Interobserver Variability in the International Study Group for Pancreas Surgery (ISGPS)-Defined Complications After Pancreatoduodenectomy: An International Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the interobserver variability for complications of pancreatoduodenectomy as defined by the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) and others. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Good interobserver variability for the definitions of surgical complications is of major importance in comparing surgical outcomes between and within centers. However, data on interobserver variability for pancreatoduodenectomy-specific complications are lacking. METHODS: International cross-sectional multicenter study including 52 raters from 13 high-volume pancreatic centers in 8 countries on 3 continents. Per center, 4 experienced raters scored 30 randomly selected patients after pancreatoduodenectomy. In addition, all raters scored six standardized case vignettes. This variability and the 'within centers' variability were calculated for twofold scoring (no complication/grade A vs grade B/C) and threefold scoring (no complication/grade A vs grade B vs grade C) of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), post-pancreatoduodenectomy hemorrhage (PPH), chyle leak (CL), bile leak (BL), and delayed gastric emptying (DGE). Interobserver variability is presented with Gwet's AC-1 measure for agreement. RESULTS: Overall, 390 patients after pancreatoduodenectomy were included. The overall agreement rate for the standardized cases vignettes for twofold scoring was 68% (95%-CI: 55%-81%, AC1 score: moderate agreement) and for threefold scoring 55% (49%-62%, AC1 score: fair agreement). The mean 'within centers' agreement for twofold scoring was 84% (80%-87%, AC1 score; substantial agreement). CONCLUSION: The interobserver variability for the ISGPS defined complications of pancreatoduodenectomy was too high even though the 'within centers' agreement was acceptable. Since these findings will decrease the quality and validity of clinical studies, ISGPS has started efforts aimed at reducing the interobserver variability.

In Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma, Which Response is the More Reliable Indicator for Prognosis, Radiologic or Biochemical?

BACKGROUND: In this era of increasing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, methods for evaluating responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy are still diverse among institutions. Additionally, the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains unclear. Therefore, this retrospective study was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of methods for assessing response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the need for adjuvant chemotherapy in treating patients with non-metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: The study identified 150 patients who underwent neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy followed by curative-intent pancreatectomy. The patients were stratified by biochemical response based on the normalization of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and by radiologic response based on size change at imaging. RESULTS: The patients were classified into the following three groups based on their response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and prognosis: biochemical responders (BR+), radiology-only responders (BR-/RR+), and non-responders (BR-/RR-). The 3-year overall survival rate was higher for BR+ (71.0%) than for BR-/RR+ (53.6%) or BR-/RR- (33.1%) (P < 0.001). Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy also was identified as a significant risk factor for recurrence in a comparison between BR-/RR+ and BR+ (hazard ratio [HR], 2.15; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-3.88; P = 0.011) and BR-/RR- (HR, 3.82; 95% CI 2.41-6.08; P < 0.001). Additionally, regardless of the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, patients who completed adjuvant chemotherapy had a significantly higher 3-year overall survival rate than those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: This response evaluation criterion for neoadjuvant chemotherapy is feasible and can significantly predict prognosis. Additionally, completion of adjuvant chemotherapy could be helpful to patients who undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy regardless of their response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Outcomes after distal pancreatectomy with or without splenectomy for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm: international multicentre cohort study.

BACKGROUND: International guidelines on intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) recommend a formal oncological resection including splenectomy when distal pancreatectomy is indicated. This study aimed to compare oncological and surgical outcomes after distal pancreatectomy with or without splenectomy in patients with presumed IPMN. METHODS: An international, retrospective cohort study was undertaken in 14 high-volume centres from 7 countries including consecutive patients after distal pancreatectomy for IPMN (2005-2019). Patients were divided into spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP) and distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (DPS). The primary outcome was lymph node metastasis (LNM). Secondary outcomes were overall survival, duration of operation, blood loss, and secondary splenectomy. RESULTS: Overall, 700 patients were included after distal pancreatectomy for IPMN; 123 underwent SPDP (17.6%) and 577 DPS (82.4%). The rate of malignancy was 29.6% (137 patients) and the overall rate of LNM 6.7% (47 patients). Patients with preoperative suspicion of malignancy had a LNM rate of 17.2% (23 of 134) versus 4.3% (23 of 539) among patients without suspected malignancy (P < 0.001). Overall, SPDP was associated with a shorter operating time (median 180 versus 226 min; P = 0.001), less blood loss (100 versus 336 ml; P = 0.001), and shorter hospital stay (5 versus 8 days; P < 0.001). No significant difference in overall survival was observed between SPDP and DPS for IPMN after correction for prognostic factors (HR 0.50, 95% c.i. 0.22 to 1.18; P = 0.504). CONCLUSION: This international cohort study found LNM in 6.7% of patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy for IPMN. In patients without preoperative suspicion of malignancy, SPDP seemed oncologically safe and was associated with improved short-term outcomes compared with DPS.

