IgM Antibodies Can Access Cryptic Antigens Denied to IgG: Hypothesis on Novel Binding Mechanism.

Antibodies are well-known protein mediators of immunity. IgM is the primordial member and the neglected sibling of the later-evolved and more proficient IgG in regard to their therapeutic and diagnostic use. Serendipitously, however, we found a paradox: While murine IgM antibodies specific for guanosine triphosphate (GTP) were able to recognize native guanylyl antigens found in primate or rat muscle tissues by immunofluorescence assays (which mimicked the auto-antibodies from autoimmune patients to skeletal or smooth muscle), the murine and human IgG counterparts failed. The results were replicated in cell-free direct binding assays using small latex microspheres decorated densely with GTP. The IgG antibodies could bind, however, if GTP was presented more spaciously on larger particles or as a univalent hapten. Accordingly, oligomerization of GTP (30-mer) destroyed the binding of the IgG antibodies but enhanced that of the IgMs in inhibition ELISA. We reason that, contrary to current belief, IgM does not bind in a lock-and-key manner like IgG. We hypothesize that whereas the intact and rigid antigen-binding site of IgG hinders the antibody from docking with antigens that are obstructed, in IgM, the two component polypeptides of the antigen-binding site can dissociate from each other and navigate individually through obstacles like the ancestral single-polypeptide antibodies found in sharks and camelids, both components eventually re-grouping around the antigen. We further speculate that polyreactive IgMs, which enigmatically bind to more than one type of antigen, use the same modus operandi. These findings call for a re-look at the clinical potential of IgM antibodies particularly in specific areas of cancer therapy, tissue pathology and vaccine design, where IgG antibodies have failed due to target inaccessibility.

Nuclear telomerase is less accessible to antibody probing than known nuclear antigens: retrieval with new immunostaining buffer.

Telomerase is an important tumor marker but few antibodies to the enzyme have been described or used without difficulty in histochemical detection. Here we report specific detection of the enzyme in cell and tissue preparations using a new monoclonal antibody (mAb 476) and a new antigen-retrieval buffer (Enhancing buffer). When used to detect telomerase under normal immunostaining conditions in HL-60 cells or tissue sections of hepatocellular carcinoma or metastatic choriocarcinoma, unexpectedly, the antibody stained the cytoplasm rather than the nucleus. Nuclear staining, however, was revealed using the Enhancing buffer. Since other nuclear antigens in the HL-60 cell could be stained both ordinarily and in the Enhancing buffer, nuclear telomerase appears to be shrouded by the nuclear matrix or blocked by accessory proteins. The cytoplasmic activity seen in normal buffer but absent largely from the Enhancing buffer may be an artifact or the nascent, "naked" enzyme. With a known cytoplasmic antigen (proteinase-3) chosen arbitrarily for comparison, the antigenicity was found enhanced, instead, by the Enhancing buffer. The mode of action of the Enhancing buffer differs from that of microwave irradiation or the signal amplification (CSA) used by some investigators. The latter was found to enhance the cytoplasmic reactivity rather than the nuclear reactivity of mAb 476.

Antibodies to guanosine triphosphate misidentified as anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies in a patient with antinuclear antibody-negative lupus, due to buckling of insolubilized assay DNA.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate why the serum of a pediatric patient with systemic lupus erythematosus was persistently (>30 months) and strongly positive for antibodies to double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) as revealed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), but yielded negative results on the antinuclear antibody test (HEp-2 immunofluorescence [IF]). METHODS: The patient's antibodies were isolated on dsDNA and single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) supports, which were then examined by dsDNA ELISA and HEp-2 IF. Tests included the use of various inhibitors to determine the fine specificity of the antibodies. Other tests performed included immunoblotting, immunoprecipitation, Crithidia luciliae IF, and neutrophil IF. RESULTS: The antibodies isolated from the dsDNA and ssDNA supports were similar, in that they were of the IgG type, bound well in the dsDNA ELISA, and recognized a normally hidden nucleolar RNA antigen in HEp-2 cells. With both the dsDNA ELISA and nucleolar antigens, inhibition studies revealed that the epitope recognized was guanosine 5'-triphosphate (GTP). Binding of the antibodies was better to GTP than to guanosine 5'-monophosphate or cytidylyl (3'-5') guanosine, and, in turn, was better than to guanosine, while N7-methylated GTP was unreactive. The antibodies did not bind to dsDNA present in solution or in HEp-2 or Crithidia cells, but bound transfer RNA well and recognized a cytoplasmic RNA antigen in neutrophils. CONCLUSION: A new problem in dsDNA ELISA is revealed in the occurrence of a hitherto-unknown and unusual buckling of the insolubilized DNA molecule, which, absent in dsDNA found in solution or in whole cells, presumably creates gaps of single-strandedness in the molecule. A new antibody specific for GTP is described in this patient, which may be clinically important.

Antibody response of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) targets the viral nucleocapsid.

The recent outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) provided an opportunity to study the antibody response of infected individuals to the causative virus, SARS coronavirus. We examined serum samples obtained from 46 patients with SARS, 40 patients with non-SARS pneumonia, and 38 healthy individuals, by use of Western blotting (WB), enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA), and immunofluorescence assay, using both native and bacterially produced antigens of the virus. We found a highly restricted, immunoglobulin G-dominated antibody response in patients with SARS, directed most frequently (89% by ELISA) and predominantly at the nucleocapsid. Almost all of the subjects without SARS had no antinucleocapsid antibodies. The spike protein was the next most frequently targeted, but only 63% of the patients (by ELISA) responded. Other targets of the response identified by use of WB included antigens of 80 and 60 kDa. Several nonstructural proteins cloned were not antigenic, and the culture-derived nucleocapsid appeared to be specifically degraded.