Medical Student Experiences on Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry Rotations: A Nationwide Survey.

BACKGROUND: Consultation-liaison (C-L) psychiatry clerkship rotations may improve medical students' understanding of psychiatric principles relevant to the settings in which they will ultimately practice. This study aimed to characterize students' experiences on C-L rotations. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey study, sponsored by the Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine Subcommittee on Medical Student Education, was conducted at 5 US medical schools between 2012 and 2016. After the C-L rotation, students completed a voluntary 17-item survey. RESULTS: A total of 235 surveys were collected (mean response rate = 92%). The most frequently endorsed benefit of C-L was learning to manage psychiatric disorders in the context of medical illness (89%). The most frequently endorsed drawback was inconsistent/excessively variable workload (40%). Overall, 82% of respondents recommended C-L to other students; 80% reported that the ideal clerkship would include exposure to both C-L and inpatient psychiatry. Overall, 38% reported that their C-L experience increased their interest in psychiatry as a career. Effect of C-L on interest in psychiatry did not differ by study site, age, sex, clerkship length, or time spent on C-L. Respondents who noted more positive role-modeling on C-L compared to other clerkship rotations were more likely to report increased interest in a psychiatry career (odds ratio = 2.70). CONCLUSIONS: Most medical students perceive C-L rotations favorably. Positive role modeling may increase their consideration of psychiatry specialization. The findings that C-L rotation length did not correlate with attitudes and that most students preferred exposure to both inpatient and C-L psychiatry suggest that C-L exposure can beneficially be integrated into core clerkships containing other elements.

Addressing Issue of Fast-Tracking in Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry Fellowship Training: Expanding Access or Undermining Competence?

Fast-tracking is an option for residents to pursue fellowship training in place of their final residency year. It is currently permissible to fast-track into a child and adolescent psychiatry fellowship, but this remains a controversial idea for other psychiatry subspecialties. In 2022, the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry featured a plenary session debate about the pros and cons of fast-tracking. Here, the authors present some of the information discussed at that session and highlight the potential benefits and pitfalls of fast-tracking into consultation-liaison psychiatry.

Annual Meeting Content Analysis: Leveraging Annual Meetings to Promote Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging in the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry.

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing need to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in all aspects of academic medicine, including through continuing medical education. Although professional medical organizations' annual meetings play an instrumental role in continuing medical education for physicians, there are no studies describing DEI content in the annual meeting programming of professional medical organizations, including the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry (ACLP), the primary professional organization for consultation-liaison psychiatrists. OBJECTIVE: To examine the ACLP annual meeting titles using Content Analysis. METHODS: We examined the publicly available ACLP annual meeting content titles on the ACLP website from 2010 to 2021. National DEI leaders from ACLP's DEI subcommittee iteratively generated keywords that covered a broad scope of DEI-related themes. Each annual meeting's content was independently coded by 2 members of the DEI subcommittee with discrepancies adjudicated by 2 additional members. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the content of the annual meeting. RESULTS: Of the 2615 annual meeting titles from 2010 to 2021 that were analyzed, 2531 were not coded to have DEI themes. Three percent (n = 84) of titles were coded to have a DEI theme as follows: Culture/diversity (n = 20, 24%), bias/disparities (n = 17, 20%), race/racism (n = 17, 20%), social justice (n = 12, 14%), gender/sexism (n = 10, 12%), and LGBTQ+ (n = 8, 10%). The frequency of DEI titles each year ranged from 1% (2010, 2018) to 17% (2021) with an increase in DEI content in 2021 (n = 24, 17%). CONCLUSIONS: Although professional medical organizations like the ACLP are poised to leverage their continuing medical education platforms embedded in annual meeting programming to train consultation-liaison psychiatrists on DEI topics, our findings suggest more work is needed to develop and promote DEI-focused educational programming for their annual meetings.

