Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Prenat Diagn ; 42(9): 1211-1221, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35765263

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Preimplantation Genetic Testing - Aneuploidy (PGT-A) for embryo selection has undergone significant advancements in the last 2 decades and yet many studies still fail to demonstrate any clinical benefits over traditional embryo morphology selection (Mo-S). To understand this conundrum, we performed a multi-center clinical study of PGT-A patients, where Mo-S and euploid selection (Eu-S) outcomes were directly compared. METHOD: All suitable blastocysts were biopsied and analyzed for chromosome copy number. Outcomes (positive beta hCG, implantation, ongoing pregnancy, and live birth rates) for Eu-S were compared to Mo-S using single embryo transfers. RESULTS: Compared to Eu-S embryos, Mo-S embryos resulted in significant reduction of outcomes for positive beta hCG (p = 0.0005), implantation (p = 0.0008), ongoing pregnancy (p = 0.0046), livebirth (p = 0.0112), babies per transfer (p = 0.0112), and babies per embryo transferred (p = 0.0112). Morphology selection resulted in patients of all age groups having non-euploid embryos chosen for transfer. Post-hoc evaluation of individual clinic performances showed variable transfer outcomes that could potentially confound the true benefits of PGT-A. CONCLUSION: Embryo chromosome status is central to improved embryo transfer outcomes and sole reliance on current morphology-based selection practices, without Eu-S, will always compromise outcomes. Often overlooked but a major effector of successful PGT-A outcomes are individual clinic performances.


Assuntos
Testes Genéticos , Diagnóstico Pré-Implantação , Aneuploidia , Biologia , Blastocisto/patologia , Feminino , Fertilização in vitro , Testes Genéticos/métodos , Humanos , Gravidez , Diagnóstico Pré-Implantação/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Transferência de Embrião Único/métodos
2.
Prenat Diagn ; 41(13): 1709-1717, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34480803

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Investigate the chromosome status and transfer outcomes of embryos selected using routine "best morphology" IVF practices. METHOD: A prospective multi-center, non-selection cohort study involving patients undertaking IVF treatment. Study entry conditions were blastocyst biopsy, >1 embryo with chromosome analysis and frozen transfer of the best morphology embryo. Primary analyses were ßhCG positive, implantation, ongoing pregnancy and birth rates and pregnancy-stage progression failures. RESULTS: After transfer, embryo chromosome status was assigned and outcomes divided into two primary groups - euploids (n = 135) and aneuploids (n = 53). Compared to euploid embryo transfers, aneuploid embryos had significantly lower primary outcomes (+ßhCG: 67% vs. 30%, p < 0.0001; IR: 56% vs. 19%, p < 0.0001; ongoing week 12: 51% vs. 9%, p < 0.0001; and livebirths: 50% vs. 8%, p < 0.0001, respectively). Transfers were further subdivided into smaller groups according to their main chromosomal feature. Stage analysis showed higher failure rates for aneuploids to initiate a pregnancy (p < 0.0001), higher subclinical miscarriage rate (p = 0.0402) and higher clinical miscarriage rate (p = 0.0038). CONCLUSION: Routine morphology-based embryo selection resulted in a high euploid selection rate but a significant number of aneuploid embryos were still inadvertently selected for transfer (28%) with the subsequent high failure rates for pregnancy initiation and progression having implications for appropriate patient management.


Assuntos
Blastocisto/fisiologia , Implantação do Embrião/genética , Fertilização in vitro/métodos , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Implantação do Embrião/fisiologia , Feminino , Fertilização in vitro/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA