RESUMO
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Conducting clinical trials in skilled nursing facilities is particularly challenging. This manuscript describes facility and patient recruitment challenges and solutions for clinical research in skilled nursing facilities. METHODS: Lessons learned from the SNF Connect Trial, a randomized trial of a heart failure disease management versus usual care for patients with heart failure receiving post-acute care in skilled nursing facilities, are discussed. Description of the trial design and barriers to facility and patient recruitment along with regulatory issues are presented. RESULTS: The recruitment of Denver-metro skilled nursing facilities was facilitated by key stakeholders of the skilled nursing facilities community. However, there were still a number of barriers to facility recruitment including leadership turnover, varying policies regarding research, fear of litigation and of an increased workload. Engagement of facilities was facilitated by their strong interest in reducing hospital readmissions, marketing potential to hospitals, and heart failure management education for their staff. Recruitment of patients proved difficult and there were few facilitators. Identified patient recruitment challenges included patients being unaware of their heart failure diagnosis, patients overwhelmed with their illness and care, and frequently there was no available proxy for cognitively impaired patients. Flexibility in changing the recruitment approach and targeting skilled nursing facilities with higher rates of admissions helped to overcome some barriers. CONCLUSION: Recruitment of skilled nursing facilities and patients in skilled nursing facilities for clinical trials is challenging. Strategies to attract both facilities and patients are warranted. These include aligning study goals with facility incentives and flexible recruitment protocols to work with patients in "transition crisis."
Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/métodos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/enfermagem , Seleção de Pacientes , Projetos de Pesquisa , Instituições de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermagem/organização & administração , Pesquisa Biomédica/legislação & jurisprudência , Hospitalização , Humanos , Transferência de Pacientes/métodos , Melhoria de QualidadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to characterize caregivers of patients considering destination therapy left ventricular assist device (DT-LVAD) and evaluate the effectiveness of a shared decision-making (SDM) intervention. BACKGROUND: Caregivers play an integral role in the care of patients with chronic illness. At the extreme, pursuing a DT-LVAD is a major preference-sensitive decision that requires high-level caregiver engagement. Yet, little is known about caregivers of patients considering DT-LVAD, and there is a paucity of research on the involvement of caregivers in medical decision-making. METHODS: A 6-center, stepped-wedge trial was conducted. After varying time in usual care (control), sites were transitioned to an SDM intervention consisting of staff education and pamphlet and video decision aids (DAs). The primary outcome was decision quality, measured by knowledge and values-choice concordance. RESULTS: From 2015 to 2017, 182 caregivers of patients considering DT-LVAD were enrolled (control group, n = 111; intervention group, n = 71). The median age was 61 years, 86.5% were female, and 75.8% were spouses. Caregiver knowledge (0% to 100%) improved from baseline to post-education in both groups: in the control group it improved from 64.2% to 73.3%; in the intervention group it improved from 62.6% to 76.4% (adjusted difference of difference: 4.8%; p = 0.08). At 1 month, correlation between stated values and caregiver-reported treatment choice was stronger in the intervention group (difference in Kendall's tau: 0.36, 95% confidence interval: 0.04 to 0.71; p = 0.03). Caregivers reported decisional conflict (0 to 100) at baseline (control group: 19.0 ± 2.1; intervention group: 21.4 ± 2.6), which decreased post-education more in the control group (control group: 9.0 ± 1.9, intervention group: 18.8 ± 2.4; p = 0.009). Caregivers in the control group were more likely to "definitely recommend" the educational materials than those in the intervention group (93.5% vs. 74.5%, respectively; p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: An SDM intervention improved concordance between caregiver values and treatment choice for their loved ones but did not significantly impact knowledge. Caregivers found the DAs less acceptable than more biased educational materials and exposure to DAs led to higher conflict initially. These findings highlight the complexity of SDM involving caregivers of patients with chronic illness. (PCORI-1310-06998 Trial of a Decision Support Intervention for Patients and Caregivers Offered Destination Therapy Heart Assist Device [DECIDE-LVAD]; NCT02344576).
Assuntos
Cuidadores/psicologia , Tomada de Decisões , Coração Auxiliar/psicologia , Cuidadores/educação , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Insuficiência Cardíaca/psicologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Cônjuges/educação , Cônjuges/psicologiaRESUMO
Importance: Shared decision making helps patients and clinicians elect therapies aligned with patients' values and preferences. This is particularly important for invasive therapies with considerable trade-offs. Objective: To assess the effectiveness of a shared decision support intervention for patients considering destination therapy left ventricular assist device (DT LVAD) placement. Design, Setting, and Participants: From 2015 to 2017, a randomized, stepped-wedge trial was conducted in 6 US LVAD implanting centers including 248 patients being considered for DT LVAD. After randomly varying time in usual care, sites were transitioned to an intervention consisting of clinician education and use of DT LVAD pamphlet and video patient decision aids. Follow up occurred at 1 and 6 months. Main Outcomes and Measures: Decision quality as measured by knowledge and values-choice concordance. Results: In total, 135 patients were enrolled during control and 113 during intervention periods. At enrollment, 59 (23.8%) participants were in intensive care, 60 (24.1%) were older than 70 years, 39 (15.7%) were women, 45 (18.1%) were racial/ethnic minorities, and 62 (25.0%) were college graduates. Patient knowledge (mean test performance) during the decision-making period improved from 59.5% to 64.9% in the control group vs 59.1% to 70.0% in the intervention group (adjusted difference of difference, 5.5%; P = .03). Stated values at 1 month (scale 1 = "do everything I can to live longer " to 10 = "live with whatever time I have left ") were a mean of 2.37 in control and 3.33 in intervention (P = .03). Patient-reported treatment choice at 1 month favored LVAD more in the control group (than in the intervention group (47 [59.5%] vs 95 [91.3%], P < .001). Correlation between stated values and patient-reported treatment choice at 1 month was stronger in the intervention group than in the control group (difference in Kendall's τ, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.05-0.45); however, there was no improved correlation between stated values and actual treatment received by 6 months for the intervention compared with the control group (difference in Kendall's τ, 0.01; 95% CI, -0.24 to 0.25). The adjusted rate of LVAD implantation by 6 months was higher for those in the control group (79.9%) than those in the intervention group (53.9%, P = .008), with significant variation by site. There were no differences in decision conflict, decision regret, or preferred control. Conclusions and Relevance: A shared decision-making intervention for DT LVAD modestly improved patient decision quality as measured by patient knowledge and concordance between stated values and patient-reported treatment choice, but did not improve concordance between stated values and actual treatment received. The rate of implantation of LVADs was substantially lower in the intervention compared with the control group. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02344576.
Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Coração Auxiliar , Participação do Paciente , Idoso , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Preferência do PacienteRESUMO
The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of in utero exposure to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) with left ventricular (LV) function and structure in HIV-exposed uninfected (HEU) children. A prospective, multisite cohort study in HEU children was conducted by the Pediatric HIV/AIDS Cohort Study (PHACS). Echocardiographic measures of LV systolic and diastolic function and cardiac structure were obtained from HEU subjects aged ≥6 years enrolled in the PHACS Surveillance Monitoring of ART Toxicities study. Echocardiographic Z-scores were calculated using normative data from an established reference cohort. We used adjusted linear regression models to compare Z-scores for echocardiographic measures from HEU children exposed in utero to HAART with those exposed to non-HAART, adjusting for demographic and maternal health characteristics. One hundred seventy-four HEU subjects with echocardiograms and maternal ARV information were included (mean age 10.9 years; 48% male, 56% black non-Hispanic). Among 156 HEU youth with any ARV exposure, we observed no differences in Z-scores for LV systolic function measures between youth exposed in utero to HAART (39%) and HAART-unexposed youth in either unadjusted or adjusted models. In adjusted models, those exposed to HAART had significantly lower mitral late diastolic inflow velocities (adjusted mean Z-score = 0.00 vs. 0.52, p = .04) and significantly higher adjusted mean LV mass-to-volume ratio Z-scores (adjusted mean Z-score = 0.47 vs. 0.11, p = .03) than HAART-unexposed youth. Uninfected children with perinatal exposure to HAART had no difference in LV systolic function. However, small but significant differences in LV diastolic function and cardiac structure were observed, suggesting that continued monitoring for cardiac outcomes is warranted in this population.
Assuntos
Antirretrovirais/uso terapêutico , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Ventrículos do Coração/efeitos dos fármacos , Troca Materno-Fetal , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Função Ventricular Esquerda/efeitos dos fármacos , Adolescente , Criança , Ecocardiografia , Feminino , Ventrículos do Coração/anatomia & histologia , Humanos , Masculino , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , TempoRESUMO
IMPORTANCE: Prior to contemporary antiretroviral therapies (ARTs), children infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) were more likely to have heart failure. This study suggests that highly active ART (HAART) does not appear to impair heart function. OBJECTIVE: To determine the cardiac effects of prolonged exposure to HAART on HIV-infected children. DESIGN: In the National Institutes of Health-funded Pediatric HIV/AIDS Cohort Study's Adolescent Master Protocol (AMP), we used linear regression models to compare echocardiographic measures. SETTING: A total of 14 US pediatric HIV clinics. PARTICIPANTS: Perinatally HIV-infected children receiving HAART (n = 325), HIV-exposed but uninfected children (n = 189), and HIV-infected (mostly HAART-unexposed) historical pediatric controls from the National Institutes of Health-funded Pulmonary and Cardiovascular Complications of Vertically Transmitted HIV Infection (P2C2-HIV) Study (n = 70). EXPOSURE Long-term HAART. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Echocardiographic measures of left ventricular (LV) function and structure. RESULTS: The 325 AMP HIV-infected children had lower viral loads, higher CD4 counts, and longer durations of ART than did the 70 HIV-infected children from the P2C2-HIV Study (all P < .001). The z scores for LV fractional shortening (a measure of cardiac function) were significantly lower among HIV-infected children from the P2C2-HIV Study than among the AMP HIV-infected group or the 189 AMP HIV-exposed but uninfected controls (P < .05). For HIV-infected children, a lower nadir CD4 percentage and a higher current viral load were associated with significantly lower cardiac function (LV contractility and LV fractional shortening z scores; all P = .001) and an increased LV end-systolic dimension z score (all P < .03). In an interaction analysis by HIV-infected cohort, the HIV-infected children from the P2C2-HIV Study with a longer ART exposure or a lower nadir CD4 percentage had lower mean LV fractional shortening z scores, whereas the mean z scores were relatively constant among AMP HIV-infected children (P < .05 for all interactions). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Long-term HAART appears to be cardioprotective for HIV-infected children and adolescents.