Evolution in the management of aorta to left ventricular tunnel in a national congenital cardiology centre.

An aorto-ventricular tunnel is a rare congenital cardiac defect, where a channel connects the lumen of the ascending aorta to the left or right ventricle. Four patients presented with an aorto-left ventricular tunnel over two decades at a median age of 8 months (range 0.1-10 months). Two patients (50%) had associated cardiac anomalies including hypoplastic left heart syndrome and left ventricular noncompaction/hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with aortic/pulmonary valve dysplasia in one patient each. Although traditionally surgical treatment has addressed this problem, management has evolved to transcatheter closure with excellent outcomes in appropriately selected patients at our national centre.

Congenital heart disease: addressing the need for novel lower-risk percutaneous interventional strategies.

INTRODUCTION: With the advent of improved neonatal care, increasingly vulnerable higher-risk patients with complex congenital heart anomalies are presenting for intervention. This group of patients will always have a higher risk of an adverse event during a procedure but by recognizing this risk and with the introduction of risk scoring systems and thus the development of novel lower risk procedures, the rate of adverse events can be reduced. AREA COVERED: This article reviews risk scoring systems for congenital catheterization and demonstrates how they can be used to reduce the rate of adverse events. Then, novel low risk strategies are discussed for low-weight infants e.g. patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) stent insertion; premature infants e.g. PDA device closure; and transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement. Finally, how risk is assessed and managed within the inherent bias of an institution is discussed. EXPERT OPINION: There has been a remarkable improvement in the rate of adverse events in congenital cardiac interventions, but now, as the benchmark of mortality rate is switched to morbidity and quality of life, continued innovation into lower risk strategies and understanding the inherent bias when assessing risk will be key to continuing this improvement.