RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Frailty, a common geriatric syndrome of vulnerability, is associated with a decline in health and function. The most problematic expression of population ageing is associated with weakness, slowing, decreased energy, lower activity and when severe, unintended weight loss. Frailty is not consciously identified in clinical practice and is not widely studied in Sri Lanka. A validated tool for screening frailty in a busy clinical setting is therefore much needed. This study was done as a part of validating the Sinhala version of the Frail Non-Disabled (S-FiND) tool. METHODS: The FiND tool was translated from English to Sinhala by two translators, blinded to each other. They were combined and translated back to the original language by two separate translators. After verifying the content validity, unambiguity and clarity of items in a focused group discussion, the pre-final version was piloted among 30 volunteers. After assessing the psychometric properties of the pre-final version, the final version was tested among 100 adults older than 65 years from the Colombo South Teaching Hospital. The tool was compared with Fried's frailty phenotype taken as the gold standard. RESULTS: Data were analysed for the agreement with the reference standard, the Fried Phenotype. The mean (SD) age of subjects was 73.9 (7.8) years. The overall time taken to fill out the questionnaire was 2 min. The agreement (Kappa) between the S-FiND questionnaire and the Fried phenotype was 0.7 (P < 001). The sensitivity and specificity of FiND in detecting frailty were 92% and 74%, respectively. The agreements (Kappa) between the individual items of S-Find: involuntary loss of weight/ more than 4.5 kg over one year, the feeling of effort/ not getting going and level of physical activity, with the Fried phenotype, were 0.28 (p = 0.001), 0.06 (p = 0.045) and 0.339 (p < 0.001). respectively. When subjects were categorized frail and robust based on FiND, frail subjects reported a higher incidence of falls (50%) during the previous 12 months, compared to those robust (13%) (p < 0.001 for Chi stat). CONCLUSION: The S-FiND is a reliable, valid and well-received tool that can be used in detecting the frailty of non-disabled Sinhala-speaking older adults.
Assuntos
Fragilidade , Humanos , Idoso , Fragilidade/epidemiologia , Idoso Fragilizado , Avaliação Geriátrica , Estudos Transversais , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Background/aim: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is closely associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD). The objective of this study was to describe the degree of ASCVD risk factor control and their association with carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) in T2DM patients followed up at a diabetes clinic in Southern, Sri Lanka. Materials and methods: A crosssectional study was conducted to examine the association between CIMT and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)in 300 T2DM patients. Both CIMT and its associations with modifiable cardiometabolic risk factors were examined using ultrasonography. The recommended optimal targets for risk factors were defined as glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) < 7 %, absence of NAFLD, albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) < 30 mg, triglyceride (TG) < 150 mg/dL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) < 100 mg/dL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) in men > 40 and in women > 50 mg/dL, systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 130 mmHg, and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < 80 mmHg. Results: SBP, DBP, LDL-C, TG, HDL-C, HbA1C, and ACR were optimally controlled in 59.3%, 75.0%, 46.7%, 84.3%, 46.0%, 33.0%, and 18.7% of patients, respectively. Notably, nearly half of the study subjects did not have NAFLD. Only three patients (1%) had achieved all therapeutic targets. There were statistically significant differences in CIMT between optimally controlled TG and suboptimally controlled TG group (p = 0.027) and between the groups with and without NAFLD (p = 0.045) when adjusted for age and duration of diabetes. CIMT showed significant and positive associations with LDL-C (p = 0.024), TG (p = 0.026), and NAFLD (p = 0.005). Among these, the presence of NAFLD had the highest odds of having higher CIMT when compared to LDL-C and TG. Conclusion: The majority of patients have not achieved the recommended targets for ASCVD risk factors and are at high risk of ASCVD. It is therefore necessary to identify the reasons for not achieving the treatment targets in order to reduce the ASCVD burden by controlling LDL-C, TG, and NAFLD.
Assuntos
Fatores de Risco Cardiometabólico , Espessura Intima-Media Carotídea , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Transversais , Sri Lanka/epidemiologia , Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica/epidemiologia , Adulto , Países em Desenvolvimento , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/metabolismo , Idoso , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Fracture risk stratification is crucial in countries with limited access to bone density measurement. 24.8% women were in the high-risk category while 30.4% were in the low-risk category. In the intermediate risk group, after recalculation of fracture risk with bone density, 38.3% required treatment. In more than half, treatment decisions can be made without bone density. PURPOSE: We aimed to examine the role of age-dependent intervention thresholds (ITs) applied to the Fracture Risk Assessment (FRAX) tool in therapeutic decision making for osteoporosis in the Malaysian population. METHODS: Data were collated from 1380 treatment-naïve postmenopausal women aged 40-85 years who underwent bone mineral density (BMD) measurements for clinical reasons. Age-dependent ITs, for both major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture (HF), were calculated considering a woman with a BMI of 25 kg/m2, aged between 40 and 85years, with a prior fragility fracture, sans other clinical risk factors. Those with fracture probabilities equal to or above upper assessment thresholds (UATs) were considered to have high fracture risk. Those below the lower assessment thresholds (LATs) were considered to have low fracture risk. RESULTS: The ITs of MOF and HF ranged from 0.7 to 18% and 0.2 to 8%, between 40 and 85years. The LATs of MOF ranged from 0.3 to 11%, while those of HF ranged from 0.1 to 5.2%. The UATs of MOF and HF were 0.8 to 21.6% and 0.2 to 9.6%, respectively. In this study, 24.8% women were in the high-risk category while 30.4% were in the low-risk category. Of the 44.8% (n=618) in the intermediate risk group, after recalculation of fracture risk with BMD input, 38.3% (237/618) were above the ITs while the rest (n=381, 61.7%) were below the ITs. Judged by the Youden Index, 11.5% MOF probability which was associated with a sensitivity of 0.62 and specificity of 0.83 and 4.0% HF probability associated with a sensitivity of 0.63 and a specificity 0.82 were found to be the most appropriate fixed ITs in this analysis. CONCLUSION: Less than half of the study population (44.8%) required BMD for osteoporosis management when age-specific assessment thresholds were applied. Therefore, in more than half, therapeutic decisions can be made without BMD based on these assessment thresholds.
Assuntos
Fraturas do Quadril , Osteoporose , Fraturas por Osteoporose , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Masculino , Medição de Risco , Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Osteoporose/terapia , Osteoporose/complicações , Fraturas por Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/complicações , Densidade Óssea , Fatores de Risco , Fraturas do Quadril/epidemiologia , Fraturas do Quadril/terapia , Fraturas do Quadril/complicações , Tomada de DecisõesRESUMO
Objectives: This study aimed to present the Asia-Pacific consensus on long-term and sequential therapy for osteoporosis, offering evidence-based recommendations for the effective management of this chronic condition. The primary focus is on achieving optimal fracture prevention through a comprehensive, individualized approach. Methods: A panel of experts convened to develop consensus statements by synthesizing the current literature and leveraging clinical expertise. The review encompassed long-term anti-osteoporosis medication goals, first-line treatments for individuals at very high fracture risk, and the strategic integration of anabolic and antiresorptive agents in sequential therapy approaches. Results: The panelists reached a consensus on 12 statements. Key recommendations included advocating for anabolic agents as the first-line treatment for individuals at very high fracture risk and transitioning to antiresorptive agents following the completion of anabolic therapy. Anabolic therapy remains an option for individuals experiencing new fractures or persistent high fracture risk despite antiresorptive treatment. In cases of inadequate response, the consensus recommended considering a switch to more potent medications. The consensus also addressed the management of medication-related complications, proposing alternatives instead of discontinuation of treatment. Conclusions: This consensus provides a comprehensive, cost-effective strategy for fracture prevention with an emphasis on shared decision-making and the incorporation of country-specific case management systems, such as fracture liaison services. It serves as a valuable guide for healthcare professionals in the Asia-Pacific region, contributing to the ongoing evolution of osteoporosis management.
RESUMO
Purpose: This study evaluated the reliability and validity of the Sinhala version of Katz index of activities of daily living (ADL) in assessing the functional status of older people aged >65 years. Materials and methods: The Katz index was translated to Sinhala, cross-culturally adapted and administered in two stages. In stage 01, 200 patients aged ≥65 years, selected randomly from out-patient medical clinics, were asked to fill the Sinhala version of Katz index along with the Sinhala version of the 10-item Barthel index (BI). The Katz index was re-administered after two weeks among a subgroup of 45 patients selected randomly. In stage 02, Katz index was administered among randomly selected 200 community dwelling older people, aged ≥65 years. In addition, performance-based physical functions [gait speed (GS) and short physical performance battery (SPPB)] were also measured. Results: The analysis of stage 01 data showed internal consistency measured with Cronbach's alpha of 0.82 and test-retest reliability evaluated with intra-class correlation (ICC) (95% CI) of 0.94 (0.89-0.96) (p < 0.001). Exploratory Factor Analysis with the Principal Component Analysis revealed the presence of two factors with Eigen value exceeding 01, explaining 75.9% of cumulative variance. Further, the Sinhala version of Katz index total score showed a strong correlation with the BI total score (r = 0.91, p < 0.001) indicating strong concurrent validity. The stage 02 data revealed that older people with poor perception of general health status had lower mean (SD) Katz index score (3.58 ± 1.82) compared to those with good perception of health (5.56 ± 0.79) (p < 0.001). Similarly older people with prevalent diseases had comparatively lower scores of Katz index, compared to those without, indicating the known group validity (p < 0.05). Further, moderate correlations between the Katz index and performance based physical functions were observed showing the agreement (with GS - r; -0.26, p < 0.001, with SPPB - r; 0.31, p < 0.001). Conclusions: We conclude that the Sinhala version of Katz index has satisfactory psychometric properties and it is a reliable and valid tool to assess the functional status of Sinhala conversant older people in Sri Lanka.
RESUMO
This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Abstract Rapid changes in disease pattern, advancement of medical technology and introduction of new treatment modalities demand continuous modifications in medical education. This can be a daunting task unless all stakeholders engaged in medical education are convinced that such changes are necessary to ensure the efficiency of the end product. The task of leading a group of academics who themselves are leaders and have their personal targets in the direction of a common goal can be a challenge. This, however, becomes the primary responsibility of a Medical Dean. In order to achieve this, Dean has to have leadership qualities and particularly good communication skills. Whether these factors are taken into consideration in selecting a Dean is questionable. Further, no attempts are made to enhance leadership qualities and other attributes that a Dean should possess among potential candidates of deanship.