Using implementation science to promote the use of the fascia iliaca blocks in hip fracture care.

PURPOSE: There is variable and suboptimal use of fascia iliaca compartment nerve blocks (FICBs) in hip fracture care. Our objective was to use an evidence-based and theory-informed implementation science approach to analyze barriers and facilitators to timely administration of FICB and select evidence-based interventions to enhance uptake. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study at a single centre using semistructured interviews and site observations. We interviewed 35 stakeholders including health care providers, managers, patients, and caregivers. We mapped barriers and facilitators to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). We compared the rate and timeliness of FICB administration before and after evidence-based implementation strategies were applied. RESULTS: The study identified 18 barriers and 11 facilitators within seven themes of influences of FICB use: interpersonal relationships between health care professionals; clinician knowledge and skills related to FICB; roles, responsibilities, and processes for delivering FICB; perceptions on using FICB for pain; patient and caregiver perceptions on using FICB for pain; communication of hip fracture care between departments; and resources for delivering FICBs. We mapped the behaviour change domains to eight implementation strategies: restructure the environment, create and distribute educational materials, prepare patients to be active participants, perform audits and give feedback, use local opinion leaders, use champions, train staff on FICB procedures, and mandate change. We observed an increase in the rates of FICBs administered (48% vs 65%) and a decrease in the median time to administration (1.63 vs 0.81 days). CONCLUSION: Our study explains why FICBs are underused and shows that the TDF and CFIR provide a framework to identify barriers and facilitators to FICB implementation. The mapped implementation strategies can guide institutions to improve use of FICB in hip fracture care.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Il existe une utilisation variable et sous-optimale des blocs nerveux du compartiment fascia iliaca (FICB) dans les soins des fractures de la hanche. Notre objectif était d'utiliser une approche scientifique de la mise en œuvre fondée sur des données probantes et sur la théorie pour analyser les obstacles et les facilitateurs à l'administration opportune d'un FICB et pour sélectionner des interventions fondées sur des données probantes pour améliorer l'adoption de cette technique. MéTHODE: Nous avons mené une étude qualitative dans un seul centre à l'aide d'entrevues semi-structurées et d'observations sur place. Nous avons interviewé 35 intervenant·es, y compris des prestataires de soins de santé, des gestionnaires, des patient·es et des soignant·es. Nous avons cartographié les obstacles et les facilitateurs du cadre des domaines théoriques (Theoretical Domains Framework, TDF) et du cadre consolidé pour la recherche sur la mise en œuvre (Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, CFIR). Nous avons comparé le taux et la rapidité d'administration d'un FICB avant et après l'application des stratégies de mise en œuvre fondées sur des données probantes. RéSULTATS: L'étude a identifié 18 obstacles et 11 facilitateurs dans sept thèmes d'influence de l'utilisation du FICB : les relations interpersonnelles entre les professionnel·les de la santé; les connaissances et les compétences des clinicien·nes liées au FICB; les rôles, responsabilités et processus d'exécution des FICB; les perceptions de l'utilisation des FICB pour soulager la douleur; les perceptions des patient·es et des soignant·es concernant l'utilisation de FICB pour soulager la douleur; la communication des soins des fractures de la hanche entre les services; et les ressources nécessaires à l'exécution des FICB. Nous avons mis en correspondance les domaines de changement de comportement avec huit stratégies de mise en œuvre : restructurer l'environnement, créer et distribuer du matériel éducatif, préparer les patient·es à participer activement, effectuer des audits et donner de la rétroaction, faire appel à des leaders d'opinion locales et locaux, utiliser des champion·nes, former le personnel sur les interventions de FICB et forcer au changement. Nous avons observé une augmentation des taux de FICB administrés (48% vs 65%) et une diminution du délai médian d'administration (1,63 vs 0,81 jour). CONCLUSION: Notre étude explique pourquoi les FICB sont sous-utilisés et montre que le TDF et le CFIR fournissent un cadre pour identifier les obstacles et les facilitateurs à la mise en œuvre des FICB. Les stratégies de mise en œuvre cartographiées peuvent aider les établissements à améliorer l'utilisation des FICB dans le traitement des fractures de la hanche.

A rationale for universal tranexamic acid in major joint arthroplasty: overall efficacy and impact of risk factors for transfusion.

BACKGROUND: Tranexamic acid (TXA) therapy is effective in reducing postoperative red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in total joint arthroplasty (TJA), yet uncertainty persists regarding comparative efficacy and safety among specific patient subgroups. We assessed the impact of a universal TXA protocol on RBC transfusion, postoperative hemoglobin (Hb), and adverse outcomes to determine whether TXA is safe and effective in TJA, both overall and in clinically relevant subgroups. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed on patients undergoing TJA at our institution spanning 1 year before and after the implementation of a universal protocol to administer intravenous (IV) TXA. The primary outcome was percentage of patients transfused, and secondary outcomes were perioperative Hb and occurrence of adverse events (death, myocardial infarction, stroke, seizure, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, and acute kidney injury ). Outcomes were compared in pre- and post-protocol groups with χ2 analysis. Logistic regression compared risk of transfusion in pre- and post-protocol subgroups of patients with differing risk for transfusion (anemia, body mass index [BMI], and sex). RESULTS: No differences were found in baseline patient characteristics across pre- and post-protocol groups (n = 1084 and 912, respectively). TXA use increased from 32.3% to 92.2% while transfusion rates decreased from 10.3% to 4.8% (p < 0.001). Postoperative Day 3 Hb increased from 95.8 to 101.4 g/L (p < 0.001). Logistic regression demonstrated reduced transfusion in post-protocol subgroups regardless of sex, anemia, or BMI (p < 0.001). No increase in adverse events was observed (p = 0.8451). CONCLUSIONS: Universal TXA was associated with a reduction of RBC transfusion, overall and in clinically relevant subgroups, strengthening the rationale for universal therapy.

Universal tranexamic acid therapy to minimize transfusion for major joint arthroplasty: a retrospective analysis of protocol implementation.

PURPOSE: Tranexamic acid (TXA) therapy can reduce red blood cell (RBC) transfusion; however, this therapy remains underutilized in many surgical patient populations. We assessed whether implementation of a protocol to facilitate universal administration of TXA in patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty would reduce the incidence of RBC transfusion without increasing adverse clinical outcomes. METHODS: We implemented a quality of care policy to provide universal administration of intravenous TXA at a dose of 20 mg·kg(-1) iv to all eligible patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty from October 21, 2013 to April 30, 2014. We compared data from an equal number of patients before and after protocol implementation (n = 422 per group). The primary outcome was RBC transfusion with secondary outcomes including postoperative hemoglobin concentration (Hb) and length of hospital stay. Adverse events were identified from the electronic medical records. Data were analyzed by a Chi square test and adjusted logistic and linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Implementation of the protocol resulted in an increase in TXA utilization from 45.8% to 95.3% [change 49.5%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 44.1 to 54.5; P < 0.001]. This change was associated with a reduction in the rate of RBC transfusion from 8.8% to 5.2%, (change -3.6%; 95% CI, -0.1 to -7.0; P = 0.043). Pre- and post-protocol mean [standard deviation (SD)] Hb values were similar, including the nadir Hb prior to RBC transfusion [72 (8) g·L(-1) vs 70 (8) g·L(-1), respectively; mean difference -1 g·L(-1); 95% CI, -3 to 5; P = 0.569]. Length of stay was not altered, and no increase in adverse events was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a perioperative TXA protocol was associated with both an increase in TXA use and a reduction in RBC transfusion following hip or knee arthroplasty. Adverse events and length of hospital stay were not influenced by the protocol.

An Individual Barrier Enclosure Actively Removing Aerosols for Airborne Isolation: A Vacuum Tent.

BACKGROUND: Aerosol barrier enclosure systems have been designed to prevent airborne contamination, but their safety has been questioned. A vacuum tent was designed with active continuous suctioning to minimize risks of aerosol dispersion. We tested its efficacy, risk of rebreathing, and usability on a bench, in healthy volunteers, and in an ergonomic clinical assessment study. METHODS: First, a manikin with airway connected to a breathing simulator was placed inside the vacuum tent to generate active breathing, cough, and CO2 production; high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) was applied in the manikin's nares. Negative pressure was applied in the vacuum tent's apex port using wall suction. Fluorescent microparticles were aerosolized in the vacuum tent for qualitative assessment. To quantify particles inside and around vacuum tent (aerosol retention), an airtight aerosol chamber with aerosolized latex microparticles was used. The vacuum tent was tested on healthy volunteers breathing with and without HFNC. Last, its usability was assessed in 5 subjects by 5 different anesthesiologists for delivery of full anesthesia, including intubation and extubation. RESULTS: The vacuum tent was adjusted until no leak was visualized using fluorescent particles. The efficacy in retaining microparticles was confirmed quantitatively. CO2 accumulation inside the vacuum tent showed an inverse correlation with the suction flow in all conditions (normal breathing and HFNC 30 or 60 L/min) in bench and healthy volunteers. Particle removal efficacy and safe breathing conditions (CO2, temperature) were reached when suctioning was at least 60 L/min or 20 L/min > HFNC flow. Five subjects were successfully intubated and anesthetized without ergonomic difficulties and with minimal interference with workflow and an excellent overall assessment by the anesthesiologists. CONCLUSIONS: The vacuum tent effectively minimized aerosol dispersion. Its continuous suction system set at a high suction flow was crucial to avoid the spread of aerosol particles and CO2 rebreathing.

Admission of Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Undergoing Ambulatory Surgery in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Within Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS), obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients are frequently encountered. To implement policies and screening measures for admission of OSA patients undergoing ambulatory surgery, actual rates of admission must first be determined. We aimed to evaluate rates and reasons for admission of OSA patients after ambulatory OHNS surgery. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was undertaken of all OSA patients undergoing elective day-surgery OHNS procedures at a tertiary center from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019. The primary outcome measure was percentage of OSA patients admitted to hospital after ambulatory OHNS surgery. Secondary outcome measures included reasons for admission. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, perioperative complications, and patient demographics were captured. RESULTS: There were 118 OSA patients, out of 1942 cases performed during the review period. Thirty-eight were excluded as the procedures were not considered ambulatory. The remaining 80 OSA patients were included for analysis, with an average age of 51.7, SD 13.8, and 30 (38%) females. The admission rate was 47.5% (38/80 patients). Admitted patients were older (P = .0061), and had higher ASA (P = .039). Indication for surgery or type of surgery did not differ among admitted and non-admitted patients. The majority of patients, 97% (37/38 patients), were admitted for post-operative monitoring. CONCLUSION: More than half of OSA patients did not require admission to hospital after ambulatory OHNS surgery, unaffected by indications for surgery or type of surgery. Higher ASA score and older age were found in admitted as compared to non-admitted patients.

Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block: outcome of 510 consecutive cases.

INTRODUCTION: Supraclavicular brachial plexus block provides consistently effective anesthesia to the upper extremity. However, traditional nerve localization techniques may be associated with a high risk of pneumothorax. In the present study, we report block success and clinical outcome data from 510 consecutive patients who received an ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block for upper extremity surgery. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, the outcome of 510 consecutive patients who received an ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block for upper extremity surgery was reviewed. Real-time ultrasound guidance was used with a high-frequency linear probe. The neurovascular structures were imaged on short axis, and the needle was inserted using an in-plane technique with either a medial-to-lateral or lateral-to-medial orientation. RESULTS: Five hundred ten ultrasound-guided supraclavicular blocks were performed (50 inpatients, 460 outpatients) by 47 different operators at different levels of training over a 24-month period. Successful surgical anesthesia was achieved in 94.6% of patients after a single attempt; 2.8% required local anesthetic supplementation of a single peripheral nerve territory; and 2.6% received an unplanned general anesthetic. No cases of clinically symptomatic pneumothorax developed. Complications included symptomatic hemidiaphragmatic paresis (1%), Horner syndrome (1%), unintended vascular punctures (0.4%), and transient sensory deficits (0.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block is associated with a high rate of successful surgical anesthesia and a low rate of complications and thus may be a safe alternative for both inpatients and outpatients. Severe underlying respiratory disease and coagulopathy should remain a contraindication for this brachial plexus approach.

Evolution of ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus blockade: retrospective analysis of 662 blocks.

PURPOSE: Ultrasound (US) is being used increasingly to guide needle placement during axillary brachial plexus blockade (AXB). This retrospective study investigated whether US guidance can increase the success rate, decrease block onset time, and reduce local anesthetic (LA) volume for AXB compared to a traditional (TRAD) approach, namely, peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and transarterial (TA) techniques. METHODS: The anesthetic records, operative reports, discharge summaries, and surgical consultation notes of all patients who had undergone AXB for surgical anesthesia at the Toronto Western Hospital, between October 2003 and November 2006 were, retrospectively reviewed for evidence of block success and associated complications. Block success was defined as the achievement of surgical anesthesia without additional LA supplementation. RESULTS: Among the 662 patients, 535 patients underwent AXB using US guidance (US group), and 127 using TRAD techniques (TRAD group), namely, 56 using PNS (PNS subgroup) and 71 using the TA technique (TA subgroup). The block success rate was higher in the US group compared to the TRAD group (91.6% vs 81.9%, P = 0.003). The LA volume used for AXB was less in the US group compared to the TRAD group (39.8 +/- 6.4 mL vs 46.7 +/- 17.1 mL, P < 0.0001). Ultrasound group patients spent less time in the block procedure room than those in the TRAD group (30.6 +/- 14.2 min vs 40.1 +/- 27.3 min, P < 0.0001). When analyzed by subgroup, the US group demonstrated significantly greater success and shorter duration in the block room compared to the PNS subgroup, but not the TA subgroup. Complications (inadvertent intravenous LA injection, and transient neuropathy) were lower in the US group compared to the TRAD group (0.37% vs 3.15%, P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that US-guided AXB may improve block success, reduce the local anesthetic volume used, and shorten the time spent in the block room compared to traditional nerve localization techniques.