Comparing clinical and genomic features based on the tumor location in patients with resected pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is anatomically divided into pancreatic head and body/tail cancers, and some studies have reported differences in prognosis. However, whether this discrepancy is induced from the difference of tumor biology is hotly debated. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the differences in clinical outcomes and tumor biology depending on the tumor location. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we identified 800 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who had undergone upfront curative-intent surgery. Cox regression analysis was performed to explore the prognostic impact of the tumor location. Among them, 153 patients with sufficient tumor tissue and blood samples who provided informed consent for next-generation sequencing were selected as the cohort for genomic analysis. RESULTS: Out of the 800 patients, 500 (62.5%) had pancreatic head cancer, and 300 (37.5%) had body/tail cancer. Tumor location in the body/tail of the pancreas was not identified as a significant predictor of survival outcomes compared to that in the head in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.14; P = 0.511). Additionally, in the genomic analyses of 153 patients, there were no significant differences in mutational landscapes, distribution of subtypes based on transcriptomic profiling, and estimated infiltration levels of various immune cells between pancreatic head and body/tail cancers. CONCLUSIONS: We could not find differences in prognosis and tumor biology depending on tumor location in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Discrepancies in prognosis may represent a combination of lead time, selection bias, and clinical differences, including the surgical burden between tumor sites.

Systematic review on surveillance for non-resected branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas.

BACKGROUND: The management of branch-duct type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMN) varies in existing guidelines. This study investigated the optimal surveillance protocol and safe discontinuation of surveillance considering natural history in non-resected IPMN, by systematically reviewing the published literature. METHODS: This review was guided by PRISMA. Research questions were framed in PICO format "CQ1-1: Is size criteria helpful to determine surveillance period? CQ1-2: How often should surveillance be carried out? CQ1-3: When should surveillance be discontinued? CQ1-4: Is nomogram predicting malignancy useful during surveillance?". PubMed was searched from January-April 2022. RESULTS: The search generated 2373 citations. After screening, 83 articles were included. Among them, 33 studies were identified for CQ1-1, 19 for CQ1-2, 26 for CQ1-3 and 12 for CQ1-4. Cysts <1.5 or 2 cm without worrisome features (WF) were described as more indolent, and most studies advised an initial period of surveillance. The median growth rate of cysts <2 cm ranged from 0.23 to 0.6 mm/year. Patients with cysts <2 cm showing no morphological changes and no WF after 5-years of surveillance have minimal malignancy risk of 0-2%. Two nomograms created with over 1000 patients had AUCs of around 0.8 and appear to be feasible in a real-world practice. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with suspected BD-IPMN <2 cm and no other WF, less frequent surveillance is recommended. Surveillance may be discontinued for cysts that remain stable during 5-year surveillance, with consideration of patient condition and life expectancy. With this updated surveillance strategy, patients with non-worrisome BD-IPMN should expect more streamlined management and decreased healthcare utilization.

First report of soybean root rot caused by Fusarium proliferatum in the Republic of Korea.

