Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Infect Dis ; 218(4): 633-644, 2018 07 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29669026

RESUMO

Background: Mosaic immunogens are bioinformatically engineered human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) sequences designed to elicit clade-independent coverage against globally circulating HIV-1 strains. Methods: This phase 1, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial enrolled healthy HIV-uninfected adults who received 2 doses of a modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA)-vectored HIV-1 bivalent mosaic immunogen vaccine or placebo on days 0 and 84. Two groups were enrolled: those who were HIV-1 vaccine naive (n = 15) and those who had received an HIV-1 vaccine (Ad26.ENVA.01) 4-6 years earlier (n = 10). We performed prespecified blinded cellular and humoral immunogenicity analyses at days 0, 14, 28, 84, 98, 112, 168, 270, and 365. Results: All 50 planned vaccinations were administered. Vaccination was safe and generally well tolerated. No vaccine-related serious adverse events occurred. Both cellular and humoral cross-clade immune responses were elicited after 1 or 2 vaccinations in all participants in the HIV-1 vaccine-naive group. Env-specific responses were induced after a single immunization in nearly all subjects who had previously received the prototype Ad26.ENVA.01 vaccine. Conclusions: No safety concerns were identified, and multiclade HIV-1-specific immune responses were elicited. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT02218125.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra a AIDS/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra a AIDS/imunologia , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , HIV-1/imunologia , Vacinas contra a AIDS/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra a AIDS/genética , Adulto , Método Duplo-Cego , Portadores de Fármacos , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/patologia , Feminino , Vetores Genéticos , Humanos , Imunidade Celular , Imunidade Humoral , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Placebos/administração & dosagem , Resultado do Tratamento , Vacinas de Subunidades Antigênicas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas de Subunidades Antigênicas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas de Subunidades Antigênicas/genética , Vacinas de Subunidades Antigênicas/imunologia , Vacinas Sintéticas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Sintéticas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Sintéticas/genética , Vacinas Sintéticas/imunologia , Vaccinia virus/genética , Adulto Jovem
2.
JAMA Surg ; 148(5): 440-6, 2013 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23325435

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether extended postoperative antibacterial prophylaxis for patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery with tube thoracostomy reduces the risk of infectious complications compared with preoperative prophylaxis only. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Brigham and Women's Hospital, an 800-bed tertiary care teaching hospital in Boston, Massachusetts. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 251 adult patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery requiring tube thoracostomy between April 2008 and April 2011. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received preoperative antibacterial prophylaxis with cefazolin sodium (or other drug if the patient was allergic to cefazolin). Postoperatively, patients were randomly assigned (at a 1:1 ratio) using a computer-generated randomization sequence to receive extended antibacterial prophylaxis (n = 125) or placebo (n = 126) for 48 hours or until all thoracostomy tubes were removed, whichever came first. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The combined occurrence of surgical site infection, empyema, pneumonia, and Clostridium difficile colitis by postoperative day 28. RESULTS: A total of 245 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (121 in the intervention group and 124 in the placebo group). Thirteen patients (10.7%) in the intervention group and 8 patients (6.5%) in the placebo group had a primary end point (risk difference, -4.3% [95% CI, -11.3% to 2.7%]; P = .26). Six patients (5.0%) in the intervention group and 5 patients (4.0%) in the placebo group developed surgical site infections (risk difference, -0.93% [95% CI, -6.1% to 4.3%]; P = .77). Seven patients (5.8%) in the intervention group and 3 patients (2.4%) in the placebo group developed pneumonia (risk difference, -3.4% [95% CI, -8.3% to 1.6%]; P = .21). One patient in the intervention group developed empyema. No patients experienced C difficile colitis. CONCLUSIONS: Extended postoperative antibacterial prophylaxis for patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery requiring tube thoracostomy did not reduce the number of infectious complications compared with preoperative prophylaxis only. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00818766.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Cefazolina/administração & dosagem , Tubos Torácicos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Toracostomia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Método Duplo-Cego , Esquema de Medicação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA