Diagnostic genome sequencing improves diagnostic yield: a prospective single-centre study in 1000 patients with inherited eye diseases.

PURPOSE: Genome sequencing (GS) is expected to reduce the diagnostic gap in rare disease genetics. We aimed to evaluate a scalable framework for genome-based analyses 'beyond the exome' in regular care of patients with inherited retinal degeneration (IRD) or inherited optic neuropathy (ION). METHODS: PCR-free short-read GS was performed on 1000 consecutive probands with IRD/ION in routine diagnostics. Complementary whole-blood RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) was done in a subset of 74 patients. An open-source bioinformatics analysis pipeline was optimised for structural variant (SV) calling and combined RNA/DNA variation interpretation. RESULTS: A definite genetic diagnosis was established in 57.4% of cases. For another 16.7%, variants of uncertain significance were identified in known IRD/ION genes, while the underlying genetic cause remained unresolved in 25.9%. SVs or alterations in non-coding genomic regions made up for 12.7% of the observed variants. The RNA-seq studies supported the classification of two unclear variants. CONCLUSION: GS is feasible in clinical practice and reliably identifies causal variants in a substantial proportion of individuals. GS extends the diagnostic yield to rare non-coding variants and enables precise determination of SVs. The added diagnostic value of RNA-seq is limited by low expression levels of the major IRD disease genes in blood.

A single center experience of prenatal parent-fetus trio exome sequencing for pregnancies with congenital anomalies.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the diagnostic yield of trio exome sequencing in fetuses with multiple structural defects with no pathogenic findings in cytogenetic and microarray analyses. METHODS: We recruited 51 fetuses with two or more defects, non-immune fetal hydrops or fetal akinesia deformation syndrome|or fetal akinesia deformation sequence (FADS). Trio exome sequencing was performed on DNA from chorionic villi samples and parental blood. Detection of genomic variation and prioritization of clinically relevant variants was performed according to in-house standard operating procedures. RESULTS: Median maternal and gestational age was 32.0 years and 21.0 weeks, respectively. Forty-three (84.3%) fetuses had two or more affected organ systems. The remaining fetuses had isolated fetal hydrops or FADS. In total, the exome analysis established the genetic cause for the clinical abnormalities in 22 (43.1%, 95% CI 29.4%-57.8%) pregnancies. CONCLUSIONS: In fetuses with multiple defects, hydrops or FADS and normal standard genetic results, trio exome sequencing has the potential to identify genetic anomalies in more than 40% of cases.

Characterization of PRAME immunohistochemistry reveals lower expression in pediatric melanoma compared to adult melanoma.

Pediatric melanomas are rare tumors that have clinical and histological differences from adult melanomas. In adult melanoma, the immunohistochemical marker PRAME is increasingly employed as a diagnostic adjunct. PRAME is also under investigation as a target structure for next-generation immunotherapies including T-cell engagers. Little is known about the characteristics of PRAME expression in pediatric melanoma. In this retrospective study, samples from 25 pediatric melanomas were compared with control groups of melanomas in young adults (18-30 years; n = 32), adult melanoma (>30 years, n = 30), and benign melanocytic nevi in children (0-18 years; n = 30) with regard to the immunohistochemical expression of PRAME (diffuse PRAME expression >75%/absolute expression). Pediatric melanomas show lower diffuse PRAME expression (4%) and lower absolute PRAME expression (25%) compared to young adult melanomas (15.6%/46.8%) and adult melanomas (50%/70%). A significant age-dependent expression could be observed. An analysis of event-free survival shows no prognostic role for PRAME in pediatric melanoma and young adult melanoma, but a significant association with diffuse PRAME expression in adulthood. The age dependency of PRAME expression poses a potential pitfall in the diagnostic application of melanocytic tumors in young patients and may limit therapeutic options within this age group. The immunohistochemical expression of the tumor-associated antigen PRAME is an increasingly important diagnostic marker for melanocytic tumors and is gaining attention as a possible immunotherapeutic target in melanoma. As the available data primarily stem from adult melanoma, and given the clinical and histological distinctions in pediatric melanomas, our understanding of PRAME expression in this specific patient group remains limited. The age-dependent low PRAME expression shown here constrains the use of this marker in pediatric melanoma and may also limit the use of immunotherapeutic strategies against PRAME in young patients.