Fusarium species are widespread soilborne pathogens that can cause damping-off, root rot, and wilting in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill], subsequently leading to significant yield suppression. Several Fusarium spp. have already been documented for their pathogenicity on soybean plants in the Republic of Korea. The nationwide monitoring of soybean diseases continues to identify new pathogenic Fusarium spp. In 2016, five plant samples at R3-R4 growth stages, showing symptoms of wilting in the upper parts and root rot, were collected in Suwon, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea. Fungal colonies were obtained from the diseased root samples, with the surface sterilized in 1% sodium hypochlorite for 2 min, rinsed thrice with sterile distilled water, and placed on water agar at 25°C. Five isolates were collected and purified by single-spore isolation. The fungal mycelium was subsequently cultivated on potato dextrose agar for ten days. The isolates produced abundant, aerial, and white mycelium and became purple in old cultures. Macroconidia were slender, falcate to almost straight, usually 3 to 5 septated, and thin-walled. Microconidia were formed in chains from polyphalides, clavate or oval, usually single-celled with a flattened base. These characteristics of isolates were consistent with the description of F. proliferatum (Leslie and Summerrell 2006), and the representative isolate 16-19 was selected for molecular identification to confirm its identity as F. proliferatum. Two evolutionarily conserved genes, the translation elongation factor 1-alpha (EF-1α) and the second-largest subunit of RNA polymerase II (RPB2) genes, were partially amplified using the primers described by O'Donnell et al. (2008), resulting in nucleotide sequences of 680 and 382 base pairs, respectively. These two sequences (GenBank accession numbers: OQ992720 and OR060666) showed 100 and 99.5% identity to the EF-1α and RPB2 of F. proliferatum A40 (GenBank accession numbers: KP964907 and KP964842). For the Petri-dish pathogenicity assay (Broders et al. 2007), five surface-sterilized seeds were placed on water agar media with either sterile water or actively growing '16-19' culture. After 7 days of incubation in a growth chamber (25°C; 12-hour photoperiod), brown lesions were observed on the roots of the inoculated plants, while no symptoms were observed in the sterile water-treated controls. The experiment was conducted three times. For root-cut pathogenicity assay, conidial suspension (1×106 conidia/ml) of the isolate '16-19' was prepared with harvested mycelia cultured on PDA for 10 days with sterile water. The roots of 10-day-old soybean seedlings were partially cut and soaked in either the suspension or sterile water for 2 hours. The seedlings were transplanted into 12 cm plastic pots (11 cm in height) and grew in a greenhouse (26 ± 3°C, 13-h photoperiod). The experiment followed a completely randomized design with three replicates (i.e. three plants in a pot), and it was repeated twice. The inoculated plants began to wilt 7 days after inoculation, while the sterile water-treated controls remained healthy. Ten days after inoculation, all plants were collected, washed under running tap water, and evaluated for the presence and severity of root rot using a 0-4 scale (Chang et al. 2015). The inoculated plants exhibited reduced vigor and developed dark brown lesions on their roots. F. proliferatum was reisolated from symptomatic root tissues of the infected plants, while not from those of the controls. Its colony and spores were morphologically identical to those of the original isolate. F. proliferatum was previously reported as a causative agent of soybean root rot in the United States (Díaz Arias et al. 2011) and Canada (Chang et al. 2015). This is the first report of soybean root rot caused by F. proliferatum in the Republic of Korea. This finding implies that F. proliferatum may potentially threaten soybean production in the Republic of Korea and suggests that effective disease management strategies should be established for soybean protection against the disease, along with continuous surveillance.

First report of soybean root rot caused by Fusarium falciforme in the Republic of Korea.

Phytopathogenic Fusarium species causing root and stem rot diseases in susceptible soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) are a major threat to soybean production worldwide. Several Fusarium species have been reported to infect soybean plants in the Republic of Korea, including F. solani, F. oxysporum, F. fujikuroi, and F. graminearum (Cho et al., 2004; Choi et al., 2019; Kang et al., 2020). During the nationwide survey of soybean diseases in 2015, soybean plants showing symptoms of leaf chlorosis, wilting, and shoot death were found in soybean fields in Seosan, Chungnam. Fusarium isolates were obtained from the margins of sterilized necrotic symptomatic and asymptomatic regions of the stem tissues of diseased samples by culturing on potato dextrose agar (PDA). To examine the morphological characteristics, isolates were cultured on PDA at 25°C in the darkness for 10 days. Colonies produced white aerial mycelia with apricot pigments in the medium. Macroconidia were hyaline, slightly curved in shape with 3 or 4 septa, and their average length and width were 34.6± 0.56 µm (31.4 to 37.8 µm) and 4.7±0.16 µm (4.1 to 5.8 µm), respectively (n = 20). Microconidia were elongated, oval with 0 or 1 septum, and their average length and width were 11.4±0.87 and 5.2±0.32 µm, respectively (n = 20). The colonies and conidia exhibited morphological similarities to those of F. falciforme (Xu et al., 2022). Using the primers described by O'Donnell et al. (2008), identity of a representative strain '15-110' was further confirmed by sequencing portions of two genes, the translation elongation factor 1-alpha (EF-1α) and the second largest subunit of RNA polymerase II (RPB2). The two sequences (GenBank accession No. OQ992718 and OR060664) of 15-110 were 99% similar to those of two F. falciforme strains, 21BeanYC6-14 (GenBank accession nos. ON375419 and ON331931), and 21BeanYC6-16 (GenBank accession nos. ON697187 and ON331933). To test the pathogenicity, a single-spore isolate was cultured on carnation leaf agar (CLA) at 25℃ for 10 days. Pathogenicity test was performed by root-cutting assays using 14-day-old soybean seedlings of 'Daewon' and 'Taekwang'. Ten-day-old mycelia of 15-110 were collected from the CLA plates by scraping with distilled water, and the spore suspension was filtered and diluted to 1 × 106 conidia/mL. The roots of the soybean seedlings were partially cut and inoculated by soaking in the diluted spore suspension for two hours. The seedlings were then transplanted into 12 cm plastic pots (11 cm in height) and grown in a growth chamber at 25°C, 14h light/10h dark for 2 weeks. The infected plants exhibited wilting, observed brown discoloration on the root, and eventually died within 2 weeks, whereas the control plants inoculated with sterile water remained healthy. F. falciforme 15-110 was reisolated from infected plants, but not from the uninoculated controls. The morphology of the re-isolated fungus on PDA and its target gene sequences were identical to those of the original colony. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of root rot in soybean caused by F. falciforme in the Republic of Korea. Fusarium spp. induce a range of diseases in soybean plants, including root rot, damping-off, and wilt. Given the variable aggressiveness and susceptibility to fungicides among different Fusarium species, it is imperative to identify the Fusarium species posing a threat to soybean production. This understanding is crucial for developing a targeted and tailored disease management strategy to control Fusarium diseases.

First report of Pythium myriotylum causing root rot on soybean in the Republic of Korea.

Pythium species are one of the most important groups of seedling pathogens affecting soybean yield. In July 2023, eight soybean plants (cv. Daewon, V3 to V4 stage) that were wilted with browning at their lower stems were discovered in a field located in Suwon, Korea. The disease incidence was 0.1% in an area of 0.1 ha, and severity was 100%. The eight plants exhibited brown root rot when removed from the soil. Their main roots were almost completely rotten, with only a few rootlets remaining. Symptomatic stem tissues (approximately 0.5 × 1 to 1.5 cm2) were sampled from the crown of each plant, disinfected with 75% ethanol for 30 sec and 1% NaOCl for 1 min, rinsed with sterile distilled water, and incubated on sterile filter paper for 3 days at 25°C. White hyphae emerging from the tissues were isolated and cultured on potato dextrose agar (PDA) plates, resulting in eight isolates. To further investigate their morphological features, the isolates were subcultured on PDA media at 25°C in the dark for 7 days. The colonies formed dense, white, fluffy aerial mycelia. The oogonia were globose with a smooth surface, typically appearing terminal, and had an average diameter of 31 µm (28 to 36 µm). The oospores were aplerotic, with an average diameter of 29 µm (26 to 31 µm). These morphological characteristics closely matched those of Pythium myriotylum as described in Van der Plaats-Niterink (1981) and Tomioka et al. (2013). The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region and cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COX1) were amplified using the primer pairs ITS1/ITS4 and OomCoxI-Levlo/OomCoxI-Levup (Robideau et al. 2011; White et al. 1990). Sequences from the eight isolates (SW2-4, SW-DF2, SW-DF3, SW-DF7, SW-DF9, SW-DF13, SW-DF14, and SW-DF16) were deposited in GenBank under following accession numbers: ITS (PP145893; PP913926 to PP913932) and COX1 (PP853484; PP977183 to PP977189). These sequences showed 100% homology with those of P. myriotylum strain CBS25470 (GenBank accession no. HQ643701, HQ708745). One isolate SW2-4 was selected to assess its pathogenicity using soil infestation method. The isolate SW2-4 was cultured on 20 ml of V8 juice agar medium per petri dish (9 cm in diameter) in the dark at 26°C for 10 days. Cultures collected from 4 petri dishes were homogenized with 40 ml of sterile distilled water, and then mixed with 1.1 liter of commercial potting soil that had been pre-soaked in 1 liter of sterile distilled water. Next, 450 ml of this Pythium-infested soil mixture was placed into pots (12 cm in diameter). Ten seeds of soybean (cv. Daewon) were then sown on top of the infested soil and covered with 2 cm of uninfested soil. Another ten seeds (cv. Daewon) were sown in the uninfested soil as controls. The pots were placed in a growth chamber (26°C, light: dark cycle of 12:12h). The experiments were repeated six times. The inoculated plants grew slowly, and dark-brown lesions appeared at the stem base 5 days after inoculation. Affected plants began to wilt 10 days after inoculation, whereas the control plants showed no symptoms and remained healthy throughout the experiments. An oomycete pathogen was re-isolated from the symptomatic stem tissue to fulfill Koch's postulates, while none was isolated from the control plants. The pathogen's morphological characteristics and DNA sequences (ITS and COX1) were confirmed to be identical to those of the inoculated isolate. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of P. myriotylum causing root rot and wilting in soybean in the Republic of Korea.

