RESUMO
BACKGROUND: B490 (EudraCT# 2011-002564-24) is a randomized, phase 2b, noninferiority study investigating the efficacy and safety of first-line cetuximab plus cisplatin with/without paclitaxel (CetCis versus CetCisPac) in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had confirmed R/M SCCHN (oral cavity/oropharynx/larynx/hypopharynx/paranasal sinus) and no prior therapy for R/M disease. Cetuximab was administered on day 1 (2-h infusion, 400 mg/m2), then weekly (1-h infusions, 250 mg/m2). Cisplatin was given as a 1-h infusion (CetCis arm: 100 mg/m2; CetCisPac arm: 75 mg/m2) on day 1 of each cycle for a maximum of six cycles. Paclitaxel was administered as a 3-h infusion (175 mg/m2) on day 1 of each cycle. After six cycles, maintenance cetuximab was administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). We assumed a noninferiority margin of 1.40 as compatible with efficacy. RESULTS: A total of 201 patients were randomized 1 : 1 to each regimen; 191 were assessable. PFS with CetCis (median, 6 months) was noninferior to PFS with CetCisPac (median, 7 months) [HR for CetCis versus CetCisPac 0.99; 95% CI: 0.72-1.36, P = 0.906; margin of noninferiority (90% CI of 1.4) not reached]. Median overall survival was 13 versus 11 months (HR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.53-1.11, P = 0.117). The overall response rates were 41.8% versus 51.7%, respectively (OR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.38-1.20, P = 0.181). Grade ≥3 adverse event rates were 76% and 73% for CetCis versus CetCisPac, respectively, while grade 4 toxicities were lower in the two-drug versus three-drug arm (14% versus 33%, P = 0.015). No toxic death or sepsis were reported and cardiac events were negligible (1%). CONCLUSION: The two-drug CetCis regimen proved to be noninferior in PFS to a three-drug combination with CetCisPac. The median OS of both regimens is comparable with that observed in EXTREME, while the life-threatening toxicity rate appeared reduced. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: EudraCT# 2011-002564-24.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/tratamento farmacológico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/secundário , Cetuximab/administração & dosagem , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Seguimentos , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/patologia , Humanos , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Paclitaxel/administração & dosagem , Prognóstico , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
The aim of the study was to explore the relationship between occupational exposure, defined by occupational categories and job title, and laryngeal cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 tobacco and alcohol-adjusted case-control studies including data from 6,906 exposed cases and 10,816 exposed controls was performed to investigate the frequency of laryngeal cancer in different occupations. Job classifications were harmonized using the International Standard Classification of Occupations. Pooled odds ratios (OR [95 % confidence intervals (CI)]) were calculated for the different occupational groups. A significantly increased risk of laryngeal cancer was observed for the occupational category of 'production-related workers, transport equipment operators, and laborers' (OR=1.3 [1.2-1.4]); particularly at risk were occupations as: miners (OR=1.6 [1.2-2.1]), tailors (OR=1.7 [1.2-2.3]), blacksmith and toolmakers (OR=1.5 [1.2-1.7]), painters (OR=1.4 [1.1-1.9]), bricklayers and carpenters (OR=1.3 [1.2-1.5]), and transport equipment operators (OR=1.3 [1.2-1.5]). Individuals working as 'professional, technical, and related workers' (OR=0.7 [0.6- 0.8]), 'administrative and managerial workers' (OR=0.6 [0.4-0.7]), or 'clerical and related workers' (OR=0.8 [0.7-0.9]) had laryngeal cancer less frequently. Occupational exposure, defined by occupational categories and job title, is likely to be an independent risk factor for laryngeal cancer. Further research on specific occupations with increased risk of laryngeal cancer is warranted to explore the underlying mechanisms.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Laríngeas/etiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Ocupações/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma refers to a heterogeneous disease frequently aggressive in its biologic behavior. Despite the improvements in the therapeutic modalities, the long-term survival rate remained unchanged over the past decade and patients with this type of cancer are at a high risk of developing recurrence. For this reason, there is a great need to find better ways to foresee outcome, to improve treatment choices, and to enable a more personalized approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine microarray gene expression datasets, reporting survival data of a total of 841 samples, were retrieved from publicly repositories. Three datasets, profiled on the same version of microarray chips, were selected and merged following a meta-analysis approach to build a training set. The remaining six studies were used as independent validation sets. RESULTS: The training set led us to identify a 172-gene signature able to stratify patients in low or high risk of relapse [log-rank, P = 2.44e-05; hazard ratio (HR) = 2.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.58-3.76]. The model based on the 172 genes was validated on the six independent datasets. The performance of the model was challenged against other proposed prognostic signatures (radiosensitivity index, 13-gene oral squamous cell carcinoma signature, hypoxia metagene, 42-gene high-risk signature) and was compared with a human papillomavirus (HPV) signature: our model resulted independent and even better in prediction. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified and validated a prognostic model based on the expression of 172 genes, independent from HPV status and able to improve assessment of patient's risk of relapse compared with other molecular signatures. In order to transpose our model into a useful clinical grade assay, additional work is needed following the framework established by the Institute of Medicine and REMARK guidelines.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/genética , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/genética , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico , Feminino , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise de Sequência com Séries de Oligonucleotídeos , Prognóstico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço , Análise de Sobrevida , Transcriptoma , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Data on preoperative chemotherapy in resectable oral cavity cancer are conflicting. We present the long-term results of a randomized trial of induction chemotherapy in resectable oral cavity cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized, parallel, multicentre trial evaluated the impact of three cycles of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 and fluorouracil 1000 mg/m2 (120-h infusion administered every 21 days) in stage T2-T4, N0-N2, previously untreated patients with advanced disease. Control group received upfront surgery. Postoperative radiation was offered to both arms when pathologic risk features were identified. The co-primary end points were the occurrence of locoregional or distant tumour relapse, and death. RESULTS: Among the 198 enrolled patients, with a median follow-up of 11.5 years, there was no difference in the incidence of locoregional relapse between chemotherapy and control group (P=0.6337), nor in distant metastasis development (P=0.1527). There was also no difference between groups in overall survival (P=0.3402). Patients with a pathological complete response (pCR) had higher probability of survival than those without (10-year OS: 76.2% versus 41.3%, P=0.0004). Late toxicities in patients with a minimum follow-up of 60 months (42 in each group) were similar between arms, except from fibrosis (cumulative incidence 40% versus 22% in chemotherapy arm) and grade 2 dysphagia (14% versus 5%). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up of this randomized trial confirmed the absence of survival benefit with preoperative chemotherapy in oral cavity cancer. Late toxicity was similar in the two arms except for fibrosis and dysphagia, which were less in the chemotherapy arm. The survival benefit for patients achieving a pCR was maintained.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Neoplasias Bucais/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Seguimentos , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Indução , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Bucais/mortalidade , Período Pré-Operatório , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Resultado do TratamentoAssuntos
Adenocarcinoma Folicular , Carcinoma Neuroendócrino , Câncer Papilífero da Tireoide , Carcinoma Anaplásico da Tireoide , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide , Humanos , Adenocarcinoma Folicular/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma Folicular/epidemiologia , Adenocarcinoma Folicular/patologia , Adenocarcinoma Folicular/terapia , Carcinoma Neuroendócrino/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Neuroendócrino/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Neuroendócrino/patologia , Carcinoma Neuroendócrino/terapia , Seguimentos , Câncer Papilífero da Tireoide/diagnóstico , Câncer Papilífero da Tireoide/epidemiologia , Câncer Papilífero da Tireoide/patologia , Câncer Papilífero da Tireoide/terapia , Carcinoma Anaplásico da Tireoide/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Anaplásico da Tireoide/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Anaplásico da Tireoide/patologia , Carcinoma Anaplásico da Tireoide/terapia , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/patologia , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/terapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: To date, no treatment modality has been identified as more effective for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC), and no predictive factors are known to guide treatment decision for this disease. This retrospective study evaluates the differential effects of diverse treatment options for OPC according to patient risk profiles. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We considered two series of locally advanced squamous cell OPC patients treated with either surgery followed by radiotherapy (surgical series) or chemoradiation (CRT) with/without induction docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) chemotherapy (CRT series). Smoking habits, tumor p16 expression/human papillomavirus (HPV) status and T and N stage were analyzed to stratify the patients according to Ang's risk profile (low, intermediate and high risk). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Globally, 171 patients were considered, 56 in surgical and 115 in CRT series. Patients were stratified in low- (20% of surgical and CRT groups), intermediate- (23% and 41%) and high-risk (57% and 39%) groups. In the surgical series, 5-year OS was 54.5%, 46.9% and 40.0% in low, intermediate and high Ang's risk profiles, respectively, whereas in the CRT series those were 100%, 78.9% and 46.7%, respectively. In the multivariable analyses, adjusting for inhomogeneity between the treatment group, the CRT effect was significantly higher in the low- and intermediate-risk groups (P-value for the interaction treatment risk group = 0.034 in the OS analysis). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective analysis, low- and intermediate-risk OPC patients had a better survival when treated with CRT compared with open surgery followed by radiation therapy. These data suggest that different treatment approaches might be essential in determining outcome results.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/cirurgia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/patologia , Idoso , Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Quimiorradioterapia , Cisplatino/uso terapêutico , Inibidor p16 de Quinase Dependente de Ciclina/biossíntese , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Docetaxel , Feminino , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Papillomaviridae/isolamento & purificação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxoides/uso terapêutico , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Despite a growing body of evidence for the effectiveness of prehabilitation, the uptake of prehabilitation in Europe remains low. Contributing factors range from limited awareness and understanding of prehabilitation to a lack of supporting infrastructure and reimbursement challenges. In this position paper, the authors propose a new comprehensive definition of prehabilitation and identify differentiated thyroid cancer as a type of cancer particularly well-suited for prehabilitation. To support clinicians with the implementation of prehabilitation programs in their clinics, the authors discuss the following practical solutions: a) find the most appropriate prehabilitation program for each patient; b) raise awareness among peers; c) develop evidence to demonstrate the effectiveness of prehabilitation; d) expand the interdisciplinary team; e) expand your network and make use of existing assets; f) utilize learnings from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Assuntos
Compostos de Fenilureia/administração & dosagem , Quinolinas/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Diferenciação Celular/fisiologia , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Hemorragia/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Compostos de Fenilureia/efeitos adversos , Medicina de Precisão , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Quinolinas/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/patologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: We and others have demonstrated that adoptive cell therapy with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-specific autologous cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) may control disease progression in patients with EBV-associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). With the aim of favoring in vivo T-cell expansion, we optimized our cell therapy approach by administering higher doses of EBV-specific CTLs, following lymphodepleting chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eleven patients with EBV-related NPC in whom conventional treatment failed have been enrolled. Patients received nonmyeloablative lymphodepleting chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine. Two doses of autologous EBV-specific CTLs were subsequently infused, 2 weeks apart. Study end points were feasibility and clinical outcome. RESULTS: All patients enrolled completed the treatment and were assessable for analysis. The median dose of CTLs per infusion was 3.7 × 10(8). Therapy was well tolerated, with no severe adverse events ascribable to either chemotherapy or cell therapy. Disease control (defined as either tumor regression or disease stabilization lasting >4 months) was obtained in 6 of 11 patients, in keeping with previously published results. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm that EBV-specific CTL therapy is safe and associated with antitumor activity in patients with advanced NPC. The use of lymphodepleting chemotherapy before high-dose CTL infusion did not enhance the clinical benefit observed in our previous series.
Assuntos
Terapia Baseada em Transplante de Células e Tecidos , Infecções por Vírus Epstein-Barr/complicações , Depleção Linfocítica , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/terapia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/virologia , Linfócitos T Citotóxicos/imunologia , Adulto , Idoso , Carcinoma , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoterapia Adotiva , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/imunologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Tumor human papillomavirus (HPV) status strongly affects overall survival (OS) of oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients. Recently, three groups with different outcomes were identified based on HPV status, smoking history and tumor stage. Our objective was to validate this model using a single-institutional retrospective database. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n=120) diagnosed with OPC at our institution, treated with concomitant cisplatin plus radiotherapy (RT) (n=64), induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemoradiation (n=39) or RT alone (n=17), were stratified in three groups with respect to the risk of death (low 26, intermediate 46 and high 49 patients) according to tumor p16 expression as surrogate of HPV status, pack-years of tobacco smoking and nodal/tumor stage. Group-stratified Kaplan-Meier OS curves were estimated and compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: The 2-year OS estimates were 100%, 86% and 70%, respectively. The difference between the survival curves was statistically significant (P=0.009). The Harrell's concordance index was 0.70. The calibration plot showed a good concordance between our results and those observed in the original study. CONCLUSIONS: This study validates the risk grouping previously identified. Risk-driven clinical decision making and trial designs will help in better defining the most appropriate treatment in OPC patients.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/patologia , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/virologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Quimiorradioterapia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Genes p16 , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Indução , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Mounting evidence suggests that recurrence of resected head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) is due to the outgrowth of unrecognized residual tumor cells as well as to the premalignant and/or precursor-field epithelial cells. We studied the impact of processes triggered by HNSCC surgery in stimulating both residual tumor cells [demonstrated to overexpress epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)], and premalignant cells surrounding the resected lesion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: EGFR expression/activation by immunohistochemistry/biochemistry and gene status by FISH were investigated in 23 primary HNSCCs and surrounding tissues. The ability to induce cell proliferation of wound healing drainages collected from 12 relapsed and 11 not relapsed patients was evaluated by a colorimetric assay in squamous cell carcinoma cell lines A431 (carrying EGFR amplification) and CAL27 (carrying three EGFR copies) in the presence/absence of EGFR therapeutic inhibitors. RESULTS: Primary tumors showed intermediate/high EGFR expression (91%), EGFR phosphorylation and EGFR-positive FISH (35%). Normal, metaplastic and dysplastic epithelium surrounding the resected tumor displayed EGFR overexpression. EGFR activation and gene amplification were observed in normal and dysplastic epithelium, respectively. Each tested wound healing drainage induced the cells to proliferate and the proliferation was significantly higher in relapsed compared with not relapsed HNSCC patients (P = 0.02 and P = 0.03). Anti-EGFR treatments inhibited the drainage-induced proliferation, with the highest inhibitory efficiency by cetuximab on A431 cells, while CAL27 cell growth was more efficiently inhibited by tyrosine kinase inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery could favor the proliferation of cells showing EGFR overexpression/activation/amplification such as residual tumor cells and/or precursor-field epithelial cells already present after surgery. Treatment with anti-EGFR reagents inhibits wound-induced stimulation, according to the EGFR family status.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Receptores ErbB/biossíntese , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Cicatrização , Adulto , Idoso , Líquidos Corporais/metabolismo , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Proliferação de Células , Células Epiteliais/patologia , Receptores ErbB/antagonistas & inibidores , Receptores ErbB/sangue , Feminino , Expressão Gênica , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/prevenção & controle , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Proteínas Oncogênicas v-erbB/metabolismo , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This monocentric study evaluates the activity and tolerability of docetaxel (Taxotere), cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (TPF) induction chemotherapy followed by intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) concurrent with high-dose cisplatin in Epstein-Barr virus -related locally advanced undifferentiated nasopharyngeal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who received induction docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 1, and 5-FU 750 mg/m(2)/day (96-h continuous infusion). Following induction, patients received full doses of IMRT concurrently with cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) every 21 days for three cycles. RESULTS: Thirty patients received three TPF cycles (median). Induction was well tolerated; the main toxicity was neutropenia (33%, grade 3-4). During chemoradiotherapy, neutropenia (40%) and mucositis (43%) were the most frequent grade 3-4 adverse events. Mean dose of IMRT was 68.8 Gy. Worst late toxicity was xerostomia. Complete response rate was 93%. At 35 months, two patients had locoregional recurrence, three had distant metastases, and one had both. Three-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 79% [95% confidence interval (CI) 64% to 94%] and 87% (95% CI 74%- to 100%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this high-stage nonendemic cancer population, TPF followed by high-dose cisplatin IMRT was promising; this treatment approach deserves evaluation in randomized trials.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Vírus Epstein-Barr/complicações , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/terapia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/virologia , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Cisplatino/efeitos adversos , Terapia Combinada , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Docetaxel , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Fluoruracila/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Indução , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/radioterapia , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/efeitos adversos , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Taxoides/administração & dosagem , Taxoides/efeitos adversosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Radioactive-iodine (RAI)-resistant differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) patients benefit from multi-kinase inhibitors (MKIs), such as lenvatinib. Incidence of treatment-related (TR) late toxicities has been not yet described. METHODS: From January 2015 to June 2019 we retrospectively reviewed clinical records of patients with RAI-resistant DTC treated with lenvatinib at Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (Milan, Italy). New side effect of any grade, appeared after 12 months of lenvatinib, was defined as late adverse event (AE). Descriptive analyses were performed. Survival curves were estimated with Kaplan-Meier method and compared with log-rank test. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were included, 65% had ≥65 years and 68% were female. Thirty patients received lenvatinib for >12 months. Lenvatinib was started at ≤20 mg/daily in 59% of patients, 64% were ≥65 years. The frequency of late AEs was 80% and cardiovascular toxicity was the most common (57%). There was no difference in the incidence of late AEs between younger/older population (77% and 82%, respectively). Median lenvatinib treatment duration (TD) was 39.96 months (95% CI 21.64-NR): 39.96 months for patients <65 years (95% CI: 13.25-NR) and 37.53 months for those ≥65 years, respectively (95% CI: 15.85-NR). Median overall survival (OS) was 39.96 months (95% CI: 21.84-NR), no statistically differences in OS was observed between younger (<65 years) and older patients (≥65 years) (HR 1.013; 95% CI 0.963-1.065; p = 0.62). CONCLUSION: Late toxicity burden of lenvatinib is not negligible. Cardiovascular toxicity remains the principal side effect even after a prolonged lenvatinib exposition.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Quinolinas , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Radioisótopos do Iodo/uso terapêutico , Compostos de Fenilureia/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Quinolinas/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/radioterapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has rapidly spread to every country around the world taking on pandemic proportions. Since 8 March 2020, the Italian government ordered a nationwide lockdown with unavoidable social isolation. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) represent the most physically and emotionally involved category. The aim of this study is to assess the social distress among HCPs in Italy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this online, totally anonymous survey, 24 multiple choice questions were posed to medical staff employed in the Italian Healthcare System during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data collection was performed from 30 March to 24 April 2020. RESULTS: A total of 600 HCPs completed the questionnaire. The majority of respondents expressed the fear of being at higher risk of contagion than the general population (83.3%) and the weighty concern of infecting their families (72.5%). An insufficient supply of personal protective equipment (PPE; P = 0.0003) and inadequate training about procedures to follow (P = 0.0092) were seen to significantly coincide with these worries. More than two-thirds declared a change in family organisation, which showed a significant correlation with the concern of infecting their relatives (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first Italian survey on social distress among HCPs during the COVID-19 pandemic. The unavailability of PPE, screening procedures and adequate training strongly affected HCPs' emotional status. Although there was a predominance of oncologists (especially from the North of Italy), which impairs the generalisation of our findings, this survey underlined the social impact that this health emergency has had on HCPs.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Oncologistas/psicologia , Estresse Psicológico/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Ansiedade , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Teste para COVID-19 , Medo , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Equipamento de Proteção IndividualRESUMO
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: On September 2009: We started a randomized multicenter phase III study comparing chemoradiation (CRT) (Aldestein RTOG regimen) versus induction chemotherapy followed by Cetuximab radiation (IBRT). The main study's aim was comparison of overall survival but no formal analyses have been made between the two arms because of low accrual and high amount of missing data. The goal of this paper is to identify the reasons of difference in accrual and quality of data among participating centers. MATERIAL/METHODS: Statistic: We correlated data collection quality with relevance of the centers, accrual and number of scientific papers (both specific on HNC and other topics) of each PI. We created an HNC publishing score dividing the number of HNC specific papers for the overall number of published papers. RESULTS: We observed a strong difference in the accrual of pts as well as in the quality of data among the participating centers. The accrual was independent from the quality of data since some centers with low accrual produced high quality data with an excellent follow up. We found a correlation among both number of published papers of each PI and HNC publishing score with the quality of data. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated that expertise in HNC is important not only to ensure a better outcomes but also to provide high quality data in phase III trials.
Assuntos
Coleta de Dados/métodos , Cetuximab/uso terapêutico , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/terapia , Humanos , Seleção de Pacientes , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Projetos de PesquisaRESUMO
AIM: Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC), an aggressive subtype of salivary gland cancer, is androgen receptor (AR)-positive in 67-96% of cases. In patients with locally recurrent and metastatic (R/M) AR-positive SDC, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has an overall response rate of 18-64.7%. In this study, we describe the efficacy of adjuvant ADT in patients with poor-risk (stage 4a) AR-positive SDC. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study in which patients with stage 4a AR-positive SDC were offered adjuvant ADT, i.e. bicalutamide, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogue or a combination of these after tumour resection. In the control group, data were collected on patients with stage 4a SDC who underwent a tumour resection but did not receive adjuvant ADT. RESULTS: Twenty-two AR-positive SDC patients were treated with adjuvant ADT for a median duration of 12 months. The control group consisted of 111 SDC patients. After a median follow-up of 20 months in the ADT-treated patients and 26 months in the control group, the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) was estimated as 48.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 14.0-82.4%) and 27.7% (95% CI 18.5-36.9%) (P = 0.037). Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed a hazard ratio of 0.138 (95% CI 0.025-0.751, P = 0.022) for DFS and 0.064 (95% CI 0.005-0.764, P = 0.030) for overall survival (OS) in favour of the ADT-treated patients. CONCLUSION: Poor-risk, AR-positive SDC patients who received adjuvant ADT have a significantly longer DFS compared with patients in the control group, who did not receive adjuvant ADT. For OS, this was just below and above the significance level, in case there was or was no correction for confounders.
Assuntos
Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias das Glândulas Salivares/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Receptores Androgênicos/metabolismo , Fatores de Risco , Ductos Salivares , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Lenvatinib is a multi-kinase inhibitor approved for patients with radioactive iodine (RAI)-resistant differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). Before the drug approval from the Italian National Regulatory Agency, a compassionate use programme has been run in Italy. This retrospective study aimed to analyse data from the first series of patients treated with lenvatinib in Italy. METHODS: The primary aim was to assess the response rate (RR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end-points include overall survival (OS) and toxicity data. RESULTS: From November 2014 to September 2016, 94 patients were treated in 16 Italian sites. Seventeen percent of patients had one or more comorbidities, hypertension being the most common (60%). Ninety-eight percent of patients were treated by surgery, followed by RAI in 98% of cases. Sixty-four percent of patients received a previous systemic treatment. Lenvatinib was started at 24 mg in 64 subjects. Partial response and stable disease were observed in 36% and in 41% of subjects, respectively; progression was recorded in 14% of patients. Drug-related side-effects were common; the most common were fatigue (13.6%) and hypertension (11.6%). Overall, median PFS and OS were 10.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.7-12.6) and 23.8 months (95% CI, 19.7-25.0) respectively. CONCLUSION: Lenvatinib is active and safe in unselected, RAI-refractory, progressive DTC patients in real-life setting. RR and PFS seem to be less favourable than those observed in the SELECT trial, likely due to a negative selection that included heavily pretreated patients or with poor performance status.