Approach to cardiology residents clinical aptitude evaluation. Multicenter design.

INTRODUCTION: To the best of our knowledge, the research herein presented is the first multicenter study in Mexico to analyze the development of clinical aptitude in medical units that train cardiologists. OBJECTIVE: To determine the degree of development of clinical aptitude in cardiology residents at three High Specialty Medical Units. METHODS: Multicenter, cross-sectional design. All students of the 2019-2020 academic year were included in the study. An instrument was constructed that evaluated clinical aptitude based on eight indicators and 170 items; conceptual/content validity and reliability were assessed by five cardiologists with teaching and educational research experience. RESULTS: By indicator and year of residence, significant statistical differences were observed in the CMN20Nov academic site. At HCSXXI and INCICh, statistically significant differences were observed in one of eight indicators. Differences between R1 residents (n = 41) of all three academic sites were estimated by indicator, with statistical significance being recorded in three of eight indicators. Between R2 (n = 35) and between R3 residents (n = 43), the result was similar. CONCLUSIONS: The degree of clinical aptitude development can be considered intermediate in all three academic sites, probably because the instrument explored problematized clinical situations that required for the residents to critically reflect on their clinical experience.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Hasta donde se tiene conocimiento, la investigación que se presenta constituye el primer trabajo multicéntrico en México que estudia el desarrollo de la aptitud clínica en unidades formadoras de cardiólogos. OBJETIVO: Determinar el grado de desarrollo de la aptitud clínica en residentes de cardiología en tres unidades médicas de alta especialidad. MÉTODOS: Diseño transversal multicéntrico. Se analizaron todos los estudiantes del ciclo académico 2019-2020. Se construyó un instrumento que evaluó la aptitud clínica a partir de ocho indicadores y 170 ítems; la validez conceptual/de contenido y la confiabilidad fueron valoradas por cinco cardiólogos con experiencia docente y en investigación educativa. RESULTADOS: Por indicador y año de residencia se observaron diferencias estadísticas significativas en la sede CMN20Nov; en HCSXXI e INCICh se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en uno de ocho indicadores. Se estimaron diferencias entre residentes R1 (n = 41) de las tres sedes por indicador, con significación estadística en tres de ocho indicadores. El resultado fue semejante al comparar R2 (n = 35) y R3 (n = 43). CONCLUSIONES: El grado de desarrollo de la aptitud clínica se puede considerar medio en las tres sedes académicas, probablemente debido a que el instrumento exploró situaciones clínicas problematizadas que exigieron del residente la reflexión crítica de su experiencia clínica.

[Critical reading of clinical research reports among resident doctors at IMSS of five specialties. Exploratory national study]. / La lectura crítica de informes de investigación clínica en médicos residentes del IMSS de cinco especialidades. Estudio exploratorio nacional.

INTRODUCTION: Critical reading holds an important role in methodical criticism of clinical aptitude, which contributes to its perfection, which would be indispensable in the study and consideration in the continuing formation of the medical resident. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the degree of development of critical reading of information of clinical investigation, in medical residents of five specialties in the country. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study took place, in 3060 medical residents of five residencies (internal medicine n=474, pediatric n=358, family medicine n=1651, ER/doctor surgical n=269 and anaesthesiology n=308). In order to measure the degree of development of critical reading, an instrument with eight clinical research article summaries was elaborated, selected according to the proposed classification of types of studies by McMaster University, with subjects that could be of interest for the studied residents; constituted by 150 items that explore three indicators (to interpret, to judge and to propose); validated by five experts with educational experience, clinical-epidemiologist and in publication of works; a pilot study was made and the internal trustworthiness with the test of Kuder-Richardson was considered (KR-20), obtaining a 0.90 coefficient. The capture of data and the qualification of the instrument were made with the blinded technique. The analysis was made with parametric statistic. RESULTS: The residencies that received greater points were internal medicine and pediatrics (X 50.23 +/- 15.02 and X 48.84 +/- 15.76, respectively, of a theoretical qualification maxima of 150). Also, it was not observed in the points reached in the critical reading by the resident doctors, an ascending tendency per year of residency (of R1 to R4). CONCLUSIONS: In critical reading, residents of internal medicine as well as pediatrics obtained the highest scores in contrast with family medicine, ER, surgical and anesthesiology which obtained lower scores. Also, it seems to be that until this moment, the development of this aptitude does not keep correspondence as it is passed per year of residency.

Aproximación hacia la evaluación de la aptitud clínica en residentes de cardiología. Diseño multicéntrico / Approach to cardiology residents clinical aptitude evaluation. Multicenter design

Resumen Introducción: Hasta donde se tiene conocimiento, la investigación que se presenta constituye el primer trabajo multicéntrico en México que estudia el desarrollo de la aptitud clínica en unidades formadoras de cardiólogos. Objetivo: Determinar el grado de desarrollo de la aptitud clínica en residentes de cardiología en tres unidades médicas de alta especialidad. Métodos: Diseño transversal multicéntrico. Se analizaron todos los estudiantes del ciclo académico 2019-2020. Se construyó un instrumento que evaluó la aptitud clínica a partir de ocho indicadores y 170 ítems; la validez conceptual/de contenido y la confiabilidad fueron valoradas por cinco cardiólogos con experiencia docente y en investigación educativa. Resultados: Por indicador y año de residencia se observaron diferencias estadísticas significativas en la sede CMN20Nov; en HCSXXI e INCICh se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en uno de ocho indicadores. Se estimaron diferencias entre residentes R1 (n = 41) de las tres sedes por indicador, con significación estadística en tres de ocho indicadores. El resultado fue semejante al comparar R2 (n = 35) y R3 (n = 43). Conclusiones: El grado de desarrollo de la aptitud clínica se puede considerar medio en las tres sedes académicas, probablemente debido a que el instrumento exploró situaciones clínicas problematizadas que exigieron del residente la reflexión crítica de su experiencia clínica.

Abstract Introduction: To the best of our knowledge, the research herein presented is the first multicenter study in Mexico to analyze the development of clinical aptitude in medical units that train cardiologists. Objective: To determine the degree of development of clinical aptitude in cardiology residents at three High Specialty Medical Units. Methods: Multicenter, cross-sectional design. All students of the 2019-2020 academic year were included in the study. An instrument was constructed that evaluated clinical aptitude based on eight indicators and 170 items; conceptual/content validity and reliability were assessed by five cardiologists with teaching and educational research experience. Results: By indicator and year of residence, significant statistical differences were observed in the CMN20Nov academic site. At HCSXXI and INCICh, statistically significant differences were observed in one of eight indicators. Differences between R1 residents (n = 41) of all three academic sites were estimated by indicator, with statistical significance being recorded in three of eight indicators. Between R2 (n = 35) and between R3 residents (n = 43), the result was similar. Conclusions: The degree of clinical aptitude development can be considered intermediate in all three academic sites, probably because the instrument explored problematized clinical situations that required the residents to critically reflect on their clinical experience.