Regional citrate anticoagulation vs systemic heparin anticoagulation for double-filtration plasmapheresis.

INTRODUCTION: Double-filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) has been utilized for immunomodulation in kidney transplantation. Anticoagulation is important to maintain circuit patency during DFPP. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) with systemic heparin anticoagulation during DFPP in kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of RCA (RCA-DFPP) to systemic heparin anticoagulation (Hep-DFPP) for DFPP among kidney transplant recipients in a single tertiary center. RESULTS: A total of 112 sessions of DFPP were performed for 23 subjects, of which 62 sessions were RCA-DFPP and 50 sessions were Hep-DFPP. There were 13 sessions (11.6%) of premature circuit clotting, 10 sessions (16.1%) for RCA-DFPP and 3 sessions (6.0%) for Hep-DFPP (P = .10). All premature circuit clotting episodes occurred in subjects who underwent DFPP through a vascular catheter. Premature circuit clotting was associated with the use of a vascular catheter (odds ratio [OR] 14.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.7-73.7; P < .01) and high postfilter ionized calcium (OR 12.7, 95% CI 1.4-112.5; P < .01). There was no major bleeding event. Hep-DFPP was associated with higher occurrence of hypocalcemia (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0-1.2; P < .01) and metabolic acidosis (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-2.0; P = .04), while hypomagnesemia was more common for RCA-DFPP (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.1-7.4; P = .03). CONCLUSION: Amongst kidney transplant patients who receive DFPP therapy, RCA-DFPP may be comparable to Hep-DFPP for the maintenance of circuit patency. Functioning vascular access is vital in avoiding premature clotting of the circuit. Close monitoring of electrolyte imbalances and coagulopathy related to DFPP is recommended.

Regional Citrate Anticoagulation during Double-Filtration Plasmapheresis in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Double-filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) may be used for immunomodulation in kidney transplant (KTx). While DFPP reduces plasma product exposure, risk of circuit clotting merits adequate anticoagulation. Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) avoids the risks of systemic anticoagulation, but a protocol for RCA-DFPP is not previously widely described. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study involving adult (≥21 years old) KTx recipients who underwent RCA-DFPP from 2018 to 2020 to investigate efficacy and safety for an RCA protocol during DFPP in KTx recipients. RESULTS: Fifty-one (85%) of 60 RCA-DFPP sessions in 17 patients completed without circuit clotting. Circuit clotting was associated with high post-filter ionized calcium (28 vs. 3.7%, odds ratio 10.1, 95% CI 1.1-89.4, p = 0.037). Hypo- and hypercalcemia developed in 5 (8.3%) and 8 (13.3%) sessions, respectively, but no adverse effects were noted despite severe hypocalcemia in one. There was no significant change in pre- and post-RCA-DFPP sodium, bicarbonate, albumin, and platelet levels. With regards DFPP procedure, prolongation of prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) was observed following 38 (64.4%) and 12 (20.3%) sessions, respectively. Severely prolonged (>1.5 × upper limit normal) PT and aPTT were recorded in 2 sessions each. Expectedly, hypofibrinogenemia developed after 31 (51.7%) sessions: including 4 (6.7%) severe hypofibrinogenemia (<0.5 g/L). Two patients developed bleeding requiring blood product transfusion. The median total volume of fluids administered per session was 1.495 (1.373-1.612) L; post-RCA-DFPP significant weight gain of 0.5 (0-1.25) kg was noted. Diuretic was commenced or dose increased following 20 (33.3%) sessions for fluid balance management. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Protocol-based RCA for DFPP is feasible and safe in KTx recipients. However, DFPP-related coagulopathy can develop consequent to treatment; caution should be exercised for patients with bleeding risk. Close monitoring and management of the patients' electrolytes, especially hypocalcemia and hypomagnesemia, and fluid status is recommended.

Description of parallel and sequential configurations for concurrent therapeutic plasma exchange and continuous kidney replacement therapy in adults.

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) are extracorporeal therapeutic procedures often implemented in management of patients. Critically ill patients may be afflicted with disease processes that require both TPE and CKRT. Performing TPE discontinuous with CKRT is technically easier, however, it disrupts CKRT and may compromise with CKRT efficiency or hemofilter life. Concurrent TPE with CKRT offers several advantages including simultaneous control of disease process and correction of electrolyte, fluid, and acid-base disturbances that may accompany TPE. Additionally, TPE may be performed by either centrifugation method or membrane plasma separation method. The technical specifications of these methods may influence the methodology of concurrent connections. This report describes and reviews two different approaches to circuit arrangements when establishing concurrent TPE and CKRT.