Fertility specialists' views, behavior, and attitudes towards the use of endometrial scratching in Italy.

BACKGROUND: Endometrial scratching (ES) or injury is intentional damage to the endometrium performed to improve reproductive outcomes for infertile women desiring pregnancy. Moreover, recent systematic reviews with meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials demonstrated that ES is not effective, data on the safety are limited, and it should not be recommended in clinical practice. The aim of the current study was to assess the view and behavior towards ES among fertility specialists throughout infertility centers in Italy, and the relationship between these views and the attitudes towards the use of ES as an add-on in their commercial setting. METHODS: Online survey among infertility centers, affiliated to Italian Society of Human Reproduction (SIRU), was performed using a detailed questionnaire including 45 questions with the possibility to give "closed" multi-choice answers for 41 items and "open" answers for 4 items. Online data from the websites of the infertility centers resulting in affiliation with the specialists were also recorded and analyzed. The quality of information about ES given on infertility centers websites was assessed using a scoring matrix including 10 specific questions (scored from 0 to 2 points), and the possible scores ranged from 0 to 13 points ('excellent' if the score was 9 points or more, 'moderate' if the score was between 5 and 8, and 'poor' if it was 4 points or less). RESULTS: The response rate was of 60.6% (43 questionnaires / 71 infertility SIRU-affiliated centers). All included questionnaires were completed in their entirety. Most physicians (~ 70%) reported to offer ES to less than 10% of their patients. The procedure is mainly performed in the secretory phase (69.2%) using pipelle (61.5%), and usually in medical ambulatory (56.4%) before IVF cycles to improve implantation (71.8%) without drugs administration (e.g., pain drugs, antibiotics, anti-hemorrhagics, or others) before (76.8%) or after (64.1%) the procedure. Only a little proportion of infertility centers included in the analysis proposes formally the ES as an add-on procedure (9.3%), even if, when proposed, the full description of the indications, efficacy, safety, and costs is never addressed. However, the overall information quality of the websites was generally "poor" ranging from 3 to 8 and having a low total score (4.7 ± 1.6; mean ± standard deviation). CONCLUSIONS: In Italy, ES is a procedure still performed among fertility specialists for improving the implantation rate in IVF patients. Moreover, they have a poor attitude in proposing ES as an add-on in the commercial setting.

High incidence of central precocious puberty in a bounded geographic area of northwest Tuscany: an estrogen disrupter epidemic?

The potential health consequences of human exposure to environmental estrogen disrupters are not known. Because many chemical compounds are environmentally persistent, toxic and estrogen-active, they can dysregulate the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, potentially inducing reproductive disorders such as central precocious puberty (CPP). We performed a multi-center analysis of CPP distribution in northwest Tuscany (NWT), an area of 5990 km2 with 1,280,895 inhabitants. Study criteria consisted of recorded CPP diagnoses and prescriptions of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs from January 1, 1998 to December 1, 2003. Although similar CPP prevalences were found in four major cities of NWT (Livorno, Lucca, Massa and Pisa) (mean 30.4 per 100,000 children, standard deviation 18.6; p > 0.05), Viareggio area (< 300 km2) with 19,219 child inhabitants (0-14 years of age) had the highest CPP prevalence: more than 161 CPP cases per 100,000 children. Living in Viareggio area significantly increased the risk of CPP (relative risk (RR) 5.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.5-9.3; rate/risk difference 0.133%, p < 0.05). Annual CPP incidence in the Viareggio area was relatively constant and significantly higher than in other NWT areas (RR 5.04, 95% CI 2.3-11.2; rate/risk difference 0.03%, p < 0.05). Indeed, 47% of total NWT cases were distributed in the countryside (300?km2) surrounding Viareggio. Specifically, three villages - Camaiore, Pietrasanta and Stazzema - in Viareggio presented the highest CPP frequency: 216.1, 393.5 and 274.0 CPP cases per 100,000 children, respectively (RR 9.59, 95% CI 1.71-16.6; rate/risk difference 0.26%, p < 0.05). Owing to the definite geographic distribution of CPP and because increasing distance (km) from Pietrasanta rarefied CPP frequency, we suggest environmental factors (e.g. estrogen disrupter pollution) as major CPP determinants in NWT.