Genomes in clinical care.

In the era of precision medicine, genome sequencing (GS) has become more affordable and the importance of genomics and multi-omics in clinical care is increasingly being recognized. However, how to scale and effectively implement GS on an institutional level remains a challenge for many. Here, we present Genome First and Ge-Med, two clinical implementation studies focused on identifying the key pillars and processes that are required to make routine GS and predictive genomics a reality in the clinical setting. We describe our experience and lessons learned for a variety of topics including test logistics, patient care processes, data reporting, and infrastructure. Our model of providing clinical care and comprehensive genomic analysis from a single source may be used by other centers with a similar structure to facilitate the implementation of omics-based personalized health concepts in medicine.

Expression of the tumor antigens NY-ESO-1, tyrosinase, MAGE-A3, and TPTE in pediatric and adult melanoma: a retrospective case control study.

Tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) are potential targets for T cell-based immunotherapy approaches in cutaneous melanoma. BNT111, an investigational lipoplex-formulated mRNA-based therapeutic cancer vaccine encoding melanoma TAAs NY-ESO-1, tyrosinase, MAGE-A3, and TPTE, is undergoing clinical testing in adults. Expression of these TAAs in pediatric melanoma is unclear but is a prerequisite for feasibility of this treatment approach in children with melanoma. Our main objective was to characterize expression of those TAAs in pediatric melanomas compared to control cohorts. In this retrospective case control study, protein and transcript expression of NY-ESO-1, tyrosinase, MAGE-A3, and TPTE were analyzed in a cohort of 25 pediatric melanomas, 31 melanomas of young adults, 29 adult melanomas, and 30 benign melanocytic nevi in children using immunohistochemical staining and digital pathology (QuPath) and reverse transcription quantitative PCR. Based on IHC analysis, pediatric melanomas expressed tyrosinase (100.0%), TPTE (44.0%), MAGE-A3 (12.0%), and NY-ESO-1 (8.0%). Young adult melanomas expressed tyrosinase (96.8%), NY-ESO-1 (19.4%), MAGE-A3 (19.4%), and TPTE (3.2%). Adult melanomas expressed tyrosinase (86.2%), MAGE-A3 (75.9%), NY-ESO-1 (48.3%), and TPTE (48.3%). Childhood melanocytic nevi only expressed tyrosinase (93.3%). Expression prevalence of individual TAAs did not differ between subtypes of pediatric melanoma, and no association with prognosis was found. All four TAAs were expressed in pediatric melanoma, albeit NY-ESO-1 and MAGE-A3 to a lesser extent than in adult melanoma. These data support the possibility of investigating vaccines targeting these TAAs for the treatment of pediatric melanoma.

Germline findings in patients with advanced malignancies screened with paired blood-tumour testing for personalised treatment approaches.

BACKGROUND: Sequencing of tumour tissue with comprehensive gene panels is increasingly used to guide treatment in precision oncology. Analysis of tumour-normal pairs allows in contrast to tumour-only assessment direct discrimination between somatic and germline alterations, which might have important implications not only for the patients but also their families. METHODS: We performed tumour normal sequencing with a large gene panel in 1048 patients with advanced cancer to support treatment decision. Sequencing results were correlated with clinical and family data. RESULTS: We identified 156 likely pathogenic or pathogenic (LP/P) germline variants in cancer predisposition genes (CPGs) in 144 cases (13.7%). Of all patients, 8.8% had a LP/P variant in autosomal-dominant cancer predisposition genes (AD-CPGs), most of them being genes with high or moderate penetrance (ATM, BRCA2, CHEK2 and BRCA1). In 48 cases, the P/LP variant matched the expected tumour spectrum. A second variant in tumour tissue was found in 31 patients with AD-CPG variants. Low frequency mutations in either TP53, ATM or DNMT3A in the normal sample indicated clonal haematopoiesis in five cases. CONCLUSIONS: Tumour-normal testing for personalised treatment identifies germline LP/P variants in a relevant proportion of patients with cancer. The majority of them would not have been referred to genetic counselling based on family history. Indirect functional readouts of tumour-normal sequencing can provide novel links between CPGs and unexpected cancers. The interpretation of increasingly complex datasets in precision oncology is challenging and concepts of interdisciplinary personalised cancer prevention are needed to support patients and their families.

Clinical trio genome sequencing facilitates the interpretation of variants in cancer predisposition genes in paediatric tumour patients.

The prevalence of pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in genes associated with cancer predisposition syndromes (CPS) is estimated to be 8-18% for paediatric cancer patients. In more than half of the carriers, the family history is unsuspicious for CPS. Therefore, broad genetic testing could identify germline predisposition in additional children with cancer resulting in important implications for themselves and their families. We thus evaluated clinical trio genome sequencing (TGS) in a cohort of 72 paediatric patients with solid cancers other than retinoblastoma or CNS-tumours. The most prevalent cancer types were sarcoma (n = 26), neuroblastoma (n = 15), and nephroblastoma (n = 10). Overall, P/LP variants in CPS genes were identified in 18.1% of patients (13/72) and P/LP variants in autosomal-dominant CPS genes in 9.7% (7/72). Genetic evaluation would have been recommended for the majority of patients with P/LP variants according to the Jongmans criteria. Four patients (5.6%, 4/72) carried P/LP variants in autosomal-dominant genes known to be associated with their tumour type. With the immediate information on variant inheritance, TGS facilitated the identification of a de novo P/LP in NF1, a gonadosomatic mosaic in WT1 and two pathogenic variants in one patient (DICER1 and PALB2). TGS allows a more detailed characterization of structural variants with base-pair resolution of breakpoints which can be relevant for the interpretation of copy number variants. Altogether, TGS allows comprehensive identification of children with a CPS and supports the individualised clinical management of index patients and high-risk relatives.

UV-radiation and MC1R germline mutations are risk factors for the development of conventional and spitzoid melanomas in children and adolescents.

BACKGROUND: Genomic characterisation has led to an improved understanding of adult melanoma. However, the aetiology of melanoma in children is still unclear and identifying the correct diagnosis and therapeutic strategies remains challenging. METHODS: Exome sequencing of matched tumour-normal pairs from 26 paediatric patients was performed to study the mutational spectrum of melanomas. The cohort was grouped into different categories: spitzoid melanoma (SM), conventional melanoma (CM), and other melanomas (OT). FINDINGS: In all patients with CM (n = 10) germline variants associated with melanoma were found in low to moderate melanoma risk genes: in 8 patients MC1R variants, in 2 patients variants in MITF, PTEN and BRCA2. Somatic BRAF mutations were detected in 60% of CMs, homozygous deletions of CDKN2A in 20%, TERTp mutations in 30%. In the SM group (n = 12), 5 patients carried at least one MC1R variant; somatic BRAF mutations were detected in 8.3%, fusions in 25% of the cases. No SM showed a homozygous CDKN2A deletion nor a TERTp mutation. In 81.8% of the CM/SM cases the UV damage signatures SBS7 and/or DBS1 were detected. The patient with melanoma arising in giant congenital nevus (CNM) demonstrated the characteristic NRAS Q61K mutation. INTERPRETATION: UV-radiation and MC1R germline variants are risk factors in the development of conventional and spitzoid paediatric melanomas. Paediatric CMs share genomic similarities with adult CMs while the SMs differ genetically from the CM group. Consistent genetic characterization of all paediatric melanomas will potentially lead to better subtype differentiation, treatment, and prevention in the future. FUNDING: Found in Acknowledgement.