NGS-based stratification refines the risk stratification in T-ALL and identifies a Very High-Risk subgroup of patients.

We previously reported a better outcome in adult and pediatric T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) harboring NOTCH1 and/or FBXW7 mutations without alterations of K-N-RAS and PTEN genes. Availability of high-throughput next-generation sequencing strategies (NGS) led us to refine the outcome prediction in T-ALL. Targeted whole-exome sequencing of 72 T-ALL related oncogenes was performed in 198 adult T-ALLs in first remission (CR1) from the GRAALL-2003/2005 protocols (ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT00222027, NCT00327678) and 242 pediatric T-ALLs from the FRALLE2000T. This approach enabled the identification of the first NGS-based classifier in T-ALL categorizing low-risk patients as those with N/F, PHF6, or EP300 mutations, excluding N-K-RAS, PI3K pathway (PTEN, PIK3CA, and PIK3R1), TP53, DNMT3A, IDH1/2, and IKZF1 alterations, with a 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) estimated at 21%. Conversely, the remaining patients were classified as high-risk, exhibiting a 5-year CIR estimated at 47%. We externally validated this stratification in the pediatric cohort. NGS-based classifier was highly prognostic, independently of minimal residual disease (MRD) and white blood cells counts (WBC), in both adult and pediatric cohorts. Integration of the NGS-based classifier into a comprehensive risk stratification model, including WBC count at diagnosis and MRD at the end of induction, enabled the identification of an adverse risk subgroup (25%) with a 5-year CIR estimated at 51%, and a favorable risk group (32%) with a 5-year CIR estimated at 12%. NGS-based stratification combined with WBC and MRD sharpens the prognostic classification in T-ALL and identifies a new subgroup of patients who may benefit from innovative therapeutic approaches.

Nilotinib with or without cytarabine for Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

ABSTRACT: We previously demonstrated that a reduced-intensity chemotherapy schedule can safely replace hyper-CVAD (cyclophosphamide-vincristine-doxorubicin [Adriamycin]-dexamethasone) cycle 1 when combined with imatinib in adults with Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. In the present randomized GRAAPH-2014 trial, we used nilotinib and addressed the omission of cytarabine (Ara-C) in consolidation. The primary objective was the major molecular response (MMR) rate measured by BCR::ABL1 quantification after cycle 4 (end of consolidation). All patients were eligible for allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT), whereas those in MMR could receive autologous SCT, followed by 2-year imatinib maintenance in both cases. After the enrollment of 156 of 265 planed patients, the data and safety monitoring board decided to hold the randomization because of an excess of relapse in the investigational arm. Among the 155 evaluable patients, 76 received Ara-C during consolidation (arm A) and 79 did not (arm B). Overall, 133 patients (85%) underwent SCT, 93 allogeneic and 40 autologous. The noninferiority end point regarding MMR was reached with 71.1% (arm A) and 77.2% (arm B) of patients reaching MMR. However, the 4-year cumulative incidence of relapse was higher in arm B compared with arm A (31.3% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 21.1%-41.9%] vs 13.2% [95% CI, 6.7%-21.9%]; P = .017), which translated to a lower relapse-free survival. With a median follow-up of 3.8 years, 4-year overall survival was 79.0% (95% CI, 70.6%-89.3%) in arm A vs 73.4% (95% CI, 63.9%-84.4%) in arm B (P = .35). Despite a noninferior rate of MMR, more relapses were observed when ARA-C was omitted without impact on survival. ClinicalTrials.gov ID, NCT02611492.

Significance of Measurable Residual Disease in Adult Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive ALL: A GRAAPH-2014 Study.

PURPOSE: BCR::ABL1 quantification is widely regarded as the standard for monitoring measurable residual disease (MRD) in Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) ALL. However, recent evidence of BCR::ABL1 multilineage involvement questions the significance of BCR::ABL1 MRD. We aimed to define the prognostic role of MRD as assessed by BCR::ABL1 or lymphoid-specific immunoglobulin/T-cell receptor (IG/TR) gene markers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted BCR::ABL1 and IG/TR quantification after each treatment cycle in 264 patients treated in the GRAAPH-2014 trial, which used four cycles of reduced-intensity chemotherapy with nilotinib, followed by hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). RESULTS: Comparing BCR::ABL1 and IG/TR MRD revealed residual BCR::ABL1-positive non-ALL cells in 98 (43%) of 228 patients, defining multilineage Ph+ ALL. Despite poorer BCR::ABL1 responses, patients with multilineage Ph+ ALL had similar disease-free survival (DFS; hazard ratio [HR], 0.83 [95% CI, 0.49 to 1.41]; P = .50). Although BCR::ABL1 response failed to predict outcomes, IG/TR positivity (≥0.01%) was strongly associated with lower DFS (after cycle 2, HR, 2.49 [95% CI, 1.40 to 4.40]; P = .002; after cycle 4, HR, 4.13 [95% CI, 1.82 to 9.38]; P = .001). In multivariable analysis, both IG/TR positivity after cycle 2 and initial WBC count ≥30 × 109/L predicted poorer DFS, enabling to define a high-risk group having a 4-year DFS of 56.5% compared with 87.6% (HR, 3.72 [95% CI, 1.93 to 7.15]; P < .001). Moreover, allogeneic HSCT significantly improved DFS in the high-risk group (HR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.18 to 0.60]; P < .001), whereas the standard-risk group had favorable outcomes regardless of allogeneic HSCT. CONCLUSION: Our findings challenge the significance of BCR::ABL1 monitoring in adult Ph+ ALL and demonstrate the prognostic role of IG/TR MRD. This study provides a framework for using MRD to guide treatment strategies in adults with Ph+ ALL.