The Cognitive Load of Inpatient Consults: A Convergent Parallel Mixed Methods Study Using the Consult Cognitive Load Instrument.

PURPOSE: Consultation is crucial for patient care and a primary responsibility of fellows. Understanding the cognitive load associated with the complex skill of consultation would enhance fellow learning. The authors aimed to determine themes describing the fellow experience during inpatient consults specifically, align these themes with Consult Cognitive Load (CCL) scores, and identify strategies to manage cognitive load to enhance fellow education and performance, and, consequently, patient care. METHOD: The authors studied 16 fellows using mixed methods. Fellows who accepted an invitation completed an inpatient consult followed by the CCL, a measure of cognitive load during consults, and an interview. Three authors conducted a thematic analysis. Member checks and triangulation supported theme trustworthiness. Subsequently, 3 authors rated the extent and cognitive demand of each theme expressed in each transcript. The authors measured interrater reliability and used Spearman correlation to describe the association of these ratings with CCL scores. The authors examined themes to identify strategies that educators might use. RESULTS: Analysis revealed 4 themes: "nature and scope," which conceptually aligned with intrinsic load (IL); "leveraging resources," which had elements of both IL and extraneous load (EL); "extraneous factors," which aligned with EL; and "drivers," which aligned with germane load (GL). Interrater reliability for extent and demand ratings ranged from 0.57 to 0.79. The correlation between "nature and scope" and IL was 0.37, "extraneous factors" and EL 0.71, and "drivers" and GL 0.32. "Leveraging resources" did not correlate with IL (0.06) or EL (-0.09). Potential strategies based on themes included offering level-appropriate assistance to match IL, focusing the fellow's attention to reduce EL, and providing succinct teaching to promote GL. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided deep insight into the fellow consult experience and suggested strategies for educators to guide consult learning. The theme "leveraging resources" merits further exploration.

The Cognitive Load of Inpatient Consults: Development of the Consult Cognitive Load Instrument and Initial Validity Evidence.

PURPOSE: Fellows and residents provide inpatient consultations. Though consults vary considerably, measuring the associated cognitive load (CL) is key to guiding faculty on how to optimize learning during consults. However, existing CL instruments, such as the unidimensional Paas scale, cannot separate the 3 components of CL and may miss the nuances of consult CL. Therefore, the authors developed the Consult Cognitive Load (CCL) instrument to measure the 3 CL components during consults. METHOD: In 2018-2019, the authors developed the CCL at the University of California, San Francisco, using Wilson's constructive approach to measurement. To generate content and response process validity evidence, the authors consulted the literature and experts to generate construct maps, items, and a scoring rubric and conducted cognitive interviews. They administered the CCL to internal medicine and psychiatry trainees across 5 University of California campuses and used Rasch family and linear regression models to assess internal structure validity and relationships to key predictor variables. They compared the CCL with the Paas scale using Wright maps and used latent correlations to support separating CL into 3 components. RESULTS: Analysis revealed appropriate fit statistics, appropriate mean respondent location increases across all levels, threshold banding, and expected relationships with key predictor variables. The CCL provided more coverage of the 3 CL components compared with the Paas scale. Correlations among the 3 CL components were not strong, suggesting that the CCL offers more nuance than a unidimensional measure of CL in the context of consults. CONCLUSIONS: This study generated initial validity evidence to support the CCL's use as a measure of consult CL and supports measuring the 3 CL components separately rather than as a single construct in the context of consults. Learners and faculty could compare learner CCL scores with reference scores to promote reflection, metacognition, and coaching.

Amphetamine usage and genital self-mutilation.

Amphetamine usage has been associated with addiction, psychosis and self-injurious behavior. We report on two patients who severely and repeatedly mutilated their own genitalia while intoxicated on amphetamines and consider possible diagnostic etiologies.

Improving residents' interviewing skills by group videotape review.