Early postoperative fever as a predictor of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-center retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: The connection between early postoperative fever and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate this association and assess the predictive value of early postoperative fever for CR-POPF. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included adult patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at a tertiary teaching hospital between 2007 and 2019. Patients were categorized into those with early postoperative fever (≥ 38 °C in the first 48 h after surgery) and those without early postoperative fever groups. Weighted logistic regression analysis using stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) and multivariable logistic analysis were performed. The c-statistics of the receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated to evaluate the impact on the predictive power of adding early postoperative fever to previously identified predictors of CR-POPF. RESULTS: Of the 1997 patients analyzed, 909 (45.1%) developed early postoperative fever. The overall incidence of CR-POPF among all the patients was 14.3%, with an incidence of 19.5% in the early postoperative fever group and 9.9% in the group without early postoperative fever. Early postoperative fever was significantly associated with a higher risk of CR-POPF after sIPTW (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34-2.22; P < 0.001) and multivariable logistic regression analysis (adjusted OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.42-2.49; P < 0.001). The c-statistics for the models with and without early postoperative fever were 0.76 (95% CI, 0.73-0.79) and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.72-0.78), respectively, showing a significant difference between the two (difference, 0.02; 95% CI, 0.00-0.03; DeLong's test, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Early postoperative fever is a significant but not highly discriminative predictor of CR-POPF after pancreaticoduodenectomy. However, its widespread occurrence limits its applicability as a predictive marker.

Inadequacy of the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer pancreatic cancer staging system for invasive carcinoma associated with premalignant lesions in the pancreas: an analysis using the National Cancer Database.

BACKGROUND: Invasive carcinomas arising from premalignant lesions are currently staged by the same criteria as conventional pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Clinicopathologic information and survival data were extracted through a thorough search of histology codes from National Cancer Database (2006-2016). A total of 723 patients with invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and mucinous cystic neoplasm were analyzed. RESULTS: The median age was 67 years, and 351 patients (48.5%) were male. There were 212 (29.3%), 232 (32.1%), 272 (37.6%), and 7 (1.0%) patients with T1, T2, T3, and T4 classification. Extrapancreatic extension (EPE) was present in 284 (39.3%). Age (HR = 1.504, 95% CI 1.196-1.891), R1 or R2 resection (HR = 1.585, 95% CI 1.175-2.140), and EPE (HR = 1.598, 95% CI 1.209-2.113) were independent prognostic factors for overall survival. Size criteria did not significantly affect survival. The median survival was 115.9 months for patients without EPE, compared to 34.2 months for those with EPE. EPE discriminated survival better than tumor size. DISCUSSION: The T classification of the eighth edition AJCC staging system is not adequate for invasive carcinomas associated with premalignant lesions of the pancreas. They merit a separate, dedicated staging system that uses appropriate prognostic factors.

