'Stat' workflow modifications to expedite care after needlestick injuries.

BACKGROUND: Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is recommended to start within hours of needlestick injuries (NSIs) among healthcare workers (HCWs). Delays associated with awaiting the results of testing from the source patient (whose blood was involved in the NSI) can lead to psychological consequences for the exposed HCW as well as symptomatic toxicities from empiric PEP. AIMS: After developing a 'stat' (immediate) workflow that prioritized phlebotomy and resulting of source patient bloodwork for immediate handling and processing, we retrospectively investigated whether our new workflow had (i) decreased HIV order-result interval times for source patient HIV bloodwork and (ii) decreased the frequency of HIV PEP prescriptions being dispensed to exposed HCWs. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed NSI records to identify source patient HIV order-result intervals and PEP dispensing frequencies across a 6-year period (encompassing a 54-month pre-intervention period and 16-month post-intervention period). RESULTS: We identified 251 NSIs, which occurred at similar frequencies before versus after our intervention (means 3.54 NSIs and 3.75 NSIs per month, respectively). Median HIV order-result intervals decreased significantly (P < 0.05) from 195 to 156 min after our intervention, while the proportion of HCWs who received one or more doses of PEP decreased significantly (P < 0.001) from 50% (96/191) to 23% (14/60). CONCLUSION: Using a 'stat' workflow to prioritize source patient testing after NSIs, we achieved a modest decrease in order-result intervals and a dramatic decrease in HIV PEP dispensing rates. This simple intervention may improve HCWs' physical and psychological health during a traumatic time.

Factors associated with persistent colonisation with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

We conducted a prospective cohort study between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2012 at five adult and paediatric academic medical centres to identify factors associated with persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonisation. Adults and children presenting to ambulatory settings with a MRSA skin and soft tissue infection (i.e. index cases), along with household members, performed self-sampling for MRSA colonisation every 2 weeks for 6 months. Clearance of colonisation was defined as two consecutive negative sampling periods. Subjects without clearance by the end of the study were considered persistently colonised and compared with those who cleared colonisation. Of 243 index cases, 48 (19·8%) had persistent colonisation and 110 (45·3%) cleared colonisation without recurrence. Persistent colonisation was associated with white race (odds ratio (OR), 4·90; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1·38-17·40), prior MRSA infection (OR 3·59; 95% CI 1·05-12·35), colonisation of multiple sites (OR 32·7; 95% CI 6·7-159·3). Conversely, subjects with persistent colonisation were less likely to have been treated with clindamycin (OR 0·28; 95% CI 0·08-0·99). Colonisation at multiple sites is a risk factor for persistent colonisation and may require more targeted decolonisation efforts. The specific effect of clindamycin on MRSA colonisation needs to be elucidated.

Inter-rater reliability of a classification system for hospital adverse drug event reports.

Hospital pharmacovigilance systems frequently classify adverse drug event (ADE) reports on various axes such as severity and type of outcome in an attempt to better detect changes in the frequency of certain types of ADEs. The aim of this study was to measure the inter-observer reliability of an ADE classification system. Two pharmacists and two internal medicine physicians reviewed 150 pharmacist-generated ADE reports and used a structured form to classify reports on four domains: the presence or absence of process measures leading to ADE; the individual who initiated the process that potentially leads to ADE; the severity of ADE; and whether the ADE was related to dose. There was wide variation in inter-observer reliability of different elements in a classification system for ADEs. Agreement on specific processes associated with ADEs ranged from poor to moderate, which limits the ability to target accurately processes to improve drug utilization.

Outcomes of critically ill cancer patients in a university hospital setting.

Critically ill cancer patients constitute a large percentage of admissions to tertiary care medical intensive care units (ICUs). We sought to describe outcomes of such patients, and to evaluate how conditions commonly seen in these patients impact mortality. A total of 348 consecutive medical ICU cancer patients were evaluated. Subgroup comparisons included the three most common cancer types (leukemia, lymphoma, lung cancer), as well as three different treatments/conditions (bone marrow transplant [BMT] versus non-BMT, mechanical ventilation [MV] versus non-MV, neutropenic versus non-neutropenic). There were no mortality differences between patients with leukemia, lymphoma, or lung cancer. By logistic regression, mortality predictors were: MV, hepatic failure, and cardiovascular failure for the group as a whole (41% overall mortality); MV and allogeneic (as compared with autologous) BMT for the BMT group (39% overall mortality); hepatic failure, cardiovascular failure, and persistent acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) for the MV group (67% overall mortality); and MV for the neutropenic group (53% overall mortality). Neutropenia showed no independent association with mortality in the group as a whole or any subgroup analyzed. We conclude that respiratory, hepatic, and cardiovascular failure predict mortality, whereas neutropenia does not. Additionally, we have noted an encouraging improvement in survival in many groups of critically ill cancer patients.