Web-based software applications for frailty assessment in older adults: a scoping review of current status with insights into future development.

BACKGROUND: A crucial aspect of continued senior care is the early detection and management of frailty. Developing reliable and secure electronic frailty assessment tools can benefit virtual appointments, a need especially relevant in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. An emerging effort has targeted web-based software applications to improve accessibility and usage. The objectives of this scoping review are to identify and evaluate web-based frailty assessment tools currently available and to identify challenges and opportunities for future development. METHODS: We conducted a review with literature (e.g., using MEDLINE databases) and Google searches (last updated on October 10, 2021). Each of the identified web applications were assessed based on eight featured categories and assigned a rating score accordingly. RESULTS: Twelve web-based frailty assessment applications were found, chiefly provided by the USA (50%) or European countries (41%) and focused on frailty grading and outcome prediction for specific patient groups (59%). Categories that scored well among the applications included the User Interface (2.8/3) and the Cost (2.7/3). Other categories had a mean score of 1.6/3 or lower. The least developed feature was Data Saving. CONCLUSIONS: Web-based applications represent a viable option for remote frailty assessments and multidisciplinary integrated care of older adults. Despite the available web-based frailty assessments on the Internet, many missed certain needed features for professional use in healthcare settings. This situation calls for fully comprehensive web-based applications, taking into consideration a number of key functions linking graphical user interface and functionalities, and paying special attention to secure data management.

Frailty Predicts Dementia and Death in Older Adults Living in Long-Term Care.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate how the accumulation of deficits traditionally related and not traditionally related to dementia predicts dementia and mortality. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study with up to 9 years of follow-up. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Long-term care residents aged ≥65 with or without dementia. METHODS: Frailty indices based on health deficit accumulation were constructed. The FI-t consisted of 27 deficits traditionally related to dementia; the FI-n consisted of 27 deficits not traditionally related to dementia; the FI-a consisted of all 54 deficits taken from the FI-t and the FI-n. RESULTS: In this long-term care sample (n = 29,758; mean age = 84.6 ± 8.0; 63.8% female), 91% of the residents had at least 1 impairment in activities of daily living, 61% had a diagnosis of dementia, and the vast majority were frail (53% had FI-a > 0.2). Residents with dementia had a higher FI-t compared with those without dementia (0.278 ± 0.110 vs. 0.272 ± 0.108), whereas residents without dementia had a higher FI-n (0.143 ± 0.082 vs. 0.136 ± 0.079). Within 9 years, 97% of the sample had died; a 0.01 increase of the FI-a was associated with a 4% increase of the mortality risk, adjusting for age, sex, admission year, stay length, and dementia type. Residents who developed dementia after admission to long-term care had higher baseline FI-t and FI-a (P's < .003) than those who remained without dementia. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Frailty is highly prevalent in older adults living in long-term care, irrespective of the presence or absence of dementia. Accumulation of deficits, either traditionally related or unrelated to dementia, is associated with risks of death and dementia, and more deficits increases the probability. Our findings have implications for improving the quality of care of older adults in long-term care, by monitoring the degree of frailty at admission, managing distinct needs in relation to dementia, and enhancing frailty level-informed care and services.

Preserving the discreteness of deficits during coding leads to a lower frailty index in individuals living in long-term care.

This study assesses two coding approaches on the frailty index (FI). Two FI were calculated using 43 variables from 29,758 older adults (84.6 ± 8 years old; 64 % female) in long-term care. Scores were coded as 0, 0.5, or 1 regardless of the number of levels (grouped), or preserved (e.g., a 4 level variable was coded as 0, 0.33, 0.67, or 1; discrete). Grouped and discrete FI were compared with each ordinal variable removed but all other ordinal variables included. This was repeated until 28 unique (14 grouped, 14 discrete) FI had been constructed each with one ordinal variable removed per FI. FI was correlated to age and mortality separated by sex. The median grouped (0.302 (0.221-0.372)) was higher relative to the discrete (0.237 (0.170-0.307)) FI. The discrete (r = 0.91, r = 0.87) and grouped (r = 0.93, r = 0.87) FI showed similar relationships to age and mortality. Removal of any ordinal variable reduced grouped FI by 0.004 or 0.016, whereas removal led to both increases (range: 0.003-0.001) and reductions (range: 0.002-0.008) for discrete FI. A grouped approach inflates FI. A discrete approach provides a more accurate measure of frailty.

Promoting early management of frailty in the new normal: An updated software tool in addressing the need of virtual assessment of frailty at points of care.

Introduction: Frailty is a state of diminished physiological reserve and can be assessed using the frailty index. Early management of frailty is crucial for preventing adverse outcomes. Intended for assessing home-living older adults, the initial release of the eFI-CGA software was prior to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods: In addressing the increased need of virtual assessment, the eFI-CGA was upgraded to version 3.0. In this paper, we introduce the updated electronic frailty assessment tool, reporting the newly developed features and validating its use. Results: End-user experiences with the previous versions are discussed. The updated features include a search function to resume disrupted assessments. The improved user interface enabled clinicians to record care management details. Conclusion: This study represents an example of software solutions in moving from disruption to transformation, benefiting healthcare for older adults during this challenging time.