Surgical Outcomes of Superotemporal Versus Inferonasal Placement of Aurolab Aqueous Drainage Implant in Refractory Pediatric Glaucoma.

PURPOSE: We sought to describe the outcomes of the Aurolab aqueous drainage implant (AADI) placed in the superotemporal (ST) versus the inferonasal (IN) quadrant in pediatric eyes with refractory glaucoma. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative interventional case series. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients ≤18 years of age who underwent AADI implantation and completed a minimum of 2-year follow-up. The choice of the quadrant depended upon the amount of scarring and conjunctival mobility. Cumulative success at 2 years was defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) ≤21 mm Hg or reduced by ≥20% below baseline on 2 consecutive follow-up visits after 3 months, IOP ≤5 mm Hg on 2 consecutive follow-up visits after 3 months, reoperation for glaucoma or a complication, or loss of light perception vision. RESULTS: A total of 144 patients (144 eyes) underwent AADI placement, including 48 eyes (33%) in the IN and 96 eyes (67%) in the ST quadrants. The IOP was significantly higher in the IN group (17.5 ± 7.4 mm Hg vs 13.7 ± 6.2 mm Hg, P = .005) with a greater number of medications (1.5 ± 1.0 vs 0.8 ± 0.9, P = .001) after 2 years of follow-up. Cumulative success rates at 2 years were 50.7% (95% confidence interval 35.4%-63.9%) in the IN group and 65.6% (95% confidence interval 56.5%-75.7%) in the ST group (P = .15). Complications occurred more frequently in the IN group, with significantly more tube exposure (12% vs 0%, P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Placement of the AADI in the ST quadrant has better IOP-related outcomes and is a safer surgical option in pediatric eyes compared with the IN quadrant. It may be prudent to avoid AADI in the IN quadrant in children unless the ST location is not a viable option.

Incidence and Outcomes of Hypertensive Phase Following Aurolab Aqueous Drainage Implant Surgery in Adults with Refractory Glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To report the incidence and outcomes of hypertensive phase (HP) following Aurolab Aqueous Drainage Implant (AADI) (Aurolab) surgery in adults with refractory glaucoma. DESIGN: Retrospective, noncomparative, interventional case series. METHODS: All eyes that received the AADI and had a minimum of 2-year follow-up were identified, and data of patients who had intraocular pressure (IOP) ≤21 mm Hg at 6 weeks (ie, the time at which the tube-ligature suture dissolves) were used for statistical analysis. HP was defined as IOP >21 mm Hg during the first 3 months after the release of the tube ligating suture (with or without medications) in the absence of tube obstruction. RESULTS: A total of 200 eyes were included in the study, and HP was seen in 64 eyes (32%) with a peak IOP (mean ± SD) of 29.6 ± 7.8 mm Hg and peak incidence at 2-3 months after surgery. HP resolved within 3 months of its onset in 60 of the 64 eyes (94%) with additional IOP-lowering medications. The cumulative success rates were 71.8% (95% CI = 59.3%-81.2%) in HP eyes and 76.4% (95% CI = 68.7%-82.7%) in non-HP eyes (P = .23). Unadjusted Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that eyes experiencing HP had a marginally higher risk of failure (HR = 1.16, 95% CI = 0.6-2.1), but this relationship was not statistically significant (P = .61). CONCLUSIONS: A third of eyes that underwent AADI placement experienced HP. HP was successfully managed with additional IOP-lowering medications in a majority of cases and did not have a significant influence on long-term success rate.

Aurolab Aqueous Drainage Implant With and Without Scleral Patch Graft in Refractory Adult and Pediatric Glaucomas: A Comparative Study.

PURPOSE: To compare the 2-year outcomes of eyes that received the Aurolab aqueous drainage implant (AADI) with and without a scleral patch graft. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative interventional case series. METHODS: Eyes with AADI and a minimum of a 2-year follow-up were included. Eyes that underwent implantation before January 2016 had surgery with a scleral patch graft covering the distal end of the tube, whereas those that were implanted after this period underwent surgery using a needle-generated scleral tunnel without the patch graft. The cumulative failure of the AADI was defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) >18 mm Hg or not reduced by 30% below baseline on 2 consecutive follow-up visits after 3 months. RESULTS: We included 215 adult eyes (n = 147 with patch graft, n = 68 without patch graft) and 111 pediatric eyes (n = 73 with patch graft, n = 38 without a patch graft). The mean IOP in eyes without the patch graft was higher at 1 month in adult eyes (before, 27.5 ± 14.1 vs after, 22.3 ± 11.1; P = .01) but not in pediatric eyes (14.3 ± before, 5.8 vs after, 17.8 ± 11.0; P = .39); there were no differences in IOP, vision, number of antiglaucoma medications, and complications between groups at all other time points. None of the eyes without the patch graft experienced tube exposure. Cumulative success rates at 2 years in adults (66.2% vs 63.9%, respectively; P = .85) were similar to those in children (77.2% vs 71.9%, respectively; P = .83) with both techniques. CONCLUSIONS: AADI placed without a scleral patch graft is as safe and effective as AADI placed with a patch graft in pediatric and adult refractory glaucomas.

Caregiver Burden in Primary Congenital Glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic factors associated with variation in the quality of life (QOL) in caregivers of children with primary congenital glaucoma (PCG) in south India. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. METHODS: Caregivers of children younger than 18 with diagnosed PCG were prospectively enrolled at Aravind Eye Hospital in Madurai and Coimbatore, India. Participants completed 2 questionnaires, the PHQ-9 (9-item Patient Health Questionnaire) and the CarCGQoL (Caregivers Congenital Glaucoma QOL Questionnaire). Clinical, demographic, and socioeconomic data were obtained for each child-caregiver dyad. Rasch-calibrated scores were calculated for patient-reported outcome measures. Spearman correlation and linear regression were used to analyze data to determine associations with caregiver QOL. RESULTS: There were 70 caregivers (mean age 32.1, 77.1% female) of 70 children with PCG (mean age 7.7, 37.1% female) included in the study. In univariate and multivariable analyses, child's age (ß = -0.04; 95% confidence interval, -0.08 to -0.01) and duration of disease (ß = - 0.03; 95% confidence interval, -0.07 to -0.01) were the only factors associated with CarCGQoL. Survey items related to anger, self-confidence, irritability, appetite, and interest in leisure activities had the lowest scores. There was a negative correlation between CarCGQoL and PHQ-9 scores (r = -0.66, P < .01), indicating that worse caregiver QOL was significantly correlated with more depressive symptoms. CONCLUSION: This study identified traits associated with QOL decline, as well as the QOL issues most likely to affect caregivers of children with PCG in south India. Findings from this study may be important for designing interventions to improve caregivers' QOL, thereby maximizing their ability to care for children with PCG.