OBJECTIVE: Internal medicine residency training programs typically emphasize biomedical learning, but relatively few provide opportunities for residents to improve outpatient interviewing skills or to address challenging patient encounters. Even fewer programs provide resources to assess patient-resident relationship skills. To address these issues, we developed a curriculum that is designed to enhance patient-centered interviewing techniques in residents. DESCRIPTION: At the UCSF-VA PRIME residency program, interns on ambulatory block attend three didactic sessions that introduce basic medical interviewing techniques, including elicitation of patient concerns and mutual agenda setting, biopsychosocial interviewing, and conflict resolution in the patient-physician relationship. These sessions are taught using role-play exercises and interactive, case-based discussions. Second- and third-year residents on ambulatory block participate in an ongoing small-group seminar in which they present videotapes of their interviews with patients. To make these tapes, residents arrange to see patients in a clinic room where a videotape recorder is mounted on the wall. Patients who consent to be videotaped complete a form stating that the tapes are to be used solely for educational purposes. Twice a year, each of our 16 residents selects one encounter that highlights personal learning goals related to interviewing and presents those learning goals with associated videotape clips in a 90-minute seminar. Each seminar is devoted to two residents, who facilitate a discussion of the effectiveness of the interview and solicit feedback about potential methods for improvement. DISCUSSION: When the seminars were originally developed, we anticipated that this innovative combination of traditional individual videotape review with small-group learning would encourage self-directed learning. Indeed, over the last three years, residents have become more confident with their interviewing capabilities and less self-conscious about showing their own videotaped interviews. As a result, the seminars have unexpectedly evolved into a highly sophisticated series of learning modules, in which residents seek their most challenging patient encounters to videotape and show to the group. Residents have presented complicated scenarios involving critical patient-physician conflicts, somatizing patients, cross-cultural communication difficulties, overzealous family members, patients with substance abuse, and bad-news interviews. These dilemmas represent fundamental management challenges that are difficult to discuss in a more didactic format, and the immediate case-based nature of the interviews makes these often-emotional issues come alive. The group videotape reviews also give residents opportunities to reflect on their own interviewing encounters, to observe other interviewing styles and techniques, and to provide support to their fellow residents after particularly emotional interviews. An ancillary benefit of these exercises is that we have now developed a library of challenging interviews, which are easily accessible for further teaching seminars. Our residents consider this learning experience to be one of the most positive of their residency and valuable for their professional development. Residents report that this small-group seminar series has markedly improved their communication with patients, and they now clamor for the opportunity to present interviewing dilemmas. We believe that similar curricula can be readily instituted at other residency programs.

A "safe space" for learning and reflection: one school's design for continuity with a peer group across clinical clerkships.

The value of continuity in medical education, particularly during clerkships, is increasingly recognized. Previous clerkship-based models have described changes that emphasize continuity in patient care, learner supervision, and curriculum. The creation of continuous student peer groups can foster interactions that enhance mutual support through uncomfortable professional transitions during the clerkship years. Here, the authors describe a third-year clerkship model based at the San Francisco Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center called VA Longitudinal Rotations (VALOR), designed explicitly to establish a supportive learning environment for small peer groups.Seven groups of medical students (42 total) completed VALOR across three academic years between 2007 and 2009. On clerkships during VALOR, one hour per week was designated for faculty-facilitated sessions amongst peer groups. Students' perceptions of peer group support and overall program satisfaction were determined with immediate post surveys and focus groups at the end of VALOR, and with follow-up surveys 5 to 27 months after completing VALOR. Students strongly valued several elements of VALOR peer groups, including support through clerkship challenges, meeting for facilitated reflection, and appreciating patient experiences across the continuum of care. Students' appreciation for their peer group experiences persisted well after the conclusion of VALOR. VALOR students performed the same as or better than traditional clerkship students on knowledge and skill-based outcomes. The authors demonstrate that their third-year clerkship program using peer groups has built supportive learning networks and facilitated reflection, allowing students to develop critical professional skills. Student communication around patient care was also feasible and highly valued.