Predictive value of baseline serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level on treatment effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer in two randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines suggest that the serum carbohydrate antigen (CA19-9) level should be used when deciding on neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (hereafter referred to as pancreatic cancer). In patients with resectable pancreatic cancer, neoadjuvant therapy is advised when the CA19-9 level is 'markedly elevated'. This study investigated the impact of baseline CA19-9 concentration on the treatment effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancers. METHODS: In this post hoc analysis, data were obtained from two RCTs that compared neoadjuvant CRT with upfront surgery in patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancers. The effect of neoadjuvant treatment on overall survival was compared between patients with a serum CA19-9 level above or below 500 units/ml using the interaction test. RESULTS: Of 296 patients, 179 were eligible for analysis, 90 in the neoadjuvant CRT group and 89 in the upfront surgery group. Neoadjuvant CRT was associated with superior overall survival (HR 0.67, 95 per cent c.i. 0.48 to 0.94; P = 0.019). Among 127 patients (70, 9 per cent) with a low CA19-9 level, median overall survival was 23.5 months with neoadjuvant CRT and 16.3 months with upfront surgery (HR 0.63, 0.42 to 0.93). For 52 patients (29 per cent) with a high CA19-9 level, median overall survival was 15.5 months with neoadjuvant CRT and 12.9 months with upfront surgery (HR 0.82, 0.45 to 1.49). The interaction test for CA19-9 level exceeding 500 units/ml on the treatment effect of neoadjuvant CRT was not significant (P = 0.501). CONCLUSION: Baseline serum CA19-9 level defined as either high or low has prognostic value, but was not associated with the treatment effect of neoadjuvant CRT in patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancers, in contrast with current guideline advice.

Oncologic safety of robotic extended cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy is applicable for the treatment of early gallbladder cancer (GBC), minimally invasive surgery is not widely used for advanced GBC. This is because advanced GBCs necessitate complicated surgical techniques, including lymph node dissection and liver resection. Robotic extended cholecystectomy (REC) is thought to overcome the limitations of laparoscopic surgery, but oncological safety studies are lacking. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to evaluate the oncologic outcomes of REC compared with those of open extended cholecystectomy (OEC). METHODS: A total of 125 patients, who underwent extended cholecystectomy for GBC with tentative T2 or higher stage between 2018 and 2021, were included and stratified by surgical methods. To minimize the confounding factors, 1:1 propensity-score matching was performed between the patients who underwent REC and those who underwent OEC. RESULTS: Regarding short-term outcomes, the REC group showed significantly lower estimated blood loss (382.7 vs. 717.2 mL, P = 0.020) and shorter hospital stay (6.9 vs. 8.5 days, P = 0.042) than the OEC group. In addition, the REC group had significantly lower subjective pain scores than the OEC group from the day of surgery through the 5th postoperative day (P = 0.006). Regarding long-term outcomes, there were no significant differences in the 3-year [5-year] overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates between the REC group [OS, 92.3% (92.3%); DFS, 84.6% (72.5%)] and the OEC group [OS, 96.8% (96.8%); DFS, 78.2% (78.2%)] (P = 0.807 for OS and 0.991 for DFS). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, REC showed superior short-term outcomes to OEC and no difference in long-term survival outcomes. Additionally, REC was superior to OEC in terms of postoperative pain. Therefore, REC may be a feasible option with early recovery compared with OEC for patients with advanced GBC.

Oncological outcome of proximal and middle extrahepatic bile duct cancer according to surgical extent (Is hilar resection oncologically acceptable in proximal and middle extrahepatic bile duct cancer?).

BACKGROUND: For proximal to middle bile duct cancer, it is controversial whether bile duct resection alone is sufficient, or whether hepatic or pancreatic resection should be accompanied by initial planning. This study aimed to determine the optimal surgical extent based on oncological outcomes in patients with proximal to middle bile duct cancer. METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for proximal to middle extrahepatic bile duct cancer, hilar resection, or combined resection of other organs were included. Clinicopathological characteristics and survival analyses were compared according to operation type. RESULTS: Among 156 patients in total, R0 rate was 56.7% for hilar resection and 82.7% for other organ resection. Although hilar resection was associated with shorter hospital stay and fewer overall complications, operation type did not affect overall survival (p = 0.259) and disease-free-survival (p = 0.774). Overall survival differed according to R status (5YSR 49.8 vs. 27.1%; p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: In proximal to middle extrahepatic bile duct cancer, surgery should be tailored to achieve R0 resection according to the extent of the disease rather than uniformly resecting extensively with other organ resections. Hilar resection could be selected if R0 resection is feasible, considering the lower morbidity with similar long-term survival.

Glucolipotoxicity Suppressed Autophagy and Insulin Contents in Human Islets, and Attenuation of PERK Activity Enhanced Them in an ATG7-Dependent Manner.

