associated with the occurrence of apnea in children 0 to 5 years of age with out-of-hospital seizure. Larger studies are needed to determine what other factors may contribute to this risk.

Apparent life-threatening event: multicenter prospective cohort study to develop a clinical decision rule for admission to the hospital.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We identify factors in emergency department (ED) patients presenting with apparent life-threatening events that distinguish those safe for discharge from those warranting hospitalization. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected on all subjects presenting to 4 EDs with apparent life-threatening events. Patients were observed for subsequent events or interventions, defined a priori, which would have mandated hospital admission (eg, hypoxia, apnea, bradycardia that is not self-resolving, or serious bacterial infection). For patients discharged from the ED, telephone follow-up was arranged. Classification and regression tree analysis was performed to delineate admission predictors. RESULTS: A total of 832 subjects were enrolled. The overall median age was 31.5 days (interquartile range 10 to 90 days); 427 (51.3%) were male patients, and 513 (61.7%) arrived by emergency medical services. One hundred ninety-one (23.0%) infants had a significant intervention warranting hospitalization. One hundred thirty-seven patients (16.5%) met predetermined criteria that would obviously mandate hospital admission (eg, persistent hypoxia requiring oxygen) by the end of their ED stay. In addition to these patients for whom it was obvious that admission would be necessary in the ED, classification and regression tree analysis (receiver operating curve=0.90) yielded 2 factors predictive of hospitalization: having a significant medical history and having greater than 1 apparent life-threatening event in 24 hours. The sensitivity was 89.0% (95% confidence interval 83.5% to 92.9%); specificity was 61.9% (95% confidence interval 58.0% to 65.7%). CONCLUSION: We found 3 variables (obvious need for admission, significant medical history, >1 apparent life-threatening event in 24 hours) that identified most but not all infants with apparent life-threatening events necessitating admission. These variables require external validation and reliability assessment before clinical implementation.

Do infants less than 12 months of age with an apparent life-threatening event need transport to a pediatric critical care center?

BACKGROUND: Some emergency medical services (EMS) systems transport infants with an apparent life-threatening event (ALTE) directly to hospitals capable of pediatric critical care (PCC) monitoring. OBJECTIVE: To describe factors identifiable by EMS providers that distinguish ALTE patients who may require PCC monitoring and management. METHODS: This was an observational analysis of ALTE patients who were transported by EMS and presented to four emergency departments (EDs). ED data were prospectively collected. Hospital records or reports from contacted parents were reviewed for interventions that mandated PCC management. We defined a priori the criteria by which PCC monitoring and management were required: if the subject needed 1) airway intervention with bag-valve-mask ventilation or advanced airway (e.g., endotracheal intubation) in the field, ED, or pediatric intensive care unit (PICU); 2) administration of vasopressors; 3) invasive monitoring; 4) surgery during the hospitalization; or 5) subspecialty consultation. Univariate analysis was performed to describe factors associated with requiring PCC management, and a multivariable model, accounting for within-hospital correlations, was developed. RESULTS: A total of 513 patients were enrolled. Of these, 51 (9.9%) had an intervention warranting PCC management. Univariate predictors for requiring PCC management included prematurity, past medical history, resuscitation attempt, upper respiratory infection, apnea, previous ALTE, more than one ALTE in 24 hours, and cyanosis. The multivariable model yielded the following independent predictors for requiring PCC management: resuscitation attempt before EMS arrival, cyanosis, and more than one ALTE in 24 hours. This model demonstrated a sensitivity of 96.3%, a specificity of 25.8%, a negative predictive value of 98.3%, and a positive predictive value of 13.5%. CONCLUSION: Only 9.9% of infants presenting in the field with ALTE had an intervention warranting PCC management, suggesting that many ALTE patients may be safely transported to hospitals without PCC capability. This would allow for better resource utilization of specialty care hospitals and still provide an option for secondary transports for those few patients not correctly identified in the field as requiring PCC. History of resuscitation attempt, cyanosis, and more than one ALTE in 24 hours are independent risk factors for requiring PCC management.

Factors Associated With Improved Pediatric Resuscitative Care in General Emergency Departments.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the quality of pediatric resuscitative care in general emergency departments (GEDs) and to determine hospital-level factors associated with higher quality. METHODS: Prospective observational study of resuscitative care provided to 3 in situ simulated patients (infant seizure, infant sepsis, and child cardiac arrest) by interprofessional GED teams. A composite quality score (CQS) was measured and the association of this score with modifiable and nonmodifiable hospital-level factors was explored. RESULTS: A median CQS of 62.8 of 100 (interquartile range 50.5-71.1) was noted for 287 resuscitation teams from 175 emergency departments. In the unadjusted analyses, a higher score was associated with the modifiable factor of an affiliation with a pediatric academic medical center (PAMC) and the nonmodifiable factors of higher pediatric volume and location in the Northeast and Midwest. In the adjusted analyses, a higher CQS was associated with modifiable factors of an affiliation with a PAMC and the designation of both a nurse and physician pediatric emergency care coordinator, and nonmodifiable factors of higher pediatric volume and location in the Northeast and Midwest. A weak correlation was noted between quality and pediatric readiness scores. CONCLUSIONS: A low quality of pediatric resuscitative care, measured using simulation, was noted across a cohort of GEDs. Hospital factors associated with higher quality included: an affiliation with a PAMC, designation of a pediatric emergency care coordinator, higher pediatric volume, and geographic location. A weak correlation was noted between quality and pediatric readiness scores.

Prospective evaluation of a clinical practice guideline for diagnosis of appendicitis in children.

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to assess the performance of a clinical practice guideline for evaluation of possible appendicitis in children. The guideline incorporated risk stratification, staged imaging, and early surgical involvement in high-risk cases. METHODS: The authors prospectively evaluated the clinical guideline in one pediatric emergency department (ED) in a general teaching hospital. Patients were risk-stratified based on history, physical examination findings, and laboratory results. Imaging was ordered selectively based on risk category, with ultrasound (US) as the initial imaging modality. Computed tomography (CT) was ordered if the US was negative or indeterminate. Surgery was consulted before imaging in high-risk patients. RESULTS: A total of 475 patients were enrolled. Of those, 193 (41%) had appendicitis. No low-risk patient had appendicitis. Medium-risk patients had a 19% rate of appendicitis, and 83% of high-risk patients had appendicitis. Factors associated with an increased likelihood of appendicitis included decreased bowel sounds; rebound tenderness; and presence of psoas, obturator, or Rovsing's signs. Of the 475 patients, 276 (58%) were managed without a CT scan. Seventy-one of the 193 (37%) patients with appendicitis went to the operating room without any imaging. The rate of missed appendicitis was 2%, and the rate of negative appendectomy was 1%. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical practice guideline performed well in a general teaching hospital. Rates of negative appendectomy and missed appendicitis were low and 58% of patients were managed without a CT scan.