New ways of working releasing general practitioner capacity with pharmacy prescribing support: a cost-consequence analysis.

BACKGROUND: General practice in the United Kingdom is experiencing a workforce crisis. Greater multidisciplinary working, including more general practice pharmacists, is seen as part of the solution. However, it is unknown what impact and cost-consequences that pharmacists may have in freeing general practitioner (GP) capacity. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-consequences of additional pharmacists in releasing GP capacity. METHODS: This cost-consequences evaluation of a prospective observational cohort study in 15 urban practices involving 69 GPs in 1 locality serving a population of 82,000 people. GPs recorded the time they spent addressing key targeted prescribing activities during 5 distinct 2-week audit periods. Pharmacists performed these key prescribing activities to release GP capacity. An additional 225 h of pharmacists' time per week was committed to the locality. Standardized staff costings were used to estimate the financial impact. Prescribing indicator performance was assessed against the other 7 localities within the health board. RESULTS: When compared with employing extra nonsalaried GPs this required an estimated additional investment of £16.73 (range £5.97-20.87) per h to free GP capacity. This achieved a sustainable 47% (73 h per week, F(4,56) = 16.05, P < 0.001) reduction in GP time spent on key prescribing activities; equating to 4.9 h (95% confidence interval 3.1-6.7) per practice per week. No significant step changes in locality safety and quality prescribing measures, and no negative effects on locality-level prescribing cost-efficiency work were observed. CONCLUSION: Appropriately resourced general practice pharmacy teams delivered prescribing cost-efficiencies as well as sustainably freeing GP capacity by performing key prescribing activities.

General practice in the United Kingdom is experiencing a workforce crisis, and is struggling to deliver services. Pharmacists have been shown to be effective in freeing general practitioner (GP) capacity. However, it is unknown how much it costs to do this. Therefore, we aimed to assess the cost-consequences of releasing GP capacity. All practices in 1 region took part. GPs recorded the time it routinely took them to address key prescribing activities, Spring 2016. Pharmacists then delivered the key prescribing activities. The region got an extra 225 h of pharmacists' time to do these activities. Then in Spring 2018, the GPs and pharmacists recorded the time took to do the key prescribing activities. Standard salary costs were used to estimate how much money was needed to free GP capacity with pharmacists. The impact on routine cost-effective work was also assessed. Pharmacists delivering key prescribing activities freed 73 h per week of GP time. This equalled an average of 5 h per week per practice. Freeing GP capacity was estimated to cost an extra £16.73 (range £5.97­20.87) per h. There were no negative effects on cost-efficiency work. Appropriately resourcing general practice with pharmacists delivers sustainable prescribing cost-efficiencies and frees GP capacity.

Atherin: a newly identified, lesion-specific, LDL-binding protein in human atherosclerosis.

Prolonged retention of LDL in focal, atherosclerosis-prone areas of arteries is a primary event in atherogenesis. To determine whether unrecognized LDL-binding proteins participate in this process, we generated a cDNA expression library from deendothelialized rabbit aorta, a model for early atherosclerosis that shows striking focal LDL retention in healing lesions. Library screening identified a previously unknown, highly conserved, 56kDa LDL-binding protein that we call atherin. Confocal microscopy of human arteries shows that atherin is present only in atherosclerotic lesions, not in normal intima. Within lesions, atherin is found both in the extracellular compartment and within foam cells. Essentially all extracellular atherin, as well as atherin within foam cells, co-localizes with LDL across the entire spectrum of human disease, from early lesions to advanced plaques. Our results suggest that focal arterial LDL accumulation may be initiated and maintained by binding between LDL and atherin, and that atherin may play a central role in atherogenesis by immobilizing LDL in the arterial wall.

Localization of (99m)Tc-Labeled ApoB Synthetic Peptide in Arterial Lesions of an Experimental Model of Spontaneous Atherosclerosis.

We have previously shown that after administration of (123)I-SP-4 (a synthetic ApoB peptide fragment) to Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic (WHHL) rabbits that foci of tracer uptake can be identified by external gamma camera imaging which correspond to regions of the aortas found to contain abundant atherosclerotic lesions at postmortem evaluation. Because (99m)Tc is preferred over (123)I for scintigraphic imaging, we prepared a (99m)Tc-labeled form of the SP-4 peptide, designated (99m)Tc-P199. To assess the feasibility of detecting atherosclerotic lesions using (99m)Tc-P199 and to compare the relative uptake of the (99m)Tc-labeled and radioiodinated peptides by such lesions, an admixture of (99m)Tc-199 and (125)I-SP-4 was administered to 11 WHHL and 2 normal rabbits. These animals were imaged for up to 3 h and were sacrificed 3--4 h after injection. The extent of aortic lesion involvement and radiotracer uptake were quantitatively compared by planimetric analysis of photographs of the endothelial surface, (99m)Tc-P199 ex vivo images and (125)I-SP-4 autoradiograms of the excised aortas. Pairwise correlation coefficients for planimetric analysis were as follows: photographs versus ex vivo images, r = 0.83, p = 0.003; photographs versus autoradiograms, r = 0.87, p = 0.001; ex vivo images versus autoradiograms, r = 0.83, p = 0.003. (99m)Tc-199 in vivo gamma camera images revealed relatively weak focal aortic uptake in 8 of 11 WHHL rabbits manifesting aortic lesions, and focal carotid artery uptake in 4 of 6 WHHL rabbits manifesting carotid lesions. Neither aortic nor carotid foci were visualized in the normal rabbits. We conclude that (99m)Tc-199 localizes specifically in atherosclerotic lesions and may be useful for external imaging of atherosclerosis.

Deciding how NHS money is spent: a survey of general public and medical views.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the validity of the Prioritization Scoring Index (PSI) methodology by obtaining the views of our local population and clinicians regarding the criteria and weightings that should be used in deciding how NHS money is spent. BACKGROUND: We have used a PSI in Argyll and Clyde to allocate new money since 1996 and to determine priorities for our 1999/2000-2003/2004 Health Improvement Programme (HIP). Since the criteria and weightings for this methodology were developed subjectively, we sought to validate these by consulting local people and to change our methodology to take account of wider population views. METHODS: A postal questionnaire was sent to 1969 members of the general public, all 314 general practitioners and all 189 hospital consultants in Argyll and Clyde in March 1999. A reminder was sent after 4 weeks. Questions were asked about general funding and prioritization in the NHS and about specific issues relating to potential criteria for prioritization, including those used in our PSI methodology. Responses were analysed quantitatively in the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) and qualitatively through examination of the responses to open questions. RESULTS: The response rate was 51% for the general public and 71% for GPs and consultants. Respondents from the general public were broadly representative of the Argyll and Clyde population. The main findings were that: greater importance should be given to care that improves health, quality of life or prevents ill health rather than to cost, or to government and local health board priorities; half of the general public and most clinicians thought there should be a limit on NHS funding; extra money for the NHS should come from the national lottery (general public) or higher taxes on cigarettes and alcohol (clinicians); doctors should have the greatest influence in deciding how NHS money is spent; a higher priority should not be given to the health-care needs of younger people rather than older people. Our public and clinicians would allocate approximately 50% of the prioritization weighting to direct patient benefits, 25% to the cost of health-care and 25% to strategic health issues. CONCLUSIONS: Consideration of public and clinician views suggests that a revised PSI should place greater weight on benefits to patients and lower weight on the cost of health-care.