BACKGRUOUND: Administration of pancreatic endoplasmic reticulum kinase inhibitor (PERKi) improved insulin secretion and hyperglycemia in obese diabetic mice. In this study, autophagic balance was studied whether to mediate it. METHODS: Human islets were isolated from living patients without diabetes. PERKi GSK2606414 effects were evaluated in the islets under glucolipotoxicity by palmitate. Islet insulin contents and secretion were measured. Autophagic flux was assessed by microtubule associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3) conversion, a red fluorescent protein (RFP)-green fluorescent protein (GFP)- LC3 tandem assay, and P62 levels. For mechanical analyses, autophagy was suppressed using 3-methyladenine in mouse islets. Small interfering RNA for an autophagy-related gene autophagy related 7 (Atg7) was transfected to interfere autophagy. RESULTS: PERKi administration to mice decreased diabetes-induced P62 levels in the islets. Glucolipotoxicity significantly increased PERK phosphorylation by 70% and decreased insulin contents by 50% in human islets, and addition of PERKi (40 to 80 nM) recovered both. PERKi also enhanced glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (6-fold). PERKi up-regulated LC3 conversion suppressed by glucolipotoxicity, and down-regulated P62 contents without changes in P62 transcription, indicating enhanced autophagic flux. Increased autophagosome-lysosome fusion by PERKi was visualized in mouse islets, where PERKi enhanced ATG7 bound to LC3. Suppression of Atg7 eliminated PERKi-induced insulin contents and secretion. CONCLUSION: This study provided functional changes of human islets with regard to autophagy under glucolipotoxicity, and suggested modulation of autophagy as an anti-diabetic mechanism of PERKi.

Efficacy of local treatment for isolated liver metastasis after pancreatectomy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although attempts of local treatment for isolated liver recurrence in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have increased, the efficacy remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effect of local treatment for recurrent liver lesions after pancreatectomy on the survival of patients with PDAC. METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed with isolated liver recurrence after pancreatectomy at a high-volume center were included. We classified these patients based on the treatment options after recurrence and performed propensity score matching to minimize confounding. RESULTS: Median with interquartile range survival after recurrence was significantly longer for patients who underwent local treatment for recurrent liver lesions plus chemotherapy (22.0 [17.0-29.0] months) than those treated with chemotherapy alone (13.0 [7.0-21.0] months, p = .027). In multivariate analysis, not only local treatment for recurrent liver lesions plus chemotherapy (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.55 [0.32-0.94]; p = .030) but also indicators for systemically controlled tumor such as late recurrence (0.57 [0.35-0.92]; p = .021), chemotherapy for ≥6 months (0.25 [0.15-0.42]; p < .001), and disease control by chemotherapy (0.36 [0.22-0.60]; p < .001) were identified as favorable prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: PDAC patients with stable recurrent liver lesions should be considered a candidate for local treatment.

Examining neoadjuvant treatment candidates in resectable pancreatic cancer based on tumor-vessel interactions and CA 19-9 levels: a retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: The applicability of neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has arisen, however, high-level evidence is lacking. This study aimed to explore patient subgroups with high-risk resectable PDAC for selecting candidates who may benefit from NAT. METHODS: The 1132 patients with resectable or borderline resectable PDAC who underwent surgery between 2007 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with resectable PDAC without contact of major vessels (R-no contact) ( n =651), with contact of portal vein or superior mesenteric vein (PV/SMV) ≤180° (R-contact) ( n =306), and borderline resectable PDAC without arterial involvement (BR-V) ( n =175) were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age was 64.3±9.8 years, and 647 patients (57.2%) were male. The median follow-up was 26 months in the entire cohort. Patients with resectable PDAC without vascular contact had the most improved overall survival (OS) (median; 31.5 months). OS did not significantly differ between NAT and upfront surgery in the entire resectable PDAC cohort. However, in R-contact group, NAT showed significantly improved OS compared to upfront surgery (33 vs. 23 months). Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX was showed a better OS than gemcitabine-based regimens in patients who underwent NAT (34 vs. 24 months). NAT was associated with a better survival in the patients with CA 19-9 level ≥150 U/ml, only when the tumor has PV/SMV contact in resectable disease (40 vs. 19 months, P =0.001). CONCLUSIONS: NAT can be considered as an effective treatment in patients with resectable PDAC, particularly when the tumor is in contact with PV/SMV and CA 19-9 ≥150 U/ml.

Training efficacy of robotic duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy simulation using silicone models for surgical fellows.

Purpose: In the era of minimally invasive surgery (MIS), robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is actively performed, and clinical fellows need to thoroughly prepare for MIS-PD during the training process. Although pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) is a difficult anastomosis that requires repeated practice, there are obstacles preventing its practice that concerns patient safety and limited time in the actual operating room. This study evaluated the efficacy of simulation-based training of robotic duct-to-mucosa PJ using pancreatic and intestinal silicone models using a scoring system. Methods: Three pancreatobiliary clinical fellows who had never performed a real robotic PJ participated in this study. Each trainee, who was well acquainted with master's video created by a senor surgeon, performed the robotic PJ procedures 9 times, and 3 independent pancreatobiliary surgeons assessed the videos and analyzed the scores using a blind method. Results: The mean robotic PJ times for the 3 trainees were 42.8 and 29.1 minutes for the first and 9th videos, respectively. The mean score was 13.8 (range, 6-17) for the first video and 17.7 (range, 15-19) for the 9th video. When comparing earlier and later attempts, the PJ time decreased significantly (2,201.67 seconds vs. 2,045.50 seconds, P = 0.007), whereas test scores increased significantly (total score 14.22 vs. 16.89, P = 0.011). Conclusion: This robotic education system will help pancreatobiliary trainees overcome the learning curves efficiently and quickly without raising ethical concerns associated with animal models or direct practice with human subjects. This will be of practical assistance to trainees preparing for MIS-PD.

Clinical outcomes of preservation versus resection of portal/superior mesenteric vein during pancreaticoduodenectomy in pancreatic cancer patients who respond to neoadjuvant treatment: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: R0 rates have increased as neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) has become the primary treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with venous involvement, suggesting a decrease in venous tumor infiltration. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of preserving the portal/superior mesenteric vein (PV/SMV) during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in PDAC patients who underwent NAT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The 113 patients with resectable and borderline resectable PDAC with venous involvement who responded to NAT and underwent curative PD between 2012 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Among the 113 patients, PV/SMV preservation (PVP) was performed in 68 patients (60.2%), and PV/SMV resection (PVR) was performed in 45 patients (39.8%). There was no significant difference in the R0 rate, 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival between the two groups. PV/SMV stenosis within 3 months after surgery was more common in the PVR group than in the PVP group (1.5% versus 22.2%; P < 0.001), and 5-year PV/SMV stenosis-free survival was significantly higher in the PVP group than in the PVR group (76.5% versus 53.4%; P=0.014). Multivariate analysis showed that gemcitabine-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with poor OS. PVR, clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula, and locoregional recurrence were independent risk factors for PV/SMV stenosis. CONCLUSION: The PVP group had similar oncologic outcomes and better vessel-functional outcomes than the PVR group. Therefore, if dissection is possible and there is a high likelihood of achieving R0 resection after NAT, routine PVR may be unnecessary in PDAC patients with venous involvement.

Re-evaluation of risk and oncological outcomes of resection of veins and arteries in the resection of pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Advances in chemotherapy have led to increasing major vascular resection during pancreatectomy which has been contraindicated due to high morbidity. This study aimed to verify the safety and oncological outcomes of vascular resection during pancreatectomy in the era of neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS: Data from patients who underwent surgery for pancreatic cancer at Seoul National University Hospital between 2001 and 2021 were reviewed. Clinicopathological outcomes were analyzed according vessel resection. A propensity-score-matched (PSM) analysis was performed to evaluate survival outcomes. RESULTS: Of 1596 patients, the proportion of those who underwent vascular resection increased from 9.2% to 23.4% over time divided into 5-year intervals. There were no differences in major complications (15.6% vs. 13.0%; p = .266) and 30-day mortality rate (0.3% vs. 0.6%; p = .837) between the vascular and nonvascular resection groups. After PSM, the vascular resection group demonstrated comparable survival outcome with the nonvascular resection group (5 year-survival-rate 20.4 vs. 23.7%; p = .194). Arterial resection yielded comparable survival outcome with nonvascular resection (5 year-survival-rate 38.1% vs. 23.7%; p = .138). CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate vascular resection-even arterial-is safe and effective in patients carefully selected for radical surgery in the era of neoadjuvant therapy. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal indication and method for vascular resection in patients with pancreatic cancer.

CORRIGENDUM: Correction of the ethical statements. Training efficacy of robotic duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy simulation using silicone models for surgical fellows.

[This corrects the article on p. 45 in vol. 106, PMID: 38205096.].